These data represent the diet composition of small pelagic fishes assessed by the Northeast U.S. Shelf Long-Term Ecological Research (NES-LTER) project. The six species of fish in this dataset represent a subset of the species collected in bottom trawls conducted by the NOAA Fisheries Northeast Ecosystems Surveys from Cape Hatteras to the Gulf of Maine. Sampling occurred in the Spring and Fall seasons. Fish were frozen and stomach content analyses were conducted by the Fisheries Oceanography and Larval Fish Ecology Lab at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. Data are counts and length measurements for prey items examined under a dissecting microscope. Prey species were matched to the lowest taxonomic level in the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS) for scientific name and taxonomic serial number. The dataset was supplemented with geospatial and temporal information from NOAA Fisheries trawl databases.
more »
« less
Methods for Combining Ichthyoplankton Datasets for Predicting Annual Larval Fish Abundances in the Gulf of Alaska
NOAA’s Alaska Fisheries Science Center’s (AFSC) Ecosystems and Fisheries-Oceanography Coordinated Investigations (EcoFOCI) program has collected spring ichthyoplankton abundance data in the Gulf of Alaska since 1981. Collections were made nearly annually until 2011 when sampling was reduced to only odd years. This dataset is used to better understand population recruitment of major fish species in the GOA and provides early warning of potential year-class strength to inform fisheries management. However, gaps in the time series during even years have made it more difficult to interpret the interannual variability of ichthyoplankton abundance in such a dynamic ecosystem. Recent collaboration with the Northern Gulf of Alaska Long Term Ecological Research (NGA LTER) program has allowed for additional spring sampling of ichthyoplankton in the GOA annually since 2018. Larval fish data collected by the NGA LTER were combined with EcoFOCI data and used to estimate abundance in years when EcoFOCI had no field presence in the GOA. Five taxa were determined to be suitable for this approach based on their percent occurrence in both surveys. A generalized additive model (GAM) was fit to ichthyoplankton data from 1981 to 2022 collected by both EcoFOCI and NGA LTER and used to predict larval abundances in 2018, 2020, and 2022. For each species, models with two different error distributions were compared and shown to produce similar predictions of larval abundance. This report provides a model framework for predicting interannual larval fish abundance while controlling for differences in sampling methodologies, timing, and location, and identifies a subset of taxa for which this framework is currently appropriate. As additional years of concurrent sampling are added in future, this approach has the potential to improve our understanding of interannual variation in ichthyoplankton dynamics and provide more comprehensive indicators for ecosystem-based fisheries management.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2222376
- PAR ID:
- 10533487
- Publisher / Repository:
- NOAA Technical Memorandum
- Date Published:
- Edition / Version:
- NMFS-TM-AFSC-485
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1-29
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- biological oceanography plankton longterm monitoring program
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This data set is a derived data set based on fish catch data. Data are collected annually to enable us to track the fish assemblages of eleven primary lakes (Allequash, Big Muskellunge, Crystal, Sparkling, Trout, bog lakes 27-02 [Crystal Bog] and 12-15 [Trout Bog], Mendota, Monona, Wingra and Fish). Sampling on Lakes Monona, Wingra, and Fish started in 1995; sampling on other lakes started in 1981. Sampling is done at six littoral zone sites per lake with seine, minnow or crayfish traps, and fyke nets; a boat-mounted electrofishing system samples three littoral transects. Vertically hung gill nets are used to obtain two pelagic samples per lake from the deepest point. A trammel net samples across the thermocline at two sites per lake. In the bog lakes only fyke nets and minnow traps are deployed. Parameters measured include species-level identification and lengths for all fish caught, and weight and scale samples from a subset. Derived data sets include species richness, catch per unit effort, and size distribution by species, lake, and year. Protocol used to generate data: Day seines were only used in 1981 and have been eliminated from this data set to make sampling effort across years comparable. Number caught for each species is summed over repetitions of a gear within a lake and over depth. For information on fish stocking by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources in LTER lakes in Dane and Vilas counties, see https://dnr.wi.gov/fisheriesmanagement/Public/Summary/Index. Beach seining was discontinued after 2019. The only sampling done in 2020 were a single gill-netting sample in Sparkling, Crystal, and Trout lakes. Sampling in Fish Lake was missed in 2021 due to significant lake level changes. Data from the two bogs is missing in 2022. Sampling Frequency: annually. Number of sites: 11more » « less
-
Abstract Abundance, biomass, size and distribution of macro-jellyfish were measured in the Northern Gulf of Alaska (NGA). Nearly 1000 kg dispersed among ~13 800 jellyfish were collected using a 5-m2 Methot net. We present length-weight regressions for seven most-common taxa. Catches were dominated by the hydrozoan Aequorea victoria and the scyphozoan Chrysaora melanaster. During 2018, epipelagic macro-jellyfish biomass averaged 1.46 ± 0.36 g WW m−3 for July and 1.14 ± 0.23 g WW m−3 for September, while during 2019 they averaged 0.86 ± 0.19 g WW m−3 for July and 0.72 ± 0.21 g WW m−3 by September. Despite similar biomass among seasons within a year, July abundances were fivefold greater than abundances in September, with July catches dominated by smaller-sized jellyfish over the inner shelf, while during September larger jellyfish were more prominent and most predominant at offshore stations. Comparison to 20 years of data from standard towed nets allowed determination of the relative magnitude of the dominant carnivorous zooplankton components: scyphozoans, hydrozoans and chaetognaths in the NGA. The biomass of these smaller epipelagic predators (5.4 mg WW m−3 for hydrozoans and 10.5 mg WW m−3 for chaetognaths) is a low percentage of the macro-jellyfish, despite their much higher numerical abundance.more » « less
-
These data represent the carbon and nitrogen stable isotope signatures of small pelagic fishes across the Northeast U.S. Continental Shelf as reported by Suca, J.J., et al. (2018) Feeding dynamics of Northwest Atlantic small pelagic fishes. Progress in Oceanography, 165, 52-62, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2018.04.014. The five species of fish in this dataset represent a subset of the species collected in bottom trawls conducted by the NOAA NEFSC Ecosystems Survey Branch from Cape Hatteras to the Gulf of Maine for years 2013-2015. Sampling occurred in the Spring and Fall seasons. Sections of dorsal musculature were analyzed for carbon and nitrogen isotopes using mass spectrometry. Carbon-to-nitrogen isotopic ratios were reported along with the isotopic signatures for carbon and nitrogen respectively. Additionally, a lipid-corrected carbon signature was calculated for the fish muscle tissue. The dataset was supplemented with geospatial and temporal information from NOAA Fisheries trawl databases.more » « less
-
Several decades of research and monitoring in the northern Gulf of Alaska (NGA) have revealed climate-related shifts in ocean temperature and salinity. Accompanying these shifts have been changes in the abundance and diversity of species, from single-celled plankton to fish, seabirds, and marine mammals. Research is documenting long-term change in the region and revealing the mechanisms by which recent marine heatwaves affect the ability of higher trophic levels to survive in these waters. Heatwaves in the northern Gulf of Alaska are likely to become longer, more frequent, and more intense, making long-term monitoring of ecosystem changes critical to understanding and predicting effects on valuable commercial fisheries and culturally significant native harvesting. In addition, documentation of change is necessary for projecting regional and global future climate scenarios and for informing climate-related policy decisions.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

