<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Hierarchical Searches for Subsolar-mass Binaries and the Third-generation Gravitational Wave Detector Era</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>The Astrophysical Journal</publisher>
				<date>12/26/2024</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10580403</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.3847/1538-4357/ad96b4</idno>
					<title level='j'>The Astrophysical Journal</title>
<idno>0004-637X</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">978</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">1</biblScope>					

					<author>Kanchan Soni</author><author>Alexander H Nitz</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[<title>Abstract</title> <p>Detecting gravitational waves (GWs) from coalescing compact binaries has become routine with ground-based detectors like Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo. However, beyond standard sources such as binary black holes and neutron stars and neutron star black holes, no exotic sources revealing new physics have been discovered. Detecting ultracompact objects, such as subsolar mass (SSM), offers a promising opportunity to explore diverse astrophysical populations. However, searching for these objects using standard matched-filtering techniques is computationally intensive due to the dense parameter space involved. This increasing computational demand not only challenges current search methodologies but also poses a significant obstacle for third-generation (3G) ground-based GW detectors. In the 3G detectors, signals are expected to be observed for tens of minutes and detection rates to reach one per minute. This requires efficient search strategies to manage the computational load of long-duration signal search. In this paper, we demonstrate how hierarchical search strategies can address the computational challenges associated with detecting long-duration signals in current detectors and the 3G era. Using SSM searches as an example, we show that optimizing data sampling rates and adjusting the number of templates in matched filtering at each stage of low-frequency searches can improve the signal-to-noise ratio by 6% and detection volume by 10%–20%. This sensitivity improvement is achieved with a 2.5-fold reduction in computational time compared to standard PyCBC searches. We also discuss how this approach could be adapted and refined for searches involving eccentric and precessing binaries with future detectors.</p>]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Introduction</head><p>The field of gravitational-wave astronomy has been rapidly expanding ever since the detection of the first binary black hole merger GW150914 (B. P. <ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. 2016a</ref>). To date, nearly 90 gravitational-wave (GW) sources are cataloged by LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA (LVK) Collaboration, including dozens of binary black holes, two binary neutron stars, and three neutron star-black hole mergers (B. P. Abbott 2023a). Additional GW sources were independently cataloged (A. H. <ref type="bibr">Nitz et al. 2021a;</ref><ref type="bibr">S. Olsen et al. 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. H. Nitz et al. 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">D. Wadekar et al. 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. K. Mehta et al. 2023</ref>) using publicly available data (B. P. <ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. 2021a;</ref><ref type="bibr">B. P. Abbott 2023b)</ref>. The third observation (O3) run of Advanced LIGO (J. <ref type="bibr">Aasi et al. 2015)</ref> and Advanced Virgo (F. <ref type="bibr">Acernese et al. 2015)</ref> led to the detection of compact objects under 3 M e with GW190814 (R. <ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. 2020)</ref>, where the secondary compact object had a mass of &#8764;2.59 M e and a low spin (0.07). Several other events like GW190425, GW191219, GW200105, GW200115, and GW200210 identified during this run also had one of the component masses less than 3 M e . The ongoing fourth observation run detected GW230529 (A. G. <ref type="bibr">Abac et al. 2024)</ref>. This event's primary object had a mass ranging between 2.5 and 4.5 M e , making it an additional compact object, likely a black hole, existing within the "lower mass gap" (C. D. <ref type="bibr">Bailyn et al. 1998;</ref><ref type="bibr">F. &#214;zel et al. 2010</ref>; W. M. <ref type="bibr">Farr et al. 2011)</ref>. Although several studies have provided insights into the mass and spin distributions of compact sources detected through current GW detectors (J. <ref type="bibr">Roulet et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">B. P. Abbott et al. 2021b)</ref>, the possibility of discovering ultracompact objects with masses less than a solar-mass range remains an open question (B. P. <ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. H. Nitz et al. 2021b</ref>; K. S. <ref type="bibr">Phukon et al. 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">R. Abbott et al. 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. H. Nitz et al. 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">LVK Collaboration 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. L. Miller 2024)</ref>.