<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Iron cycling and isotopic fractionation in a ferruginous, seasonally ice-covered lake</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>Elsevier</publisher>
				<date>10/01/2024</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10553594</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.gca.2024.07.037</idno>
					<title level='j'>Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta</title>
<idno>0016-7037</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">383</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">C</biblScope>					

					<author>Andy W Heard</author><author>Chadlin M Ostrander</author><author>Elizabeth D Swanner</author><author>Kathryn Rico</author><author>Sune G Nielsen</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[Ferruginous conditions, defined by anoxia and abundant dissolved ferrous iron (Fe2+aq), dominated the Precambrian oceans but are essentially non-existent in a modern, oxygenated world. Ferruginous meromictic lakes represent natural laboratories to ground truth our understanding of the stable Fe isotope proxy, which has been used extensively in interpreting the origins of Fe-rich sedimentary rocks like iron formations (IFs) and the interactions of early life with high-Fe2+aq conditions. Here we report comprehensive geochemical and Fe isotopic analyses of samples collected in May and August 2022, and March 2023, from Deming Lake, Minnesota, a ferruginous meromictic lake that undergoes surface freezing in winter and never becomes euxinic. Through chemical and Fe isotopic analyses of different putative Fe sources to Deming Lake; including eolian input trapped in winter ice cover, nearby bogs, and regional groundwaters sampled at surface springs; we find that a groundwater source provides the best chemical and Fe isotopic match for Deming Lake and can support Fe2+aq-rich waters at depth that maintain a permanent chemocline at ~12 m. The ice-free Deming Lake water column can be split into three layers dominated by distinct Fe cycling regimes. Layer (I) extends from the lake surface to the base of the oxycline at ~6 m, and its Fe cycling is dominated by isotopically light Fe uptake into biomass, likely from stabilized dissolved Fe3+, with variable eolian lithogenic influences. Layer (II) extends between the oxycline and the chemocline at ~12 m and is dominated by partial Fe2+aq oxidation on approach to the oxycline, with the formation of variably isotopically heavy Fe3+-bearing particles. Layer (III) underlies the chemocline and is defined by Fe2+ phosphate (vivianite) and carbonate saturation and precipitation under anoxic, Fe2+aq-rich conditions with little Fe isotopic fractionation. The ice-covered winter water column features more homogenous Fe chemistry above the chemocline, which we attribute to seasonal homogenization of Layers (I) and (II), with suppressed ferric particle formation. Authigenic Fe minerals with non-crustal (light) Fe isotopic compositions only appreciably accumulate in sediments in Deming Lake underlying the chemocline. All sediments deposited above 12 m appear crustal in their Fe isotopic, Mn/Fe, and Fe/Al ratios, likely revealing efficient reductive dissolution of Fe3+-bearing lake precipitates and remineralization of Fe-bearing biomass. We find limited fractionation of Fe isotopes in the ice-covered water column and suggest this provides evidence that substantial delivery of oxidants is required to generate highly fractionated Fe isotopic compositions in Sturtian Snowball era IFs. By comparing Fe isotopic and Mn/Fe fractionation trends in the different Deming Lake layers, we also suggest that correlations between these two parameters in giant early Paleoproterozoic IFs requires the simultaneous deposition of multiple authigenic phases on the ancient seafloor. Finally, high-precision triple Fe isotopic analyses of dissolved Fe impacted by extensive oxidation near the Deming Lake oxycline reveal that the slope of the mass fractionation law for natural, O2-mediated Fe2+aq oxidation is identical to those previously defined for both UV photo-oxidation, and for an array of highly fractionated Paleoproterozoic IFs.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><p>conditions. Here we report comprehensive geochemical and Fe isotopic analyses of samples collected in May and August 2022, and March 2023, from Deming Lake, Minnesota, a ferruginous meromictic lake that undergoes surface freezing in winter and never becomes euxinic. Through chemical and Fe isotopic analyses of different putative Fe sources to Deming Lake; including eolian input trapped in winter ice cover, nearby bogs, and regional groundwaters sampled at surface springs; we find that a groundwater source provides the best chemical and Fe isotopic match for Deming Lake and can support Fe 2+  aq-rich waters at depth that maintain a permanent chemocline at ~12 m. The ice-free Deming Lake water column can be split into three layers dominated by distinct Fe cycling regimes. Layer (I) extends from the lake surface to the base of the oxycline at ~6 m, and its Fe cycling is dominated by isotopically light Fe uptake into biomass, likely from stabilized dissolved Fe 3+ , with variable eolian lithogenic influences. Layer (II) extends between the oxycline and the chemocline at ~12 m and is dominated by partial Fe 2+ aq oxidation on approach to the oxycline, with the formation of variably isotopically heavy Fe 3+ -bearing particles.</p><p>Layer (III) underlies the chemocline and is defined by Fe 2+ phosphate (vivianite) and carbonate saturation and precipitation under anoxic, Fe 2+ aq-rich conditions with little Fe isotopic fractionation. The ice-covered winter water column features more homogenous Fe chemistry above the chemocline, which we attribute to seasonal homogenization of Layers (I) and (II), with suppressed ferric particle formation. Authigenic Fe minerals with non-crustal (light) Fe isotopic compositions only appreciably accumulate in sediments in Deming Lake underlying the chemocline. All sediments deposited above 12 m appear crustal in their Fe isotopic, Mn/Fe, and Fe/Al ratios, likely revealing efficient reductive dissolution of Fe 3+ -bearing lake precipitates and remineralization of Fe-bearing biomass. We find limited fractionation of Fe isotopes in the icecovered water column and suggest this provides evidence that substantial delivery of oxidants is required to generate highly fractionated Fe isotopic compositions in Sturtian Snowball era IFs. By comparing Fe isotopic and Mn/Fe fractionation trends in the different Deming Lake layers, we also suggest that correlations between these two parameters in giant early Paleoproterozoic IFs requires the simultaneous deposition of multiple authigenic phases on the ancient seafloor. Finally, high-precision triple Fe isotopic analyses of dissolved Fe impacted by extensive oxidation near the Deming Lake oxycline reveal that the slope of the mass fractionation law for natural, O2-mediated Fe 2+ aq oxidation is identical to those previously defined for both UV photo-oxidation, and for an array of highly fractionated Paleoproterozoic IFs.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Introduction</head><p>The evolution of redox conditions in Earth's oceans and atmosphere has been one of the key environmental controls on the evolution of life on our planet. The oceans featured dissolved iron (Fe) in its reduced, ferrous form (Fe 2+  aq) as the dominant redox species for the majority of Earth history <ref type="bibr">(Poulton and Canfield, 2011)</ref>. Prior to the rise of molecular oxygen (O2) in the atmosphere after the Great Oxidation Event (GOE) around 2.2-2.4 billion years (Ga) ago <ref type="bibr">(Gumsley et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Poulton et al., 2021)</ref> and for much of the ensuing Precambrian, Fe 2+ was the most abundant inorganic redox-active species in the oceans <ref type="bibr">(Poulton and Canfield, 2011)</ref>. A lack of abundant dissolved O2 or hydrogen sulfide (H2S) in the deep oceans to remove Fe as insoluble Fe 3+ oxides or Fe sulfide minerals enabled Fe 2+ aq from seafloor hydrothermal and continental weathering sources to accumulate to high concentrations of perhaps 1000s of &#956;g/L <ref type="bibr">(Holland, 1984;</ref><ref type="bibr">Eroglu et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dauphas et al., 2024)</ref>.</p><p>The most striking evidence for high dissolved Fe 2+ aq in the Precambrian oceans are iron formations (IFs), Fe-and Si-rich chemical sedimentary rocks that are found in sedimentary successions on all major Precambrian cratons and today host the largest economic Fe deposits <ref type="bibr">(Bekker et al., 2010)</ref>. The widespread and Fe-rich nature of IFs indicates that: i) the early oceans were anoxic and rich in reduced Fe 2+ aq, the only Fe species that is soluble at high concentrations in seawater, in conditions that are defined as 'ferruginous' and ii) mechanisms existed in the early oceans to promote the voluminous precipitation of Fe minerals from the large marine Fe 2+ aq pool.</p><p>The modern-day mineral assemblages of IFs reflect long term diagenetic and metamorphic processes. Candidate precipitate phases include ferric oxyhydroxides, mixed-valence green rusts, Fe-rich carbonates, and predominantly Fe 2+ -bearing phyllosilicates <ref type="bibr">(Halevy et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Konhauser et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Siahi et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rasmussen et al., 2021)</ref>. These candidate IF precursor phases interact very differently with respect to dissolved nutrient elements <ref type="bibr">(Robbins et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tostevin and Ahmed, 2023)</ref>, and their formation requires vastly different chemical and redox conditions for formation. Better constraints on which of these minerals were the dominant IF precipitates are a key to unlocking myriad aspects of ocean biogeochemistry under a dominantly ferruginous redox state.</p><p>Ferruginous conditions dominating the Precambrian also means that oxygenic phototrophs like cyanobacteria that ultimately fueled the rise of oxygen emerged against a backdrop of high dissolved Fe 2+ aq in or at the boundaries of their habitat. As such, interpreting the geological record of the earliest signs of oxygenic photosynthesis should be aided by a better understanding of the geochemical and isotopic imprints of cyanobacterial growth in high Fe conditions <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2015a</ref><ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., , 2017))</ref>.</p><p>It is essentially impossible to study the biogeochemical cycling of Fe in ferruginous ocean conditions today because these environments do not exist in the modern oceans <ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., 2024)</ref>. Most of the global oceans are well-oxygenated such that the stable Fe species is highly insoluble Fe 3+ that precipitates as amorphous oxyhydroxides rather than accumulating in solution <ref type="bibr">(Millero, 1998)</ref>. Where anoxic conditions are established in the modern oceans in sites of extremely high organic productivity and/or through the restriction and stratification of water masses, Fe 2+ aq does not accumulate to the extent representative of early ferruginous oceans. This is because abundant dissolved sulfate in the modern oceans enables H2S to accumulate at far higher levels than Fe 2+ aq following anaerobic bacterial sulfate reduction, either in 'euxinic' water columns featuring free H2S, or in sedimentary porewaters. In turn, H2S efficiently removes all of the less abundant Fe to insoluble sulfide minerals such as pyrite (FeS2) <ref type="bibr">(Raiswell et al., 2018)</ref>.</p><p>In the absence of a direct marine analog for early ferruginous oceans, most of our understanding of natural ferruginous environments comes from the study of meromictic lakes i.e., lakes that are vertically stratified with a deepest water layer (monimolimnion) that does not mix with shallower waters <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2020)</ref>. Such lakes exist around the world in settings where physical properties promote stratification and isolation of the monimolimnion from the oxygenated atmosphere or photosynthetic oxygen production. Ferruginous conditions can be established in the monimolimnion of such lakes where local geochemical sources promote a higher abundance of dissolved Fe than sulfur species. There is a rich history of geochemical studies of meromictic lakes and their underlying sediments, many of which have been motivated by the early Earth questions detailed above. In particular, meromictic lakes have become popular natural laboratories for understanding stable Fe isotope geochemistry, using observed systematics in ferruginous water columns and sediments as analogs for interpreting the vast database of Fe isotope analyses made of IFs and other Fe-rich Precambrian sediments <ref type="bibr">(Malinovsky et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Teutsch et al., 2009;</ref><ref type="bibr">Busigny et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ellwood et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yang et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">K. Liu et al., 2022)</ref>. A focus of those studies has been on dissolved (and to a lesser extent, particulate) Fe isotopic compositions developed close to the transitional boundary layer or 'oxycline' between oxygenated near-surface waters and Fe 2+ aq-rich deeper waters, where a large amount of Fe 2+ aq oxidation takes place. This natural oxidation process at the top of an anoxic deep water mass mimics the most widely cited model for the genesis of IFs <ref type="bibr">(Konhauser et al., 2017)</ref>. In particular, the formation of isotopically heavy ferric oxyhydroxides, which leads to isotopically light dissolved Fe near the redoxcline, has been used as evidence to support both the oxide-precursor origin of IFs (which are often isotopically heavy) and a mass-balance interpretation of other, Fe isotopically light Precambrian sediments such as Archean pyrites <ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., 2004b;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rouxel et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Planavsky et al., 2012)</ref>.</p><p>Considerably less attention has been given to Fe isotopic systematics in the monimolimnion of meromictic ferruginous lakes where redox processes play little role in Fe mineral precipitation and drive muted fractionation. Similarly, the interactions of dissolved Fe with biology inhabiting the shallowest epilimnion and or/oxycline of these lakes, where dissolved and particulate Fe abundances are typically low enough to present analytical challenges, have received limited attention <ref type="bibr">(Ellwood et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">K. Liu et al., 2022)</ref>. All of these depth regimes offer important calibration points for understanding Fe isotopic systematics of ancient chemical sediments beyond those formed through simple oxidation-reduction processes. Furthermore, prior studies have not always analyzed the coupled Fe isotopic systematics of dissolved and particulate Fe, even near to lake oxyclines. To understand the Fe chemical and isotopic interactions between dissolved and particulate phases in a ferruginous water column in more detail, including processes occurring away from the redoxcline, we conducted three field sampling campaigns at Deming Lake, Minnesota (MN), USA.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Deming Lake, USA</head><p>Deming Lake is a small meromictic lake in Itasca State Park, MN, USA (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>). With a surface area of ~50,000 m 2 and a maximum depth of &gt;17 m in a small kettle-hole depression near its center, Deming Lake has a relative depth (depth divided by average lake diameter) of ~8 %. Its small surface area makes Deming Lake susceptible to stratification <ref type="bibr">(Gorham and Boyce, 1989;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2020</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., , 2023a) )</ref> because wind mixing cannot act on a large enough area to drive vertical mixing of the entire water column depth. Surface mixing by wind is further hindered by the surrounding thickly wooded and steeply elevated margins of the lake <ref type="bibr">(Lascu et al., 2012)</ref>. The lake is thermally stratified in the spring to fall months, but undergoes freezing and thermocline collapse during the winter, enabling vertical mixing of the epilimnion and metalimnion <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. However, a permanent chemocline separating high specific conductance deeper waters beneath 11-13 m depth has been recognized for several decades <ref type="bibr">(Baker and Brook, 1971;</ref><ref type="bibr">Church et al., 1989;</ref><ref type="bibr">Reiter et al., 1998;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lascu et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">McLauchlan et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2023b)</ref>, and this chemical stratification is strong enough to prevent seasonal mixing in the deepest several meters of the lake.