<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Geology, microstratigraphy, and paleontology of the lacustrine Truckee Formation diatomite deposits near Hazen, Nevada, USA, with emphasis on fossil stickleback fish</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>University of California Museum of Paleontology</publisher>
				<date>05/08/2024</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10558893</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.5070/P941161500</idno>
					<title level='j'>PaleoBios</title>
<idno>0031-0298</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">41</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>					

					<author>Jacopo Niccolò Cerasoni</author><author>Michael A Bell</author><author>Yoel E Stuart</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[Varved lacustrine diatomite deposits of the Truckee Formation near Hazen, Nevada, are of Miocene age (ca. 10.3 million years old). They are exposed in several commercial mines and have been a productive source of stickleback fish fossils (Gasterosteus doryssus) spanning over 100,000 years of deposition. The evolutionary sequence of G. doryssus has revealed stasis, rapid morphological change, genetic evolution, and local extinction against a background of changing diatom communities and lake environments. Here, we draw on published geological, paleolimnological, and vertebrate paleontological data to summarize the geographic and paleontological context of the Hazen diatomite deposits. We include a geomorphological map of the study region as well as a stratigraphic section from a key stickleback quarry describing lithology and specimen frequency at 1 mm and 1 cm resolutions, respectively. This paper should help researchers identify patterns in the distribution of fossil sites on the landscape and better understand the geological processes that have shaped the area, spurring new sampling and future research.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>INTRODUCTION</head><p>Diatomite is a sedimentary rock composed mostly of silicious frustules (shells) of aquatic unicellular algae called diatoms <ref type="bibr">(Dodd 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dejardin 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bradley 2015)</ref>. Diatom shells accumulate on ocean and lake bottoms after death. Diatomite deposits can therefore reveal long, uninterrupted geological records of ancient aquatic ecosystems with high resolution <ref type="bibr">(Schindel 1982)</ref>. The Hazen diatomite deposits, located in west central Nevada near the towns of Hazen and Fernley, are one such accumulation. They are estimated to be up to 90 m thick and cover an area of approximately 39 km 2 (Houseman 2004). They are located within the Lahontan Basin, which contained both the Miocene Lake Truckee <ref type="bibr">(Krebs et al. 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cousens et al. 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cohen et al. 2013</ref>) and the Pleistocene Lake Lahontan.</p><p>Diatomite is often composed of continuously deposited, layered couplets (i.e., varves) formed from diatom shells laid down during the growing season alternating with dark silt deposited between growing seasons. In the Hazen deposit described here, these couplets form annual layers that are about 0.3 mm thick, usually undisturbed by burrowing organisms (i.e., bioturbation) or turbulence. Thus, varves allow the conversion of stratigraphic distance to years <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 2006a)</ref>, resolving specimen time of deposition to as fine as single years <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 1987</ref><ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. , 1989))</ref>.</p><p>Hazen diatomite has been mined since the early 1900s for industrial applications including filter media, insulation, fire retardant, filler, and abrasives <ref type="bibr">(Houseman 2004)</ref>. The Hazen mines are notable to paleobiologists because commercial diatomite mining in multiple quarries has exposed six sections (here called A-F; Table <ref type="table">1</ref>) containing well preserved fossil vertebrates, including a sequence of a fossil stickleback fish, Gasterosteus doryssus (Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). A seventh quarry, G, contains stickleback but was naturally exposed. The stickleback are abundant, well-preserved, and nearly continuously distributed throughout most sections in multiple quarries (Appendix; Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). In particular, more than 108,000 years of stickleback deposition is exposed within Quarry D, where stickleback have been studied since 1974 (reviewed in <ref type="bibr">Bell 2009)</ref>. These works revealed long-term evolutionary stasis and change <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 1985)</ref>, evidence of directional natural selection <ref type="bibr">(Hunt et al. 2008)</ref>, allometric evolution <ref type="bibr">(Voje et al. 2022)</ref>, and the genetics of adaptation <ref type="bibr">(Stuart et al. 2020)</ref>, all within the context of a changing paleoecology <ref type="bibr">(Purnell et al. 