Supraglacial lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) can impact both the ice sheet surface mass balance and ice dynamics. Thus, understanding the evolution and dynamics of supraglacial lakes is important to provide improved parameterizations for ice sheet models to enable better projections of future GrIS changes. In this study, we utilize the growing inventory of optical and microwave satellite imagery to automatically determine the fate of Greenland-wide supraglacial lakes during 2018 and 2019; cool and warm melt seasons respectively. We develop a novel time series classification method to categorize lakes into four classes: 1) refreezing, 2) rapidly draining, 3) slowly draining, and 4) buried. Our findings reveal significant interannual variability between the two melt seasons, with a notable increase in the proportion of draining lakes in 2019. We also find that as mean lake depth increases, so does the percentage of lakes that drain, indicating that lake depth may influence hydrofracture potential. However, we also observe that non-draining lakes are deeper during the cooler 2018 melt season, suggesting that additional factors may predispose lakes to drain earlier in a warmer year. Our automatic classification approach and the resulting two-year ice-sheet-wide dataset provide unprecedented insights into GrIS supraglacial lake dynamics and evolution, offering a valuable resource for future research.
more »
« less
Greenland Ice Sheet Wide Supraglacial Lake Evolution and Dynamics: Insights From the 2018 and 2019 Melt Seasons
Abstract Supraglacial lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) can impact both the ice sheet surface mass balance and ice dynamics. Thus, understanding the evolution and dynamics of supraglacial lakes is important to provide improved parameterizations for ice sheet models to enable better projections of future GrIS changes. In this study, we utilize the growing inventory of optical and microwave satellite imagery to automatically determine the fate of Greenland‐wide supraglacial lakes during 2018 and 2019; low and high melt seasons respectively. We develop a novel time series classification method to categorize lakes into four classes: (a) Refreezing, (b) rapidly draining, (c) slowly draining, and (d) buried. Our findings reveal significant interannual variability between the two melt seasons, with a notable increase in the proportion of draining lakes, and a particular dominance of slowly draining lakes, in 2019. We also find that as mean lake depth increases, so does the percentage of lakes that drain, indicating that lake depth may influence hydrofracture potential. We further observe rapidly draining lakes at higher elevations than the previously hypothesized upper‐elevation hydrofracture limit (1,600 m), and that non‐draining lakes are generally deeper during the lower melt 2018 season. Our automatic classification approach and the resulting 2‐year ice‐sheet‐wide data set provide new insights into GrIS supraglacial lake dynamics and evolution, offering a valuable resource for future research.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10579968
- Publisher / Repository:
- AGU
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Earth and Space Science
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 2
- ISSN:
- 2333-5084
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Supraglacial lakes form on the surface of the Greenland Ice Sheet during the summer months and can directly impact ice sheet mass balance by removing mass via drainage and runoff or indirectly impact mass balance by influencing ice sheet dynamics. Here, we utilize the growing inventory of optical and microwave satellite imagery to automatically determine the fate of Greenland-wide supraglacial lakes during 2018 and 2019, a cool and warm melt season respectively. We use a machine learning time series classification approach to categorize lakes into four different categories: lakes that 1) refreeze, 2) rapidly drain, 3) slowly drain, and 4) become buried lakes at the end of the melt season. We find that during the warmer 2019, not only was the number of lake drainage events higher than in 2018, but also the proportion of lakes that drained was greater. By investigating mean lake depths for these four categories, we show that drained lakes were, on average, 22% deeper than lakes that refroze or became buried lakes. Interestingly, drained lakes had approximately the same maximum depth in 2018 and 2019; however, lakes that did not drain were 29% deeper in 2018, a cooler year. Our unique two-year dataset describing the fate of every Greenland supraglacial lake provides novel insight into lake drainage and refreeze in a relatively warm and cool year, which may be increasingly relevant in a warming climate.more » « less
-