</p><p>The monimolimnion of Deming Lake is extremely rich in dissolved Fe 2+ aq, on par with some other well-characterized ferruginous meromictic lakes such as Lac Pavin, France, and Brownie and Canyon Lakes, USA <ref type="bibr">(Busigny et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lambrecht et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2020)</ref>.</p><p>Stabilization of a high dissolved Fe 2+ aq concentration in the lake is enabled by the lack of interaction between deep waters and the oxygenated atmosphere, by a lack of sulfur in the system that may generate H2S, and by the likely input at depth of Fe-rich carbonate-bicarbonate-type groundwaters that are typical for the region <ref type="bibr">(Megard et al., 1993)</ref>. Deming Lake has minimal surface inflows, but a short water residence time (~90 days), implicating shallow groundwater as a major component of the water budget <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. Various Fe-rich groundwater-fed springs are found in the nearby surrounding areas of Itasca State Park <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>.</p><p>A key feature of Deming Lake's biogeochemistry is the presence of a subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer (SCML), a turbidity maximum at 5 m to 6.5 m depth created by abundant</p><p>Chlorophyll-a-containing Cyanobacteria inhabiting a depth coincident with the summer thermocline <ref type="bibr">(Baker and Brook, 1971;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. This SCML is particularly pronounced during the summer months, but despite the abundance of Chlorophyll-a, likely consumes O2 such that the SCML is coincident with the oxycline <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. This zone offers the potential to observe the isotopic effect of interactions between abundant Cyanobacteria and water column Fe.</p><p>Unlike some other meromictic ferruginous lakes that have been the subject of stable Fe isotopic study <ref type="bibr">(Busigny et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ellwood et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yang et al., 2022)</ref>, H2S never appreciably accumulates in Deming Lake, making it an ideal natural laboratory for studying Fe isotopic fractionation where Fe 2+ aq is the dominant redox species at all depths beneath the oxycline. We conducted a comprehensive Fe isotopic and geochemical survey of the Deming Lake water column, sediments, and various putative Fe sources to the lake, to address the following questions:</p><p>&#8226; What are the major sources and sinks of Fe in Deming Lake, and how do these fluxes maintain strongly ferruginous conditions at depth?</p><p>&#8226; Does biomass at the oxycline have a distinctive Fe isotopic signature, particularly within the highly productive SCML?</p><p>&#8226; How do seasonal mixing of the epilimnion and metalimnion and establishment of winter ice cover impact ferruginous lake chemical profiles and Fe export?</p><p>&#8226; Can targeted studies of coupled dissolved and particulate Fe geochemical systematics in Deming Lake refine our understanding of the ancient geochemical record?</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Methods</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.1.">Sampling Procedures</head><p>Sampling and in situ sensor analysis during May and August 2022 was conducted from an anchored boat at the deepest location of the lake, approximately 20 m water depth. Sampling of the ice-covered lake in March 2023 was conducted on foot using the same sampling and sensor equipment, through holes cored in the lake ice. A Yellow Springs Instruments (YSI) ProDSS was lowered on a depth-calibrated cable and used to record depth (m), temperature (&#176;C), pH, oxidation/reduction potential (ORP; in mV), dissolved O2 (mg/L), turbidity (Formazin Nephelometric Units or FNU), specific conductance (Sp Cond; in Microsiemens Per Centimeter or &#181;S/cm), and total dissolved solids (TDS; in mg/L). These are reported for each sampling date in Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>. All samples for water column dissolved and particulate major and minor elements and Fe isotopes were collected using a Proactive Mini Monsoon pump with a low-flow controller that was attached to vinyl tubing and a power cable marked with 0.5 m depth increments. As the pump was lowered to each new sampling depth, the pump was run for a period of time measured to be long enough to ensure that shallower-derived waters were flushed out and waters at the depth of interest were flowing out of the sampling tubes, before sample collection was initiated.</p><p>Waters were filtered in-line for Fe isotopic analysis using Millipore &#174; Sterivex &#8482; -GP pressure filter units with Luer-Lok connections and 0.22 &#956;m PES membrane filters that were purged by syringe, sealed with parafilm and frozen until leaching and analysis. Water samples for Fe isotope analyses were collected in 1 L Nalgene HDPE bottles precleaned with 10 % trace metal-grade HCl. At some depth levels, we report dissolved but not particulate analyses where additional dissolved Fe analyses were made possible with excess water samples collected for trace metal analysis that contained sufficiently high dissolved Fe. Sterivex &#8482; filters were also used to collect materials for particulate manganese (Mn) oxide concentration (pMnox) measurements by passing 150 mL and stored identically to filters collected for particulate Fe isotopes. Waters for trace metal analysis were filtered with removable 25 mm diameter 0.22 &#956;m PES membrane filters placed in acid-cleaned polypropylene Swinnex filter holders that were removed and immediately placed in cleaned Savillex Teflon reactors until leaching and analysis. Filtered waters for dissolved trace metal samples were collected in 50 mL centrifuge tubes that were precleaned with 10 % trace metal-grade HCl. All lake water samples were acidified at the end of the sampling day using</p><p>Optima grade HCl to a molarity of 0.4 M.</p><p>A core of ice from the center of the lake was obtained in March 2023 using a Kovacs Mark V coring system. The core barrel extracts a 14 cm diameter ice core and returned a ~40 cm-long ice core topped with ~5 cm of snow cover. This core was transported to the field station in a clean plastic bag. Visual examination of the core revealed the presence of 3 layers: a ~5 cm unconsolidated snow layer at the top; a ~20 cm opaque layer identified as deriving from snow and referred to hereafter as 'snow ice'; and a ~20 cm transparent layer identified as frozen lake water or 'lake ice'. The outer layer of the ice core was washed liberally with methanol and Milli-Q water prior to sampling, and all samples from the ice core specifically avoided the outer surface of the core that was in direct contact with the coring system. Five discrete sample layers, one from the unconsolidated snow and two each from the snow ice and lake ice, were collected from this core by manual separation with a ceramic chisel. These approximately 400 mL samples were melted in acid-cleaned 500 mL Savillex Teflon reactors prior to transportation back to Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI).</p><p>Several sites around Itasca State Park that are potentially representative of Fe input sources to Deming Lake were sampled in August 2023. Water from a bog on the southeast margin of Deming Lake represented surface inputs, and water from springs along Nicollet Creek, and from Elk Springs on the margins of Elk Lake represent regional groundwaters. These were sampled with acid-cleaned syringes fit with 0.45 and 0.22 &#956;m syringe filters, waters were acidified at the University of Minnesota Itasca Biological Station, and both filters and waters were returned to Iowa State University and shipped to WHOI for analysis. Both spring sites feature rusty surface mineralization and are likely Fe-rich due to anoxic subsurface conditions <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>.</p><p>Sediment samples from the lake bottom were collected from the boat in May 2022. Ten samples capturing a few centimeters depth of the upper sediment layer were collected from depths between 1 m and 16.5 m depth along a transect from the northern shore and slope of the lake using a Wildco Ekman dredge. Additionally, one gravity core was collected at 4 m depth that yielded 7 discrete samples from depths between 0 and 7 cm into the sediment column. All sediment samples were transferred into acid-cleaned 50 mL centrifuge tubes aboard the boat and frozen on return from the field for transportation. These samples were subsequently freeze-dried on return to WHOI using a benchtop freeze dryer with a Polytetrafluoroethylene coated stainless steel collector (Labcono FreeZone). Once dry, each sample was ground to a fine powder using a FRITSCH Mini-Mill Pulverisette 23 with zirconium oxide bowl and grinding balls.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.2.">Particulate Mn Oxide Analysis</head><p>Particulate Mn oxide abundance data were generated using the same methodologies employed in <ref type="bibr">Gadol et al. (2023)</ref>. On return of the filter cartridges to the laboratory at WHOI, pMnox abundances were quantified using the leucoberbelin blue (LBB) assay with a permanganate standard curve <ref type="bibr">(Altmann, 1972;</ref><ref type="bibr">Oldham et al., 2015)</ref>. Sterivex TM cartridge filters containing lake particles were filled with 2 mL LBB at a concentration of 0.004% in 0.1% acetic acid and then resealed with Parafilm. After approximately two hours the liquid extract was removed, and absorbance was measured at 620 nm on a UV-Vis spectrophotometer.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.3.">Sample Digestion and Elemental Analysis</head><p>All sample preparation was performed in the NIRVANA class 100 clean laboratory at WHOI unless otherwise indicated. All reagents used through all preparation steps were double distilled or purchased at Optima grade, and sample preparation steps made use of Savillex Teflon reactors unless otherwise stated. Dissolved elemental compositions were determined directly from acidified water samples, while particulate, ice, and sediment samples underwent further preparation steps prior to elemental analysis.</p><p>Filtered lake particles for elemental analysis were leached from the PES membrane filters originally mounted on the Swinnex holders overnight in 0.6 M HCl at 80 &#176;C in a volume of acid calibrated to be sufficient to leach all trace metals from filters of a given surface area, following the methodology of <ref type="bibr">Bishop and Wood (2008)</ref>. Ice core samples were melted in 500 mL Savillex Teflon reactors at the University of Minnesota Itasca Biological Station on the same day of collection and evaporated to dryness on a hotplate at WHOI. Dried ice samples were reconstituted in 10 mL of concentrated HNO3, transferred to smaller reactors, and dried down. To ensure complete transfer of materials from the 500 mL reactors, these were sequentially refluxed with aqua regia (3:1 concentrated HCl:HNO3) and 1:1 HNO3:H2O2 overnight and each time the acids were transferred into the smaller volume reactors. Samples were then redried and digested in 1:1 concentrated HNO3:H2O2 several times to dissolve particles, then reconstituted in 5 mL 2 % HNO3.</p><p>For sediments, approximately 50 mg of bulk powders were weighed into Savillex Teflon reactors and digested in 2 mL concentrated HF + 1 mL concentrated HNO3. These samples were then sequentially dried down and digested in aqua regia followed by 1:1 concentrated HNO3:H2O2 to destroy organics. Samples were dried down, fluxed in concentrated HNO3, redried, and constituted in 5 mL of 2 % HNO3.</p><p>Aliquots of all sample types, constituted in dilute HNO3, were analyzed for their full metal element concentrations using a Thermo Fisher iCAP-Q inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) at the WHOI Plasma Facility following dilution in 2 % HNO3. Indium (In)</p><p>was added to samples at a concentration of 1 ng/g prior to analyses to monitor and correct for instrument drift and matrix effects by normalizing to In intensities. Concentrations were calculated using a five-point calibration curve obtained by fitting of ion beam intensities measured for serial dilutions of a gravimetrically prepared multi-element standard in an artificial seawater matrix. The relative standard deviation (RSD) for five measurements of each sample was ~10% on the iCAP-Q. The accuracy and precision of similar concentration measurements on iCAP-Q at WHOI have previously been determined to be &#61617; 5-10 % (1SD) based on comparison with USGS reference materials AGV-1, AGV-2, BHVO-1, BHVO-2, BIR-1, and BCR-2 prepared and analyzed as unknowns during earlier runs <ref type="bibr">(Jochum et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shu et al., 2017)</ref>.</p><p>After elemental analysis provided Fe concentration data that indicated what sample quantities were required for Fe isotopic analysis, all target samples were prepared in a similar manner to eventually constitute them in 6 M HCl for column chemistry purification. Aliquots of acidified lake and spring water intended for Fe isotopic analysis (between 1 mL and 1 L) were dried down on a hotplate for digestion of organics and reconstitution in small acid volumes. The dried samples were sequentially digested in aqua regia, redried and digested in 1:1 concentrated HNO3: H2O2 to destroy dissolved organic matter. Filtered particulate Fe was extracted for Fe isotopic analysis by leaching Sterivex &#8482; (or in the case of spring samples, removable PES membrane) filters overnight at 80 &#176;C in 6 M HCl. The leachates were sequentially dried down and digested in aqua regia followed by 1:1 concentrated HNO3:H2O2 to destroy organics. After elemental analysis determined that concentrations of Fe in each individual depth layer sampled in the ice core were too low for Fe isotopic analysis, the three uppermost samples (1 snow sample and the 2 snow ice samples)</p><p>were combined to provide a bulk isotopic sample of surficial flux accumulation on the ice cover.</p><p>After an aliquot was taken for elemental analysis, bulk sediment digest samples were dried down.</p><p>After necessary digestion steps, all sample types (waters, particles, ice, sediment digest) were dried down, fluxed overnight in concentrated HCl to convert the Fe to chloride form, then redried and reconstituted in 6 M HCl prior to Fe purification.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.4.">Iron Purification and Isotopic Analysis</head><p>Iron was purified using established column chemistry procedures detailed in the literature <ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., 2004a</ref><ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., , 2009;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Craddock and Dauphas, 2011b)</ref>. Samples in 6 M HCl were loaded onto 1 mL of AG1-X8 anion exchange resin in disposable Biorad PolyPrep columns. The resin was pre-cleaned with MilliQ water, 1 M HNO3 and 0.4 M HCl and preconditioned with 2 mL of 6 M HCl. After sample loading, matrix elements including Cr and Ni were eluted in 8 mL of 6 M HCl. Sample Fe was then eluted in 9 mL 0.4 M HCl. To ensure complete purification of samples, the Fe solution was dried down, organics leached off the column were destroyed using aqua regia followed by HNO3 + H2O2 digestion, and the sample was refluxed in HCl then reconstituted in 0.5 mL of 6 M HCl, for the column procedure to be repeated. Purified samples were then dried down, fluxed overnight in 1 mL of concentrated nitric acid to convert them to nitrate form, then redried and taken up in 5 ml of 2 % HNO3 for mass spectrometry. Procedural blanks were typically 20 ng of Fe which is negligible in comparison to the mass of sample Fe, between 5 &#956;g and 500 &#956;g.