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dejardin 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cerasoni et al. 2023)</ref>. The fossil series is the focus of our ongoing studies on the  <ref type="table">1</ref> for central coordinates). Note that previously reported coordinates of Quarries A-D were visually confirmed against satellite imagery. Quarries E-G could not be confirmed via satellite imagery and are based solely on <ref type="bibr">Brown (1987)</ref>. The solid-lined red rectangle shows the coverage of panel two. Panel 2. Enlargement of the area around quarries B (black solid line) and D (red dotted line). evolution of reproductive isolation, sexual dimorphism, adaptive walks, ecological change, and the tempo and mode of evolution.</p><p>In this paper, we present a geomorphological map (Appendix), document the approximate locations and</p><p>Quarry Latitude Longitude A 39.564 -119.112 B 39.520 -119.100 C 39.515 -119.077 D 39.526 -119.098 E 39.507 -119.115 F 39.514 -119.120 G 39.507 -119.096 Table <ref type="table">1</ref>. Central coordinates for quarries (A-G) at Hazen diatomite deposits derived from reports <ref type="bibr">(Brown 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Houseman 2004</ref>) and field triangulation using a USGS Two Tips, Nev. 1957 topographic map. All coordinates were recorded using map datum WGS84. relative ages of quarries, and review previous research on fossil vertebrates from the Hazen diatomite quarries within the Middle Member of the Truckee Formation <ref type="bibr">(Axelrod 1957;</ref><ref type="bibr">Houseman 2004</ref>) (Figs. <ref type="figure">1</ref><ref type="figure">2</ref><ref type="figure">3</ref><ref type="figure">4</ref>). The main sections of the map are 1) political and topographical information; 2) geology, including geomorphological, paleolimnological, and elevation data, as well as human structures (e.g., roads, canals, etc.); 3) stratigraphy of Pit L in Quarry D, the upper section of Quarry D with the most dynamic stickleback change <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 2006a;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hunt et al. 2008</ref>) (Figure <ref type="figure">5</ref>, Figure <ref type="figure">6</ref>, full map in Appendix).</p><p>The literature review includes observations on the geographic locations of Quarries D and E, a review of fossils from the quarries, and observations on taphonomic and paleoenvironmental conditions of the stickleback fossil assemblages.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>MATERIALS AND METHODS</head><p>We compiled information from MAB's field notes and field stratigraphic measurements, as well as geological studies and maps <ref type="bibr">(Brown 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Houseman 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">NBMG Open Data, 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">OpenStreetMap, 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">USGS, 2023)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Geomorphological Map</head><p>The full map is available in the Appendix and is a combination of the geomorphological map of the local region (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>) and the stratigraphical section for Pit L in Quarry (Fig. <ref type="figure">6</ref>).</p><p>To produce the geomorphological map we used QGIS 3. <ref type="bibr">22.16 (2023)</ref> to generate a low-resolution regional map with data from Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology (NBMG Open Data 2023) and USGS databases (USGS 2023). Then we built a contour map extrapolated from USGS Eros data (1:250000 scale) with the QGIS contour extraction function. We extrapolated the geolocated boundaries of the quarries from Figure <ref type="figure">2</ref> of <ref type="bibr">Houseman (2004)</ref> to generate a high-resolution geomorphological map for Quarries A-G (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>; Appendix).</p><p>We exported the map from QGIS as a georeferenced pdf file into Adobe Illustrator 2023. Using the Esri ArcGIS Maps for Adobe Creative Cloud workspace extension (accessed July 2023), we added human structures, political units, and other features (e.g., roads, canals, county boundaries, water bodies) with data from OpenStreet-Map (2023). The state-wide and study-area maps were created using ArcGIS Maps for Adobe Creative Cloud on Adobe Illustrator 2023. Esri Natural Earth (accessed July 2023) base vectors were used for both maps.</p><p>The photograph of the Gasterosteus doryssus specimen in the main map was taken by JNC using a Sony Alpha 7 IV camera and a Sony macro lens FE 90mm f/2.8-22 Macro G OSS (SEL90M28G). The image was post-processed in Adobe Photoshop 2023 using a healing brush tool to remove the sample identification numbers. The image of the fossil was not otherwise modified or manipulated.