An official website of the United States government
Most organisms on Earth possess an internal timekeeping system which ensures that bodily processes such as sleep, wakefulness or digestion take place at the right time. These precise daily rhythms are kept in check by a master clock in the brain. There, thousands of neurons – some of which carrying an internal ‘molecular clock’ – connect to each other through structures known as synapses. Exactly how the resulting network is organised to support circadian timekeeping remains unclear. To explore this question, Shafer, Gutierrez et al. focused on fruit flies, as recent efforts have systematically mapped every neuron and synaptic connection in the brain of this model organism. Analysing available data from the hemibrain connectome project at Janelia revealed that that the neurons with the most important timekeeping roles were in fact forming the fewest synapses within the network. In addition, neurons without internal molecular clocks mediated strong synaptic connections between those that did, suggesting that ‘clockless’ cells still play an integral role in circadian timekeeping. With this research, Shafer, Gutierrez et al. provide unexpected insights into the organisation of the master body clock. Better understanding the networks that underpin circadian rhythms will help to grasp how and why these are disrupted in obesity, depression and Alzheimer’s disease.
more »
« less
The Drosophila circadian clock gene cycle controls the development of clock neurons
Daily behavioral and physiological rhythms are controlled by the brain’s circadian timekeeping system, a synchronized network of neurons that maintains endogenous molecular oscillations. These oscillations are based on transcriptional feedback loops of clock genes, which inDrosophilainclude the transcriptional activatorsClock (Clk)andcycle (cyc). While the mechanisms underlying this molecular clock are very well characterized, the roles that the core clock genes play in neuronal physiology and development are much less understood. TheDrosophilatimekeeping center is composed of ~150 clock neurons, among which the four small ventral lateral neurons (sLNvs) are the most dominant pacemakers under constant conditions. Here, we show that downregulating the clock genecycspecifically in thePdf-expressing neurons leads to decreased fasciculation both in larval and adult brains. This effect is due to a developmental role ofcyc, as both knocking downcycor expressing a dominant negative form ofcycexclusively during development lead to defasciculation phenotypes in adult clock neurons.Clkdownregulation also leads to developmental effects on sLNv morphology. Our results reveal a non-circadian role forcyc, shedding light on the additional functions of circadian clock genes in the development of the nervous system.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2239994
- PAR ID:
- 10573134
- Editor(s):
- Ewer, John
- Publisher / Repository:
- PLOS Genetics
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- PLOS Genetics
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 1553-7404
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e1011441
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Organisms track time of day through the function of cell-autonomous molecular clocks. In addition to a central clock located in the brain, molecular clocks are present in most peripheral tissues. Circadian clocks are coordinated within and across tissues, but the manner through which this coordination is achieved is not well understood. We reasoned that the ability to track in vivo molecular clock activity in specific tissues of the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, would facilitate an investigation into the relationship between different clock-containing tissues. Previous efforts to monitor clock gene expression in single flies in vivo have used regulatory elements of several different clock genes to dictate expression of a luciferase reporter enzyme, the activity of which can be monitored using a luminometer. Although these reporter lines have been instrumental in our understanding of the circadian system, they generally lack cell specificity, making it difficult to compare molecular clock oscillations between different tissues. Here, we report the generation of several novel lines of flies that allow for inducible expression of a luciferase reporter construct for clock gene transcriptional activity. We find that these lines faithfully report circadian transcription, as they exhibit rhythmic luciferase activity that is dependent on a functional molecular clock. Furthermore, we take advantage of our reporter lines’ tissue specificity to demonstrate that peripheral molecular clocks are able to retain rhythmicity for multiple days under constant environmental conditions.more » « less
-