</p><p>Iron isotopic compositions were measured in medium-resolution mode on a Thermo Scientific Neptune multi-collector inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (MC-ICP-MS) at WHOI. Platinum coated 'A' sampler and 'H' skimmer cones were used for improved sensitivity and stability. A quartz cyclonic spray chamber was used to introduce sample solutions containing 1 &#956;g/g Fe in 2 % HNO3, giving a signal of ~10 V on 56 Fe, the most abundant Fe isotope. Intensities on 54 Fe + , 56 Fe + , 57 Fe + , and 58 Fe + were measured simultaneously, in addition to 53 Cr + and 60 Ni + , which were used to correct for 54 Cr + and 58 Ni + interferences on 54 Fe + and 58 Fe + , respectively, using the exponential law. These corrections always had negligible impact on calculated isotopic ratios. Iron was measured on flat-topped peak shoulders to the low-mass side of molecular interference peaks resulting from argide ions ( 40 Ar 14 N + , 40 Ar 16 O + , 40 Ar 16 O 1 H + , and 40 Ar 18 O + ). Standard-sample bracketing was used to correct Fe isotopic ratios for instrumental mass fractionation. All solutions were prepared using the same batch of 2 % HNO3, and signal intensities on 56 Fe in sample and standard solutions were matched to within &lt;5 % prior to isotopic analysis. Iron isotope ratios are reported in &#948; x Fe notation, the per mil deviation of x Fe/ 54 Fe in the sample relative to IRMM-524, which has an identical isotopic composition to IRMM-014, where: &#948; x Fe (&#8240;) = [( x Fe / 54 Fe)sample / ( x Fe / 54 Fe)IRMM-014 -1] &#215; 1000, (1a) or in the logarithmic notation in which mass fractionation laws (MFLs) are strictly straight lines: &#948;' x Fe (&#8240;) = 1000 ln[( x Fe/ 54 Fe)sample/( x Fe/ 54 Fe)IRMM-014], (1b) Mass dependent fractionation was confirmed by checking the relationship between &#948;' 56 Fe and &#948;' 57 Fe values, which in all cases fell well within error of the expected MFL (&#948;' 56 Fe = &#952; 56/57 &#215; &#948;' 57 Fe</p><p>where the slope &#952; 56/57 &#8776; 2/3). We note that &#948; 56 Fe and &#948;' 56 Fe are functionally identical at the scale of natural variations we observe, but &#948;' 56 Fe is strictly the correct formulation when discussing mass fractionation laws as truly linear arrays. The IF-G, BHVO-2, and AGV-2 geostandards were processed through the same preparation protocols as unknown samples, and their &#948; 56 Fe values always agreed with the recommended values within error (Table <ref type="table">S2</ref>) <ref type="bibr">(Craddock and Dauphas, 2011b)</ref>. Here and elsewhere unless otherwise stated, uncertainties are given at the 95% confidence interval level following 5 repeat standard-sample bracket measurements <ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., 2009)</ref>,</p><p>for water column (Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>), spring and bog (Table <ref type="table">S4</ref>), and sediment (Table <ref type="table">S5</ref>) samples.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.4.1">High-precision Triple Fe Isotopic Analysis</head><p>Selected dissolved Fe samples were also analyzed at high precision to determine the precise value of the slope, &#952; 56/57 , for the MFL associated with Fe 2+ oxidation in Deming Lake. Previous studies have shown that the value of &#952; 56/57 can vary slightly in nature and may be used to resolve different Fe cycling pathways in the ancient sedimentary record <ref type="bibr">(Nie et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard et al., 2020)</ref>.</p><p>The value of &#952; 56/57 is determined by measuring parts per 10 4 departures, &#1013;' 56 Fe, from the expected 56 Fe/ 54 Fe ratio on a reference MFL for a given 57 Fe/ 54 Fe ratio, which we express here as: &#1013;' 56 Fe = (&#948;' 56 Fe -&#952; 56/57 Reference &#215; &#948;' 57 Fe) &#215; 10.</p><p>(2)</p><p>The &#1013;' 56 Fe values were initially calculated as &#1013;' Fe .</p><p>(4)</p><p>Subsequently, data were renormalized to make the high-temperature equilibrium limit law with &#952; 56/57 eq = 0.678 the reference law, following conventional presentations of these datasets:</p><p>&#1013;' Fe 56 eq =&#1013;' Fe 56 exp -10 &#215; (0.678 -0.672)&#215;&#916;&#948;' 57 Fe.</p><p>(5)</p><p>The 'measured' slope of the MFL expressed in the Deming Lake water column can be determined by taking the slope of &#1013;' 56 Fe vs. &#948;' 57 Fe and using the relationship:</p><p>&#916;&#1013;' 56 Feeq = (&#952; 56/57 Measured -0.678) &#215; &#916;&#948;' 57 Fe &#215; 10.</p><p>In practical terms, total variation of &#1013;' 56 Fe values is so small that measurements require far higher precision than achievable with routine Fe isotope analytical protocols. To achieve the necessary precision, measurements were made via standard-sample bracketing using the same mass spectrometric setup as described above, with the following modifications: Sample solutions were prepared at 10 &#956;g/g Fe, analyzed in ~20 standard sample brackets, and sample and standard intensities were matched to within 1 % on the 56 Fe signal. This specific analytical protocol follows that of <ref type="bibr">Hopp et al. (2022)</ref>, which improved the methods employed in earlier low temperature applications of triple Fe isotope measurements <ref type="bibr">(Nie et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard et al., 2020)</ref>. The geostandards IF-G and BHVO-2 were analyzed using the same methods during this measurement session and produced &#1013;' 56 Fe values in agreement with those published in the literature (Table <ref type="table">S6</ref>) <ref type="bibr">(Nie et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hopp et al., 2022)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.5">Mineral Saturation Calculations</head><p>Mineral saturation indices for the precipitation of vivianite and siderite were calculated for selected depths in the monimolimnion using Geochemist's Workbench <ref type="bibr">(Bethke, 2022)</ref> incorporating cation-anion data, carbonate alkalinity, and sonde measurements of dissolved O2 and pH from August 2023. As discussed in the Results, geochemistry of the monimolimnion is observed to be seasonally stable and thus, while carbonate alkalinity data are unavailable for our earlier sampling dates, the results of mineral saturation calculations are anticipated to be representative of chemistry in this layer throughout the duration of our study.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Results</head><p>In addition to Figures, all data are available in Tables <ref type="table">S1-7</ref> in the Supplementary Online Material.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.1">Water Column Physical Properties, pH, and O2</head><p>The full list of parameters analyzed with in situ YSI sensors have been published in an openaccess repository <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023b)</ref>. Temperature, turbidity, pH and dissolved [O2] profiles are shown in Table <ref type="table">S1</ref> and <ref type="table">Figure 2</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.1.1">May 2022</head><p>The upper 2 m of the epilimnion is well-mixed with a temperature of ~15 &#176;C, a thermocline between 2 m and 6 m, and a mixolimnion temperature of to 4.3 &#176;C and monimolimnion temperature of 5 &#176;C (Fig. <ref type="figure">2A</ref>). Turbidity increases from 1.7 FNU at the lake surface to 9.8 FNU at 16 m depth, with local maxima at 3.5 m and 6.5 m depths (Fig. <ref type="figure">2B</ref>). Lake pH can be divided into three distinct intervals of 8.3 at 0 -2 m, 6.8 at 4 -10 m, and 6.3 at 12 -16 m, with transitions between these intervals (Fig. <ref type="figure">2C</ref>). Surface dissolved O2 concentration (dO2) is 14.1 mg/L, there is a subsurface maximum at of 16.9 mg/L at 2 -2.5 m, and dO2 sharply declines between 2.5 and 5 m depth, below which no O2 is detected (detection limit: 0.01 mg/L) (Fig. <ref type="figure">2D</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.1.2.">August 2022</head><p>The upper 3 m of the epilimnion is well-mixed with a temperature of ~23 &#176;C, a thermocline between 3 m and 8 m to 4.7 &#176;C (Fig. <ref type="figure">2E</ref>), a mixolimnion temperature of 4.5 and monimolimnion temperature of 5 &#176;C. Turbidity increases from 0.7 FNU at the lake surface to 8.9 FNU at 16 m depth, with sharp local maxima of 6.8 and 14.1 FNU at 4 m and 6 m depths (Fig. <ref type="figure">2F</ref>). Lake pH Is 7.8 in the upper 3 m, peaks to 8.6 at 3.5 m, declines through a local minimum of 6.7 at 5.5 m, then gently declines to 6.3 at 16 m (Fig. <ref type="figure">2G</ref>). Surface dO2 is 8.6 mg/L, there is a sharp subsurface maximum at of 16.6 mg/L at 3.5 m depth, with dO2 sharply declining between 3.5 and 6 m depth, below which no O2 is detected (Fig. <ref type="figure">2H</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.1.3.">March 2023</head><p>The March 2023 water column is overlain by ~40 cm of ice cover, and features an inverted temperature profile with 0.4 &#176;C just beneath the ice cover, increasing to 5 &#176;C at 17 m, with the steepest temperature gradient occurring in the upper 4 m (Fig. <ref type="figure">2I</ref>). Turbidity is uniformly 2.1 to 2.7 FNU in the upper 10 m of the water column and increases at greater depths to 10.2 FNU at 17 m (Fig. <ref type="figure">2J</ref>). Water pH is 6.6 just below the ice surface, increases gently to 6.9 at 8 m depth, then decreases again to 6.4 at 17 m (Fig. <ref type="figure">2K</ref>). dO2 reaches 5.5 mg/L just below the ice cover and declines to below detection levels within the upper 2.5 m of the water column (Fig. <ref type="figure">2L</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.2.">Water Column Fe, &#948; 56 Fe, Mn Oxide, and Mn/Fe Systematics</head><p>Water column dissolved and particulate Fe concentrations (dFe and pFe, where throughout, dX and pX will denote the dissolved and particulate concentrations for element X), &#948; 56 Fe (where d&#948; 56 Fe and p&#948; 56 Fe denote dissolved and particulate values), and Mn/Fe data are shown in Table <ref type="table">S3</ref> and </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.2.1">May 2022</head><p>Layer (I): dFe is between 12 and 15 &#956;g/L and pFe between 33 and 105 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3A</ref>). d&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.28 to -0.08 &#8240; and p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.72 to -0.46 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3B</ref>). Dissolved Mn is below detection limits above 4 m, and dMn/dFe increases sharply from 1.1 to 24 mol/mol between 4 and 5 m depth, while pMn/pFe ranges between 0.38 and 0.85 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3C</ref>). Almost all depths at which pMnox is measured fall within Layer (I), with surface values of ~7.5 &#956;g/L and a subsurface peak of 66 &#956;g/L at 4.5 m depth (Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Layer (II):</head><p>Here, dFe increases dramatically beneath the oxycline from 71 &#956;g/L at 6 m depth to 5.0 mg/L at 10 m depth, to 39 mg/L at 12 m, while pFe ranges from 50 to 299 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3A</ref>).</p><p>Dissolved &#948; 56 Fe is at a minimum of -2.06 &#8240; just below the oxycline at 6 m, increasing to -0.41 &#8240; at 12 m, while p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.51 to 0.64 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3B</ref>). Dissolved Mn/Fe increases from 0.050 to 9.4 mol/mol with decreasing depth, while pMn/pFe ranges from 0.02 to 0.083 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3C</ref>). Particulate Mn oxide measured at 7 and 8 m depth is around 0.5 &#956;g/L (Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>).</p><p>Layer (III): dFe ranges from 39 to 67 mg/L and pFe ranges from 180 to 390 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3A</ref>).</p><p>d&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.40 to -0.25 &#8240; and p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.30 to -0.07 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3B</ref>). dMn/dFe ranges from 0.030 to 0.042 mol/mol and pMn/pFe ranges from 0.025 to 0.039 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3C</ref>).</p><p>Triple Fe isotope data for the May 2022 dissolved Fe pool between 6 and 16 m water depth (below the oxycline) define a mass fractionation array with a slope of 0.0077 &#177; 0.0100 in &#1013;' 56 Feexp vs. &#948;' 57 Fe space, which corresponds to a value of 0.6788 &#177; 0.0010 for the slope of the MFL, &#952; 56/57 (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>). All measured &#1013;' 56 Feexp values of the dissolved Fe pool were slightly negative, and the &#1013;' 56 Feexp vs. &#948;' 57 Fe mass fractionation array for May 2022 dissolved Fe pool has a slightly negative intercept of &#1013;' 56 Feexp = -0.0275 &#177; 0.0139.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.2.2.">August 2022</head><p>Layer (I): dFe is between 2.1 and 5.8 &#956;g/L and pFe between 33 and 47 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3D</ref>). d&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.24 to 0.18 &#8240; and p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.94 to -0.47 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3E</ref>). dMn/dFe ranges from 0.21 to 414 mol/mol, while pMn/pFe ranges between 0.55 and 3.4 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3F</ref>). All depths at which pMnox is measured fall within Layer (I), with values of between 12 and 33 &#956;g/L (Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Layer (II):</head><p>Here, dFe increases dramatically beneath the oxycline from 870 &#956;g/L at 6.5 m depth to 8.9 mg/L at 10 m depth, to 36 mg/L at 12 m, while pFe ranges from 62 to 349 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3D</ref>).</p><p>Dissolved &#948; 56 Fe is at a minimum of -1.37 &#8240; just below the oxycline at 6 m, increasing to -0.35 &#8240; at 12 m, while p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from 0.07 to 0.37 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3E</ref>). Dissolved Mn/Fe increases from 0.040 to 6.5 mol/mol with decreasing depth, while pMn/pFe ranges from 0.036 to 0.11 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3F</ref>).</p><p>Layer (III): dFe ranges from 36 to 54 mg/L and pFe ranges from 164 to 252 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3D</ref>).</p><p>d&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.35 to -0.29 &#8240; and p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from 0.03 to 0.05 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3E</ref>). dMn/dFe ranges from 0.032 to 0.040 mol/mol and pMn/pFe ranges from 0.025 to 0.035 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3F</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.2.3.">March 2023</head><p>Layers (I) to (III) are less well-defined in the ice-covered March 2023 water column, but for simplicity we still place the layer boundaries at base of the oxycline, and the 12 m depth level.</p><p>Ice Cover: The pooled sample of the ~20 cm-thick snow-derived portion of the ice core has a &#948; 56 Fe of -0.20 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">5A</ref>), and an Mn/Fe of 0.21 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">5B</ref>). The transparent lake waterderived ice layer contained insufficient Fe for an isotopic measurement.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Layer (I):</head><p>The oxygenated Layer (I) covers a very narrow (2 m) depth interval in the ice-covered lake, and only the upper two dissolved and particulate samples capture this layer. dFe is between 16 and 50 &#956;g/L and pFe between 39 and 50 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3G</ref>). d&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.24 to -0.20 &#8240; and p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.91 to -0.86 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3H</ref>). dMn/dFe ranges from 0.60 to 0.89 mol/mol, while pMn/pFe ranges between 0.27 and 0.31 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3I</ref>). Particulate Mn oxide abundance is 5.5 &#956;g/L in waters immediately below the ice and peaks at 14 &#956;g/L at 2 m depth (Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>).