We provide improved differentially private algorithms for identity testing of high-dimensional distributions. Specifically, for d-dimensional Gaussian distributions with known covariance Σ, we can test whether the distribution comes from N(μ∗,Σ) for some fixed μ∗ or from some N(μ,Σ) with total variation distance at least α from N(μ∗,Σ) with (ε,0)-differential privacy, using only O~(d1/2α2+d1/3α4/3⋅ε2/3+1α⋅ε) samples if the algorithm is allowed to be computationally inefficient, and only O~(d1/2α2+d1/4α⋅ε) samples for a computationally efficient algorithm. We also provide a matching lower bound showing that our computationally inefficient algorithm has optimal sample complexity. We also extend our algorithms to various related problems, including mean testing of Gaussians with bounded but unknown covariance, uniformity testing of product distributions over {−1,1}d, and tolerant testing. Our results improve over the previous best work of Canonne et al.~\cite{CanonneKMUZ20} for both computationally efficient and inefficient algorithms, and even our computationally efficient algorithm matches the optimal \emph{non-private} sample complexity of O(d√α2) in many standard parameter settings. In addition, our results show that, surprisingly, private identity testing of d-dimensional Gaussians can be done with fewer samples than private identity testing of discrete distributions over a domain of size d \cite{AcharyaSZ18}, which refutes a conjectured lower bound of~\cite{CanonneKMUZ20}.
more »
« less
Beyond Catoni: Sharper Rates for Heavy-Tailed and Robust Mean Estimation
We study the fundamental problem of estimating the mean of a d-dimensional distribution with covariance Σ≼σ2Id given n samples. When d=1, \cite{catoni} showed an estimator with error (1+o(1))⋅σ2log1δn−−−−−√, with probability 1−δ, matching the Gaussian error rate. For d>1, a natural estimator outputs the center of the minimum enclosing ball of one-dimensional confidence intervals to achieve a 1−δ confidence radius of 2dd+1−−−√⋅σ(dn−−√+2log1δn−−−−−√), incurring a 2dd+1−−−√-factor loss over the Gaussian rate. When the dn−−√ term dominates by a log1δ−−−−√ factor, \cite{lee2022optimal-highdim} showed an improved estimator matching the Gaussian rate. This raises a natural question: Is the 2dd+1−−−√ loss \emph{necessary} when the 2log1δn−−−−−√ term dominates? We show that the answer is \emph{no} -- we construct an estimator that improves over the above naive estimator by a constant factor. We also consider robust estimation, where an adversary is allowed to corrupt an ϵ-fraction of samples arbitrarily: in this case, we show that the above strategy of combining one-dimensional estimates and incurring the 2dd+1−−−√-factor \emph{is} optimal in the infinite-sample limit.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2238080
- PAR ID:
- 10568949
- Publisher / Repository:
- Conference on Learning Theory. The 37th Annual Conference on Learning Theory (COLT 2024)
- Date Published:
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Edmonton, Canada
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
We present a fast, differentially private algorithm for high-dimensional covariance-aware mean estimation with nearly optimal sample complexity. Only exponential-time estimators were previously known to achieve this guarantee. Given n samples from a (sub-)Gaussian distribution with unknown mean μ and covariance Σ, our (ε,δ)-differentially private estimator produces μ~ such that ∥μ−μ~∥Σ≤α as long as n≳dα2+dlog1/δ√αε+dlog1/δε. The Mahalanobis error metric ∥μ−μ^∥Σ measures the distance between μ^ and μ relative to Σ; it characterizes the error of the sample mean. Our algorithm runs in time O~(ndω−1+nd/ε), where ω<2.38 is the matrix multiplication exponent. We adapt an exponential-time approach of Brown, Gaboardi, Smith, Ullman, and Zakynthinou (2021), giving efficient variants of stable mean and covariance estimation subroutines that also improve the sample complexity to the nearly optimal bound above. Our stable covariance estimator can be turned to private covariance estimation for unrestricted subgaussian distributions. With n≳d3/2 samples, our estimate is accurate in spectral norm. This is the first such algorithm using n=o(d2) samples, answering an open question posed by Alabi et al. (2022). With n≳d2 samples, our estimate is accurate in Frobenius norm. This leads to a fast, nearly optimal algorithm for private learning of unrestricted Gaussian distributions in TV distance. Duchi, Haque, and Kuditipudi (2023) obtained similar results independently and concurrently.more » « less
-
We present a fast, differentially private algorithm for high-dimensional covariance-aware mean estimation with nearly optimal sample complexity. Only exponential-time estimators were previously known to achieve this guarantee. Given n samples from a (sub-)Gaussian distribution with unknown mean μ and covariance Σ, our (ϵ,δ)-differentially private estimator produces μ~ such that ∥μ−μ~∥Σ≤α as long as n≳dα2+dlog1/δ√αϵ+dlog1/δϵ. The Mahalanobis error metric ∥μ−μ^∥Σ measures the distance between μ^ and μ relative to Σ; it characterizes the error of the sample mean. Our algorithm runs in time O~(ndω−1+nd/\eps), where ω<2.38 is the matrix multiplication exponent.We adapt an exponential-time approach of Brown, Gaboardi, Smith, Ullman, and Zakynthinou (2021), giving efficient variants of stable mean and covariance estimation subroutines that also improve the sample complexity to the nearly optimal bound above.Our stable covariance estimator can be turned to private covariance estimation for unrestricted subgaussian distributions. With n≳d3/2 samples, our estimate is accurate in spectral norm. This is the first such algorithm using n=o(d2) samples, answering an open question posed by Alabi et al. (2022). With n≳d2 samples, our estimate is accurate in Frobenius norm. This leads to a fast, nearly optimal algorithm for private learning of unrestricted Gaussian distributions in TV distance.Duchi, Haque, and Kuditipudi (2023) obtained similar results independently and concurrently.more » « less
-
Diffusion models have become the most popular approach to deep generative modeling of images, largely due to their empirical performance and reliability. From a theoretical standpoint, a number of recent works~\cite{chen2022,chen2022improved,benton2023linear} have studied the iteration complexity of sampling, assuming access to an accurate diffusion model. In this work, we focus on understanding the \emph{sample complexity} of training such a model; how many samples are needed to learn an accurate diffusion model using a sufficiently expressive neural network? Prior work~\cite{BMR20} showed bounds polynomial in the dimension, desired Total Variation error, and Wasserstein error. We show an \emph{exponential improvement} in the dependence on Wasserstein error and depth, along with improved dependencies on other relevant parameters.more » « less
-
Location estimation is one of the most basic questions in parametric statistics. Suppose we have a known distribution density f, and we get n i.i.d. samples from f(x − µ) for some unknown shift µ. The task is to estimate µ to high accuracy with high probability. The maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) is known to be asymptotically optimal as n → ∞, but what is possible for finite n? In this paper, we give two location estimators that are optimal under different criteria: 1) an estimator that has minimax-optimal estimation error subject to succeeding with probability 1 − δ and 2) a confidence interval estimator which, subject to its output interval containing µ with probability at least 1 − δ, has the minimum expected squared interval width among all shift-invariant estimators. The latter construction can be generalized to minimizing the expectation of any loss function on the interval width.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