</p><p>quarries A through D were indeed close to white areas indicative of open surface mining, and we further confirmed them by reference to the topography, roads, and the shapes of the mined areas. The quarries assigned to A through D in figures 1 and 5 and the appendix as well as the coordinates given in Table <ref type="table">1</ref> are based on this visual confirmation of quarry locations. Quarries E, F, and G could not be verified via satellite, and so locations estimated by <ref type="bibr">Brown (1987)</ref> are presented (Table <ref type="table">1</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Quarry D, Pit L Stratigraphy</head><p>We used published information and MAB's original field notes and stratigraphic records <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al., 2006a;</ref><ref type="bibr">2009)</ref> to record geographic location and build the stratigraphic section for Pit L in Quarry D (Fig. <ref type="figure">6</ref>; Appendix). We relied on field measurements tied to field excavated lithological sections to avoid stratigraphical repetition and inversion. These records are available as metadata associated with collections of Gasterosteus doryssus in the University of California Museum of Paleontology</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Quarry Coordinate Locations</head><p>The geographic locations for quarries A through F were determined during a field survey by MAB and T. R. Haglund in 1978 and reported by <ref type="bibr">Bell et al. (1985</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. ( , 1987</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. ( , 1989) )</ref> and <ref type="bibr">Bell (1994</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell ( , 2009) )</ref> based on estimates by Haglund using triangulation with a Brunton Pocket Transit and a paper copy of the USGS Two Tips, <ref type="bibr">Nevada, 1957 topographic map (Haglund, pers. comm. to MAB)</ref>. Using the same methods F. H. Brown replicated Haglund's estimates and concluded that Haglund erred in coordinates for E and F <ref type="bibr">(Brown, pers. comm. to MAB)</ref>. Brown reported new coordinates for E and F, as well as coordinates for a new quarry, G <ref type="bibr">(Brown 1987)</ref>. In 2006, M. D. Shapiro used a GPS device to estimate the location of Pit L in Quarry D, and these coordinates were reported in <ref type="bibr">Bell et al. 2006a</ref> and subsequent papers.</p><p>We attempted to vet Brown's coordinates by comparing them against satellite imagery to visually confirm that the coordinates were centered in quarries. Inspection of modern satellite imagery (Figure <ref type="figure">1</ref>) revealed that (UCMP). The section starts from the upper measured surface (youngest; 0 cm), to the lowest and oldest layer (850 cm). The stratigraphic section includes lithology (rock type), which comprised mostly diatomite interrupted by thin to moderately thick (&lt;3 mm) layers of ashes (crystalline and glassy) and mudstone (Figure <ref type="figure">6</ref>). The stratigraphic section also includes a histogram with specimen counts for G. doryssus at a resolution of 1 mm (~2.9 years/mm based on varve counts). Finally, the star in the stratigraphy indicates the horizon where the low-armored stickleback that had dominated during the first ~93,000 years of quarry D was replaced by a high-armored form <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 1985</ref><ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. , 2006a;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell 2009)</ref>. This is associated with a temporary increase in lake level <ref type="bibr">(Houseman 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell 2009;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dejardin 2014)</ref>, with a subsequent water level reduction that was that associated with subsequent reduction in armor <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 2006a;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hunt et al. 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Stuart et al. 2020)</ref>. </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Institutional abbreviations LUC-Loyola</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>RESULTS</head><p>The main map (Appendix) shows the geomorphological context of the seven Hazen quarries (A-G; Figs. <ref type="figure">2</ref>,<ref type="figure">4</ref>). The quarries are located on the eastern slope of the Virginia Range between about 1340 m and 1400 m elevation on the margin of the Lahontan Basin. The modern landscape of the Lahontan Basin contains seasonally dry wetlands and deposits of Pleistocene Lake Lahontan (with which the Miocene Lake Truckee has sometimes been confused <ref type="bibr">[La Rivers 1994]</ref>). Modern vegetation on the slopes of the Virginia Range is desert scrub <ref type="bibr">(Olson et al. 2001)</ref>. Riparian woodlands along the Truckee River to the west and the Truckee Canal to the northeast are dominated by cottonwood (Populus fremonti) and willows (Salix spp.).