Abstract Measuring, reporting, and verification (MRV) of ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) presents challenges due to the dynamic nature of the ocean and the complex processes influencing marine carbonate chemistry. Given these challenges, finding the optimal sampling strategies and suite of parameters to be measured is a timely research question. While traditional carbonate parameters such as total alkalinity (TA), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), pH, and seawater pCO2 are commonly considered, exploring the potential of carbon isotopes for quantifying additional CO2 uptake remains a relatively unexplored research avenue. In this study, we use a coupled physical-biogeochemical model of the California Current System (CCS) to run a suite of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) simulations. The physical circulation for the CCS is generated using a nested implementation of the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with an outer domain of 1/10 ̊ (~10 km) and an inner domain of 1/30 ̊ (~3 km) resolution. The biogeochemical model, NEMUCSC, is a customized version of the North Pacific Ecosystem Model for Understanding Regional Oceanography (NEMURO) that includes carbon cycling and carbon isotopes. The CCS is one of four global eastern boundary upwelling systems characterized by high biological activity and CO2 concentrations. Consequently, the CCS represents an essential test case for investigating the efficacy and potential side effects of OAE deployments. The study aims to address two key questions: (1) the relative merit of OAE to counter ocean acidification versus the additional sequestration of CO2 from the atmosphere, and (2) the footprint of potentially harmful seawater chemistry adjacent to OAE deployments. We plan to leverage these high-resolution model results to competitively evaluate different MRV strategies, with a specific focus on analyzing the spatiotemporal distribution of carbon isotopic signatures following OAE. In this talk, we will showcase our initial results and discuss challenges in integrating high-resolution regional modeling into models of the global carbon cycle. More broadly, this work aims to provide insights into the plausibility of OAE as a climate solution that maintains ocean health and to inform accurate quantification of carbon uptake for MRV purposes. https://agu.confex.com/agu/fm23/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/1437343
more »
« less
Monitoring, reporting, and verification for ocean alkalinity enhancement
Abstract. Monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) refers to the multistep process of monitoring the amount of greenhouse gas removed by a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) activity and reporting the results of the monitoring to a third party. The third party then verifies the reporting of the results. While MRV is usually conducted in pursuit of certification in a voluntary or regulated CDR market, this chapter focuses on key recommendations for MRV relevant to ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) research. Early stage MRV for OAE research may become the foundation on which markets are built. Therefore, such research carries a special obligation toward comprehensiveness, reproducibility, and transparency. Observational approaches during field trials should aim to quantify the delivery of alkalinity to seawater and monitor for secondary precipitation, biotic calcification, and other ecosystem changes that can feed back on sources or sinks of greenhouse gases where alkalinity is measurably elevated. Observations of resultant shifts in the partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) and ocean pH can help determine the efficacy of OAE and are amenable to autonomous monitoring. However, because the ocean is turbulent and energetic and CO2 equilibration between the ocean and atmosphere can take several months or longer, added alkalinity will be diluted to perturbation levels undetectable above background variability on timescales relevant for MRV. Therefore, comprehensive quantification of carbon removal via OAE will be impossible through observational methods alone, and numerical simulations will be required. The development of fit-for-purpose models, carefully validated against observational data, will be a critical part of MRV for OAE.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2141278
- PAR ID:
- 10576087
- Editor(s):
- Oschlies, Andreas
- Publisher / Repository:
- Copernicus
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- State of the Planet
- Volume:
- 2-oae2023
- ISSN:
- 2752-0706
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 12
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Measuring, reporting, and verification (MRV) of ocean-based carbon dioxide removal (CDR) presents challenges due to the dynamic nature of the ocean and the complex processes influencing marine carbonate chemistry. Given these challenges, finding the optimal sampling strategies and suite of parameters to be measured is a timely research question. While traditional carbonate parameters such as total alkalinity (TA), dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), pH, and seawater pCO2 are commonly considered, exploring the potential of carbon isotopes for quantifying additional CO2 uptake remains a relatively unexplored research avenue. In this study, we use a coupled physical-biogeochemical model of the California Current System (CCS) to run a suite of Ocean Alkalinity Enhancement (OAE) simulations. The physical circulation for the CCS is generated using a nested implementation of the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) with an outer domain of 1/10 ̊ (~10 km) and an inner domain of 1/30 ̊ (~3 km) resolution. The biogeochemical model, NEMUCSC, is a customized version of the North Pacific Ecosystem Model for Understanding Regional Oceanography (NEMURO) that includes carbon cycling and carbon isotopes. The CCS is one of four global eastern