Abstract Tallgrass prairie is among the most threatened ecosystems but is often fragmented and surrounded by human‐modified landscapes. Small mammals are integral components of tallgrass prairies. However, little is known about how landscape composition, configuration, and management impact small mammals in tallgrass prairies.We conducted a systematic literature review to identify species‐specific and community associations with three broad topics: landscape composition, landscape configuration, and management practices.We identified 61 studies that assessed our variables of interest. We categorised the location, species assessed, variables monitored, and results by species and for the community.The majority of studies (64%) were conducted in two states, Illinois and Kansas. Deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus), prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), and white‐footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) showed specific associations with landscape variables, with deer mice preferring bare ground and recently burned plots, and prairie voles preferring thatch and negatively associated with prescribed fire. White‐footed mice were frequently associated with wooded areas.Small mammal biodiversity was positively associated with patchy habitats containing greater diversity in vegetative composition and management regime. Management and land composition were both relatively well studied for several species; habitat configuration was understudied.We identified significant gaps in our understanding of small mammal landscape ecology in tallgrass prairies. With tallgrass prairie restoration a growing trend in this region, a greater understanding of drivers of small mammal populations will be crucial to successful restoration efforts. Future research should focus on understudied areas and species, and examine how habitat heterogeneity impacts small mammal biodiversity. 
                        more » 
                        « less   
                    
                            
                            Patterns of acorn selection in Peromyscus mice and possible implications in a changing climate
                        
                    
    
            Abstract Rodents play a key role in forest regeneration by dispersing seeds and interspecific differences in seed preferences could have important consequences for forest growth. The White-footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) and Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus gracilis) are 2 closely related species that can exploit Red Oak (Quercus rubra) acorns but may display different preference levels due to the high tannin concentration present in these acorns. Here we investigated how White-footed Mice and Deer Mice differ in their ability to exploit Red Oak acorns. We conducted a cafeteria-style experiment where we offered mice (n = 61) acorns of Red Oak and Bur Oak (Q. macrocarpa; control seed with lower tannin levels) and video-recorded their preference and the acorn fate (consumed or cached). Using mixed-effects models, we found that both mouse species selected and consumed Bur Oak acorns at a high rate; however, White-footed Mice were 6.67 times more likely to select and consume Red Oak acorns than Deer Mice. Furthermore, White-footed Mice tended to cache Red Oak acorns near the surface where there is a higher chance of germination, while they usually consumed Bur Oak acorns. Our results suggest that Red Oaks have a better strategy for avoiding predation than Bur Oaks (i.e., high tannin levels leading to caching), and the strong interaction between the White-footed Mouse and Red Oak might be an important mechanism behind the current range expansion of both species in response to climate change. 
        more » 
        « less   
        
    
                            - Award ID(s):
- 1940525
- PAR ID:
- 10570570
- Editor(s):
- Frey, Jennifer
- Publisher / Repository:
- ASM
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Mammalogy
- Volume:
- 105
- Issue:
- 4
- ISSN:
- 0022-2372
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 697 to 705
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
- 
            
