An official website of the United States government
Abstract The effects of adjuvants for increasing the immunogenicity of influenza vaccines are well known. However, the effect of adjuvants on increasing the breadth of cross-reactivity is less well understood. In this study we have performed a systematic screen of different toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, with and without a squalene-in-water emulsion on the immunogenicity of a recombinant trimerized hemagglutinin (HA) vaccine in mice after single-dose administration. Antibody (Ab) cross-reactivity for other variants within and outside the immunizing subtype (homosubtypic and heterosubtypic cross-reactivity, respectively) was assessed using a protein microarray approach. Most adjuvants induced broad IgG profiles, although the response to a combination of CpG, MPLA and AddaVax (termed ‘IVAX-1’) appeared more quickly and reached a greater magnitude than the other formulations tested. Antigen-specific plasma cell labeling experiments show the components of IVAX-1 are synergistic. This adjuvant preferentially stimulates CD4 T cells to produce Th1>Th2 type (IgG2c>IgG1) antibodies and cytokine responses. Moreover, IVAX-1 induces identical homo- and heterosubtypic IgG and IgA cross-reactivity profiles when administered intranasally. Consistent with these observations, a single-cell transcriptomics analysis demonstrated significant increases in expression of IgG1, IgG2b and IgG2c genes of B cells in H5/IVAX-1 immunized mice relative to naïve mice, as well as significant increases in expression of the IFNγ gene of both CD4 and CD8 T cells. These data support the use of adjuvants for enhancing the breath and durability of antibody responses of influenza virus vaccines.
more »
« less
Co‐Delivery of Multiple Toll‐Like Receptor Agonists and Avian Influenza Hemagglutinin on Protein Nanoparticles Enhances Vaccine Immunogenicity and Efficacy
Abstract Most seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines are derived from inactivated or attenuated virus propagated in chicken eggs, while more advanced delivery technologies, such as the use of recombinant proteins and adjuvants, are under‐utilized. In this study, the E2 protein nanoparticle (NP) platform is engineered to synthesize vaccines that simultaneously co‐deliver influenza hemagglutinin (H5) antigen, TLR5 agonist flagellin (FliCc), and TLR9 agonist CpG 1826 (CpG) all on one particle (termed H5‐FliCc‐CpG‐E2), with uniform molecular orientation significant for immunomodulation. Antigen‐bound NP formulations elicit higher IgG antibody responses and broader homosubtypic cross‐reactivity against different H5 variants than unconjugated antigen alone. IgG1/IgG2c skewing is modulated by adjuvant type and NP attachment. Conjugation of flagellin to the NP causes significant IgG1 (Th2) skewing while attachment of CpG yields significant IgG2c (Th1) skewing, and simultaneous conjugation of both flagellin and CpG results in a balanced IgG1/IgG2c (Th2/Th1) response. Animals immunized with E2‐based NP vaccines and subsequently challenged with H5N1 influenza show 100% survival, and only animals that receive adjuvanted NP formulations are also protected against morbidity. This investigation highlights that NP‐based delivery of antigen and multiple adjuvants can be designed to effectively modulate the strength, breadth toward variants, and bias of an immune response against influenza viruses.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2011967
- PAR ID:
- 10571494
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Advanced Healthcare Materials
- Volume:
- 14
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 2192-2640
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Adjuvants play a central role in enhancing the immunogenicity of otherwise poorly immunogenic vaccine antigens. Combining adjuvants has the potential to enhance vaccine immunogenicity compared with single adjuvants, although the cellular and molecular mechanisms of combination adjuvants are not well understood. Using the influenza virus hemagglutinin H5 antigen, we define the immunological landscape of combining CpG and MPLA (TLR-9 and TLR-4 agonists, respectively) with a squalene nanoemulsion (AddaVax) using immunologic and transcriptomic profiling. Mice immunized and boosted with recombinant H5 in AddaVax, CpG+MPLA, or AddaVax plus CpG+MPLA (IVAX-1) produced comparable levels of neutralizing antibodies and were equally well protected against the H5N1 challenge. However, after challenge with H5N1 virus, H5/IVAX-1–immunized mice had 100- to 300-fold lower virus lung titers than mice receiving H5 in AddaVax or CpG+MPLA separately. Consistent with enhanced viral clearance, unsupervised expression analysis of draining lymph node cells revealed the combination adjuvant IVAX-1 significantly downregulated immune homeostasis genes, and induced higher numbers of antibody-producing plasmablasts than either AddaVax or CpG+MPLA. IVAX-1 was also more effective after single-dose administration than either AddaVax or CpG+MPLA. These data reveal a novel molecular framework for understanding the mechanisms of combination adjuvants, such as IVAX-1, and highlight their potential for the development of more effective vaccines against respiratory viruses.more » « less
