skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Accurate three-body noncovalent interactions: the insights from energy decomposition
An impressive collection of accurate two-body interaction energies for small complexes has been assembled into benchmark databases and used to improve the performance of multiple density functional, semiempirical, and machine learning methods. Similar benchmark data on nonadditive three-body energies in molecular trimers are comparatively scarce, and the existing ones are practically limited to homotrimers. In this work, we present a benchmark dataset of 20 equilibrium noncovalent interaction energies for a small but diverse selection of 10 heteromolecular trimers. The new 3BHET dataset presents complexes that combine different interactions including π −π, anion−π, cation−π, and various motifs of hydrogen and halogen bonding in each trimer. A detailed symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT)-based energy decomposition of the two- and three-body interaction energies shows that 3BHET consists of electrostatics- and dispersion-dominated complexes. The nonadditive three-body contribution is dominated by induction, but its influence on the overall bonding type in the complex (as exemplified by its position on the ternary diagram) is quite small. We also tested the extended SAPT (XSAPT) approach which is capable of including some nonadditive interactions in clusters of any size. The resulting three-body dispersion term (obtained from the many-body dispersion formalism) is mostly in good agreement with the supermolecular CCSD(T)−MP2 values and the nonadditive induction term is similar to the three-body SAPT(DFT) data, but the overall three-body XSAPT energies are not very accurate as they are missing the first-order exchange terms.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1955328
PAR ID:
10548192
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Publisher / Repository:
Royal Society of Chemistry
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
Volume:
25
Issue:
42
ISSN:
1463-9076
Page Range / eLocation ID:
28621 to 28637
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, The Journal of Chemical Physics)
    Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) directly computes intermolecular interaction energy in terms of electrostatics, exchange-repulsion, induction/polarization, and London dispersion components. In SAPT based on Hartree–Fock (“SAPT0”) or based on density functional theory, the most time-consuming step is the computation of the dispersion terms. Previous work has explored the replacement of these expensive dispersion terms with simple damped asymptotic models. We recently examined [Schriber et al. J. Chem. Phys. 154, 234107 (2021)] the accuracy of SAPT0 when replacing its dispersion term with Grimme’s popular -D3 correction, reducing the computational cost scaling from O(N5) to O(N3). That work optimized damping function parameters for SAPT0-D3/jun-cc-pVDZ using estimates of the coupled-cluster complete basis set limit [CCSD(T)/CBS] on a 8299 dimer dataset. Here, we explore the accuracy of SAPT0-D3 with additional basis sets, along with an analogous model using -D4. Damping parameters are rather insensitive to basis sets, and the resulting SAPT0-D models are more accurate on average for total interaction energies than SAPT0. Our results are surprising in several respects: (1) improvement of -D4 over -D3 is negligible for these systems, even charged systems where -D4 should, in principle, be more accurate; (2) addition of Axilrod–Teller–Muto terms for three-body dispersion does not improve error statistics for this test set; and (3) SAPT0-D is even more accurate on average for total interaction energies than the much more computationally costly density functional theory based SAPT [SAPT(DFT)] in an aug-cc-pVDZ basis. However, SAPT0 and SAPT0-D3/D4 interaction energies benefit from significant error cancellation between exchange and dispersion terms. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, The Journal of Chemical Physics)
    High-level quantum chemical computations have provided significant insight into the fundamental physical nature of non-covalent interactions. These studies have focused primarily on gas-phase computations of small van der Waals dimers; however, these interactions frequently take place in complex chemical environments, such as proteins, solutions, or solids. To better understand how the chemical environment affects non-covalent interactions, we have undertaken a quantum chemical study of π– π interactions in an aqueous solution, as exemplified by T-shaped benzene dimers surrounded by 28 or 50 explicit water molecules. We report interaction energies (IEs) using second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory, and we apply the intramolecular and functional-group partitioning extensions of symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (ISAPT and F-SAPT, respectively) to analyze how the solvent molecules tune the π– π interactions of the solute. For complexes containing neutral monomers, even 50 explicit waters (constituting a first and partial second solvation shell) change total SAPT IEs between the two solute molecules by only tenths of a kcal mol −1 , while significant changes of up to 3 kcal mol −1 of the electrostatic component are seen for the cationic pyridinium–benzene dimer. This difference between charged and neutral solutes is attributed to large non-additive three-body interactions within solvated ion-containing complexes. Overall, except for charged solutes, our quantum computations indicate that nearby solvent molecules cause very little “tuning” of the direct solute–solute interactions. This indicates that differences in binding energies between the gas phase and solution phase are primarily indirect effects of the competition between solute–solute and solute–solvent interactions. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, The Journal of Chemical Physics)
    Routinely assessing the stability of molecular crystals with high accuracy remains an open challenge in the computational sciences. The many-body expansion decomposes computation of the crystal lattice energy into an embarrassingly parallel collection of computations over molecular dimers, trimers, and so forth, making quantum chemistry techniques tractable for many crystals of small organic molecules. By examining the range-dependence of different types of energetic contributions to the crystal lattice energy, we can glean qualitative understanding of solid-state intermolecular interactions as well as practical, exploitable reductions in the number of computations required for accurate energies. Here, we assess the range-dependent character of two-body interactions of 24 small organic molecular crystals by using the physically interpretable components from symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (electrostatics, exchange-repulsion, induction/polarization, and London dispersion). We also examine correlations between the convergence rates of electrostatics and London dispersion terms with molecular dipole moments and polarizabilities, to provide guidance for estimating convergence rates in other molecular crystals. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Molecules)
    The Osme bond is defined as pairing a Group 8 metal atom as an electron acceptor in a noncovalent interaction with a nucleophile. DFT calculations with the ωB97XD functional consider MO4 (M = Ru, Os) as the Lewis acid, paired with a series of π electron donors C2H2, C2H4, C6H6, C4H5N, C4H4O, and C4H4S. The calculations establish interaction energies in the range between 9.5 and 26.4 kJ/mol. Os engages in stronger interactions than does Ru, and those involving more extensive π-systems within the aromatic rings form stronger bonds than do the smaller ethylene and acetylene. Extensive analysis questions the existence of a true Osme bond, as the bonding chiefly involves interactions with the three O atoms of MO4 that lie closest to the π-system, via π(C-C)→σ*(M-O) transfers. These interactions are supplemented by back donation from M-O bonds to the π*(CC) antibonding orbitals of the π-systems. Dispersion makes a large contribution to these interactions, higher than electrostatics and much greater than induction. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; (, The Journal of Chemical Physics)
    Symmetry-adapted perturbation theory (SAPT) is an ab initio approach that directly computes noncovalent interaction energies in terms of electrostatics, exchange repulsion, induction/polarization, and London dispersion components. Due to its high computational scaling, routine applications of even the lowest order of SAPT are typically limited to a few hundred atoms. To address this limitation, we report here the addition of electrostatic embedding to the SAPT (EE-SAPT) and ISAPT (EE-ISAPT) methods. We illustrate the embedding scheme using water trimer as a prototype example. Then, we show that EE-SAPT/EE-ISAPT can be applied for efficiently and accurately computing noncovalent interactions in large systems, including solvated dimers and protein–ligand systems. In the latter application, particular care must be taken to properly handle the quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics boundary when it cuts covalent bonds. We investigate various schemes for handling charges near this boundary and demonstrate which are most effective in the context of charge-embedded SAPT. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email