skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: River corridor beads are important areas of floodplain‐groundwater exchange within the Colorado River headwaters watershed
Abstract Floodplains are essential ecosystems that provide a variety of economic, hydrologic, and ecologic services. Within floodplains, surface water‐groundwater exchange plays an important role in facilitating biogeochemical processes and can have a strong influence on stream hydrology through infiltration or discharge of water. These functions can be difficult to assess due to the heterogeneity of floodplains and monitoring constraints, so numerical models are useful tools to estimate fluxes, especially at large spatial extents. In this study, we use the SWAT+ (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) ecohydrological model to quantify magnitudes and spatiotemporal patterns of floodplain surface water‐groundwater exchange in a mountainous watershed using an updated version of thegwflowmodule that directly calculates floodplain‐aquifer exchange rates during periods of floodplain inundation. Thegwflowmodule is a spatially distributed groundwater modelling subroutine within the SWAT+ code that uses a gridded network and physically based equations to predict groundwater storage, groundwater head, and groundwater fluxes. We used SWAT+ to model the 7516 km2Colorado River headwaters watershed and streamflow data from USGS gages for calibration and testing. Models that included floodplain‐groundwater interactions outperformed those without such interactions and provided valuable information about floodplain exchange rates and volumes. Our analyses on the location of floodplain fluxes in the watershed also show that wider areas of floodplains, “beads” (e.g., like beads on a necklace), exchanged a higher net and per area volume of water, as well as higher rates of exchange, compared to narrower areas, “strings.” Study results show that floodplain channel‐groundwater exchange is a valuable process to include in hydrologic models, and model outputs could inform land conservation practises by indicating priority locations, such as beads, where substantial hydrologic exchange occurs.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2115169
PAR ID:
10543154
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Hydrological Processes
Volume:
38
Issue:
9
ISSN:
0885-6087
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ABSTRACT Floodplains along low‐gradient, meandering river systems contain diverse hydrogeomorphic features, ranging from isolated depressions to hydrologically‐connected channels. These ephemerally‐flooded features inundate prior to river water overtopping all banks, enhancing river‐floodplain connectivity during moderately high flow stages. Predicting when and where ecological functions occur in floodplains requires understanding the dynamic hydrologic processes of hydrogeomorphic features, including inundation and exchange. In this study, we examined storm event‐scale inundation and exchange dynamics along a lowland, meandering river system in central Illinois (USA). We monitored surface water presence/absence, surface water level, and groundwater level across floodplain hydrogeomorphic feature types (i.e., isolated depression, backwater channel, and flow‐through channel). Using these data, we evaluated inundation onset and recession characteristics, drivers of groundwater‐surface water interactions, and direction of hydrologic exchange with the river channel. Surface water presence/absence patterns suggested inundation onset timescales were primarily controlled by microtopography and recession timescales were correlated with floodplain elevation. Employing a novel hysteresis approach for characterising groundwater‐surface water interactions, we observed distinct patterns indicating differences in water sources across hydrogeomorphic units and event characteristics. Finally, differences in hydraulic head along floodplain channels revealed that channels with multiple inlets/outlets (i.e., flow‐through channels) conveyed down‐valley flow and channels with single inlets primarily functioned as sinks of river‐derived water to the floodplain with short source periods. These results highlight the heterogeneity of hydrologic processes that occur along lowland, meandering river‐floodplains, and more specifically, point to the important role hydrogeomorphic features play in controlling dynamic connectivity within the river corridor. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract The elevation of natural river levees can vary considerably along the length of a river, and low‐lying features such as secondary floodplain channels allow for hydrologic exchange between a river and its floodplain over a range of discharges. This hydrologic, “river‐floodplain connectivity” plays a role in attenuating flood waves and transporting fluvial material to floodplain ecosystems. However, flood wave attenuation and transport are also limited by the available storage provided by floodplains. In this study, we explore the combined controls of river‐floodplain connectivity and floodplain width on flood wave attenuation and transport, and how those controls change as flood magnitude increases. We develop idealized river‐floodplain models based on the geometry of the lower Trinity River in Texas, USA, varying floodplain width, peak discharge, and degree of river‐floodplain connectivity, which we prescribe by varying the width of a secondary channel connecting the river to the floodplain. We show that attenuation transitions from connectivity‐limited to storage‐limited as discharge increases. Secondary channel conveyance allows for floodplain inundation at lower discharges, but also fills the floodplain faster and, for larger floods, can cause higher flood peaks downstream. Greater secondary channel conveyance and wider floodplains increase fluxes to the floodplain, but secondary conveyance allows the floodplain to drain faster while wider floodplains have longer average residence times. This study presents a framework for understanding how secondary channel conveyance and floodplain width combine to modulate lateral flow exchange, residence times, and flood wave attenuation, and can guide successful management of river systems and future restoration efforts. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract Hydrologic connectivity controls the lateral exchange of water, solids, and solutes between rivers and floodplains, and is critical to ecosystem function, water treatment, flood attenuation, and geomorphic processes. This connectivity has been well‐studied, typically through the lens of fluvial flooding. In regions prone to heavy rainfall, the timing and magnitude of lateral exchange may be altered by pluvial flooding on the floodplain. We collected measurements of flow depth and velocity in the Trinity River floodplain in coastal Texas (USA) during Tropical Storm Imelda (2019), which produced up to 75 cm of rainfall locally. We developed a two‐dimensional hydrodynamic model at high resolution for a section of the Trinity River floodplain inspired by the compound flooding of Imelda. We then employed Lagrangian particle routing to quantify how residence times and particle velocities changed as flooding shifted from rainfall‐driven to river‐driven. Results show that heavy rainfall initiated lateral exchange before river discharge reached flood levels. The presence of rainwater also reduced floodplain storage, causing river water to be confined to a narrow corridor on the floodplain, while rainwater residence times were increased from the effect of high river flow. Finally, we analyzed the role of floodplain channels in facilitating surface‐water connectivity by varying model resolution in the floodplain. While the resolution of floodplain channels was important locally, it did not affect as much the overall floodplain behavior. This study demonstrates the complexity of floodplain hydrodynamics under conditions of heavy rainfall, with implications for sediment deposition and nutrient removal during floods. 
    more » « less
  4. Abstract High‐resolution topography reveals that floodplains along meandering rivers in Indiana commonly contain intermittently flowing channel networks. We investigated how the presence of floodplain channels affects lateral surface‐water connectivity between a river and floodplain (specifically exchange flux and timescales of transport) as a function of flow stage in a low‐gradient river‐floodplain system. We constructed a two‐dimensional, surface‐water hydrodynamic model using Hydrologic Engineering Center's River Analysis System (HEC‐RAS) 2D along 32 km of floodplain (56 km along the river) of the East Fork White River near Seymour, Indiana, USA, using lidar elevation data and surveyed river bathymetry. The model was calibrated using land‐cover specific roughness to elevation‐discharge data from a U.S. Geological Survey gage and validated against high‐water marks, an aerial photo showing the spatial extent of floodplain inundation, and measured flow velocities. Using the model results, we analyzed the flow in the river, spatial patterns of inundation, flow pathways, river‐floodplain exchange, and water residence time on the floodplain. Our results highlight that bankfull flow is an oversimplified concept for explaining river‐floodplain connectivity because some stream banks are overtopped and major low‐lying floodplain channels are inundated roughly 19 days per year. As flow increased, inundation of floodplain channels at higher elevations dissected the floodplain, until the floodplain channels became fully inundated. Additionally, we found that river‐floodplain exchange was driven by bank height or channel orientation depending on flow conditions. We propose a conceptual model of river‐floodplain connectivity dynamics and developed metrics to analyze quantitatively complex river‐floodplain systems. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract Groundwater discharge zones connect aquifers to surface water, generating baseflow and serving as ecosystem control points across aquatic ecosystems. The influence of groundwater discharge on surface flow connectivity, fate and transport of contaminants and nutrients, and thermal habitat depends strongly on hydrologic characteristics such as the spatial distribution, age, and depth of source groundwater flow paths. Groundwater models have the potential to predict spatial discharge characteristics within river networks, but models are often not evaluated against these critical characteristics and model equifinality with respect to discharge processes is a known challenge. We quantify discharge characteristics across a suite of groundwater models with commonly used frameworks and calibration data. We developed a base model (MODFLOW‐NWT) for a 1,570‐km2watershed in the northeastern United States and varied the calibration data, control of river‐aquifer exchange directionality, and resolution. Most models (n = 11 of 12) fit similarly to calibration metrics, but patterns in discharge location, flow path depth, and subsurface travel time varied substantially. We found (1) a 15% difference in the percent of discharge going to first‐order streams, (2) threefold variations in flow path depth, and (3) sevenfold variations in the subsurface travel times among the models. We recalibrated three models using a synthetic discharge location data set. Calibration with discharge location data reduced differences in simulated discharge characteristics, suggesting an approach to improved equifinality based on widespread field‐based mapping of discharge zones. Our work quantifying variation across common modeling approaches is an important step toward characterizing and improving predictions of groundwater discharge characteristics. 
    more » « less