</p><p>Layer (II): this layer features much less dramatic variations with depth than those observed in May and August 2022. dFe ranges from 129 to 760 &#956;g/L, while pFe ranges from 12 to 314 &#956;g/L (Fig. <ref type="figure">3G</ref>). Dissolved &#948; 56 Fe is ranges from -0.97 to -0.35 &#8240;, while p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.66 to -0.15 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3H</ref>). Dissolved Mn/Fe ranges from 0.042 to 1.4 mol/mol, while pMn/pFe ranges from 0.025 to 0.39 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3I</ref>).</p><p>Layer (III): dFe ranges from 36 to 61 mg/L and pFe ranges from 301 to 372 &#956;g/L, except for an extremely low value of 2.3 &#956;g/L (omitted from Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref>) at 14 m that likely reflects a failure in sample filtration given that this depletion is seen in all elements (Fig. <ref type="figure">3G</ref>). d&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.35 to -0.22 &#8240; and p&#948; 56 Fe ranges from -0.36 to -0.30 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3H</ref>). dMn/dFe ranges from 0.031 to 0.042 mol/mol and pMn/pFe ranges from 0.025 to 0.34 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">3I</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.3.">Springs and Bog</head><p>For the Deming Lake bog, dFe is 120 to 680 &#956;g/L and pFe is 76 to 120 &#956;g/L (Table <ref type="table">S4</ref>).</p><p>Dissolved and particulate &#948; 56 Fe are -0.57 to -0.56 &#8240; and -0.59 to -0.29 &#8240;, respectively (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>), and dMn/dFe is 0.06-0.13 mol/mol. No particulate sample for trace elements was analyzed (Fig. <ref type="figure">6B</ref>). For the samples from Elk Spring, dFe is 7.4 to 7.7 mg/L and pFe is 150 to 510 &#956;g/L (Table <ref type="table">S4</ref>). Dissolved and particulate &#948; 56 Fe are -0.27 to -0.15 &#8240; and -0.04 &#8240;, respectively (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>).</p><p>Dissolved and particulate Mn/Fe are 0.037 mol/mol and 0.015 mol/mol, respectively (Fig. <ref type="figure">6B</ref>).</p><p>For the samples from the spring near Nicollet Creek, dFe is 340 to 400 &#956;g/L and pFe is 750 to 1500 &#956;g/L (Table <ref type="table">S4</ref>). Dissolved and particulate &#948; 56 Fe are -0.77 to -0.74 &#8240; and -0.85 to 0.75 &#8240;, respectively (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>). Dissolved and particulate Mn/Fe are 0.33 to 0.38 mol/mol and 0.13 mol/mol, respectively (Fig. <ref type="figure">6B</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.4.">Lake Sediments</head><p>Selected bulk compositional information for the lake sediments collected along the shallow to deep transect in Deming Lake is presented in Table <ref type="table">S5</ref>. Sediment samples are almost invariant with respect to Fe isotopes, both with depth in the lake or depth within the sediment column for the gravity core sample (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>, <ref type="figure">B</ref>). Sediments from lake depths between 1 and 16.5 m have average &#948; 56 Fe = 0.09 &#177; 0.09 &#8240; (2 SD), with individual values ranging from 0.00 &#8240; at 14 m depth to 0.15 &#8240; at 3 m depth (Fig. <ref type="figure">6B</ref>). While there is a slight trend of decreasing &#948; 56 Fe with increasing lake depth, most samples agree within individual measurement error bars. All core samples from 0-7 cm depth within a gravity core taken at 4 m lake depth have identical &#948; 56 Fe within error, with an average value of 0.13 &#177; 0.03 &#8240; (2 SD; Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>). For reference, the bulk upper continental crustal value of &#948; 56 Fe is 0.09 to 0.12 &#8240; <ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">X.-M. Liu et al., 2022)</ref>.</p><p>From 1 to 12 m depth, sediments feature mostly invariant Mn/Fe between 0.015 and 0.030 mol/mol with no systematic depth dependence, with elevated values of 0.057 mol/mol occurring at 14 m and 16.5 m depth (Fig. <ref type="figure">6C</ref>). Most values are moderately elevated relative to the upper continental crust (UCC) value of 0.017 mol/mol <ref type="bibr">(Taylor and McLennan, 1995)</ref>. Sediments from 1-12 m depth feature Fe/Al within &#177; 20 % of the UCC value of 0.21 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">6D</ref>). At 14 to 16.5 m depth, Fe/Al sharply increases to 0.43 -0.47 (Fig. <ref type="figure">6D</ref>), which is approximately twice the crustal value.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.">Discussion</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.1.">Iron Sources to Deming Lake</head><p>Deming Lake has no inlet or outlet streams, so its potential sources of Fe include eolian input, surface outflow from boggy areas surrounding the lake, and subsurface groundwater inflow <ref type="bibr">(Lascu et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. Factors to consider when we assess the relative importance of these different inputs to the Fe budget of Deming Lake include direct measurements of the chemical and isotopic characteristics of material that might be representative of these fluxes, and the depth distribution of Fe in the water column. To compare source fluxes to the whole lake, we calculate column-averaged, volume-and dFe-weighted d&#948; 56 Fe for the Deming Lake water column (d&#948; 56 Fecolumn) using numerical integration and depth-dependent volume estimates for Deming Lake from <ref type="bibr">Swanner et al. (2023a)</ref>;</p><p>where d&#948; 56 Fe(z), dFe(z), and V(z) are the d&#948; 56 Fe, dFe, and water volume within 0.5 m depth intervals in the lake, and summation was carried out over the full sampled lake depth. We find that the average of d&#948; 56 Fe, which accounts for the vast majority of all Fe in the lake, has essentially identical values of -0.34 &#8240; in May 2022, -0.36 &#8240; in August 2022, and -0.35 &#8240; in March 2023 (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>).</p><p>We can estimate the composition and flux of eolian inputs to Deming Lake from the material collected in the 'snow ice' portion of the ice core sampled in March 2023. This portion of the ice core derives from snowfall over the preceding winter months and therefore should have also accumulated all eolian particles deposited at the lake surface over this time. It is possible that eolian fluxes to Deming Lake change in the winter months compared to the rest of the year, but this integrated sampling provides a first order estimate of atmospheric Fe delivery. The snow ice layer was ~20 cm thick and has an Fe concentration of 75 ng/g, equating to 1.4 &#956;g Fe/cm 2 .</p><p>Assuming this Fe mass represents the accumulation of eolian material over ~4 months of ice coverage on the lake, this equates to an annual eolian Fe flux of ~4 &#956;g Fe/cm 2 /yr. Over the entire 5 &#215; 10 8 cm 2 Deming Lake surface, this gives an estimated Fe mass delivery rate of 2,000 g Fe/yr with an Fe isotopic composition of &#948; 56 Fe = -0.20 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>). This mass delivery rate represents less than 0.1 % of the standing Fe reservoir in Deming Lake of 2.9-3.6&#215;10 6 g Fe, calculated using numerical integration. The &#948; 56 Fe value of the eolian input is slightly more positive than the columnaveraged d&#948; 56 Fe value for the lake waters and similar to the inferred authigenic sedimentary outputs from the lake, but the eolian flux is more than an order of magnitude lower than the inferred authigenic Fe output flux from the lake (Section 5.4). Therefore, eolian input is unlikely to be the dominant Fe source to the lake.</p><p>The other possible surficial input of Fe to Deming Lake, runoff from nearby bogs, has a d&#948; 56 Fe of approximately -0.6 &#8240; that is substantially isotopically lighter than the d&#948; 56 Fecolumn of ~-0.35 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>), and inferred authigenic sedimentary outputs from the lake of -0.3 to -0.2 &#8240; (Section 5.4). While a mass flux from bog runoff is not possible to calculate, the low 100s of &#956;g/L dFe of the bog make this a less likely source of Fe to the lake.</p><p>Turning to subsurface Fe sources, groundwater inputs to Deming Lake are expected to be calcium, magnesium, and carbonate/bicarbonate-rich, consistent with the geochemistry of the lake water itself, due to reaction of waters with the calcareous Itasca moraine <ref type="bibr">(Megard et al., 1993;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. While subsurface groundwater inflow sources of Fe into Deming lake were not directly sampled due to the lack of infrastructure, two nearby surface springs we sampled provide useful insights on their chemical attributes. Elk Spring and the Nicollet Creek Spring have the Ca-Mg systematics expected, as both feature high dCa (Elk ~90 mg/L, Nicollet ~55 mg/L) and dMg (Elk ~23 mg/L, Nicollet ~16 mg/L), and have dCa/dMg ratios of 2.1 to 2.4 mol/mol that agree with values for the Deming Lake water column (Table <ref type="table">S7</ref>). The Fe geochemistry of Elk Spring provides a good match for the Deming Lake water column, with d&#948; 56 Fe of -0.27 &#177; 0.11 to -0.15 &#177; 0.11 &#8240; overlapping with the water column averaged values and with the deep water dissolved &#948; 56 Fe specifically (Figs. <ref type="figure">3</ref>, <ref type="figure">6A</ref>). Perhaps more importantly, the Elk Spring input flux closely resembles the &#948; 56 Fe of the inferred authigenic sedimentary flux out of Deming Lake, discussed in detail in Section 5.4. The dMn/dFe ratio of Elk Spring water of 0.037 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">6B</ref>) is also in very good agreement with deep water dMn/dFe ratios in Deming Lake (Fig. <ref type="figure">3</ref>). The vast majority of Fe and Mn in the Elk spring samples was measured in the dissolved rather than the particulate phase, so these water samples are likely to be representative of bulk groundwater d&#948; 56 Fe and dMn/dFe and have undergone little modification by particle precipitation (Table <ref type="table">S4</ref>). Nicollet</p><p>Spring waters appear to have undergone more oxidative particle precipitation after exposure to air, with more than half of the total Fe being trapped on particle filters (Table <ref type="table">S4</ref>). However, the water and particulate phases both feature similar, very negative &#948; 56 Fe values of -0.85 to -0.74 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>), so the formation of a particulate phase in Nicollet Spring waters does not appear to impact the isotopic signature we infer for it.</p><p>Guided by the data described above, we consider it highly likely that subsurface groundwater supply is the dominant source of Fe to Deming Lake. Elk Spring waters feature very similar dCa/dMg, dMn/dFe, and d&#948; 56 Fe to the averaged water column <ref type="bibr">(Figs. 3,</ref><ref type="bibr">6)</ref>, and to the inferred authigenic removal flux from the lake (Section 5.4). While not providing a perfect match for Deming Lake waters, notably in having an overall lower dFe/dCa ratio by an order of magnitude (0.06 mol/mol in Elk Spring vs. approximately 0.85 mol/mol column average in Deming Lake deep waters), Elk Spring provides clear evidence that Fe-rich groundwaters with the required d&#948; 56 Fe and dMn/dFe exist in the vicinity of Deming Lake and may be the most viable source of Fe. The specific higher dFe and dFe/dCa of Deming Lake vs. any accessible groundwater source in Itasca State Park may reflect the flow of Deming Lake input waters along an extended subsurface path through high-permeability tunnel valley deposits as described by <ref type="bibr">Swanner et al. (2023a)</ref>. Flowing groundwaters may accumulate additional Fe during anoxic alteration of host rocks, while a longer residence time of dFe than dCa in the lake, driven by redox cycling, is also discussed below as a potential driver of this elevated dFe/dCa relative to inputs, in Section 5.4.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.2.">Distinct Iron Systematics in Water Column Layers</head><p>The three layers defined by different dominant Fe cycling behaviors we define in the Deming Lake water column are shown schematically in Figure <ref type="figure">4</ref>. These layers are particularly evident in May and August but appear to persist to some degree in March under the ice cover (Figs. <ref type="figure">3</ref>, <ref type="figure">4</ref>).</p><p>This suggests that some similar processes operate in the lake year-round. Layer (I), above the oxycline, is defined by uniformly very low dFe that is up to several times lower than pFe. The particulate fraction has lower &#948; 56 Fe than the dissolved fraction by approximately 0.2 to 1.0 &#8240;, with an offset that varies through the year but shows no clear depth dependence. Layer (II), extending from the base of the oxycline to the 12 m depth, features increasing dFe and d&#948; 56 Fe with increasing depth, particularly immediately below the oxycline. Dissolved Mn/Fe and pFe peak near the base of the oxycline. Particulate &#948; 56 Fe is significantly higher than d&#948; 56 Fe throughout the upper parts of Layer (II) but trends towards similar values to the dissolved fraction approaching the chemocline at ~12 m. Layer (III), beneath the chemocline, is defined by extremely high dFe, &#948; 56 Fe and Mn/Fe that are mostly unfractionated between dissolved and particulate phases, and little seasonal variation. As detailed further below, we interpret the Fe systematics of Layer (I) to be dominated by biological Fe uptake with variable lithogenic input (Section 5.2.1), Layer (II) to be dominated by Fe 2+ aq oxidation and Fe 3+ mineral precipitation (Section 5.2.2), and Layer (III) to be dominated by anoxic Fe 2+ mineral precipitation (Section 5.2.3) (Fig. <ref type="figure">4</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.2.1.">Layer (I): Biological Fe Uptake with Variable Lithogenic Input</head><p>Above the oxycline, p&#948; 56 Fe values are more negative than d&#948; 56 Fe values, by -0.18 to -1.15 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">7</ref>). This difference implies the particulate phase in the oxygenated mixolimnion preferentially takes up isotopically light Fe relative to the dissolved pool. The majority of total Fe in Layer (I)</p><p>resides in the particulate phase, with pFe/FeT = 0.60-0.88 in May, 0.85-0.94 in August, and 0.58-0.70 in March (FeT = dFe + pFe; Fig. <ref type="figure">7A</ref>). Under the assumption that Fe is predominantly advected upwards from depth in the lake, preferential uptake of isotopically light Fe to particles can also explain how d&#948; 56 Fe values recover from such strongly negative values just below the oxycline to the slightly negative to slightly positive values seen in Layer (I) (Fig. <ref type="figure">3</ref>).</p><p>Above the oxycline, low dFe levels are likely present as Fe 3+ stabilized by complexation with dissolved organic matter that is abundant in Deming Lake and the source of its brown coloration <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. The subsequent uptake of isotopically light Fe into the particulate phase is explainable through biological uptake of this stabilized Fe pool. Biomass is abundant in the upper water column even during the ice-covered winter months, and selective Fe uptake by phytoplankton has been demonstrated in marine <ref type="bibr">(Ellwood et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sieber et al., 2021)</ref> and lacustrine settings (K. <ref type="bibr">Liu et al., 2022)</ref>, to preferentially incorporate isotopically light Fe in cells and enrich the remaining dissolved pool in isotopically heavy Fe. In another lake study, <ref type="bibr">Ellwood et al. (2019)</ref> attributed a switch in Fe isotope fractionation behavior above the oxycline of meromictic Lake Cadagno, Switzerland, to rapid kinetic precipitation of ferric oxides from aqueous Fe 3+ . The systematics observed in that setting are essentially identical to those observed and attributed to biological uptake here and in other studies. It is also not clear how rapid Fe 3+ precipitation as oxides to drive a large kinetic isotope effect could be sustained several meters above the depth of high dFe and peak oxidation rates as in Lake Cadagno as reported by <ref type="bibr">Ellwood et al. (2019)</ref>. We suggest that such phenomena can uniformly be explained by the biological driver.