- 
            Abstract A key question in biology concerns the extent to which distributional range limits of species are determined by intrinsic limits of physiological tolerance. Here, we use common‐garden data for wild rodents to assess whether species with higher elevational range limits typically have higher thermogenic capacities in comparison to closely related lowland species. Among South American leaf‐eared mice (genusPhyllotis), mean thermogenic performance is higher in species with higher elevational range limits, but there is little among‐species variation in the magnitude of plasticity in this trait. In the North American rodent genusPeromyscus, highland deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) have greater thermogenic maximal oxygen uptake () than lowland white‐footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) at a level of hypoxia that matches the upper elevational range limit of the former species. In highland deer mice, the enhanced thermogenic in hypoxia is attributable to a combination of evolved and plastic changes in physiological pathways that govern the transport and utilization of O2and metabolic substrates. Experiments withPeromyscusmice also demonstrate that exposure to hypoxia during different stages of development elicits plastic changes in cardiorespiratory traits that improve thermogenic via distinct physiological mechanisms. Evolved differences in thermogenic capacity provide clues about why some species are able to persist in higher‐elevation habitats that lie slightly beyond the tolerable limits of other species. Such differences in environmental tolerance also suggest why some species might be more vulnerable to climate change than others.imagemore » « less
- 
            null (Ed.)Animals native to the hypoxic and cold environment at high altitude provide an excellent opportunity to elucidate the integrative mechanisms underlying the adaptive evolution and plasticity of complex traits. The capacity for aerobic thermogenesis can be a critical determinant of survival for small mammals at high altitude, but the physiological mechanisms underlying the evolution of this performance trait remain unresolved. We examined this issue by comparing high-altitude deer mice ( Peromyscus maniculatus ) with low-altitude deer mice and white-footed mice ( P. leucopus ). Mice were bred in captivity and adults were acclimated to each of four treatments: warm (25°C) normoxia, warm hypoxia (12 kPa O 2 ), cold (5°C) normoxia or cold hypoxia. Acclimation to hypoxia and/or cold increased thermogenic capacity in deer mice, but hypoxia acclimation led to much greater increases in thermogenic capacity in highlanders than in lowlanders. The high thermogenic capacity of highlanders was associated with increases in pulmonary O 2 extraction, arterial O 2 saturation, cardiac output and arterial–venous O 2 difference. Mechanisms underlying the evolution of enhanced thermogenic capacity in highlanders were partially distinct from those underlying the ancestral acclimation responses of lowlanders. Environmental adaptation has thus enhanced phenotypic plasticity and expanded the physiological toolkit for coping with the challenges at high altitude.more » « less
- 
            ABSTRACT Mice in the genusPeromyscusare abundant and geographically widespread in North America, serving as reservoirs for zoonotic pathogens, includingBorrelia burgdorferi(B. burgdorferi), the causative agent of Lyme disease, transmitted byIxodes scapularisticks. While the white‐footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus(P. leucopus)) is the primary reservoir in the United States, the deer mouse (P. maniculatus), an ecologically similar congener, rarely transmits the pathogen to biting ticks. Understanding the factors that allow these similar species to serve as a poor and competent reservoir is critical for understanding tick‐borne disease ecology and epidemiology, especially as climate change expands the habitats where ticks can transmit pathogens. Our study investigated immunological differences between these rodent species. Specifically, we compared the expression of six immune genes (i.e., TLR‐2, IFN‐γ, IL‐6, IL‐10, GATA‐3, TGF‐β) broadly involved in bacterial recognition, elimination, and/or pathology mitigation in ear biopsies collected by the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) as part of their routine surveillance. A principal components analysis indicated that immune gene expression in both species varied in two dimensions: TLR2, IFN‐γ, IL‐6, and IL‐10 (comprising PC1) and TGF‐β and GATA3 (comprising PC2) expression tended to covary within individuals. However, when we analyzed expression differences of each gene singly between species,P. maniculatusexpressed more TLR2, IL‐6, and IL‐10 but less IFN‐γ and GATA3 thanP. leucopus. This immune profile could partly explain whyP. leucopusis a better reservoir for bacterial pathogens such asB. burgdorferi.more » « less
- 
            Abstract Small mammals such as mice and voles play a fundamental role in the ecosystem service of seed dispersal by caching seeds in small hoards that germinate under beneficial conditions. Pilferage is a critical step in this process in which animals steal seeds from other individuals' caches. Pilferers often recache stolen seeds, which are often pilfered by new individuals, who may recache again, and so on, potentially leading to compounded increased dispersal distance. However, little research has investigated intraspecific differences in pilfering frequency, despite its importance in better understanding the role of behavioural diversity in the valuable ecosystem service of seed dispersal.We conducted a field experiment in Maine (USA) investigating how intraspecific variation, including personality, influences pilferage effectiveness.Within the context of a long‐term capture‐mark‐recapture study, we measured the unique personality of 3311 individual small mammals of 10 species over a 7‐year period. For this experiment, we created artificial caches using eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) seeds monitored with trail cameras and buried antennas for individual identification.Of the 436 caches created, 83.5% were pilfered by 10 species, including deer mice ((Peromyscus maniculatus) and southern red‐backed voles (Myodes gapperi). We show how individuals differ in their ability to pilfer seeds and that these differences are driven by personality, body condition and sex. More exploratory deer mice and those with lower body condition were more likely to locate a cache, and female southern red‐backed voles were more likely than males to locate caches. Also, caches were more likely to be pilfered in areas of higher small mammal abundance.Because the risk of pilferage drives decisions concerning where an animal chooses to store seeds, pilferage pressure is thought to drive the evolution of food‐hoarding behaviour. Our study shows that pilferage ability varies between individuals, meaning that some individuals have a disproportionately strong influence on others' caching decisions and disproportionately contribute to compounded longer‐distance seed dispersal facilitated by pilferage. Our results add to a growing body of knowledge showing that the unique personalities of individual small mammals play a critical role in forest regeneration by impacting seed dispersal.more » « less
 An official website of the United States government
An official website of the United States government 
				
			 
					 
					
 
                                    