</p><p>Subsolar-mass (SSM) compact objects do not follow the standard stellar evolution pathway. These objects, if black holes, are expected to form through nonstellar evolution models and could be primordial black holes (PBHs; B. J. <ref type="bibr">Carr et al. 2010</ref>). If they are neutron stars (V. <ref type="bibr">Doroshenko et al. 2022)</ref>, they might result from nonstandard supernova explosion models (B. <ref type="bibr">M&#252;ller et al. 2024)</ref>. Although the search for SSM black holes began quite early (T. <ref type="bibr">Nakamura et al. 1997;</ref><ref type="bibr">C. Alcock et al. 2000;</ref><ref type="bibr">B. Abbott et al. 2005</ref><ref type="bibr">B. Abbott et al. , 2008))</ref>, no candidates have been found yet. Since then, numerous models have proposed various formation pathways for these sources. The most common formation mechanism of PBHs suggests their origin from the direct collapse of early, small-scale fluctuations (Y. B. <ref type="bibr">Zel'dovich &amp; I. D. Novikov 1967;</ref><ref type="bibr">S. Hawking 1971)</ref> due to certain features of the inflationary potential. Additionally, there are alternative formation channels where PBHs emerge from phase transitions (C. T. <ref type="bibr">Byrnes et al. 2018)</ref> in the early Universe or through the collapse of topological defects like cosmic strings (S. W. <ref type="bibr">Hawking 1989;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. Polnarev et al. 1991;</ref><ref type="bibr">C. Hong-bo et al. 1996)</ref>.</p><p>If an SSM compact object, whether a black hole or neutron star, appears in a binary system, the emitted GW can be detected through ground-based interferometers. Several studies have investigated the search for SSM black holes (B. P. <ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. 2018</ref><ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. , 2019;;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. H. Nitz et al. 2021b</ref><ref type="bibr">A. H. Nitz et al. , 2021c;;</ref><ref type="bibr">R. Abbott et al. 2022</ref>), but no significant detections have been made to date. Studies show that a small fraction of dark matter could be due to PBHs (B. J. <ref type="bibr">Carr et al. 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">B. Carr et al. 2021)</ref>. While many cosmological investigations have ruled out their existence at extremely low masses (M. <ref type="bibr">Sasaki et al. 2018)</ref>, exploration continues in a mass range spanning several orders of magnitude. A confirmed detection within the LIGO-Virgo frequency band would provide critical insights into the formation mechanisms of PBHs and contribute to constraining the fraction of dark matter in the universe. On the other hand, a SSM neutron star in a binary system could provide a high tidal effect on its companion (F. <ref type="bibr">Crescimbeni et al. 2024a</ref>). These effects would be measured with the future-generation GW detectors (F. <ref type="bibr">Crescimbeni et al. 2024b)</ref>.</p><p>The offline search for GWs from merging binaries uses the matched-filtering technique (B. S. <ref type="bibr">Sathyaprakash et al. 1991</ref>; S. V. <ref type="bibr">Dhurandhar et al. 1994a</ref><ref type="bibr">Dhurandhar et al. , 1994b;;</ref><ref type="bibr">B. J. Owen et al. 1999;</ref><ref type="bibr">B. Allen et al. 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">S. A. Usman et al. 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">G. S. Davies et al. 2020)</ref>. In this method, a bank of modeled signals, or templates, is correlated with well-calibrated interferometer data (X. <ref type="bibr">Siemens et al. 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">J. Abadie et al. 2010</ref>). However, this approach becomes computationally demanding, particularly for low-mass binaries, as the cost increases with the number of templates and the length of the signal model used as a matched-filter template. To mitigate the computational challenges, suboptimal choices are often made by limiting the search parameters. For instance, searches may only filter data above 45 Hz (B. P. Abbott et al. 2016b) or limit the duration of the templates to nearly 512 s (A. H. <ref type="bibr">Nitz et al. 2021b</ref><ref type="bibr">Nitz et al. , 2022))</ref>. While these restrictions help reduce computational costs, they also reduce the sensitive volume by approximately 24%, within which PBHs might be detected.</p><p>Observing long-duration GW signals poses significant challenges with existing search methods. The main difficulty arises from the necessity of using a very dense template bank ( ( ) &#61519; 10 7 ), which significantly increases the computational cost of the matched-filtering search. Furthermore, the search sensitivity can be compromised by nonstationary data, which may contain long-duration correlations that hinder current signal-vetoing techniques and statistical analyses. This nonstationarity can also impact the statistics and signal-vetoing methods used in current search pipelines. These issues are expected to become considerably more severe in the era of third-generation (3G) ground-based detectors-3G detectors such as the Cosmic Explorer (B. P. <ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">D. Reitze et al. 2019</ref>) and the Einstein Telescope (S. <ref type="bibr">Hild et al. 2009;</ref><ref type="bibr">M. Punturo et al. 