</p><p>The observed magnitude of the isotopic offset between particulate and dissolved Fe (p&#948; 56 Fe -d&#948; 56 Fe), referred to hereafter as &#916; 56 Fep-d, varies from -0.18 to -1.15 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">7B</ref>). The largest fractionation of -1.15 &#8240; is comparable to the maximum &#916; 56 Fep-d observed in Lake Cadagno (-0.9 &#8240;; <ref type="bibr">Ellwood et al., 2019)</ref>, two boreal study lakes in Northwestern Ontario (-1.0 &#8240;; K. <ref type="bibr">Liu et al., 2022)</ref>, and the upper Southern Ocean in a cold core eddy (~-1 &#8240;; <ref type="bibr">Ellwood et al., 2020)</ref>. In Deming Lake, the maximum and average &#916; 56 Fep-d in Layer (I) increase in magnitude from May (max -0.57 &#8240;, average -0.35 &#8240;), through August (max -0.94 &#8240;, average -0.76 &#8240;), into the following March (max -1.15 &#8240;, average -0.90 &#8240;). Particulate and dissolved &#948; 56 Fe in Layer (I)</p><p>show no systematic variations with depth, dFe, or pFe/FeT that may be expected with varied extents of exchange during biological Fe uptake (Fig. <ref type="figure">7A</ref>).</p><p>One plausible control on observed &#916; 56 Fep-d values in Layer (I) that is consistent with other observations of Layer (I) chemistry is variable contributions of lithogenic Fe from surficial, possible eolian, deposition within this mixed upper layer (Figs 6, 7B). As such, eolian input may impact the low-Fe upper layers of the lake even though this flux is not a significant contributor to the overall lake Fe budget. Such a process could act to dilute both dissolved and particulate Fe pools with near-zero &#948; 56 Fe material and mute any isotopic variability expressed between them. This is observed in the Al-rich upper few meters of the water column of Lake Cadagno (Ellwood et al., 2019), where Al is reasonably taken as an indicator of lithogenic material. Dissolved and particulate Al concentrations in Layer (I) are both highest in May 2022 and lowest in March 2023, and FeT/AlT values in Layer (I) are lowest in May 2022 and highest in March 2023 (Figs. 6C, 7B;</p><p>Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>). The lowest FeT/AlT in the May 2022 water column, observed at 0 m depth, is 0.83 mol/mol, the lowest value observed in Layer (I) in any season. This Fe/Al ratio is similar to the value of 0.74 mol/mol determined from the snow ice cover sampled in March 2023 and taken as a compositional proxy for atmospheric inputs to the lake (Fig. <ref type="figure">6C</ref>). The &#948; 56 Fe value of -0.20 &#8240; for the snow ice cover is isotopically heavier than p&#948; 56 Fe observed in Layer (I) (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>), so addition of this inferred eolian Fe component to the dFe and pFe pools would contribute to a smaller apparent &#916; 56 Fed-p. Qualitatively, the increase in magnitude of the apparent &#916; 56 associated with biogenic Fe uptake, a value consistent with maximum fractionations observed in the mixed layer of other water bodies <ref type="bibr">(Ellwood et al., 2019</ref><ref type="bibr">(Ellwood et al., , 2020;;</ref><ref type="bibr">K. Liu et al., 2022)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.2.2.">Layer (II): Precipitation of Ferric Iron-Bearing Phases</head><p>Layer (II) features consistent behaviors in May and August, while Fe cycling is sufficiently distinct in March that we discuss it separately in Section 5.3. Unlike in Layer (I), deeper layers in the lake feature pAl more than an order of magnitude lower than pFe, so detrital contributions of Fe to the particulate populations of the metalimnion and monimolimnion are not considered hereafter.</p><p>Beneath the oxycline in May and August, dFe and d&#948; 56 Fe sharply increase with depth, as observed previously in Fe-rich anoxic lakes and attributed to Fe partitioning between soluble ferrous and insoluble ferric phases <ref type="bibr">(Malinovsky et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Teutsch et</ref> al., 2009; Busigny et al., 2014; Ellwood et al., 2019; Yang et al., 2022; K. Liu et al., 2022). The maximum &#916; 56 Fep-d values observed in Layer (II) are +1.54 and +1.74 &#8240; in May and August respectively (Figs 3B, <ref type="figure">E</ref>), which overlap with values between +0.59 and +2.14 &#8240; recorded beneath the oxycline in previous anoxic lake studies <ref type="bibr">(Malinovsky et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ellwood et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">K. Liu et al., 2022)</ref>. In all cases, these fractionations are interpretable through equilibrium fractionation between ferric and ferrous Fe that enriches the insoluble ferric phase in heavy Fe isotopes. In this layer, pMn/pFe is persistently lower than dMn/dFe (Figs 3C, F), as expected following the formation of Fe 3+ -rich particulates, because Fe 2+ aq and Mn 2+ exhibit similar behaviors but Mn 4+ particles only form at higher redox potentials than Fe 3+ and in the absence of Fe 2+ aq <ref type="bibr">(Robbins et al., 2023)</ref>. <ref type="bibr">Teutsch et al. (2009)</ref> suggested that this pattern of fractionation is driven in Lake Nyos, Cameroon, by the progressive dissolution of ferric oxyhydroxides sinking beneath a layer of quantitative oxidation at the oxycline; as a result of microbial dissimilatory Fe 3+ reduction (DIR) which preferentially releases light Fe into Fe 2+ aq. While such an interpretation is consistent with the large fractionation known to be induced by DIR <ref type="bibr">(Beard et al., 1999;</ref><ref type="bibr">Crosby et al., 2007)</ref>, its formulation assumes quantitative oxidation of Fe 2+ aq solely at the oxycline, which is difficult to reconcile with positively fractionated p&#948; 56 Fe values already forming several meters below the oxycline that we observe in Deming Lake. However, while it may not be the dominant control on water column &#948; 56 Fe systematics, DIR of sinking Fe 3+ precipitates likely is occurring in Layer (II) of Deming Lake. Such a process can explain why a peak in particulate Fe around the oxycline is not propagated downward through Layer (II) by particle sinking. As discussed in Section 5.4, recycling of ferric precipitates is likely the dominant processes that retains Fe 2+ aq in the lake water column for far longer than the water residence time <ref type="bibr">(Campbell and Torgersen, 1980;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>.</p><p>Studies of anoxic Fe rich lakes have more commonly attributed the systematics we observe in Layer (II) in May and August to progressive oxidation of upwelling Fe 2+ aq that removes isotopically heavy Fe from solution as Fe 3+ particles. Experimental studies have documented an equilibrium isotopic fractionation of 3.0 &#8240; in &#948; 56 Fe between Fe 2+ aq and Fe 3+ aq that enriches the latter in 56 Fe <ref type="bibr">(Johnson et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Welch et al., 2003)</ref>. In near-neutral aqueous conditions like the ones that exist in the majority of marine and lacustrine settings, Fe 3+ is highly insoluble and rapidly hydrolyses to form precipitates of Fe 3+ -oxyhydroxides or other hydrous ferric minerals, such as phyllosilicates or phosphates, according to the prevailing solution chemistry (e.g. <ref type="bibr">Cosmidis et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hinz et al., 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Millero, 1998;</ref><ref type="bibr">Millero et al., 1987)</ref>. Experiments produce a range of net Fe isotopic fractionations during the formation of Fe 3+ -oxyhydroxides following the oxidation of Fe 2+ aq, reflecting in part a range in fractionations between short-lived Fe 3+ aq and the mineral precipitates where additional equilibrium and/or kinetic isotope effects accompany precipitation <ref type="bibr">(Bullen et al., 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Skulan et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Croal et al., 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Balci et al., 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Beard et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wu et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Nie et al., 2017)</ref>. The two-step transformation from Fe 2+ aq to solid Fe 3+ precipitates during oxidation of ferruginous waters can therefore be associated with variable sizes of net Fe isotopic fractionation of 1 to 3 &#8240;, but in all cases the precipitates should be isotopically heavier.</p><p>The &#916; 56 Fep-d values we observe within Layer (II) are consistent with the formation of particulate Fe 3+ by oxidation processes occurring at and beneath the oxycline.</p><p>Free O2 is likely the major oxidant for Fe 2+ aq in the shallower levels of Layer (II) (Figs. <ref type="figure">8A-B</ref>).</p><p>Particulate Fe concentration peaks around the base of the oxycline and slightly below the SCML in the May and August water columns (Figs. <ref type="figure">8C-D</ref>), where O2 should be supplied photosynthetically but rapidly consumed by oxidation. The convergence of dFe and dO2 profiles at near zero values around this depth layer are consistent with the expectations of simple 1D reaction-transport models for the oxidation of upwelling ferruginous waters by an oxygenated overlying photic zone <ref type="bibr">(Czaja et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard et al., 2020)</ref>. The development of strongly negative d&#948; 56 Fe values (Figs. <ref type="figure">8 E-F</ref>) and a sharp decrease in dFe compared to deeper waters are explainable by extensive oxidation of Fe 2+ aq by O2 and precipitation of isotopically heavy Fe 3+ .</p><p>The occurrence of these isotopic signatures near the SCML could also directly implicate cyanobacteria in driving the large positive &#916; 56 Fep-d because both oxidation of Fe 2+ aq mediated by cyanobacteria, and adsorption of Fe 3+ aq to their cells, are observed in experiments to enrich the particulate phase in 56 Fe by 1.8 to 2.9 &#8240; relative to Fe 2+ aq <ref type="bibr">(Mulholland et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2017)</ref>.</p><p>Sinking Mn oxide particles formed by the O2-induced oxidation of Mn 2+ aq in overlying waters can also play a role in Fe 2+ aq oxidation. In both the May and August water columns, the depth of maximum Fe 2+ aq oxidation is marked by a sharp increase in dMn and a sharp decrease in pMn and pMnox relative to overlying waters (Figs. <ref type="figure">8A-B</ref>). These covariations are consistent with Fe 2+ aq oxidation at the expense of the reduction of sinking Mn oxides, due to the higher redox potential of the Mn 2+ -Mn 4+ redox couple. The simplified net reaction:</p><p>has been inferred at Lac Pavin <ref type="bibr">(Busigny et al., 2014)</ref>, where Fe(OH)3 represents potential Fe 3+ -bearing mineral precipitates. From a stoichiometric perspective, <ref type="bibr">Busigny et al. (2014)</ref> argued that at Lac Pavin, the change in dissolved dMn occurring around the redoxcline was an order of magnitude smaller than the change in dFe and thus sinking MnO2 could only account for a fraction of the total Fe 2+ aq oxidation taking place. By contrast, around the top of Layer (II), the sharp ~1,000&#956;g/L drop in dFe is of a similar magnitude to the ~300 (in May) to 1,000 &#956;g/L (in August) increase in dMn that occurs at the same depth in the Deming Lake water column (Figs <ref type="figure">8A-B</ref>).</p><p>However, pMn and pMnox change by only up to tens of &#956;g/L in May and August, significantly less than the ~300 &#956;g/L spike in pFe at this depth, which introduces some ambiguity into the relative role of Mn-oxide driven Fe 2+ aq oxidation at the top of Layer (II). It thus appears plausible that up to tens of percent of the total oxidative Fe drawdown in August at this depth level may be driven by Mn oxide reduction, but direct O2 oxidation is likely also required.</p><p>While the sharpest changes in dFe and pFe occur within 1 m of the oxycline and can be reasonably attributed to oxidation by O2 (either directly or via Mn oxides), dFe and d&#948; 56 Fe continue increasing with depth to the base of Layer (II) (Fig. <ref type="figure">3</ref>). This suggests that oxidation of upwarddiffusing Fe 2+ aq begins at greater depth within the anoxic portion of the water column, and indeed, a large &#916; 56 Fep-d &gt;1 &#8240; down to 10 m depth is still observed in the May water column where particulate data are available. Beneath 6 m depth, dissolved dO2 is below the ~0.01 mg/L detection level of the YSI sensor. At such low dissolved dO2, direct abiotic Fe 2+ aq oxidation would be hindered, unless in situ cyanobacterial O2 production at these depths acts as a cryptic O2 source that is balanced by rapid consumption during oxidation. Alternatively, low-oxygen or anoxic biological oxidation pathways, such as microbial Fe 2+ oxidation by microaerophilic chemoautotrophs or anoxygenic photoautotrophs, could drive the formation of isotopically heavy Fe 3+ -dominated particulates under low dO2 conditions to at least 10 m depth in May. Similar systematics of heavy Fe isotope removal to particulates many meters below the redoxcline are observed in numerous other ferruginous lakes and have been similarly attributed to these pathways <ref type="bibr">(Ellwood et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yang et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">K. Liu et al., 2022)</ref>. Microaerophilic chemoautotrophs can function at single digit micromolar O2 concentrations below our detection limit <ref type="bibr">(Chan et al., 2016)</ref> and produce Fe 3+ precipitates with positive &#916; 56 Fep-d similar to other known oxidation mechanisms <ref type="bibr">(Bullen et al., 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Croal et al., 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Balci et al., 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rouxel et al., 2018)</ref>.</p><p>Alternatively, anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria have also been observed to drive &#916; 56 Fep-d values consistent with our observations in Deming Lake <ref type="bibr">(Croal et al., 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2015b)</ref>. At this time we are unable to determine whether anoxygenic phototrophs are present in Deming Lake, whether they would be utilizing Fe 2+ aq rather than even a trace sulfide pool in the anoxic portion of the water column as observed in ferruginous Lake Matano, Indonesia <ref type="bibr">(Crowe et al., 2014)</ref>, or if there is sufficient light to drive photosynthesis at those depths. While persistently positive, &#916; 56 Fep-d values in Layer (II) decrease in magnitude with increasing depth and increasing dissolved Fe 2+ aq (Fig. 9), suggesting additional factors beyond fractionation during Fe 2+ aq oxidation. Kinetic isotope effects are unlikely to be driving this variability because these would drive lower net &#916; 56 Fep-d values at the depth of maximum Fe 2+ aq oxidation rates. These rates are highest at the top of Layer (II), where observed &#916; 56 Fep-d values are in fact the largest. More likely contributors to variable &#916; 56 Fep-d values include changing ferric/ferrous Fe proportions in mineral precipitates, the adsorption of Fe 2+ aq to ferric mineral surfaces, and the adsorption of Fe 3+ aq to cells <ref type="bibr">(Crowe et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cosmidis et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Busigny et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2017)</ref>. The partial survival of sinking particles formed at shallower depths with more negative &#948; 56 Fe could also decrease the observed &#916; 56 Fep-d deeper in Layer (II), and as discussed below in the context of Layer (III) (Section 5.2.3), this phenomenon may be enhanced in August 2023 due to major particle formation and coagulation at around the SCML.