</p><p>Regional geology is characterized by a mix of sedimentary (centric and pennate diatomite, with rare gravels possibly transported into the lake), clastic (of both volcanic and sedimentary origin), and volcanic (basalt, andesite) deposits <ref type="bibr">(Stewart and Perkins 1999)</ref>. The Hazen diatomite deposits are in a topographically complex basaltic setting, probably caused by the site's proximity to several volcanic centers <ref type="bibr">(Stewart 1980;</ref><ref type="bibr">Jayko and Bursik 2011)</ref>. These centers include the Virginia Range and the Stillwater Range to the east. Both ranges contain lava flows, ash deposits, and tuff. A series of faults formed among Miocene paleolake deposits within this area <ref type="bibr">(Brown 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Houseman 2004)</ref>, and between and within some of the quarries (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>). The tuffaceous and basaltic deposits shown in the regional map (Appendix) reveal faulting from volcanic activity.</p><p>The stratigraphy of Pit L (within Quarry D; Figs. <ref type="figure">5</ref> and <ref type="figure">6</ref>) is consistent with continuous diatom-dominated sedimentation. Quarry D has a composite stratigraphical thickness of over 50 m <ref type="bibr">(Brown 1987)</ref>. Some of the other quarries contain part of the stratigraphic section present in Quarry D (Quarries A, C, E, and G; Fig. <ref type="figure">7</ref>; <ref type="bibr">Brown 1987</ref>), but differences exist between the fossil assemblages at each quarry. For example, many more fossil plants were retrieved from Quarry E, presumably a near-shore area of the Miocene paleolake Truckee <ref type="bibr">(Bell 2009)</ref>. The variation observable between quarries suggests that the deposits exposed in quarries A-G are limnetic. Analysis of the layers within Pit L reveals varves representing short chronological formation periods, likely yearly formation following springtime blooms of algal mats <ref type="bibr">(Houseman 2004</ref>). These varved diatomite sequences are interrupted by sand-based, mud-based, and volcanic ash-based sediments, or a combination of them. Sometimes sediments are mixed with fossil diatoms.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Corrections and new interpretations for Quarries D and E</head><p>Quarry D</p><p>The coordinates for Quarry D were incorrectly estimated by T. R. Haglund in 1978 using triangulation. That is, the coordinates reported in <ref type="bibr">Bell and Haglund (1982)</ref> were 30.52417 N Latitude and 119.01083 W Longitude. These were taken from MAB's field notes, and "30 N" must have been a typo in <ref type="bibr">Bell and Haglund (1982)</ref>. This mistake was repeated in <ref type="bibr">Bell et al. (1985)</ref> but was subsequently corrected via GPS and reported in <ref type="bibr">Bell et al. (2006a)</ref> and subsequent papers.</p><p>Coarse red-to-yellow crystalline ashes heterogeneous in particle size are common throughout Quarry D. These ashes are useful for radioisotope dating and stratigraphic correlation. They were probably deposited most often by airfall and then settled through the water column. They were not transported into the quarry by water and therefore should not be called sandstones. Rare grey to brown mudstones were presumably transported from igneous surfaces by streams <ref type="bibr">(Houseman 2004)</ref>.</p><p>Quarry E The coordinates determined by T. R. Haglund in 1978 for Quarry E were also apparently incorrect (F. H. <ref type="bibr">Brown, pers. comm. to MAB 1988)</ref>. Haglund used Black Butte and other prominent topographic features and a Brunton Pocket Transit for triangulation and recorded the location of Quarry E on a hard copy of the 1957 USGS 1:62500 scale Two Tips, Nev. topographic map. In 1987, F. H. Brown repeated this procedure to estimate the location of Quarry E and marked his estimate of the location on the original paper map with an arrow from his to Haglund's location <ref type="bibr">(Brown, 1987)</ref>. We compared this marked map to the current digital map of the same area (USGS Hazen, NV 2014),to locate Quarry E and correct the coordinates ( Table <ref type="table">1</ref>).</p><p>The diatomite in Quarry E is more friable (i.e., more prone to erosion and displacement), and the laminations are thicker than elsewhere. The grey glassy ashes are very thick, indicating nearshore deposition (M. D. Houseman, pers. comm.) because they combine both airfall and ash transported into the depositional environment from the adjacent land. This nearshore interpretation is supported by the presence of abundant plant fossils <ref type="bibr">(Wilson 1980)</ref>.  <ref type="bibr">Brown (1987, fig. 4)</ref>. Correlations are based on <ref type="bibr">Brown's (1987, fig. 4</ref>) geochemical analyses of crystalline ashes. Note that the stratigraphic correlations of quarries E and G are based on geochemical analyses of crystalline ashes, which conflict with radio isotope dating that suggests that they are younger than Quarries D, C, and D <ref type="bibr">(Brown 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Perkins et al. 1998;</ref><ref type="bibr">Houseman 2004</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Fossil Vertebrates from the Hazen Quarries</head><p>Truckee Formation diatomites have produced only eleven vertebrate taxa, with stickleback and killifish being alternatively abundant and having complementary stratigraphic distributions. (Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). We know of one other fish taxon, possibly a cyprinid, that is not listed in Table <ref type="table">2</ref> because those specimens have not been acquired from their owners. Six of the rarer taxa were found only from Quarry D, which is probably not due to depositional bias but to greater sampling effort (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Bell and</ref><ref type="bibr">Haglund 1982, Bell et al. 1985;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. 2006a;</ref><ref type="bibr">Stuart et al. 2020)</ref>.</p><p>Fishes</p><p>The stickleback, Gasterosteus doryssus, occurs in Quarries A-G and is usually abundant and well preserved (Fig. <ref type="figure">8</ref>). Stratigraphically, it is almost continuously distributed through the sections in all but Quarry B, facilitating analyses of phenotypic evolution (i.e., <ref type="bibr">Bell and Haglund 1982;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. 1985</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. , 1987</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. , 1989</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. , 2006a</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. , 2006b;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell and Legendre 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Voje et al. 2022</ref>) and inference of ecological shifts <ref type="bibr">(Purnell et al. 2007</ref>), natural selection <ref type="bibr">(Hunt et al. 2008)</ref>, and genetics <ref type="bibr">(Stuart et al. 2020</ref>). Several dense samples of G. doryssus within single varves (i.e., mass mortality events) are comparable to samples from modern populations, enabling quantification of polymorphism and phenotypic variation within single generations <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 1987</ref><ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. , 1989))</ref>. Analysis of phenotypic evolution at a time scale that is intermediate to that observable in typical fossil sequences and from extant populations is feasible <ref type="bibr">(Schindel 1982)</ref>.</p><p>La <ref type="bibr">Rivers (1994)</ref> reported that <ref type="bibr">Jordan (1907)</ref> incorrectly named the fossils that would come to be recognized as Gasterosteus doryssus as a new silverside (Atherinidae) genus and species, Merriamella doryssa. Jordan's type specimen came from excavations for the Truckee Canal, near Hazen, and though he dated it accurately, he mistakenly said that it came from Truckee, California, about 105 km to the west. A few weeks later, <ref type="bibr">Hay (1907)</ref> described specimens from the same site as G. williamsoni leptosomus, a stickleback. From its lack of lateral armor plates, Hay inferred that it was related to the unarmored Threespine Stickleback, the nominal species G. williamsoni, from southern California. <ref type="bibr">Jordan (1908)</ref> accepted that it was a Gasterosteus and properly applied his prior specific name, yielding Gasterosteus doryssus (Fig. <ref type="figure">8</ref>). However, he also accepted <ref type="bibr">Hay's (1907)</ref> incorrect inference that the specimen came from late Pleistocene Lahontan beds, which may overlay Truckee Formation deposits near Hazen. <ref type="bibr">Bertin (1925)</ref> argued that all phenotypically diverse threespine stickleback species, including G. williamsoni, should be synonymized with G. aculeatus because differences among them were not heritable. Although his premise that none of their differences were heritable was false, it has become common practice to use G. aculeatus for phenotypically diverse populations. G. doryssus was Figure <ref type="figure">8</ref>. Gasterosteus doryssus fossil (UCMP 332916) from Pit L, Quarry D, within its original diatomite matrix. The head is to the left, and the eye is stained grey. Scale is 1 cm. This specimen has three dorsal spines and a full pelvis, structures that are sometimes lost entirely in G. doryssus. already established, however, and the name has continued to be used. Because the pelvic skeleton is often but not always reduced in G. doryssus (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Bell 1974</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell , 1987;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. 