The circadian clock is a conserved timekeeping mechanism that is essential for integrating different environmental cues such as light and temperature to coordinate biological processes with the time of day. While much is known about transcriptional regulation by the clock, the role of post-transcriptional regulation, particularly through sequestration into biomolecular condensate such as stress granules, remains less understood. Stress granules are dynamic RNA-protein assemblies that play a critical role in the cellular response to stress by sequestering mRNAs to regulate translation during stressful conditions. In animals and fungi, the circadian clock regulates stress granule formation and mRNA translation by controlling key factors such as eIF2α, which orchestrates the rhythmic sequestration and translation of specific mRNAs. In plants, it has been shown that some transcripts, despite coming from arrhythmic expression, are rhythmically translated. In addition, some clock-controlled genes (CCGs) are induced in response to heat stress only at the transcriptional level and not at the translational level. Together this highlights a layer of clock regulation beyond transcription. This review discusses the intersection between the circadian clock and heat stress-related biomolecular condensates across eukaryotes, with a particular focus on plants. We discuss how the clock may regulate stress granule dynamics and preferential translation of mRNAs at specific times of the day or during stress responses, thereby enhancing cellular function and energy efficiency. By integrating evidence from animals, fungi, and plants, we highlight emerging questions regarding the role of biomolecular condensates as post-transcriptional mechanisms in controlling circadian rhythms and stress tolerance in plants.more » « less
-
The circadian system coordinates multiple behavioral outputs to ensure proper temporal organization. Timing information underlying circadian regulation of behavior depends on a molecular circadian clock that operates within clock neurons in the brain. In Drosophila and other organisms, clock neurons can be divided into several molecularly and functionally discrete subpopulations that form an interconnected central clock network. It is unknown how circadian signals are coherently generated by the clock network and transmitted across output circuits that connect clock cells to downstream neurons that regulate behavior. Here, we have exhaustively investigated the contribution of clock neuron subsets to the control of two prominent behavioral outputs in Drosophila: locomotor activity and feeding. We have used cell-specific manipulations to eliminate molecular clock function or induce electrical silencing either broadly throughout the clock network or in specific subpopulations. We find that clock cell manipulations produce similar changes in locomotor activity and feeding, suggesting that overlapping central clock circuitry regulates these distinct behavioral outputs. Interestingly, the magnitude and nature of the effects depend on the clock subset targeted. Lateral clock neuron manipulations profoundly degrade the rhythmicity of feeding and activity. In contrast, dorsal clock neuron manipulations only subtly affect rhythmicity but produce pronounced changes in the distribution of activity and feeding across the day. These experiments expand our knowledge of clock regulation of activity rhythms and offer the first extensive characterization of central clock control of feeding rhythms. Despite similar effects of central clock cell disruptions on activity and feeding, we find that manipulations that prevent functional signaling in an identified output circuit preferentially degrade locomotor activity rhythms, leaving feeding rhythms relatively intact. This demonstrates that activity and feeding are indeed dissociable behaviors, and furthermore suggests that differential circadian control of these behaviors diverges in output circuits downstream of the clock network.more » « less
-
The circadian clock is the broadly conserved, protein-based, timekeeping mechanism that synchronizes biology to the Earth’s 24-h light-dark cycle. Studies of the mechanisms of circadian timekeeping have placed great focus on the role that individual protein-protein interactions play in the creation of the timekeeping loop. However, research has shown that clock proteins most commonly act as part of large macromolecular protein complexes to facilitate circadian control over physiology. The formation of these complexes has led to the large-scale study of the proteins that comprise these complexes, termed here “circadian interactomics.” Circadian interactomic studies of the macromolecular protein complexes that comprise the circadian clock have uncovered many basic principles of circadian timekeeping as well as mechanisms of circadian control over cellular physiology. In this review, we examine the wealth of knowledge accumulated using circadian interactomics approaches to investigate the macromolecular complexes of the core circadian clock, including insights into the core mechanisms that impart circadian timing and the clock’s regulation of many physiological processes. We examine data acquired from the investigation of the macromolecular complexes centered on both the activating and repressing arm of the circadian clock and from many circadian model organisms.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1011441