</p><p>Iron isotopic interpretations often simplify the Fe 3+ -bearing precipitate phase to a Fe 3+ oxyhydroxide. However, detailed mineralogical analysis of suspended particles in Lac Pavin, from depths where anoxic Fe 2+ aq oxidation was inferred, indicated a mixture of Fe 3+ -bearing phyllosilicates, oxyhydroxides, bacterially-associated amorphous ferric-ferrous phosphates, and vivianite (Fe3(PO4)2&#8226;8(H2O)), a ferrous phosphate mineral <ref type="bibr">(Cosmidis et al., 2014)</ref>. Among these putative phases, it is notable that Layer (II) particles in Deming Lake feature pP values that are significant relative to pFe (Table <ref type="table">S7</ref>; Fig. <ref type="figure">10</ref>). Any phosphate-associated Fe 2+ component should be less 56 Fe-enriched than purely Fe 3+ -bearing phases and increased contributions of such phases with increasing dFe at depth provide one possible explanation for the depth dependence of &#916; 56 Fep-d. Particulate Fe/P ratios between 1.0 and 8.9 mol/mol (Table <ref type="table">S7</ref>; Fig. <ref type="figure">10</ref>) are consistent with variable combinations of Fe 3+ oxyhydroxides with surfaced-adsorbed phosphate, and/or a Fe phosphate phase that may host some Fe 2+ , and these ratios also agree with observations from Lac Pavin <ref type="bibr">(Cosmidis et al., 2014)</ref>. We discuss the potential importance of vivianite specifically in Layer (III) further in Section 5.2.3 below. A lack of correlation between pFe/pP and &#916; 56 Fep-d suggests, however, that other less fractionated particulate Fe phases must also be present in Layer (II).</p><p>Another pathway to incorporating isotopically lighter Fe 2+ in deeper Layer (II) particles is through the partial precipitation of authigenic magnetite (Fe 2+ Fe 3+ 2O4) and/or carbonated green</p><p>) in the water column, as has been observed</p><p>in Lakes Towuti and Matano, Indonesia <ref type="bibr">(Zegeye et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bauer et al., 2020)</ref>, and in flowthrough reactor experiments <ref type="bibr">(Benner et al., 2002)</ref>. These biomineralization pathways involve partial reduction of Fe 3+ -oxyhydroxides coupled to organic matter respiration; and may be expressed more clearly in August than May due to increased production of organic matter in the overlying SCML in August.</p><p>In addition to mineralogical controls, the &#916; 56 Fep-d deeper in Layer (II) may be impacted by adsorption of Fe 2+ aq to mineral surfaces, which will increase at higher dFe <ref type="bibr">(Busigny et al., 2014)</ref>.</p><p>Adsorption of Fe 2+ aq to ferric oxyhydroxide mineral surfaces has been observed experimentally to produce an adsorbed pool with &#916; 56 Fep-d between 0.30 and 0.87 &#8240; <ref type="bibr">(Crosby et al., 2007)</ref>. An increased fraction of adsorbed Fe 2+ aq <ref type="bibr">(Crowe et al., 2011)</ref> with a lower but still positive &#916; 56 Fep-d values with increasing depth in Layer (II) provides a further pathway to generating the depthdependent &#916; 56 Fep-d we observe, and is supported by a clear negative correlation between &#916; 56 Fep-d and dFe in Layer (II) (Fig. <ref type="figure">9</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.2.3.">Layer (III): Anoxic Precipitation of Ferrous Minerals</head><p>Layer (III) lies below the chemocline in Deming Lake and is defined by dramatically elevated total dissolved solutes, particularly dissolved Fe, Ca, and Mg. Both d&#948; 56 Fe and dMn/dFe are nearly invariant at depths greater than 12 m across the three seasons (Fig. <ref type="figure">3</ref>). Particulate Fe removal at these depths appears to have limited impact on the dissolved Fe mass balance in Layer (III), with</p><p>&gt;99 % of Fe in the dissolved phase. Particle formation also drives muted fractionation, with dissolved and particulate Mn/Fe being indistinguishable in Layer (III) in all seasons and &#916; 56 Fep-d being within error of 0 &#8240; in May and March. The two available Layer (III) datapoints from August feature non-zero &#916; 56 Fep-d values of 0.32 to 0.36 &#8240; and as discussed below, may reflect enhanced survival of sinking Layer (II) particles at this time. These observations suggest that Layer (III) is defined by stable precipitation of a small fraction of the dissolved Fe pool into ferrous minerals which, unlike Fe 2+ aq oxidation, minimally fractionates &#948; 56 Fe and Mn/Fe. The high dissolved Fe 2+ aq levels in Layer (III) should strongly buffer oxidant species, while photosynthetically active radiation &lt;0.01 &#956;M photons/m 2 /s (Swanner et al., 2023b) should inhibit anoxygenic photosynthesis. Ferrous minerals at or above saturation equilibrium and thus able to precipitate in the deepest waters of Deming Lake may include vivianite, and Fe-bearing carbonates, both of which have been observed to form in other ferruginous water columns <ref type="bibr">(Crowe et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Jones et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cosmidis et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Herndon et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vuillemin et al., 2020</ref><ref type="bibr">Vuillemin et al., , 2022;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wittkop et al., 2020b)</ref>.</p><p>The precipitation of vivianite in Layer (III) is suggested by elevated pP beneath the chemocline, increasing with depth in a manner that tracks increasing dP (Table <ref type="table">S7</ref>; Fig. <ref type="figure">10</ref>). To assess if vivianite precipitation in Layer (III) is reasonable, we calculated the vivianite saturation index (SI)</p><p>for waters in Deming Lake for August 2023, when return sampling enabled determination of requisite cation-anion data <ref type="bibr">(Rico et al., in prep)</ref>, using measured pH, dP and dFe, and a published solubility product constant (Ksp) for vivianite of 10 -35.8 (Al-Borno and Tomson, 1994). We find that the SI values for vivianite-calculated as log(Q/K), where Q = ion activity product and K = mineral solubility constant -at 11 m and 14 m depths are 1.14 and 2.15, respectively, and lower than 0 for all depths shallower than 11 m. Therefore, vivianite is oversaturated in Layer (III) and should be expected to precipitate. Particulate Fe/P values in Layer (III) range from 2.0-5.4 mol/mol in May, 2.2-3.4 mol/mol in August, and 3.7-5.0 mol/mol in March (Fig. <ref type="figure">10</ref>). Assuming a stoichiometric Fe/P of 1.5 for vivianite, the maximum fraction of pFe hosted in vivianite in Layer (III) ranges from 0.28-0.73 in May, 0.44-0.68 in August, and 0.30-0.41 in March. No experimental or theoretical data exist for the Fe isotopic systematics of vivianite. However, the fact that &#916; 56 Fep-d values are unresolvable from 0.0 &#8240; even in samples (Fig. <ref type="figure">9</ref>) where over 2/3 of pFe appears to be hosted in vivianite, strongly suggests that the precipitation of vivianite from oversaturated anoxic solutions is associated with little Fe isotopic fractionation.</p><p>Saturation of Fe and Mn carbonates in the monimolimnion of anoxic lakes and accumulation in underlying sediments is well-documented <ref type="bibr">(Crowe et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Jones et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lambrecht et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Herndon et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wittkop et al., 2020b;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vuillemin et al., 2022)</ref>. Using dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentrations from a multiparameter database for Deming Lake <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023b)</ref>, and assuming relative year-to-year stability of solutes in the lake over this timeframe, we estimated the SI for siderite, FeCO3. The siderite SI was 1.20 at 14 m depth, lower than 1 for all depths shallower than 14 m, and lower than 0 for all depths shallower than 9 m.</p><p>Therefore, precipitation of Fe-bearing carbonates appears feasible within Layer (III).</p><p>The particulate profiles of common carbonate-hosted cations Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Fe 2+</p><p>(corrected for vivianite) show clear covariation in Layer (III) of Deming Lake (Table <ref type="table">S7</ref>; Fig. <ref type="figure">11A</ref>, <ref type="figure">C</ref>, <ref type="figure">E</ref>). This can be seen most clearly between 12 and 14 m depth in May where all four elements peak in concentration (Fig. <ref type="figure">11A</ref>). Here, pMg, pCa, and pMn are all strongly positively correlated.</p><p>Bulk pFe is not correlated with these elements, but after correcting for Fe hosted in vivianite (pFecorr = pFe -pFevivianite), pFecorr also shows a positive relationship with the other three divalent cations in <ref type="bibr">May (Fig 11B)</ref>. We take these covariations to indicate that carbonate is the dominant mineral precipitate in Layer (III) for Mg, Ca, and Mn, and a significant carrier, at least in May, of non-vivianite-hosted Fe. As pure calcite, dolomite, and rhodochrosite are undersaturated at these depths, a mixed cation carbonate phase such as ankerite, Ca(Fe,Mg,Mn)(CO3)2, a ferroan dolomite, or an amorphous precursor to these mineral phases, could be the major host for these elements.</p><p>Taking pFecorr to approximate carbonate-hosted Fe for May, we find that carbonate pFe/pMg, pFe/pCa, and pFe/pMn ratios are respectively 0.93-2.8 mol/mol, 0.56-1.4 mol/mol, and 9.6-23 mol/mol. These ratios are consistent with ankerite and siderite, or amorphous precursors to these phases, being the dominant carbonate minerals forming in Deming Lake. At the high dMn levels in Deming Lake, formation of kutnohorite, CaMn(CO3)2, may also be possible <ref type="bibr">(Wittkop et al., 2014</ref><ref type="bibr">(Wittkop et al., , 2020b;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Herndon et al., 2018)</ref>. Particulate Mg, Ca, and Mn are lower in August and March, suggesting less overall carbonate precipitation (Fig. <ref type="figure">11</ref>), and are uncorrelated with pFecorr in these months. This lack of correlation likely reflects the dilution of any less abundant carbonate-hosted</p><p>Fe by other authigenic Fe phases.</p><p>The &#916; 56 Fep-d values observed in Layer (III) <ref type="bibr">(Figs. 3,</ref><ref type="bibr">9)</ref> suggest that Fe isotopic fractionation associated with carbonate precipitation is not significant. Experimental constraints on the Fe isotopic fractionation between siderite and Fe 2+ aq range from &#916; 56 Fesid-Fe2+aq = -0.48 &#177; 0.22 &#8240; during abiotic precipitation from solution <ref type="bibr">(Wiesli et al., 2004)</ref> to &#916; 56 Fesid-Fe2+aq = 0.0 &#8240; during siderite precipitation following microbial DIR <ref type="bibr">(Johnson et al., 2005)</ref>. Thus, Fe carbonate precipitation should induce a zero to slightly negative &#916; 56 Fep-d value. Our finding that &#916; 56 Fep-d is indistinguishable from zero in Layer (III) in May and March therefore agrees with the experimental results, given that we can infer that between 1/3 and 2/3 of particulate Fe is hosted in carbonate in these months.</p><p>The positive &#916; 56 Fep-d of ~0.33 &#8240; observed in Layer (III) in August (Figs. <ref type="figure">3E</ref>, <ref type="figure">9</ref>) may in part reflect the persistence of sinking Fe 3+ -bearing phases either as minerals that are observed to be capable of partial surviving sinking and burial in ferruginous sediments <ref type="bibr">(Crowe et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Friese et al., 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gadol et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Akam et al., 2024)</ref>, or cells with adsorbed Fe 3+ aq <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2017)</ref>, in the anoxic portion of the water column. In all cases, these heavy isotopic signatures would be diluted by unfractionated carbonates and vivianite. Delivery of magnetite to the sediment-water interface <ref type="bibr">(Lascu et al., 2012)</ref> offers a means to transfer isotopically heavy ferric Fe precipitated in Layer (II) downward to Layer (III), as might the sinking of mixed-valence green rust <ref type="bibr">(Zegeye et al., 2012)</ref>. Last, adsorption of Fe 2+ aq onto Fe 3+ -oxyhydroxide surfaces may protect ferric particles in the fully anoxic portion of the water column by rendering the Fe 3+ mineral surface inaccessible to DIR-operating bacteria and thus 'deactivating' these sinking minerals <ref type="bibr">(Roden and</ref><ref type="bibr">Urrutia, 1999, 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Royer et al., 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Friese et al., 2021)</ref>. Turbidity around 6 m depth is dramatically higher in August and overlaps with the SCML. The presence of abundant particulate organic matter may thus aid the export of ferric particulates deep into the water column. Physical settling rates may be higher where ferric particulates coagulate with sinking cellular material to increase particles size. Meanwhile, close associations of sinking Fe 3+ -oxyhydroxides with abundant particulate organic matter may promote partial microbial reduction and biomineralization of mixed-valence Fe phases like magnetite and green rust and the adsorption of Fe 2+ aq. All of those processes would decrease the observed &#916; 56 Fep-d within Layer (II) but, conversely, increase the survivability of sinking partially ferric precipitates, matching our observations of particulate Fe isotopic variability in August.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.3.">Impacts of Ice Cover and Winter Mixing on Fe Cycling</head><p>The water column sampled in March 2023 has distinct geochemical profiles compared to May and August 2022 (Figs. <ref type="figure">2</ref>, <ref type="figure">3</ref>), with features attributable to the effects of ice cover, and vertical mixing above 12 m driven by thermocline collapse <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. Ice cover should inhibit atmospheric exchange, driving shallowing of the oxycline to 2.5 m and lower dO2 in surface waters (Fig. <ref type="figure">2L</ref>); impose light limitation on photosynthetic biomass and dO2 production; and shut down lithogenic particle delivery from atmospheric dust (Fig. <ref type="figure">7B</ref>). These factors result in elevated dFe in surface waters compared to May and August 2022 (Fig. <ref type="figure">3G</ref>) and larger negative &#916; 56 Fep-d values (Fig. <ref type="figure">7</ref>).</p><p>The water column between the oxycline and the chemocline has a distinct geochemistry in March. A sharp increase in dFe beneath the shallowed oxycline reflects the restriction of strong biological and oxidative Fe 2+ aq removal to depths shallower than 3 m (Fig. <ref type="figure">3G</ref>). At 3 m, &#916; 56 Fep-d = 0.19 &#8240; (Fig. <ref type="figure">3H</ref>), which may reflect offsetting effects of isotopically heavier Fe 3+ precipitates and isotopically light biological material forming in the same depth range. Dissolved &#948; 56 Fe does not reach values lower than -0.85 &#8240; at the base of the oxycline, suggesting less extensive oxidation of Fe 2+ aq in March due to lower dO2 (Fig. <ref type="figure">2L</ref>).</p><p>At greater depths in the March Layer (II), dFe plateaus at levels 10 times lower than those observed in the same layer in ice-free seasons and remains at these lower levels to as deep as ~10 m, beneath which it increases sharply to seasonally stable dFe levels beneath the chemocline (Fig. <ref type="figure">3G</ref>). March d&#948; 56 Fe profiles between 3 and 10 m depth show muted variation, with values between -0.99 &#8240; at 9 m depth -0.71 &#8240; at 4.5 m depth (Fig. <ref type="figure">3H</ref>). Particulate Fe concentrations are an order of magnitude lower in March throughout this section of the water column than during May and August, while &#916; 56 Fep-d varies in a narrow range from 0.42-0.58 &#8240; (Figs. <ref type="figure">3G-H</ref>).</p><p>Similarly, dMn/dFe in this depth range shows muted variation over a factor of less than 4, with pMn/pFe values that are consistently 0.2 to 0.3 times the dissolved value (Fig <ref type="figure">3I</ref>). These data collectively suggest that the Layer (II) water column establishes a new configuration during winter with a stable particulate formation regime defined by low fractions of dFe precipitation, &#916; 56 Fep-d of ~0.5 &#8240;, and modest depletion of pMn/pFe (Figs. <ref type="figure">3</ref>, <ref type="figure">9</ref>).