boundary upwelling systems characterized by high biological activity and CO2 concentrations. Consequently, the CCS represents an essential test case for investigating the efficacy and potential side effects of OAE deployments. The study aims to address two key questions: (1) the relative merit of OAE to counter ocean acidification versus the additional sequestration of CO2 from the atmosphere, and (2) the footprint of potentially harmful seawater chemistry adjacent to OAE deployments. We plan to leverage these high-resolution model results to competitively evaluate different MRV strategies, with a specific focus on analyzing the spatiotemporal distribution of carbon isotopic signatures following OAE. In this talk, we will showcase our initial results and discuss challenges in integrating high-resolution regional modeling into models of the global carbon cycle. More broadly, this work aims to provide insights into the plausibility of OAE as a climate solution that maintains ocean health and to inform accurate quantification of carbon uptake for MRV purposes. https://agu.confex.com/agu/OSM24/prelim.cgi/Paper/1491096more » « less
-
Achieving net zero CO2 emissions requires gigatonne-scale atmospheric CO2 removal (CDR) to balance residual emissions that are extremely difficult to eliminate. Marine CDR (mCDR) methods are seen increasingly as potentially important additions to a global portfolio of climate policy actions. The most widely considered mCDR methods are coastal blue carbon and seaweed farming that primarily depend on biological manipulations; ocean iron fertilisation, ocean alkalinity enhancement, and direct ocean capture that depend on chemical manipulations; and artificial upwelling that depends on physical manipulation of the ocean system. It is currently highly uncertain which, if any, of these approaches might be implemented at sufficient scale to make a meaningful contribution to net zero. Here, we derive a framework based on additionality, predictability, and governability to assess implementation challenges for these mCDR methods. We argue that additionality, the net increase of CO2 sequestration due to mCDR relative to the baseline state, will be harder to determine for those mCDR methods with relatively large inherent complexity, and therefore higher potential for unpredictable impacts, both climatic and non-climatic. Predictability is inherently lower for mCDR methods that depend on biology than for methods relying on chemical or physical manipulations. Furthermore, predictability is lower for methods that require manipulation of multiple components of the ocean system. The predictability of an mCDR method also affects its governability, as highly complex mCDR methods with uncertain outcomes and greater likelihood of unintended consequences will require more monitoring and regulation, both for risk management and verified carbon accounting. We argue that systematic assessment of additionality, predictability, and governability of mCDR approaches increases their chances of leading to a net climatic benefit and informs political decision-making around their potential implementation.more » « less
-
Abstract Marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR) is gaining interest as a tool to meet global climate goals. Because the response of the ocean–atmosphere system to mCDR takes years to centuries, modeling is required to assess the impact of mCDR on atmospheric CO2reduction. Here, we use a coupled ocean–atmosphere model to quantify the atmospheric CO2reduction in response to a CDR perturbation. We define two metrics to characterize the atmospheric CO2response to both instantaneous ocean alkalinity enhancement (OAE) and direct air capture (DAC): the cumulative additionality (α) measures the reduction in atmospheric CO2relative to the magnitude of the CDR perturbation, while the relative efficiency (ϵ) quantifies the cumulative additionality of mCDR relative to that of DAC. For DAC,αis 100% immediately following CDR deployment, but declines to roughly 50% by 100 years post-deployment as the ocean degasses CO2in response to the removal of carbon from the atmosphere. For instantaneous OAE,αis zero initially and reaches a maximum of 40%–90% several years to decades later, depending on regional CO2equilibration rates and ocean circulation processes. The global meanϵapproaches 100% after 40 years, showing that instantaneous OAE is nearly as effective as DAC after several decades. However, there are significant geographic variations, withϵapproaching 100% most rapidly in the low latitudes whileϵstays well under 100% for decades to centuries near deep and intermediate water formation sites. These metrics provide a quantitative framework for evaluating sequestration timescales and carbon market valuation that can be applied to any mCDR strategy.more » « less
-
Scenarios to stabilize global climate and meet international climate agreements require rapid reductions in human carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, often augmented by substantial carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from the atmosphere. While some ocean-based removal techniques show potential promise as part of a broader CDR and decarbonization portfolio, no marine approach is ready yet for deployment at scale because of gaps in both scientific and engineering knowledge. Marine CDR spans a wide range of biotic and abiotic methods, with both common and technique-specific limitations. Further targeted research is needed on CDR efficacy, permanence, and additionality as well as on robust validation methods—measurement, monitoring, reporting, and verification—that are essential to demonstrate the safe removal and long-term storage of CO2. Engineering studies are needed on constraints including scalability, costs, resource inputs, energy demands, and technical readiness. Research on possible co-benefits, ocean acidification effects, environmental and social impacts, and governance is also required.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