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">M. Maggiore et al. 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">S. Di Pace et al. 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">A. Grado 2023)</ref> are anticipated to detect binary mergers at rates 2 to 3 orders of magnitude higher than current detectors (M. <ref type="bibr">Evans et al. 2021)</ref>. These detectors, designed to operate from very low frequencies (starting from 2 Hz), will observe signals for several minutes or hours. Due to their high sensitivity in the lower-frequency band, the likelihood of detecting eccentric or precessing binaries will be higher, which will indirectly expand the template bank&#700;s parameter space both in dimensionality and parameter ranges, thereby increasing the computational cost of the search. Furthermore, since signals would remain in the sensitivity band for longer periods, the Earth&#700;s rotation will reduce search sensitivity by altering the detector&#700;s response functions and affecting matched-filter statistics. Therefore, developing an efficient, cost-effective matched-filtering strategy for longduration GW signals is essential to advance the current stateof-the-art search techniques.</p><p>One approach to efficiently search for long-duration signals, such as those from SSM binaries, is implementing a hierarchical search strategy (R. <ref type="bibr">Dhurkunde et al. 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">K. Soni et al. 2022)</ref>. In this method, a two-stage matched-filtering search is performed using multiple template banks of varying densities. In the first stage, the search is conducted over coarsely sampled data using a coarse bank to identify coincident triggers that could represent true GW events. These triggers are followed up in the second stage with a finer search, focusing on the neighborhood of the parameter space identified in the first stage. This two-stage approach effectively reduces the number of matched-filtering operations required for the search, significantly reducing computational time.</p><p>In this paper, we demonstrate how hierarchical search strategies can be effectively applied to search for long-duration GW signals from compact binary mergers in Advanced LIGO data. Using the SSM compact object search as a case study, we show that performing the search at lower frequencies in Advanced LIGO and tuning each stage of the existing hierarchical search strategy (K. <ref type="bibr">Soni et al. 2022</ref><ref type="bibr">Soni et al. , 2024</ref>) not only reduce the computational cost of matched-filtering process but also enhance the search sensitivity. Specifically, we show that our approach increases the search&#700;s volumetric sensitivity by approximately 10%-20% while reducing computation time by a factor of 2.5 compared to the standard two-detector PyCBC search. This methodology also accounts for the increase in background noise due to the larger template bank, as well as signal consistency tests and potential signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) losses resulting from approximations introduced during the hierarchical stages. Furthermore, we discuss how hierarchical search strategies could be generalized for computationally intensive compact binary coalescence (CBC) searches in 3G detectors.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Method</head><p>The matched-filtering search for long-duration signals as in the case of binaries containing SSM compact objects is expensive as it requires a very dense template bank. To optimize the search, often the length of the template is reduced to a manageable duration (&#8764;512 s) so that search analysis can be performed. This could be enabled by performing matched filtering from 45 Hz rather than 15 Hz (B. P. Abbott 2023a). However, such adjustments affect the horizon distance of the binary and the expected SNR.</p><p>The horizon distance (K. S. Thorne 1987; B. <ref type="bibr">Allen et al. 2012)</ref> for an inspiraling binary is given by</p><p>where f min and f max are the minimum and maximum frequencies of the LIGO's sensitivity range. S n ( f ) is the power spectral density of the noise in the detector and &#961; is the expected matched-filter SNR for an inspiraling binary with chirp mass &#61517; observed in the detector's frame. For a particular source of chirp mass of a few that have a fixed SNR in the detector's frame, changing the operating frequency band can affect the detectability of a signal. This means that the fractional SNR loss, as also shown in R. <ref type="bibr">Magee et al. (2018)</ref>, due to a change in the operating frequency band would be</p><p>, 2</p><p>SNR loss max min max max with respect to the standard operational band of Advanced LIGO for matched filtering for generic CBC search (B. P. Abbott 2023a).