Violent behavior, police brutality, and racial discrimination are currently at the forefront of society’s attention, and they should be. We investigated whether mild sleep loss—as typical for many adults throughout the work week—could aggravate the socio-emotional-cognitive processes contributing to violence and discrimination. In a sample of 40 healthy young adults, we either experimentally restricted participants’ sleep for four nights (6.2 h/night) or let participants obtain normal sleep (7.7 h/night)—and then had them complete the Police Officer’s Dilemma Task. In this computerized task, the participant must rapidly decide to shoot or not shoot at White and Black men who either are or are not holding a gun. Results showed significant racial biases, including more and quicker shooting of Black targets compared to White targets. Furthermore, signal detection analyses demonstrated that mild sleep restriction changed participants’ decision criterion, increasing the tendency to shoot, even when controlling for psychomotor vigilance, fluid intelligence, and self-reported desirability to behave in a socially acceptable manner. The increased tendency to shoot was also observed in participants who reported believing that they had adapted to the sleep loss. Future experimental research using trained police officers will help establish the generalizability of these laboratory effects. Importantly, sleep loss is modifiable via organization-level changes (e.g., shift scheduling, light entrainment) and individual-level interventions (e.g., sleep hygiene education, incentives for behavioral change), suggesting that if sleep loss is corrected, it could save lives—including Black lives.
The current study examines the effect of sleep deprivation and caffeine use on racial bias in the decision to shoot. Participants deprived of sleep for 24 hr (vs. rested participants) made more errors in a shooting task and were more likely to shoot unarmed targets. A diffusion decision model analysis revealed sleep deprivation decreased participants’ ability to extract information from the stimuli, whereas caffeine impacted the threshold separation, reflecting decreased caution. Neither sleep deprivation nor caffeine moderated anti-Black racial bias in shooting decisions or at the process level. We discuss how our results clarify discrepancies in past work testing the impact of fatigue on racial bias in shooting decisions.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 1756092
- PAR ID:
- 10547103
- Publisher / Repository:
- SAGE Publications
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Social Psychological and Personality Science
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 5
- ISSN:
- 1948-5506
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 638-647
- Size(s):
- p. 638-647
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract Sleep loss has been shown to alter risk preference during decision-making. However, research in this area has largely focussed on the effects of total sleep deprivation (TSD), while evidence on the effects of sleep restriction (SR) or the potentially moderating role of sex on risk preference remains scarce and unclear. The present study investigated risky decision-making in 47 healthy young adults who were assigned to either of two counterbalanced protocols: well-rested (WR) and TSD, or WR and SR. Participants were assessed on the Lottery Choice Task (LCT), which requires a series of choices between two risky gambles with varying risk levels. Analyses on the pooled dataset indicated across all sleep conditions, participants were generally more risk-seeking when trying to minimise financial loss (LOSSES) than while trying to maximise financial gain (GAINS). On GAINS trials, female participants were more risk-averse during TSD and SR, whereas male participants remained unchanged. On LOSSES trials, female participants remained unchanged during TSD and SR, whereas male participants became more risk-seeking during TSD. Our findings suggest the relationship between sleep loss and risk preference is moderated by sex, whereby changes in risk preference after TSD or SR differ in men and women depending on whether the decision is framed in terms of gains or losses.
-
Abstract This article questions the widespread use of experimental social psychology to understand real-world group disparities. Standard experimental practice is to design studies in which participants make judgments of targets who vary only on the social categories to which they belong. This is typically done under simplified decision landscapes and with untrained decision-makers. For example, to understand racial disparities in police shootings, researchers show pictures of armed and unarmed Black and White men to undergraduates and have them press “shoot” and “don't shoot” buttons. Having demonstrated categorical bias under these conditions, researchers then use such findings to claim that real-world disparities are also due to decision-maker bias. I describe three flaws inherent in this approach, flaws which undermine any direct contribution of experimental studies to explaining group disparities. First, the decision landscapes used in experimental studies lack crucial components present in actual decisions ( missing information flaw ). Second, categorical effects in experimental studies are not interpreted in light of other effects on outcomes, including behavioral differences across groups ( missing forces flaw ). Third, there is no systematic testing of whether the contingencies required to produce experimental effects are present in real-world decisions ( missing contingencies flaw ). I apply this analysis to three research topics to illustrate the scope of the problem. I discuss how this research tradition has skewed our understanding of the human mind within and beyond the discipline and how results from experimental studies of bias are generally misunderstood. I conclude by arguing that the current research tradition should be abandoned.more » « less
-
more » « less
The use of AI-based decision aids in diverse domains has inspired many empirical investigations into how AI models’ decision recommendations impact humans’ decision accuracy in AI-assisted decision making, while explorations on the impacts on humans’ decision fairness are largely lacking despite their clear importance. In this paper, using a real-world business decision making scenario—bidding in rental housing markets—as our testbed, we present an experimental study on understanding how the bias level of the AI-based decision aid as well as the provision of AI explanations affect the fairness level of humans’ decisions, both during and after their usage of the decision aid. Our results suggest that when people are assisted by an AI-based decision aid, both the higher level of racial biases the decision aid exhibits and surprisingly, the presence of AI explanations, result in more unfair human decisions across racial groups. Moreover, these impacts are partly made through triggering humans’ “disparate interactions” with AI. However, regardless of the AI bias level and the presence of AI explanations, when people return to make independent decisions after their usage of the AI-based decision aid, their decisions no longer exhibit significant unfairness across racial groups.
-
more » « less
Abstract The photoperiod has been evidenced to influence sleep regulation in the rat. Nevertheless, lengthening of the photoperiod beyond 30 days seems to have little effect on the 24‐hr baseline level of sleep and the response to total sleep deprivation. We studied the effects of 12:12 (habitual) and 16:8 (long) light–dark photoperiods on sleep, locomotor activity and body core temperature, before and after 24 hr of total sleep deprivation. Eight rats were submitted for 14 days to light–dark 12:12 (lights on: 08:00 hours–20:00 hours) followed by total sleep deprivation, and then for 14 days to light–dark 16:8 (light extended to 24:00 hours) followed by total sleep deprivation. Rats were simultaneously recorded for electroencephalogram, locomotor activity and body core temperature for 24 hr before and after total sleep deprivation. At baseline before total sleep deprivation, total sleep time and non‐rapid eye movement sleep per 24 hr and during extended light hours (20:00 hours–24:00 hours) were higher (13% for total sleep time) after light–dark exposure compared with habitual photoperiod, while percentage delta power in non‐rapid eye movements and rapid eye movements were unchanged. Locomotor activity and body core temperature were lower, particularly during extended light hours (20:00 hours–24:00 hours). Following total sleep deprivation, total sleep time and non‐rapid eye movements were significantly lower after long photoperiod between 20:00 hours and 24:00 hours, and between 10:00 hours and 12:00 hours, and unchanged per 24 hr. The percentage delta power in non‐rapid eye movements was lower between 08:00 hours and 11:00 hours. Total sleep deprivation decreased locomotor activity and body core temperature after habitual photoperiod exposure only. Fourteen days under long photoperiod (light–dark 16:8) increased non‐rapid eye movements sleep, and decreased sleep rebound related to total sleep deprivation (lower non‐rapid eye movements duration and delta power). This may create a model of sleep extension for the rat that has been found to favour anabolism in the brain and the periphery.
