skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Bridging 1,2-Bis(diphenylphosphino)methane Ligands Facilitate the Formation of Binuclear Complexes with Both Two-Coordinate and Three-Coordinate Gold(I) Ions
Award ID(s):
2246913
PAR ID:
10560843
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
American Chemical Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Inorganic Chemistry
Volume:
63
Issue:
52
ISSN:
0020-1669
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: p. 24563-24572
Size(s):
p. 24563-24572
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. The coordinate descent (CD) method is a classical optimization algorithm that has seen a revival of interest because of its competitive performance in machine learning applications. A number of recent papers provided convergence rate estimates for their deterministic (cyclic) and randomized variants that differ in the selection of update coordinates. These estimates suggest randomized coordinate descent (RCD) performs better than cyclic coordinate descent (CCD), although numerical experiments do not provide clear justification for this comparison. In this paper, we provide examples and more generally problem classes for which CCD (or CD with any deterministic order) is faster than RCD in terms of asymptotic worst-case convergence. Furthermore, we provide lower and upper bounds on the amount of improvement on the rate of CCD relative to RCD, which depends on the deterministic order used. We also provide a characterization of the best deterministic order (that leads to the maximum improvement in convergence rate) in terms of the combinatorial properties of the Hessian matrix of the objective function. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
  3. null (Ed.)