</p><p>If we perform a search from 35 Hz, assuming the other source parameters do not change, the percentage loss in SNR is about 3.1% for a frequency band of 35-2048 Hz. This loss is relatively small compared to the SSM searches conducted in the 45-2048 Hz band (R. Abbott et al. 2022), which experience an SNR loss of about 8%-9%. This comparison can also be seen in Figure <ref type="figure">1</ref>. Ideally, the lower-frequency limit can be further lowered to match that used for a generic CBC search. However, this step will increase the computation demand and require very long-duration templates in the bank. Therefore, in our work, we select a lower-frequency cutoff of 35 Hz. By making this choice, we expect the loss in astrophysical volumetric sensitivity to the inspiral stage by &#8764;10% of binary coalescence, which is lower than 24% as observed in R. <ref type="bibr">Abbott et al. (2022)</ref>.</p><p>Generating templates at lower frequencies enhances the sensitivity of the search, but it can also lead to a higher density of the template bank. This increase in density may raise the computational cost of matched filtering in traditional offline PyCBC or flat search (S. A. <ref type="bibr">Usman et al. 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">G. S. Davies et al. 2020</ref>). However, this added computational burden can be mitigated by adopting hierarchical search strategies.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.1.">Review of Hierarchical Search</head><p>The two-detector flat search performs matched filtering over a discretely sampled data segment using a dense bank of templates and generates triggers with SNRs (&#961;) (S. A. <ref type="bibr">Usman et al. 2016)</ref>. In contrast, a hierarchical search strategy offers a more efficient approach by enabling a multistage matched-filtering process, where the number of templates is progressively reduced at each stage. As described in K. <ref type="bibr">Soni et al. (2022)</ref>, this search divides a flat search into two stages: coarse and fine. During the coarse stage, the data is matched filtered using a coarse template bank, which consists of sparsely placed templates. The sparseness of these templates is determined by the minimal match (B. J. <ref type="bibr">Owen 1996)</ref> at which the bank is constructed, typically set lower (below 0.97) than the value used for constructing a bank for the flat search.</p><p>Performing a coarse search reduces the number of matchedfiltering operations. This reduction is further enhanced when the data are sampled at a lower frequency (512 Hz). However, this approach comes with the trade-off of potentially lower matched-filter SNR values for the resulting triggers. To address this, the SNR thresholds are lowered (&#961; = 3.5) compared to those used in a flat search (&#961; = 4). Given these triggers could be generated by non-Gaussian features or glitches (B. P. Abbott et al. 2021c) present in the data, the SNRs are further downweighted using chi-square vetoes (B. Allen 2005; A. H. <ref type="bibr">Nitz 2018)</ref>. Only those triggers that pass these vetoes are then subjected to a coincidence test (S. A. <ref type="bibr">Usman et al. 2016)</ref>, during which a ranking statistic is computed to assess their significance (A. H. <ref type="bibr">Nitz et al. 2017)</ref>.</p><p>The coincident triggers obtained from the coarse search, with ranking statistics above a certain threshold (approximately 7, as used in K. <ref type="bibr">Soni et al. 2022)</ref>, are followed up in the second stage for a finer search. In this stage, a focused search is conducted within the vicinity or neighborhood (nbhd) of the coarse template&#700;s parameter space. This nbhd is a region around a coarse template where the minimal match between templates within the nbhd (&#8764;10-100) and the coarse template ranges from 0.75 to 0.99.</p><p>To avoid the computational burden of calculating the nbhd for each coarse template on the fly, a precomputed nbhd bank is used. This bank contains all the nbhd regions and the corresponding templates for each coarse template. During the second-stage search, a union of all the nbhds corresponding to the coarse triggers in each data segment is used for matched filtering. To further improve the SNR, the data sampling rate is increased to 2408 Hz, which is higher than that used in the coarse search. Triggers with SNRs above 4 that pass all chisquare tests are then subjected to a final coincidence search, compiling a list of foreground candidates.</p><p>To assess the significance of potential GW events, the false alarm rate (FAR) is estimated based on the background (S. A. <ref type="bibr">Usman et al. 2016)</ref>. Unlike the flat search, which estimates the background by applying millions of time shifts to triggers from a single detector, the hierarchical search employs a hybrid approach in its second stage (K. <ref type="bibr">Soni et al. 2024)</ref>. At first, a few time shifts are applied to generate coincident background triggers. Then, an exponential fit is applied to the cumulative distribution of these background triggers, and the fitted curve is used to calculate the FAR for the foreground triggers obtained in the second stage. This method of estimating the background is particularly effective for longduration signals, as the expected background distribution tends to follow the tail of a Poisson distribution (S. A. <ref type="bibr">Usman et al. 2016)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.2.">Template Bank</head><p>We construct two aligned-spin banks-a coarse bank at a minimal match of 0.92 and a fine bank of 0.97-using a geometric placement algorithm (I. W. <ref type="bibr">Harry et al. 2014)</ref> for the hierarchical search. Both banks are designed to cover parameters where m 1 ranges between 0.2 and 10 M e and m 2 between 0.2 and 1.0 M e in the detector frame. The dimensionless spins are restricted to 0.1 for component masses smaller than 0.5 and 0.9 for larger masses. The orbital precession and the existence of multipoles are neglected in the search space. These bank parameter ranges are consistent with the bank used for the LVK search (R. Abbott et al. 2022; LVK Collaboration 2023). From here, we refer to this bank as the flat bank .