An official website of the United States government
Abstract Designing protein-binding proteins is critical for drug discovery. However, artificial-intelligence-based design of such proteins is challenging due to the complexity of protein–ligand interactions, the flexibility of ligand molecules and amino acid side chains, and sequence–structure dependencies. We introduce PocketGen, a deep generative model that produces residue sequence and atomic structure of the protein regions in which ligand interactions occur. PocketGen promotes consistency between protein sequence and structure by using a graph transformer for structural encoding and a sequence refinement module based on a protein language model. The graph transformer captures interactions at multiple scales, including atom, residue and ligand levels. For sequence refinement, PocketGen integrates a structural adapter into the protein language model, ensuring that structure-based predictions align with sequence-based predictions. PocketGen can generate high-fidelity protein pockets with enhanced binding affinity and structural validity. It operates ten times faster than physics-based methods and achieves a 97% success rate, defined as the percentage of generated pockets with higher binding affinity than reference pockets. Additionally, it attains an amino acid recovery rate exceeding 63%.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on December 1, 2025
Generalized Protein Pocket Generation with Prior-Informed Flow Matching
Designing ligand-binding proteins, such as enzymes and biosensors, is essential in bioengineering and protein biology. One critical step in this process involves designing protein pockets, the protein interface binding with the ligand. Current approaches to pocket generation often suffer from time-intensive physical computations or template-based methods, as well as compromised generation quality due to the overlooking of domain knowledge. To tackle these challenges, we propose PocketFlow, a generative model that incorporates protein-ligand interaction priors based on flow matching. During training, PocketFlow learns to model key types of protein-ligand interactions, such as hydrogen bonds. In the sampling, PocketFlow leverages multi-granularity guidance (overall binding affinity and interaction geometry constraints) to facilitate generating high-affinity and valid pockets. Extensive experiments show that PocketFlow outperforms baselines on multiple benchmarks, e.g., achieving an average improvement of 1.29 in Vina Score and 0.05 in scRMSD. Moreover, modeling interactions make PocketFlow a generalized generative model across multiple ligand modalities, including small molecules, peptides, and RNA.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2339524
- PAR ID:
- 10572219
- Editor(s):
- Globerson, A; Mackey, L; Belgrave, D; Fan, A; Paquet, U; Tomczak, J; Zhang, C
- Publisher / Repository:
- 38th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2024).
- Date Published:
- ISBN:
- 000-00-00000-00-0
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Location:
- Vancouver, Canada
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
ABSTRACT Predicting the structure of ligands bound to proteins is a foundational problem in modern biotechnology and drug discovery, yet little is known about how to combine the predictions of protein‐ligand structure (poses) produced by the latest deep learning methods to identify the best poses and how to accurately estimate the binding affinity between a protein target and a list of ligand candidates. Further, a blind benchmarking and assessment of protein‐ligand structure and binding affinity prediction is necessary to ensure it generalizes well to new settings. Towards this end, we introduceMULTICOM_ligand, a deep learning‐based protein‐ligand structure and binding affinity prediction ensemble featuring structural consensus ranking for unsupervised pose ranking and a new deep generative flow matching model for joint structure and binding affinity prediction. Notably,MULTICOM_ligand ranked among the top‐5 ligand prediction methods in both protein‐ligand structure prediction and binding affinity prediction in the 16th Critical Assessment of Techniques for Structure Prediction (CASP16), demonstrating its efficacy and utility for real‐world drug discovery efforts. The source code for MULTICOM_ligand is freely available on GitHub.more » « less
-
Protein–DNA interactions play an important role in various biological processes such as gene expression, replication, and transcription. Understanding the important features that dictate the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes and predicting their affinities is important for elucidating their recognition mechanisms. In this work, we have collected the experimental binding free energy (ΔG) for a set of 391 Protein-DNA complexes and derived several structure-based features such as interaction energy, contact potentials, volume and surface area of binding site residues, base step parameters of the DNA and contacts between different types of atoms. Our analysis on relationship between binding affinity and structural features revealed that the important factors mainly depend on the number of DNA strands as well as functional and structural classes of proteins. Specifically, binding site properties such as number of atom contacts between the DNA and protein, volume of protein binding sites and interaction-based features such as interaction energies and contact potentials are important to understand the binding affinity. Further, we developed multiple regression equations for predicting the binding affinity of protein-DNA complexes belonging to different structural and functional classes. Our method showed an average correlation and mean absolute error of 0.78 and 0.98 kcal/mol, respectively, between the experimental and predicted binding affinities on a jack-knife test. We have developed a webserver, PDA-PreD (Protein-DNA Binding affinity predictor), for predicting the affinity of protein-DNA complexes and it is freely available at https://web.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo2/pdapred/more » « less
-
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of cell-surface receptor proteins with important functions in signal transduction and often serve as therapeutic drug targets. With the rapidly growing public data on three dimensional (3D) structures of GPCRs and GPCR-ligand interactions, computational prediction of GPCR ligand binding becomes a convincing option to high throughput screening and other experimental approaches during the beginning phases of ligand discovery. In this work, we set out to computationally uncover and understand the binding of a single ligand to GPCRs from several different families. Three-dimensional structural comparisons of the GPCRs that bind to the same ligand revealed local 3D structural similarities and often these regions overlap with locations of binding pockets. These pockets were found to be similar (based on backbone geometry and side-chain orientation using APoc), and they correlate positively with electrostatic properties of the pockets. Moreover, the more similar the pockets, the more likely a ligand binding to the pockets will interact with similar residues, have similar conformations, and produce similar binding affinities across the pockets. These findings can be exploited to improve protein function inference, drug repurposing and drug toxicity prediction, and accelerate the development of new drugs.more » « less
-
Abstract New drug production, from target identification to marketing approval, takes over 12 years and can cost around $2.6 billion. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled the urgent need for more powerful computational methods for drug discovery. Here, we review the computational approaches to predicting protein–ligand interactions in the context of drug discovery, focusing on methods using artificial intelligence (AI). We begin with a brief introduction to proteins (targets), ligands (e.g. drugs) and their interactions for nonexperts. Next, we review databases that are commonly used in the domain of protein–ligand interactions. Finally, we survey and analyze the machine learning (ML) approaches implemented to predict protein–ligand binding sites, ligand-binding affinity and binding pose (conformation) including both classical ML algorithms and recent deep learning methods. After exploring the correlation between these three aspects of protein–ligand interaction, it has been proposed that they should be studied in unison. We anticipate that our review will aid exploration and development of more accurate ML-based prediction strategies for studying protein–ligand interactions.more » « less