1985;</ref><ref type="bibr">2006a)</ref>, <ref type="bibr">Mural (1973)</ref> proposed that fossil specimens from the Middle Member of the Truckee Formation with a full pelvic skeleton be called G. doryssus and those with vestigial or no pelvic skeleton be assigned to a new species, G. apodus. <ref type="bibr">Bell (1974)</ref> noted that pelvic structure in fossil samples of G. doryssus and within several extant populations of G. aculeatus (e.g., see <ref type="bibr">Bell 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell and Ort&#237; 1994</ref>) exhibits a wide range of variation from full expression to total absence and thus synonymized G. apodus with G. doryssus.</p><p>Other than Gasterosteus doryssus, the extinct Nevada Killifish, Fundulus nevadensis, has the greatest potential for evolutionary research because it is abundant and well preserved in long sections from quarries D and B. This species was first discovered near Hazen and described as Parafundulus nevadensis by <ref type="bibr">Eastman (1917)</ref>. Eastman erroneously reported it to be from the Pleistocene Lahontan beds. Subsequent authors have treated it as Fundulus <ref type="bibr">(La Rivers 1994;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ghedotti and Davis 2017)</ref>. In Quarry D, it occurs rarely for the first 115,000 years of the section, where G. doryssus is common. However, G. doryssus disappears suddenly near the top of the Quarry D section, and F. nevadensis simultaneously becomes common (MAB unpubl. data). Of 154 fishes collected by Bell and his collaborators in 1978 in Quarry B, which is apparently up section from Quarry D, only one was a G. doryssus, and all the others are F. nevadensis. Stickleback persisted but were in other quarries after it disappeared near the top of the section in Quarry D. F. nevadensis but not G. doryssus was also found during prospecting by MAB in diatomite exposed by a stream cut on the east side of Hazen.</p><p>Both Gasterosteus doryssus and Fundulus nevadensis belong to groups that usually are restricted to coastal lowland regions and are absent from the Great Basin today. The Sierra Nevada range was lower in the late Miocene, and drainages in west-central Nevada drained into the Pacific Ocean when the Truckee Formation was deposited <ref type="bibr">(Axelrod 1957</ref><ref type="bibr">(Axelrod , 1962;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell 1974)</ref> ancestors of these two fish species probably entered the region from the Pacific coast of North America and went extinct as the Sierra Nevada rose and the Great Basin became drier <ref type="bibr">(Bell 1974)</ref>. The Lake Truckee basin was also entered by ancestors of Ameiurus hazenensis from the Mississippi River basin (see below). However, extant Gasterosteus and Fundulus species do not occur in the upper reaches of the Mississippi basin (NatureServe 2010) and probably entered from the Pacific. Two specimens of Oncorhynchus belli, a type of Cutthroat Trout (UMMP V74362), were found in the upper part of the Quarry D section <ref type="bibr">(Stearley and Smith 2016)</ref>. Extant Cutthroat Trout prey on Gasterosteus aculeatus, and their predation selects for robust armor (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Hagen and Gilbertson 1972;</ref><ref type="bibr">Reimchen 1994</ref><ref type="bibr">Reimchen , 1995))</ref>. However, only two fossil trout were found in Quarry D while thousands of fossil stickleback were collected, and the scales of one of those trout specimens formed intact rows that were displaced from the skeleton, suggesting that the fish was bloated and could have floated a long distance. Trout therefore do not appear to have lived in high abundance in the open water depositional environment of Quarry D or did live in the open water but were much less likely to be preserved for an unknown reason.</p><p>Ameiurus hazenensis <ref type="bibr">(Baumgartner 1982</ref>; originally described as Ictalurus hazenensis) is an extinct bullhead catfish. The holotype was found near Quarry E, apparently a nearshore depositional environment <ref type="bibr">(Bell 2009</ref>, see above). Some extant Ameiurus species eat fishes <ref type="bibr">(Moyle 2002)</ref>, and A. hazenensis may have consumed Gasterosteus doryssus. Stickleback from Quarry E are relatively highly armored compared to G. doryssus from the other quarries (e.g., Quarry D) but weakly armored compared to most extant, freshwater G. aculeatus populations (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Hagen and Gilbertson 1972;</ref><ref type="bibr">Reimchen 1994)</ref>.</p><p>Occurrence of Ameiurus hazenensis in the Truckee Formation has biogeographic implications. The extinct A. vespertinus from Oregon and Idaho is the only other bullhead species known from west of the Rocky Mountains. If A. hazenensis and A. vespertinus are sister species, as <ref type="bibr">Baumgartner (1982)</ref> proposed, their common ancestor likely entered the Great Basin by crossing the continental divide north of the present Colorado Plateau, when drainages in Idaho and Nevada were connected, perhaps by the Missouri River system <ref type="bibr">(Spencer et al. 2008)</ref>. Amphibians A large, complete, and previously unreported anuran (UCMP 298000) was collected in the lower third of the section in Quarry D. It has long hind legs, seeming to exclude toads (Bufonidae) and is probably too large to be a treefrog (Hylidae), suggesting that it is a member of the genus Rana. The presence of a frog supports inferences from the diatoms that the depositional environment was not very saline <ref type="bibr">(Houseman 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dejardin 2014)</ref>. Amphibian bones were also identified by D. B. Wake in a bird regurgitation from Quarry D (pers. comm. to MAB).