-
Vaccines are a pivotal achievement in public health, offering inexpensive, distributable and highly effective protection against infectious diseases. Despite significant advancements in vaccine development, there are still many diseases for which vaccines are unavailable or offer limited protection. The global impact of the deficiency in vaccine‐induced immunity against these diseases is profound, leading to increased rates of illness, more frequent hospitalizations, and higher mortality rates. Recent studies have demonstrated conjugation mechanisms and delivery methods to co‐present adjuvants and protein epitopes to antigen‐presenting cells, significantly enhancing adaptive immunity. We introduce a novel approach to incorporate an adjuvant into the vaccine by covalently attaching it to whole enveloped virions. Using clickable azide‐enabled viral particles, generated through metabolic incorporation of N‐azidoacetyl glucosamine (GlcNAz), we conjugated the virions with a cyclo‐octyne‐modified CpG‐ODN. Conjugation yielded a potent adjuvant‐virus complex, eliciting higher TLR9‐mediated cell activation of cultured bone marrow‐derived macrophages relative to co‐administered adjuvants and virions. Administration of covalent adjuvant‐virion conjugates increase immune cell stimulation and may provide a generalizable and effective strategy for eliciting a heightened immune response for vaccine development.more » « less
-
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 sparked intensive research into the development of effective vaccines, 50 of which have been approved thus far, including the novel mRNA-based vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna. Although limiting the severity of the disease, the mRNA-based vaccines presented drawbacks, such as the cold chain requirement. Moreover, antibody levels generated by these vaccines decline significantly after 6 months. These vaccines deliver mRNA encoding the full-length spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2, but must be updated as new strains and variants of concern emerge, creating a demand for adjusted formulations and booster campaigns. To overcome these challenges, we have developed COVID-19 vaccine candidates based on the highly conserved SARS CoV-2, 809-826 B-cell peptide epitope (denoted 826) conjugated to cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) nanoparticles and bacteriophage Qβ virus-like particles, both platforms have exceptional thermal stability and facilitate epitope delivery with inbuilt adjuvant activity. We evaluated two administration methods: subcutaneous injection and an implantable polymeric scaffold. Mice received a prime–boost regimen of 100 μg per dose (2 weeks apart) or a single dose of 200 μg administered as a liquid formulation, or a polymer implant. Antibody titers were evaluated longitudinally over 50 weeks. The vaccine candidates generally elicited an early Th2-biased immune response, which stimulates the production of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies, followed by a switch to a Th1-biased response for most formulations. Exceptionally, vaccine candidate 826-CPMV (administered as prime-boost, soluble injection) elicited a balanced Th1/Th2 immune response, which is necessary to prevent pulmonary immunopathology associated with Th2 bias extremes. While the Qβ-based vaccine elicited overall higher antibody titers, the CPMV-induced antibodies had higher avidity. Regardless of the administration route and formulation, our vaccine candidates maintained high antibody titers for more than 50 weeks, confirming a potent and durable immune response against SARS-CoV-2 even after a single dose.more » « less
-
Abstract Cancer immunotherapies have reshaped the paradigm for cancer treatment over the past decade. Among them, therapeutic cancer vaccines that aim to modulate antigen‐presenting cells and subsequent T cell priming processes are among the first FDA‐approved cancer immunotherapies. However, despite showing benign safety profiles and the capability to generate antigen‐specific humoral and cellular responses, cancer vaccines have been limited by the modest therapeutic efficacy, especially for immunologically cold solid tumors. One key challenge lies in the identification of tumor‐specific antigens, which involves a costly and lengthy process of tumor cell isolation, DNA/RNA extraction, sequencing, mutation analysis, epitope prediction, peptide synthesis, and antigen screening. To address these issues, in situ cancer vaccines have been actively pursued to generate endogenous antigens directly from tumors and utilize the generated tumor antigens to elicit potent cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response. Biomaterials‐based in situ cancer vaccines, in particular, have achieved significant progress by taking advantage of biomaterials that can synergize antigens and adjuvants, troubleshoot delivery issues, home, and manipulate immune cells in situ. This review will provide an overview of biomaterials‐based in situ cancer vaccines, either living or artificial materials, under development or in the clinic, and discuss the design criteria for in situ cancer vaccines.more » « less