Abstract. The Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) is losing mass as the climate warms through both increased meltwater runoff and ice discharge at marine-terminating sectors. At the ice sheet surface, meltwater runoff forms a dynamic supraglacial hydrological system which includes stream and river networks and large supraglacial lakes (SGLs). Streams and rivers can route water into crevasses or into supraglacial lakes with crevasses underneath, both of which can then hydrofracture to the ice sheet base, providing a mechanism for the surface meltwater to access the bed. Understanding where, when, and how much meltwater is transferred to the bed is important because variability in meltwater supply to the bed can increase ice flow speeds, potentially impacting the hypsometry of the ice sheet in grounded sectors, and iceberg discharge to the ocean. Here we present a new, physically based, supraglacial hydrology model for the GrIS that is able to simulate (a) surface meltwater routing and SGL filling; (b) rapid meltwater drainage to the ice sheet bed via the hydrofracture of surface crevasses both in and outside of SGLs; (c) slow SGL drainage via overflow in supraglacial meltwater channels; and, by offline coupling with a second model, (d) the freezing and unfreezing of SGLs from autumn to spring. We call the model the Supraglacial Hydrology Evolution and Drainage (or SHED) model. We apply the model to three study regions in southwest Greenland between 2015 and 2019 (inclusive) and evaluate its performance with respect to observed supraglacial lake extents and proglacial discharge measurements. We show that the model reproduces 80 % of observed lake locations and provides good agreement with observations in terms of the temporal evolution of lake extent. Modelled moulin density values are in keeping with those previously published, and seasonal and inter-annual variability in proglacial discharge agrees well with that which is observed, though the observations lag the model by a few days since they include transit time through the subglacial system, while the model does not. Our simulations suggest that lake drainage behaviours may be more complex than traditional models suggest, with lakes in our model draining through a combination of both overflow and hydrofracture and with some lakes draining only partially and then refreezing. This suggests that, in order to simulate the evolution of Greenland's surface hydrological system with fidelity, a model that includes all of these processes needs to be used. In future work, we will couple our model to a subglacial model and an ice flow model and thus use our estimates of where, when, and how much meltwater gets to the bed to understand the consequences for ice flow.more » « less
-
Abstract. Over recent decades, the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) has lost mass through increased melting and solid ice discharge into the ocean. Surface meltwater features such as supraglacial lakes (SGLs), channels and slush are becoming more abundant as a result of the former and are implicated as a control on the latter when they drain. It is not yet clear, however, how these different surface hydrological features will respond to future climate changes, and it is likely that GrIS surface melting will continue to increase as the Arctic warms. Here, we use Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 optical satellite imagery to compare the distribution and evolution of meltwater features (SGLs, channels, slush) in the Russell–Leverett glacier catchment, southwest Greenland, in relatively high (2019) and low (2018) melt years. We show that (1) supraglacial meltwater covers a greater area and extends further inland to higher elevations in 2019 than in 2018; (2) slush – generally disregarded in previous Greenland surface hydrology studies – is far more widespread in 2019 than in 2018; (3) the supraglacial channel system is more interconnected in 2019 than in 2018; (4) a greater number and larger total area of SGLs drained in 2019, although draining SGLs were, on average, deeper and more voluminous in 2018; (5) small SGLs (≤0.0495 km2) – typically disregarded in previous studies – form and drain in both melt years, although this behaviour is more prevalent in 2019; and (6) a greater proportion of SGLs refroze in 2018 compared to 2019. This analysis provides new insight into how the ice sheet responds to significant melt events, and how a changing climate may impact meltwater feature characteristics, SGL behaviour and ice dynamics in the future.more » « less
-
Supraglacial lakes on the Greenland Ice Sheet drain through physically distinct pathways: hydrofracture, moulins, lateral stream routing, and crevasse-fields. Each drainage mechanism carries unique implications for ice sheet dynamics. Existing automated classifications reduce each lake's drainage behavior to a time-series of scalar values representing the observed water surface-area and classify each lake based on drainage rate (e.g., rapid vs. slow). This scalar reduction conflates physically different drainage mechanisms, which can only be determined through consideration of full spatio-temporal tracking. Here we introduce a human-benchmarked, machine learning-ready benchmark dataset that pairs full Sentinel-2 multispectral satellite imagery time series with human-expert-labels assigned for N=1679 supraglacial lakes in the central-west basin of the Greenland Ice Sheet during the 2018 (n=679) and 2019 (n=1000) melt seasons. The dataset is formatted as per-lake CF-1.8 NetCDF files each containing: six Sentinel-2 reflectance bands at 10 meter spatial resolution and daily cadence over the 153 day melt season (1 May to 30 September); a per-pixel binary cloud mask; co-registered lake water masks (both static and dynamic); and the human-assigned drainage classification labels. We accompany the dataset with a baseline deep learning classifier, demonstrating the utility of the dataset both in deep learning workflows and in extending lake drainage classification from rate-based to mechanism-based. The dataset is released through the Stanford Digital Repository under a CC BY 4.0 license, and the accompanying open-source sat-tile-stack preprocessing software under an MIT license.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

