skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


This content will become publicly available on December 22, 2025

Title: Instructor-Student Interactions in Geometry Courses for Secondary Teachers: Results from A National Survey
We report preliminary results of selected questions from a national survey of instructors of geometry courses for secondary teachers about the nature of instructor-student interactions. Survey responses (n= 118) are used to indicate six latent constructs describing aspects of instructor-student interaction that in turn quantify hypothesized characteristics of two didactical contracts, which we call inquiry in geometry and study of geometry. We found that instructors whose highest degree is in mathematics education are less likely to rely on a study of geometry contract than instructors whose highest degree is in mathematics. Also, instructors who have previously taught high school geometry are less likely to lecture.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1725837
PAR ID:
10561595
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Editor(s):
Cook, S; Katz, B; Moore_Russo, D
Publisher / Repository:
The Special Interest Group of the Mathematical Association of America (SIGMAA) for Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
ISSN:
2474-9346
Page Range / eLocation ID:
162-169
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
geometry, secondary teacher education, survey, didactical contract, instruction
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; (, Kent State University.)
    Kosko, K; Caniglia, J; Courtney, S; Zolfaghari, M; Morris, G (Ed.)
    We report partial analysis of a survey of instructors of undergraduate geometry courses for teachers, attending to how they described the nature of the mathematical work they engage students in and the opportunities to learn that students had. Analysis of latent construct correlations showed that engagement of students in inquiry into geometry was significantly associated with opportunity to learn about mathematical definitions and conjecturing and engagement of students in the study of geometry was significantly associated with opportunity to learn about axioms and about history of geometry. Latent variable means comparisons showed group differences in claimed opportunity to learn between instructors whose highest degree was in mathematics and those whose highest degree was in mathematics education. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, University of Nevada, Reno.)
    Lamberg, T; Moss, D (Ed.)
    We report on an effort to vet a list of 10 student learning objectives (SLOs) for geometry courses taken by prospective geometry teachers. Members of a faculty online learning community, including mathematicians and mathematics educators who teach college geometry courses taken by prospective secondary teachers developed this list in an effort to reach a consensus that might satisfy various stakeholders. To provide feedback on the final list of 10 SLOs, we constructed and collected responses to a survey in which 121 college geometry instructors ranked a set of potential SLOs, including the 10 proposed SLOs as well as 11 distractors. The 10 SLOs were, for the most part, among the highest ranked by the sample. 
    more » « less
  3. ; (, Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education)
    MacDonald, Laura J (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Building rapport between instructors and students is a challenge, especially in large classes and in online environments. Previous work has shown that non-content Instructor Talk can foster positive student-teacher relationships, but less is known about non-content talk in electronic instructor messages. Here, we used the established Instructor Talk framework to craft positively phrased electronic messages that were sent through the course’s learning management system to students enrolled in an introductory biology course at a large public institution. We examined both close- and open-ended survey responses (n= 226) to assess students’ perceptions of the electronic messages, the course, and their instructor. Of the established Instructor Talk categories, the building student/instructor relationship category was most memorable to students. Encouragingly, 61% of students indicated they “liked the course more” and 88% indicated they “liked the instructor more” in response to the electronic messages. This demonstrates that implementing positively phrased Instructor Talk into electronic communication is an effective way to build rapport between instructors and students. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; (, ACM)
    Despite evidence of its effectiveness, Peer Instruction (PI) has not been widely adopted by undergraduate computing instructors. In PI, an instructor displays a hard multiple-choice question that students answer individually, then discuss their answer with peers, then answer again, and finally an instructor leads a discussion of the question. Even though the benefits of PI are well documented, it can be difficult to convince computing instructors to move away from passive lectures. Major reasons why instructors do not adopt PI include a lack of awareness, lack of time, and concerns over their ability to cover content. We hypothesized that we could encourage the adoption of PI by creating Peer+, a free tool in an ebook platform, a searchable question bank, and running summer instructor workshops. We offered a three-day in-person summer workshop to a total of 37 instructors in 2022 and 2023. Instructors completed a pre-survey, immediate post-survey, and a follow-up post survey after the fall semester. We also conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 instructors. On the immediate post-survey most (33/37, 89%) instructors reported that they were very likely or likely to use the tool in the fall. However, on the follow-up survey, less than a quarter (6/26, 23%) actually did. The number one reason for not using the tool was a lack of time (18/26, 69%). Notably, all of the instructors who used Peer+ planned to use it again. This work informs efforts to increase the adoption of evidence-based pedagogical approaches in computing. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, Journal of Civil Engineering Education)
    Brown, Shane (Ed.)
    To understand factors that influence successful practitioner participation in meeting the course support needs of instructors, we utilized a survey to conduct an empirical analysis to model the critical success path of practitioners’ support for student development in practitioner-instructor collaborations. Our results indicated that student-related factors are significant and have a moderate influence. Also, instructor-related factors have a significant impact and large effect on student-related factors. Findings can inform the design and management of practitioners’ provision of instructors’ course support needs. These insights aid student development through practitioner-instructor collaborations. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email