</p><p>Reptiles A snake assigned to the genus Coluber was reported from an Eagle Pitcher Mining Company quarry a few kilometers west of Quarry D in Lyon County near its eastern border with Churchill County <ref type="bibr">(Ruben 1971)</ref>, though its exact quarry is unknown to us. Quarry A is a nearby Eagle Pitcher mine, and it existed when this snake was collected, so perhaps Quarry A is the collection locality. This snake contained three fishes in its esophagus including at least one stickleback <ref type="bibr">(Rubin 1971)</ref>, indicating that it may have been a garter snake (Thamnophis sp., Colubridae family) that choked on a stickleback. A small snake from Quarry D (UCMP 297999) is complete and well-preserved but has not been studied.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Mammals</head><p>The only mammal from these diatomite quarries, a tree squirrel from Quarry A, Sciurus olsoni <ref type="bibr">(Emry et al. 2005)</ref>, lost one front leg, one hind leg, and the tail before deposition. It has complete upper and lower dentition, and several teeth were removed from the skull for study. It was presumably transported into the lake from a forest habitat. It fills a chronological gap in the fossil record of North American tree squirrels between 5 and 15 million years ago. This remarkably long gap might reflect either lack of preservation or extinction of tree squirrels in North America for 10 My and recolonization from Asia. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that this time gap was due to lack of preservation <ref type="bibr">(Mercer and Roth 2003)</ref>, and occurrence of S. olsoni in the middle of the gap is consistent with this phylogenetic inference.</p><p>Birds Bird fossils include nearly complete articulated skeletons, sets of articulated bones, and isolated bones and feathers. Nearly complete skeletons of two undescribed perching birds (Passeriformes) were collected by MAB from Quarry D and a graded area to its north. Two species of grebes (Podicipedidae), a piscivorous group, were described by <ref type="bibr">Ksepka et al. (2013)</ref>. Bone aggregations are commonly recovered in fossil samples and often contain rounded bones that appear to have been partially dissolved by stomach acid and may be bird regurgitations. These presumptive regurgitations contain stickleback spines. Presumptive regurgitations from samples from horizons with highly armored stickleback sometimes contain those spines, but such spines are absent in presumptive regurgitations from horizons in which intact stickleback have evolved loss of the two large dorsal spines and the two pelvic spines. This association suggests that temporal variation in articulated Gasterosteus doryssus represents variation over an area in which grebes foraged during a limited period of time.</p><p>Fossil Insects from the Hazen Quarries Terrestrial insects are often abundant and well preserved in lake deposits (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Wilson 1980;</ref><ref type="bibr">Grande 1984;</ref><ref type="bibr">Meyer and Smith 2008)</ref> but insects are nearly absent from Truckee Formation deposits. We have no clear explanation for the lack of insects. Further studies of nearshore deposits are necessary to better understand the observed lack of terrestrial insects at the site.</p><p>Fossil Diatoms, Plants and Paleolimnology The diatomite deposits contain abundant diatoms, many of which are intact and can be identified to study paleolimnology <ref type="bibr">(Houseman 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dejardin 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cerasoni et al. 2023)</ref>. The composition and abundance of the diatomite community changes through time, indicative of changing atmospheric and environmental conditions. Based on fossil leaves and other flora from Quarry D, <ref type="bibr">Axelrod (1948)</ref> inferred that at the time of the Gasterosteus doryssus deposition, summers were warm but rarely hot, and winters were mild with only occasional light frosts <ref type="bibr">(Bell 1974)</ref>. However, presence of very rare pieces of gravel in Quarry D suggests that ice formed near shore and rafted gravel into the lake. Axelrod also inferred that average annual rainfall was 38 to 40 cm, including some summer rain <ref type="bibr">(Bell 1974)</ref>. Plants are usually rare in Truckee Formation deposits (Fig. <ref type="figure">6</ref>), though they are relatively abundant in Quarry E. Unusually thick volcanic ash layers at Quarry E may also indicate proximity to shore, as does dominance by planktonic diatom species that are more likely to be held in suspension by shoreline turbulence. Sediments in the other quarries, including D, apparently accumulated far from shore but in shallow water and consist mostly of benthic diatoms <ref type="bibr">(Houseman 2004</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>DISCUSSION</head><p>The Hazen diatomite quarries captured a rare deposit of tens of thousands of years of stickleback evolution on approximately annual time scales <ref type="bibr">(Anderson and Dean, 1988;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. 