More Like this

1. Satisfaction Guaranteed: When Moral Hazard Meets Moral Preferences

   https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.20170119  

   Andreoni, James (November 2018, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics)
2. Moral character evaluation: Testing another's moral-cognitive machinery

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103906  

   Critcher, Clayton R.; Helzer, Erik G.; Tannenbaum, David (March 2020, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology)
3. On Further Reflection... Moral Reflections Enhance Robotic Moral Persuasive Capability

   https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30933-5_19  

   Wen, Ruchen; Kim, Boyoung; Phillips, Elizabeth; Zhu, Qin: Williams (April 2023, PERSUASIVE)

   To enable robots to exert positive moral influence, we need to understand the impacts of robots’ moral communications, the ways robots can phrase their moral language to be most clear and persuasive, and the ways that these factors interact. Previous work has suggested, for example, that for certain types of robot moral interventions to be successful (i.e., moral interventions grounded in particular ethical frameworks), those interventions may need to be followed by opportunities for moral reflection, during which humans can critically engage with not only the contents of the robot’s moral language, but also with the way that moral language connects with their social-relational ontology and broader moral ecosystem. We conceptually replicate this prior work (N=119) using a design that more precisely manipulates moral ref lection. Our results confirm that opportunities for moral reflection are indeed critical to the success of robotic moral interventions—regardless of the ethical framework in which those interventions are grounded. 

   more » « less
4. On Further Reflection... Moral Reflections Enhance Robotic Moral Persuasive Capability

   Wen, Ruchen; Kim, Boyoung; Phillips, Elizabeth; Zhu, Qin; Williams, Tom (January 2023, Persuasive technologies Conference)

   To enable robots to exert positive moral influence, we need to understand the impacts of robots’ moral communications, the ways robots can phrase their moral language to be most clear and persuasive, and the ways that these factors interact. Previous work has suggested, for example, that for certain types of robot moral interventions to be successful (i.e., moral interventions grounded in particular ethical frameworks), those interventions may need to be followed by opportunities for moral reflection, during which humans can critically engage with not only the contents of the robot’s moral language, but also with the way that moral language connects with their social-relational ontology and broader moral ecosystem. We conceptually replicate this prior work (N =119) using a design that more precisely manipulates moral reflection. Our results confirm that opportunities for moral reflection are indeed critical to the success of robotic moral interventions—regardless of the ethical framework in which those interventions are grounded. 

   more » « less
5. Conservatives’ Moral Foundations Are More Densely Connected Than Liberals’ Moral Foundations

   https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220916070  

   Turner-Zwinkels, Felicity M.; Johnson, Branden B.; Sibley, Chris G.; Brandt, Mark J. (May 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)

   We use network psychometrics to map a subsection of moral belief systems predicted by moral foundations theory (MFT). This approach conceptualizes moral systems as networks, with moral beliefs represented as nodes connected by direct relations. As such, it advances a novel test of MFT’s claim that liberals and conservatives have different systems of foundational moral values, which we test in three large datasets ( NSample1 = 854; NSample2 = 679; NSample3 = 2,572), from two countries (the United States and New Zealand). Results supported our first hypothesis that liberals’ moral systems show more segregation between individualizing and binding foundations than conservatives. Results showed only weak support for our second hypothesis, that this pattern would be more typical of higher educated than less educated liberals/conservatives. Findings support a systems approach to MFT and show the value of modeling moral belief systems as networks. 

   more » « less