</p><p>Physical processes can provide the best explanation for the reconfigured water column Fe chemistry in March. During cooling of surface waters beginning in late fall, Deming Lake becomes isothermal and loses its thermal stratification, undergoing vertical mixing of the epilimnion and metalimnion <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023)</ref>. The monimolimnion waters are denser with much higher dissolved loads and thus resist this mixing. The result of vertical mixing should be to homogenize the upper ~10 m of a 'late summer' water column that would roughly resemble the ice-free May to August 2022 water columns (Fig. <ref type="figure">12</ref>). This would mix low dFe, near-zero d&#948; 56 Fe Layer (I)</p><p>waters containing some O2, with anoxic Layer (II) waters featuring highly variable Fe chemistry but generally higher dFe and more negative d&#948; 56 Fe. Within the upper few meters of this homogenized water column, limited extents of Fe 2+ aq oxidation and biological Fe uptake would subsequently be superimposed on the new chemical profile.</p><p>To test this hypothesis of vertical homogenization of a late summer water column above the chemocline, we estimate column-averaged May and August dFe and d&#948; 56 Fe values in the lake volume above 10 m depth using numerical integration as in Section 5.1. For May, the columnaveraged values for dissolved dFe (dFecol) and d&#948; 56 Fe (d&#948; 56 Fecol) above 10 m are 762 &#956;g/L and -0.86 &#8240;, respectively, and for August, dFecol = 980 &#956;g/L and d&#948; 56 Fecol = -0.81 &#8240; (Figs. <ref type="figure">12A-B</ref>). These values compare favorably with the range of dFe and d&#948; 56 Fe in the March water column (Fig. <ref type="figure">12A</ref>). Calculating the same total column averages above 10 m for March would produce dFecol = 570 &#956;g/L and d&#948; 56 Fecol = -0.81 &#8240;. The lower dFecol value suggests some net removal of dFe, likely in the upper few meters of the water column through Fe 3+ oxyhydroxide precipitation and cellular Fe uptake after more Fe-rich waters were mixed upward. Removal of the requisite 192-410 &#956;g/L over the upper 9 m of water depth by particle formation, sinking, and redissolution below the chemocline would create no detectable change in dissolved dFe in Layer (III).</p><p>An apparent ~2.5 m-high perturbation centered around 5.5 m depth with higher dFe (by ~100-150 &#956;g/L or ~20%) and d&#948; 56 Fe (by ~0.10 &#8240;) and lower dMn/dFe (by ~0.6 mol/mol) relative to over-and underlying waters (Figs. <ref type="figure">3G-I</ref>) is not explained by this vertical homogenization process.</p><p>This feature cannot reflect the breakdown of sinking particulate Fe, as pFe is uniformly low (&lt;20 &#956;g/L), and p&#948; 56 Fe is higher at 5.5 m than in overlying waters <ref type="bibr">(Fig 3G)</ref>. We suggest instead that this water column feature reflects a depth interval of enhanced Fe input from the lakebed. Such an input flux would need to have higher dFe and d&#948; 56 Fe and lower dMn/dFe than 'in situ' waters at this depth in the lake water column. A supply of dFe to the water column at this depth that is only evident during winter months may derive from reductive dissolution of sediments on the lakebed.</p><p>In May and August, peak Fe 3+ -oxyhydroxide precipitation occurs at 6 to 6.5 m depth <ref type="bibr">(Figs. 3,</ref><ref type="bibr">8)</ref>.</p><p>Sediments formed from water column particles precipitated around this depth contain abundant isotopically heavy, reducible Fe with low Mn/Fe, and may seasonally undergo reductive dissolution (driven by microbial DIR) when the oxycline migrates to above these depths during winter. A ~15-25 % contribution of dFe from quantitative dissolution of Fe 3+ oxyhydroxide sediment with &#948; 56 Fe = 0 to 0.5 &#8240; can account for the ~0.1 &#8240; positive shift in d&#948; 56 Fe within this depth region of slightly elevated dFe.</p><p>Iron particle formation in the March mid-depth water column is muted, with pFe several times lower than that seen in Layer (II) in May and August (Fig. <ref type="figure">3G</ref>). This limited particle formation is associated with &#916; 56 Fep-d ~0.5 &#8240; (Figs. <ref type="figure">3H</ref>, <ref type="figure">9</ref>). Given the lack of significant atmospheric O2 penetration, these muted fractionations deeper in the water column likely reflect the formation of a mixed-valence Fe phase where isotopically heavy Fe 3+ is diluted by unfractionated Fe 2+ . These mixed valence phases may include green rust, magnetite, or ferric-ferrous amorphous phosphates observed to form in other ferruginous water columns <ref type="bibr">(Zegeye et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cosmidis et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bauer et al., 2020)</ref> that were inferred to form deeper in Layer (II) in August. Particulate Fe/P ratios &lt;1 mol/mol in the March mid-depth water column (Fig. <ref type="figure">10F</ref>) support that an amorphous (mixedvalence) Fe phosphate could be a significant pFe carrier, but vivianite is undersaturated at these depths.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.4.">Sedimentary Outputs, Residence Time, and Recycling of Iron in Deming Lake</head><p>Deming Lake sediments sampled between 1 and 16.5 m water depth are far more uniform in their chemistry and &#948; 56 Fe than the particulates forming in the overlying water column (Fig. <ref type="figure">6</ref>).</p><p>Based on the observation that sediments between 1 and 12 m depth feature &#948; 56 Fe values indistinguishable from the bulk upper continental crust (UCC) value of 0.09 to 0.12 &#8240; <ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">X.-M. Liu et al., 2022)</ref>, with Fe/Al and Mn/Fe ratios within &#177; 20 % and a factor of two of the UCC estimates, respectively (Fe/AlUCC = 0.21 mol/mol, Mn/FeUCC = 0.017 mol/mol; <ref type="bibr">Taylor and McLennan, 1995)</ref>, any contribution of authigenic Fe to the bulk sediment is likely minor. At 14 and 16.5 m depth, Fe/Al in the lake sediments (0.43-0.47 mol/mol) is slightly more than double the UCC value and Mn/Fe (0.057 mol/mol) is more than three times the UCC value, while &#948; 56 Fe values are slightly lower than the 1 to 12 m sediment values and UCC value, at 0.00 &#177; 0.049 &#8240; and 0.038 &#177; 0.049 &#8240;. We estimate the authigenic Fe fraction in the 14-16 m sediment to be ~0.53 (Table <ref type="table">S5</ref>). The implied ~1:1 mixture of crustal-like (&#948; 56 Fe = 0.1 &#8240;) Fe, and authigenic Fe from Layer (III) (with &#948; 56 Fe = -0.30 to 0.03 &#8240;) would reproduce the &#948; 56 Fe values of the 14 and 16 m sediments provided that slightly higher &#948; 56 Fe August water column particles contribute part of the sedimentary Fe budget at this depth. Our conclusions would not change qualitatively if we instead compared sedimentary values to local lithogenic sources best represented by the MN till samples CSS-43 and WAD-25, with Fe/Al = 0.29 mol/mol and Mn/Fe = 0.022 mol/mol <ref type="bibr">(Wittkop et al., 2020a)</ref>.</p><p>Overall, our data suggest that some particulate authigenic Fe formed in the water column below 12 m depth survives sedimentary burial, while little particulate Fe survives burial at shallower depths in the lake. Across all seasons and depths, water column pFe/pAl ranges from 1.1 to 60 mol/mol, with values generally increasing with depth, pFe, and from May (most lithogenic input)</p><p>to March (least lithogenic input; Fig. <ref type="figure">6D</ref>, Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>). Particulate Fe/Al is always &gt;10 mol/mol in Layer (III). Therefore, Deming Lake bottom sediments with Fe/Al ~0.20 mol/mol are depleted in Fe by more than 6 times, but often upwards of 100 times, relative to suspended particles.</p><p>Sedimentary Fe/Al is also more than three times lower than the inferred atmospheric lithogenic source sampled from the ice core with Fe/Al = 0.74 mol/mol (Fig. <ref type="figure">6D</ref>). The crustal &#948; 56 Fe signature of Deming Lake bottom sediments deposited above 12 m water depth therefore likely reflects the survival solely of unreactive lithogenic minerals.</p><p>High organic carbon burial in Deming Lake <ref type="bibr">(Lascu et al., 2012)</ref> should promote efficient reductive dissolution of Fe 3+ -bearing minerals deposited on the lakebed. Meanwhile, aerobic respiration of cyanobacterial organic matter in Layer (I) would release cell-bound Fe back into the water column and prevent accumulation of isotopically light biogenic Fe in sediments in the upper ~6 m of the lake. These two processes appear to occur withing the upper ~1 cm of the sediment, because &#948; 56 Fe values of 1 cm intervals between 0 and 7 cm depth in the sediment pile obtained via the push core at 4 m lake depth are uniform and crustal (Fig. <ref type="figure">6A</ref>). Authigenic Fe enrichments only survive in sediments deposited well below the chemocline where we interpret that pFe is dominated by ferrous minerals such as vivianite and Fe bearing carbonates. These minerals should more easily survive burial under reducing conditions alongside organic matter. In support of the survival and significant contribution of vivianite to the authigenic Fe sedimentary load, the 14-16.5 m sediments contain approximately 1600 &#956;g/g of P, more than two times the average P concentration of 740 &#956;g/g we observed in sediments formed at 1-12 m depth. As reduced phases precipitated in Layer (III) appear to be the dominant removal flux of Fe from the lake, the net removal flux should have an &#948; 56 Fe value of -0.30 to -0.20 &#8240; (or perhaps up to 0.03 &#8240;, as observed in August) similar to particles sampled beneath 12 m water depth. This &#948; 56 Fe for the removal flux overlaps with the d&#948; 56 Fe values for waters from Elk Spring inferred to be the most plausible source of Fe to Deming Lake (Section 5.1).</p><p>The total flux of authigenic Fe is quantifiable for sediments deposited at 14 and 16 m depth, because Fe/Al ratios are significantly higher than the UCC value (Fig. <ref type="figure">6D</ref>), and 210 Pb-and 14 Cderived sedimentary accumulation rates are available for the deepest part of the lake <ref type="bibr">(Lascu et al., 2012)</ref>. Dry sediment mass accumulation rates in the deepest part of Deming Lake over the last several decades are approximately 20-50 mg/cm 2 /yr. We calculate the average authigenic Fe concentration in these sediments, after correcting for detrital Fe using the measured Al concentration and the published Fe/Al of the UCC <ref type="bibr">(Taylor and McLennan, 1995)</ref>, to be 1.77 wt%.</p><p>We thus estimate an authigenic Fe burial rate below 12 m depth of 0.35-0.89 mg Fe/cm 2 /yr. A ~6.3 &#215; 10 7 cm 2 area of the lake floor underlies water of at least 12 m, giving a total authigenic Fe burial rate of ~2.2-5.5 &#215; 10 4 g Fe/yr. As the majority of authigenic Fe burial in sediments appears to take place below 12 m depth, we take this value to be a conservative estimate for the authigenic Fe burial rate of the entire lake. For comparison, we estimated above in Section 5.1 that atmospheric surficial inputs may have delivered ~2 &#215; 10 3 g Fe/yr. Even accounting for seasonal variations in atmospheric Fe fluxes, this input flux is more than an order of magnitude lower than the conservative lower limit for the mass of authigenic Fe accumulating in deep lake sediments. This underlines that the dominant supplies of Fe to support high dFe and authigenic mineral accumulation at depth must be from subsurface groundwater fluxes that are large relative to the eolian flux.</p><p>Using the numerical integration described above, we estimate that the column-averaged, volume-weighted dissolved dFe for Deming Lake is 13-15 mg/L, and thus the total dissolved Fe load in the lake is 2.9-3.6&#215;10 6 g Fe. Assuming that authigenic burial below 12 m depth is the dominant output of Fe, we calculate a residence time of 55 to 148 years for Fe in Deming Lake.</p><p>These residence times are approximately 200-600 times longer than the estimated water residence time of the lake (~90 days; <ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>. This scaling factor between water and Fe residence times is considerably higher than estimates for another ferruginous meromictic lake, in Canada, studied by <ref type="bibr">Campbell and Torgersen (1980)</ref>. They found an Fe residence time that was 4-5 times longer than that of lake water and conservative cations like Ca and K. Qualitatively, the elongated residence time of Fe in Deming Lake offers an explanation for why the water column dissolved dFe/dCa is more than an order of magnitude greater than the geochemically closest matching groundwater input of Elk Spring (Section 5.1). As recognized by <ref type="bibr">Campbell and Torgersen (1980)</ref>, effective redox cycling takes place between Fe 2+ aq, which is oxidized upon upward approach to the oxycline, and reductive dissolution of sinking Fe 3+ oxyhydroxide particles.</p><p>Through cycling in this 'ferrous wheel', the same Fe can be retained in the water column for longer periods of time than conservative elements.</p><p>Because we see only limited net authigenic Fe sedimentation through formation of stable ferrous mineral phases deep in the anoxic monimolimnion, but groundwater recharge in the lake is vigorous <ref type="bibr">(Swanner et al., 2023a)</ref>, it is possible that an additional, or even dominant output flux of Fe from Deming Lake via groundwater outflow exists. In this scenario, Deming Lake itself could be acting as a pass-through for groundwater flow within permeable tunnel valley channel deposits that connect it to neighboring Arco and Josephine Lakes. In such a case, the relative enrichment of dFe/dCa in the Deming Lake water column compared to groundwater sources may provide another means to estimate the Fe residence time relative to the Ca residence time (equivalent to the water residence time). This would imply an Fe residence time of ~8 years ([dFe/dCa]lake/[dFe/dCa]Elk Spring &#215; 90 days). Coincidentally, a groundwater removal flux would likely have the same &#948; 56 Fe as the major sedimentary removal flux to Layer (III) authigenic sediments, because the majority of the dissolved Fe pool in Deming Lake resides in waters below 12 m depth that are extremely Fe rich and impacted solely by precipitation of particles that are unfractionated with respect to &#948; 56 Fe.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.5.">Lessons from Deming Lake as an Ancient Ocean Analog</head><p>The chemistry and Fe isotopic compositions of Deming Lake sediments suggest limited survival of Fe 3+ -bearing authigenic Fe precipitates through burial, most likely due to the extremely high sedimentary organic carbon contents <ref type="bibr">(Lascu et al., 2012)</ref>. The Deming Lake sedimentary record is thus a poor analog for Fe-rich, organic poor chemical sediments such as IFs formed in ancient ferruginous oceans. However, following the widely held assumption that chemical sediments like IFs are archives of mineral precipitation processes occurring in the water column <ref type="bibr">(Konhauser et al., 2017)</ref>, it is possible that the dynamic cycling of Fe between dissolved and particulate pools in Deming Lake may still provide insight into the primary mineral precipitation processes that drove deposition of ancient ferruginous chemical sediments.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.5.1.">Implications for Fe Isotope Records of Sturtian Glacial Iron Formations</head><p>The most significant example of an ice-covered ferruginous water column in Earth history is the occurrence of synglacial IFs in sedimentary successions formed during the 717 to 661 Ma Sturtian glaciation <ref type="bibr">(Macdonald et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rooney et al., 2020)</ref>, the first Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth episode. Sturtian IF deposition is generally accepted to have been driven by the oxidation of ferruginous deep seawater established in snowball oceans through a lack of extensive ocean-atmosphere exchange, and Fe-rich, S-poor hydrothermal venting imposed by a depleted marine sulfate pool and lower mid-ocean-ridge overpressure <ref type="bibr">(Kirschvink, 1992;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kump and Seyfried, 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ilyin, 2009;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hoffman et al., 2017)</ref>. It has been argued that Fe 2+ aq oxidation near the continents was driven by the delivery of atmospheric O2 beneath ice sheets, either into the surface ocean via atmospheric gas trapped in bubbles, or via meltwater streams at the grounding lines of glaciers <ref type="bibr">(Lechte and Wallace, 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Busigny et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lechte et al., 2019)</ref>. All Sturtian IFs are characterized by variable &#948; 56 Fe values, extending to extremely positive values up to 2.7 &#8240; <ref type="bibr">(Halverson et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cox et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Busigny et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lechte et al., 2019)</ref>. These values approach the theoretical equilibrium fractionation between Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ and have generally been interpreted to reflect low-degree partial oxidation under O2-limited conditions.