</p><p>In contrast to the flat bank, where templates commence at a frequency of 45 Hz, the templates in our banks start at a frequency of 35 Hz. This choice reduces the fractional loss in the matched-filter SNR, as shown in Section 2. As a result, even though our coarse bank is constructed at a lower minimal match, it is approximately 1.6 times the size of the flat bank. These distinctions are summarized in Table <ref type="table">1</ref>.</p><p>The hierarchical search requires the construction of the nbhd bank for the second-stage search. Therefore, we use the generated fine bank to construct the nbhd bank using the method described in Section IV of K. <ref type="bibr">Soni et al. (2022)</ref>.</p><p>Figure <ref type="figure">2</ref> shows the parameter space covered by the coarse templates in the chirp mass and effective spin plane. This plot shows that the distribution of templates within a nbhd is not uniform across the parameter space, primarily due to boundary effects. These effects occur because the match between neighboring templates gradually decreases as the mismatch in the &#964; 3 mass parameter increases relative to &#964; 0 , thereby significantly extending the nbhd region along this coordinate.</p><p>As shown in Figure <ref type="figure">2</ref>, the number of templates in an nbhd typically ranges from a few tens to hundreds. This can significantly affect the final background in the second stage. To improve background estimation, more noise coincidences from the coarse search need to be followed up. However, since the number of templates in the nbhds is relatively small, the search cost is not expected to be significantly higher than that of the flat search.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Application to SSM Search</head><p>We perform an SSM search on publicly available data sets using a two-stage hierarchical approach, as outlined in Section 2. The data consist of approximately 5 days of coincident observations from the O3 run of the two LIGO detectors LIGO Hanford and LIGO Livingston, covering the period from 2019 April 1 to 8.</p><p>To begin, we first conduct a coarse search over the data sampled at 512 Hz using the coarse bank described in Section 2.2. The templates are generated at 35 Hz using the TaylorF2 (R. Sturani 2010) waveform model with phase corrections up to 3.5 post-Newtonian order. The lengths of these templates range between 10 2 and 10 3 at 35 Hz. To prevent the templates from wrapping around during the fast Fourier transform operation in the matched-filtering step, we ensure that the data segment length exceeds that of the longest template in the bank. Consequently, we set the data segment length to 2048 seconds for our analysis.</p><p>We identify triggers with a matched-filter SNR and reweighted SNR (B. Allen 2005; S. A. <ref type="bibr">Usman et al. 2016</ref>) of 3.5 or greater. This threshold is chosen to increase the likelihood of detecting true signals that might be missed due to lower data sampling and the use of a coarse bank. To reduce the impact of short-duration glitches in the data, the triggers are further weighted using a chisquare and sine-Gaussian vetoes. The surviving triggers then undergo a coincidence test, where they are shifted in time by 5000 seconds, and a ranking statistic (&#923;) (A. H. <ref type="bibr">Nitz et al. 2017</ref>; G. S. <ref type="bibr">Davies et al. 2020</ref>) is computed.</p><p>In the next step, we perform a finer search in the second stage on coincident triggers with &#923; 7. During this stage, matched filtering is conducted again on data sampled at 2048 Hz, using a union of nbhds around the identified coarse templates. The data sampling rate is increased by a factor of 4 to improve the matched-filter SNR. Triggers from this stage are collected if their SNRs and reweighted SNRs exceed a threshold of 4. These triggers are then reweighted using chisquare and sine-Gaussian vetoes before undergoing a coincidence test, over the same time-shift interval as in the first stage. Finally, a list of foreground and background triggers is compiled, and the FAR for the foreground triggers is calculated following the procedure described in K. <ref type="bibr">Soni et al. (2024)</ref>.</p><p>The primary differences between the SSM search using the hierarchical method and the search adopted by the LVK (R.    45 Hz, our approach begins at a lower frequency of 35 Hz. This choice enhances the sensitivity of our search to potential GW signals, particularly those that might be present at lower frequencies. By adjusting the matched-filtering start frequency, we aim to improve the detection capabilities for signals that might be overlooked in the flat search. Note that our analysis utilizes data from the two LIGO detectors, whereas the LVK analysis incorporates data from the Virgo detector as well. However, this distinction does not impact the comparison of results in Section 3.1, as both analyses consider two-detector configurations for consistency.