2006a)</ref>, allowing researchers to observe stasis and adaptation and to infer underlying ecological and genetic processes <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 1985;</ref><ref type="bibr">Anderson and Dean 1988;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. 2006a</ref><ref type="bibr">Bell et al. , 2009;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Purnell et al. 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hunt et al. 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Dejardin 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Stuart et al. 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Voje et al. 2022)</ref>. Why did stickleback preserve so well in this deposit? Benthic diatoms growing seasonally on the lakebed could have formed a thick, sticky, algal mat, protecting dead stickleback from scavengers, organic decomposition, and perturbation <ref type="bibr">(Dodd 1987)</ref>. Other studies suggest that benthic diatoms like those found in the depositional environment may form a biofilm with antibiotic properties, retarding decay and disarticulation <ref type="bibr">(O'Brien et al. 2008)</ref>. Potential sedimentological evidence for this phenomenon may include the alternating sediments in the stratigraphy where thick to medium-thick diatom rich deposits alternate with clay-and silt-rich deposits. This could be interpreted as annual recurring springtime bloom events, where thick algal mats formed with little to no incursion of terrestrial sediments.</p><p>Fossil stickleback from quarry D often show few signs of post-mortem taphonomic alteration. The most common post-mortem alterations include partial cranial and vertebral disarticulation, arguably caused by generation of gas within the cranial and abdominal cavities. Even during these events, the majority of skeletal remains appear to be undisturbed and close to other skeletal elements. Taphonomic studies are currently underway to better understand preservation of the stickleback in the Hazen diatomite beds. The same chronology used to study stickleback evolution <ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. 1985</ref><ref type="bibr">(Bell et al. , 2006;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hunt et al. 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Stuart et al. 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Voje et al. 2022)</ref> has also been used to study paleolimnological changes. Microfossil communities in the diatomite (diatoms, phytoliths, sponge spicules) have been analyzed for changes in richness and abundance <ref type="bibr">(Dejardin 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cerasoni et al. 2023)</ref>; stable isotope ratios for carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen have also been measured <ref type="bibr">(Dejardin 2014</ref>). Together, this evidence can reveal changes in lake level, temperature, salinity, and plankton community ecology on decadal time scales. Detailed palaeoecological studies including high-resolution microbotanical and isotopic reconstructions of the Hazen deposits are currently underway.</p><p>The Lahontan Basin can still be explored for more fossil-rich, lacustrine, Truckee Formation deposits. Mines are the easiest sites to sample. They are generally safe, but permission from landowners must be obtained. Transitional sequences between lacustrine diatomites and other lacustrine shales or fluvial deposits may produce other species or stickleback phenotypes. For example, Quarry E appears to be a near-shore deposit and revealed a catfish as well as stickleback that contrast morphologically with those from other sites that apparently formed farther from shore. <ref type="bibr">Brown (1987)</ref> used geochemical properties of volcanic ashes to correlate between quarries, and radioisotope dating of some crystalline ashes can be used to estimate the absolute ages of quarries. The high quality, abundance, and frequently continuous stratigraphic occurrence of fossil stickleback, killifish, and diatoms over extended time intervals provide unusual opportunities to observe paleoecological and evolutionary phenomena that require fine temporal resolution but extend over thousands of years. Although the most reliably interesting sampling will involve abundant taxa, further sampling will continue to yield rare but interesting fossil specimens.</p><p>D C E F B A</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>PaleoBios May 2024</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