</p><p>The muted &#916; 56 Fep-d range observed in the ice-covered March water column (Figs. 3H, 9) in Deming Lake suggests that this system does not represent a good analog for ferruginous snowball oceans, despite superficial similarities. Apparently, the ice-covered water column conditions at Deming Lake, extremely depleted in O2, are unconducive to the precipitation of purely ferric minerals with strongly positive &#948; 56 Fe. In contrast, we observe large positive &#916; 56 Fep-d values in Layer (II) of the ice-free water columns of May and August, even in deeper waters where dFe is still in the mg/L range (Figs. 3, 9). The distinguishing feature of these water columns is the presence of an overlying, effectively infinite O2-rich layer that enables the precipitation of enough isotopically heavy Fe 3+ for this to be the dominant particulate phase. Qualitatively, our observations from Deming Lake support interpretations that isotopically heavy Sturtian IFs formed at redox gradients where Fe 2+ aq oxidation dominated the total particulate Fe export to the seafloor. This dominant export of isotopically heavy Fe 3+ -bearing precipitates may either indicate that deep-water Fe 2+ aq concentrations were too low for mixed valence mineral precipitation or Fe 2+ aq adsorption to be significant, and/or that oxidants were sufficiently abundant for Fe 3+ oxidation products to dominate the overall particulate Fe pool. In practical terms this constraint favors a concentrated and potentially open system delivery of oxidants that could maintain Fe 3+ production during sustained upwelling of Fe 2+ -rich ocean waters. This favors oxidant supplies from subglacial streams at grounding lines or via atmospheric exchange in patches of ice-free open ocean, and disfavors models that feature a diffuse, closed system input of O2 from air bubbles in the underside of marine ice sheets (Lechte and Wallace, 2016; Busigny et al., 2018; Lechte et al., 2019). It is worth noting that while reaction-transport models simulating the latter scenario can reproduce Sturtian IF &#948; 56 Fe at sub-nanomolar dO2 (Busigny et al., 2018), these models are not able to consider the isotopic consequences of such small Fe 3+ precipitation fluxes in a stillferruginous water column where subsequent mixed-valence mineral formation and Fe 2+ aq</p><p>adsorption can take place (Fig. <ref type="figure">9</ref>). Regardless of the source of oxidants, preservation of elevated &#948; 56 Fe in Sturtian IFs must have required organic poor conditions in the water column and sediments, in contrast to the abundance of water column and sedimentary organic carbon in Deming Lake <ref type="bibr">(Lascu et al., 2012)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.5.2.">Implications for Archean-Paleoproterozoic IF Depositional Processes</head><p>The canonical model for IF deposition prior to the Great Oxidation Event (GOE) ~2.4 Ga ago involves the oxidation of Fe 2+ aq and precipitation of Fe 3+ -oxyhydroxide mineral precursors that underwent diagenetic transformations and later metamorphism to produce the assemblage of ferric and ferrous minerals observed in IFs today. In this model, Fe oxidation in the water column was driven by some combination of cyanobacterial O2 <ref type="bibr">(Cloud, 1973)</ref>, anoxygenic photoferrotrophy <ref type="bibr">(Konhauser et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kappler et al., 2005)</ref>, and UV photo-oxidation <ref type="bibr">(Braterman et al., 1983;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fran&#231;ois, 1986;</ref><ref type="bibr">Nie et al., 2017)</ref>. The Fe isotopic record of IFs has generally been interpreted in the context of the large (1-3 &#8240;) fractionation that imparts positive &#948; 56 Fe signatures to Fe 3+</p><p>precipitates formed via any of these processes <ref type="bibr">(Dauphas et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard and Dauphas, 2020)</ref>.</p><p>A similarly large range in &#948; 56 Fe values of Fe rich carbonates in IFs is generally explained in the context of this model through closed-system diagenetic transfer of Fe from Fe 3+ precipitates to carbonates forming in the Archean-Paleoproterozoic sediment pile following microbial DIR <ref type="bibr">(Heimann et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Craddock and Dauphas, 2011a)</ref>. However, more recently <ref type="bibr">Siahi et al. (2020)</ref>, motivated by observations of primary Fe and Mn-bearing carbonate precipitation in the water columns of ferruginous lakes <ref type="bibr">(Lambrecht et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vuillemin et al., 2020</ref><ref type="bibr">Vuillemin et al., , 2022;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wittkop et al., 2020b)</ref>, proposed that the carbonate-dominated 2.43 Ga Griquatown IF, South Africa, may have formed through water-column precipitation of the Fe-rich carbonates siderite and ankerite. Based A test for any model for the genesis of variably carbonate-rich IFs should be its ability to reproduce negative log-linear correlations of Mn/Fe vs. &#948; 56 Fe, which are widely observed in the largest early Paleoproterozoic IF successions of South Africa and Western Australia (Fig. <ref type="figure">13</ref>; <ref type="bibr">Haugaard et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kurzweil et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lantink et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Thibon et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tsikos et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2023)</ref>. In the canonical model, these relationships are interpreted in the context of a Rayleigh distillation-type evolution of an upwelling water mass on the margins of an IF-depositing basin, where the removal of Mn poor, high &#948; 56 Fe Fe 3+ oxyhydroxides produces progressively higher dMn/dFe, lower d&#948; 56 Fe water masses from which subsequent ferric precipitates formed <ref type="bibr">(Kurzweil et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Thibon et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Nie et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard et al., 2022)</ref>. The enclosed nature of Deming Lake compared to a laterally extensive IF depositional basin complicates any direct analogy being drawn between the two. However, Deming Lake data can reveal whether instantaneous dissolved-particulate fractionation of Mn/Fe and &#948; 56 Fe in a ferruginous water column supports such a simple distillation model for early</p><p>Paleoproterozoic IF Mn/Fe vs. &#948; 56 Fe systematics (Fig. <ref type="figure">13</ref>).</p><p>Ferric oxyhydroxide formation in Layer (II) imparts a clear negative log-linear correlation in dMn/Fe vs. d&#948; 56 Fe (Fig. <ref type="figure">13A-D</ref>). This is consistent with the expectations for a distillation process driven by removal of isotopically heavy, low Mn/Fe particulates <ref type="bibr">(Nie et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Heard et al., 2022)</ref>. However, particulate data do not follow a complementary negative correlation in this space (Fig. <ref type="figure">13A-C</ref>; E). Therefore, correlations in the dissolved phase likely only reflect Fe removal, with limited partitioning of Mn into particulates leaving most Mn remaining in solution and not systematically tracking the evolution of dMn/dFe. Taken at face value, this is evidence against a simple Fe 3+ oxyhydroxide precursor as the driver of Mn/Fe vs. &#948; 56 Fe systematics in pre-GOE IFs.</p><p>values of &#952; 56/57 are apparently indistinguishable for O2 and UV oxidation, and both agree with the theoretical high-temperature equilibrium law <ref type="bibr">(Young et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dauphas and Schauble, 2016)</ref>, which suggests that regardless of abiotic oxidation mechanism, Fe 2+ aq and Fe 3+ precipitates produced during oxidation reach isotopic equilibrium.</p><p>It is unlikely that high-precision triple Fe isotope measurements will be able to identify the dominant oxidation mechanism involved in the deposition of pre-GOE IFs, if indeed they did form as oxide precipitates. However, two outstanding details need resolving before this proxy approach can be fully disregarded as a means to determine pre-GOE oxidation pathways. First, it will be imperative to conduct Fe 2+ aq oxidation experiments in photoferrotrophy cultures and make high precision &#1013;' 56 Fe vs. &#948;' 57 Fe measurements of the reactants and products, to confidently assert that this oxidation mechanism also follows the &#952; 56/57 for isotopic equilibrium. This result is expected, because of the similar &#948; 56 Fe systematics of previous photoferrotrophy experiments to the results of other oxidation pathways <ref type="bibr">(Croal et al., 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanner et al., 2015b)</ref>. Second, some of the most highly fractionated Fe isotope data for IFs that are observed to adhere to the equilibrium MFL <ref type="bibr">(Heard et al., 2020)</ref>, derive from Mn-rich deposits formed at the onset of the GOE or in earlier 'oxygen oases' <ref type="bibr">(Tsikos et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Planavsky et al., 2014)</ref>. Such samples are the most likely IFs to record the impact of O2-driven Fe 2+ aq oxidation. However, if other oxidation mechanisms were also important for the deposition of less Mn-rich IFs, and if extensive analysis of these more 'typical' IFs reveals any diversity in &#952; 56/57 values, this may be attributable to a distinct photoferrotrophy MFL, and, thus, a different formation pathway for IFs deposited at different times in Earth history <ref type="bibr">(Wang et al., 2023)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="6.">Conclusions</head><p>We present the Fe isotopic and selected chemical characteristics of sediments, putative sources, and seasonal dissolved and particulate phases from the water column of Deming Lake, a small ferruginous meromictic lake that undergoes seasonal surface freezing. Deming Lake is an endmember site to study Fe cycling in purely ferruginous conditions due to its negligible sulfur pool, making it an excellent natural laboratory for investigating water column and early diagenetic processes in a setting analogous to that which may have dominated the oceans for large swathes of Earth history.</p><p>Deming Lake is dominantly supplied its Fe by a groundwater source at depth and maintains a strong chemocline beneath 12 meters water depth. A Ca-Mg-carbonate-type groundwater is likely the dominant source of Fe to the lake, with locally accessible springs providing examples of waters with Fe isotopic and major dissolved elemental ratios that are a good match for the groundwater source to Deming Lake. Modest eolian inputs at its surface deliver a few percent of the total Fe burial flux at depth on an annual basis.</p><p>Under ice-free conditions, Deming Lake features a ~6 meter deep oxic surface layer, with a subsurface chlorophyll maximum layer residing around the oxycline. Within the upper oxic layer, the dissolved Fe pool is low in concentration and isotopically heavy relative to particles, reflecting the uptake of isotopically light dissolved Fe into particulate biomass with seasonally variable additions of eolian lithogenic material. Deeper, Fe-rich waters in the Deming Lake water column are rapidly depleted in dFe and d&#948; 56 Fe by oxidation on approach to the oxycline and removal to an Despite large Fe isotopic fractionations between dissolved Fe and sinking particles in the Deming Lake water column, authigenic Fe enrichments only survive in lake floor sediments deposited below &gt;12 m water depth. This is likely a result of the high organic burial rates in Deming Lake that enable effective DIR of Fe 3+ -bearing authigenic precipitates deposited above the chemocline. We estimate that the annual authigenic Fe burial flux on the Deming Lake floor underlying water depths of &gt;12 m is more than an order of magnitude greater than the lithogenic input flux of Fe at the lake surface, necessitating a dominant Fe source from groundwater. Using this Fe output flux, we estimate a water column residence time of dissolved Fe in the lake of between 50 and 150 years.</p><p>Fractionations in &#948; 56 Fe and Mn/Fe between dissolved and particulate pools in the Deming Lake water column can provide insights on the origin of organic-poor iron formations from different episodes in the Precambrian. By comparison with particulate &#948; 56 Fe systematics near the oxycline in ice-free and ice-covered water columns at Deming Lake, we suggest that isotopically heavy IF deposited during the Sturtian Snowball Earth glaciation must have formed in the presence of sufficient oxidants to prevent mixed-valence Fe particle formation under high dissolved Fe 2+ conditions. Meanwhile, through a comparison of dissolved and particulate systematics in Deming Lake with extensive early Paleoproterozoic IFs formed shortly before the GOE in South Africa and Western Australia, we suggest that simultaneous burial of more than one authigenic Fe phase is required to explain negative &#948; 56 Fe vs. Mn/Fe trends observed in these IFs.     56 Fe values are parts per 10,000 deviations in 56 Fe/ 54 Fe from the expected value of the high-temperature limit equilibrium mass fractionation law passing through the origin. The slope for the Deming Lake water column mass fractionation array is within error of the high temperature limit equilibrium law and previous determinations of the mass fractionation law for syn-GOE Mn-rich IFs, and laboratory UV photooxidation. Iron isotopic compositions of dissolved (filled symbols) and particulate (open symbols) fractions vs. the fraction of total Fe (dissolved + particulate) in Layer (I). Difference in &#948; 56 Fe between dissolved and particulate are not simply explained by variable degrees of particulate uptake with a constant fractionation factor. B: Iron isotopic fractionation between particulate and dissolved Fe (&#916; 56 Fep-d) vs. total Fe:Al ratio in Layer (I). Most variation in &#916; 56 Fep-d in Layer (I) appears to be explainable with dilution of a large biologically induced negative fractionation effect by addition of lithogenic material with &#948; 56 Fe &#8776; 0 &#8240; to both the dissolved and particulate Fe pools. Lithogenic addition is most pronounced in May 2022 and least pronounced in March 2023 when the lake surface is under ice cover.  define strong negative log-linear correlations consistent with removal of isotopically heavy Fe to particles with little removal of Mn, roughly replicating the systematics seen in pre-or syn-GOE IFs (small grey circles). Particulate phases show no systematic Ln(Mn/Fe) vs. &#948; 56 Fe behaviors, with Layer (III) samples falling close to dissolved values and Layer (II) samples being consistently more positive in &#948; 56 Fe but showing no uniform behavior in Mn/Fe fractionation (E), and thus not effectively replicating trends seen in pre-or syn-GOE IFs (small grey circles). In the context of these results, we suggest that well developed negative Ln(Mn/Fe) vs. &#948; 56 Fe trends in several distinct IFs shortly pre-or syn-dating the GOE (F) are unlikely to reflect simple one-phase deposition of oxide precipitates following a Raleigh distillation-type behavior, and may require simultaneous formation of more than one Fe-bearing phase in the early Paleoproterozoic water column. Note that A-E are plotted against the same axis scales while F features a different axis scale. All IF data are from previous publications <ref type="bibr">(Haugaard et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kurzweil et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lantink et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Thibon et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tsikos et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2023)</ref>.</p></div></body>
		</text>
</TEI>