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.1.">Results</head><p>The hierarchical search yielded a list of GW candidates, many of which were statistically insignificant due to their FAR values exceeding 1 per year. These candidates along with the ones identified through a flat search using the same data set are summarized in Table <ref type="table">2</ref>. While a few candidates are common to both search pipelines, none are statistically significant. As shown in Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref>, the foreground events overlap with the background distributions for both searches, indicating that the candidates are primarily noise coincidences.</p><p>Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref> also highlights the disparity in backgrounds between hierarchical and flat searches, with the hierarchical search producing a larger background. This difference is due to the usage of different numbers of templates within their respective search pipelines. As shown in Table <ref type="table">1</ref>, the coarse bank is approximately 1.6 times and the fine bank is 4.8 times denser the flat bank owing to the template generation at 35 Hz. If the flat search had employed the fine bank, its background distribution would likely resemble that of the hierarchical search, especially in the tail. Although the number of templates used in the second-stage search is low (&#8764;10-1000 per data segment), the background generated in the second stage is expected to increase leading to more instances of noise coincidence. However, this also improves the chances of detecting GW sources that might be missed in a flat search.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.2.">Sensitivity and Search Efficiency</head><p>The sensitivity of a search is determined by how many signals it can detect at a particular significance level within a given observation time (T). This can be quantified by estimating the observable volume-time (VT) product (V. Tiwari 2018). For a constant merger rate of the population of binaries, the average VT sensitivity product is given by</p><p>where N det is the number of detected sources in the search and N inj is the total number of injected sources. V 0 is the volume defined as</p><p>where dV dz c is the differential comoving volume in an expanding universe with redshift z.</p><p>To test the sensitivity of our search method, we conducted a comparative analysis through an injection campaign on a simulated binary population. In this population, we assumed that one of the compact objects has a mass below a solar mass, while the other ranges from 1 to 10 solar masses. We created three distinct sets of injections, each defined by different spin conditions: high spin, low spin, and a mixed case where only one compact object has low spin. The distributions and ranges of the component masses and spins for these three scenarios are detailed in Table <ref type="table">3</ref>.</p><p>For the given parameter space, we generated GW signals using the waveform approximants listed in Table <ref type="table">3</ref>, starting at a frequency of 35 Hz. Each signal was injected into the data with a minimum interval of 100 seconds between injections, assuming an isotropic distribution for the sky locations of the sources. Following this procedure, approximately 6500 injections were made across the three sets, and a search was performed using both the traditional flat method and our hierarchical approach.</p><p>Figure <ref type="figure">4</ref> shows the VT ratio computed for the two search methods. The hierarchical search outperforms the flat search, for each identified candidate. The FARs of the detected events in the flat search were determined using the time-shift method, whereas those for the hierarchical search were determined by the method described in K. <ref type="bibr">Soni et al. (2024)</ref>. showing an improvement in the VT ratio by approximately 1.1-1.2. This improvement is primarily due to the SNR enhancement, when the search is performed at a lower frequency of 35 Hz instead of 45 Hz. When the search is performed at 35 Hz, we expect the gain in the SNR to be approximately 6% and an astrophysical volumetric gain of &#8764;20%. However, the injection study results indicate that the detection volume improves by only 10%-20%. This discrepancy likely arises from an increase in the noise background when the lower bound of the matched-filtering frequency is reduced.</p><p>We compared the matched-filtering cost by comparing the number of CPU core hours required by each detector in use in the two searches. As shown in Table <ref type="table">4</ref>, the number of CPU core hours required by flat search is more than coarse and fine searches owing to the different number of templates used in each search. The numbers show that the overall cost of a hierarchical search is approximately 2.5 times less than a flat search. This is a huge advantage of hierarchical search given that the search sensitivity is also more than that of the flat search.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Conclusion and Discussion</head><p>The search for long-duration GW signals from compact binary mergers, such as SSM binaries, low-mass BNSs, precessing binaries, and binaries with moderate-mass ratios (m 1 /m 2 , m 1 m 2 ) and noncircular orbits, is challenging with the current matched-filtering search methods. This is primarily because of the requirement for large, densely populated template banks. To mitigate the computational burden, suboptimal choices are often made, which inevitably limit the sensitivity of such searches. With the advent of 3G detectors, these challenges are expected to become more pronounced as GW signals will be observed over longer durations, ranging from tens to hundreds of minutes. This extended observation window will substantially increase the computational demands due to the rapid expansion of the parameter space. Consequently, the development of efficient hierarchical search strategies is critical, not only to enhance current detection capabilities but also to ensure readiness for the vastly more computationally expensive searches required by next-generation detectors.</p><p>In this paper, we demonstrated for the first time how the hierarchical search strategy can be used to search long-duration signals, such as those from binaries containing an SSM compact object, without restricting the parameter space. In Section 2, we presented a preliminary calculation indicating that the SNR improves by approximately 6% when the matched filtering is conducted starting at a frequency of 35 Hz. This means that an approximately 20% increase in the sensitive</p><p>Table 3 Overview of Three Injection Sets Focusing on One of the Component Masses in SSM Ranges   <ref type="table">3</ref>). The VT ratio, binned over inverse false alarm rates (IFARs), demonstrates an improvement in search sensitivity across all chirp mass (M chirp ) bins. Our findings in this paper highlight that near-optimal sensitivity can be achieved using a hierarchical search strategy for very long-duration signals, even compared to a direct flat search. We specifically showed that by optimizing different aspects of the search process in two stages, such as adjusting the frequency of operation, data sampling rates, and the density of the template banks, we achieved computational savings of up to a factor of 2.5 while simultaneously enhancing the sensitivity of the SSM search.</p><p>Looking ahead, 3G detectors are expected to introduce several significant challenges for CBC searches due to their enhanced low-frequency sensitivity, as discussed in Section 1. With the ability to detect GW signals from a broader range of CBC sources, including eccentric and precessing binaries over extended durations, the search space will expand dramatically. This expansion in search space will, in turn, increase computational demands to potentially unmanageable levels. Therefore, a hierarchical approach may be proposed to address these challenges effectively.</p><p>In the 3G era, the hierarchical search could be structured into stages, with the first stage focused on efficiently identifying potential GW candidates. This efficient identification could be achieved by focusing on certain features in the signal&#700;s morphology and maximizing the likelihood of detecting it across those source parameters. In contrast, the second stage aims to improve the SNR and address any losses from the first stage. Since the primary goal of the first stage is to locate regions where signals are likely to be present, general optimizations such as reducing the template bank size, adjusting data sampling, and defining the operating frequency range for matched filtering can be applied, as demonstrated in this work. The density of the template bank could be reduced by coarsening the bank and adjusting the frequency at which templates are generated. However, this step should focus on regions of the parameter space where a higher SNR is expected due to features in the binary&#700;s orbit. For example, in eccentric binaries, the effects of eccentricity are most prominent at lower frequencies, while at higher frequencies, the binary&#700;s orbit is expected to circularize. Therefore, the template bank, matchedfiltering frequency band, and data sampling rate could be adjusted to prioritize higher frequencies, reducing the search cost. To enhance detection probability, an nbhd search could be performed in the second stage with templates incorporating eccentricities at lower frequencies. A similar strategy could be applied to binaries with moderate precession. For these binaries, the first stage can be adjusted to search for signals with variable starting frequencies for matched filtering, excluding less significant merger-ringdown phases, which could be relaxed in the second stage. Since the Earth&#700;s rotation is expected to impact the antenna response functions, potentially reducing search sensitivity, approximate response functions that include the effect of the source&#700;s orientation with respect to the detector could be introduced only in the second stage of the hierarchical search, thereby improving overall sensitivity. The second stage could also be optimized to recover any SNR losses from the first stage due to the various optimizations applied earlier.</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>The Astrophysical Journal, 978:69 (8pp), 2025 January 01Soni &amp; Nitz</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
