More Like this

1. Rowasu'u: An A'uwẽ-Xavante Community Archive

   Jahnke, Lori M; Dent, Rosanna; Welch, James R (May 2025, Transactions of the American Philosophical Society)

   Rowasu'u is a digital archives project that seeks to reunite A'uwẽ-Xavante individuals with researcher produced documentation of their ancestors, families, bodies, culture, and homelands and eventually provide a platform for the collection and preservation of community knowledge. A'uwẽ-Xavante have a long history of receiving academic researchers including anthropologists, geneticists, biomedical researchers, ecologists, and linguists, but they have had limited access to the documentation and other data produced through these encounters. The Rowasu'u project is working with scholars to compile and make accessible records of more than 60 years of decentralized academic research while partnering with A'uwẽ-Xavante communities historically positioned as the most prominent participants. Our larger aspiration is that in addition to supporting A'uwẽ-Xavante efforts to reclaim their history as recorded by scientists, Rowasu'u will advance Indigenous research governance and data sovereignty as human rights applicable to past as well as future research. This chapter discusses our early progress in developing Rowasu'u using Mukurtu CMS, including the challenges and complexities inherent in navigating local politics in the context of generations of marginalization and exclusion. 

   more » « less
2. Board 157: Creating National Leadership Cohorts for Making Academic Change Happen: Sharing Lessons Learned Through RED Participatory Action Research (REDPAR) Tipsheets

   https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--32275  

   Williams, Julia; Litzler, Elizabeth; Margherio, Cara; Andrijcic, Eva; Doten-Snitker, Kerice (June 2020, 2019 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access)

   null (Ed.)

   Our work with teams funded through the National Science Foundation REvolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments (RED) program began in 2015. Our project—funded first by a NSF EAGER grant, and then by a NSF RFE grant—focuses on understanding how the RED teams make change on their campuses and how this information about change can be captured and communicated to other STEM programs that seek to make change happen. Because our RED Participatory Action Research (REDPAR) Project is a collaboration between researchers (Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity at the University of Washington) and practitioners (Making Academic Change Happen Workshop at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology), we have challenged ourselves to develop means of communication that allow for both aspects of the work—both research and practice—to be treated equitably. As a result, we have created a new dissemination channel—the RED Participatory Action Project Tipsheet. The tipsheet format accomplishes several important goals. First, the content is drawn from both the research conducted with the RED teams and the practitioners’ work with the teams. Each tipsheet takes up a single theme and grounds the theme in the research literature while offering practical tips for applying the information. Second, the format is accessible to a wide spectrum of potential users, remaining free of jargon and applicable to multiple program and departmental contexts. Third, by publishing the tipsheets ourselves, rather than submitting them to an engineering education research journal, we make the information timely and freely available. We can make a tipsheet as soon as a theme emerges from the intersection of research data and observations of practice. During the poster session at ASEE 2019, we will share the three REDPAR Tipsheets that have been produced thus far: Creating Strategic Partnerships, Communicating Change, and Shared Vision. We will also work with attendees to demonstrate how the tipsheet content is adaptable to the attendees’ specific academic context. Our goal for the poster session is to provide attendees with tipsheet resources that are useful to their specific change project. 

   more » « less
3. Creating National Leadership Cohorts for Making Academic Change Happen: Sharing Lessons Learned Through RED Participatory Action Research (REDPAR) Tipsheets

   Williams, J.; Litzler, E.; Margherio, C.; Doten-Snitker, K.; Andrijcic, E.; and Mohan, S. (June 2019, 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition)

   Our work with teams funded through the National Science Foundation REvolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments (RED) program began in 2015. Our project—funded first by a NSF EAGER grant, and then by a NSF RFE grant—focuses on understanding how the RED teams make change on their campuses and how this information about change can be captured and communicated to other STEM programs that seek to make change happen. Because our RED Participatory Action Research (REDPAR) Project is a collaboration between researchers (Center for Evaluation & Research for STEM Equity at the University of Washington) and practitioners (Making Academic Change Happen Workshop at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology), we have challenged ourselves to develop means of communication that allow for both aspects of the work—both research and practice—to be treated equitably. As a result, we have created a new dissemination channel—the RED Participatory Action Project Tipsheet. The tipsheet format accomplishes several important goals. First, the content is drawn from both the research conducted with the RED teams and the practitioners’ work with the teams. Each tipsheet takes up a single theme and grounds the theme in the research literature while offering practical tips for applying the information. Second, the format is accessible to a wide spectrum of potential users, remaining free of jargon and applicable to multiple program and departmental contexts. Third, by publishing the tipsheets ourselves, rather than submitting them to an engineering education research journal, we make the information timely and freely available. We can make a tipsheet as soon as a theme emerges from the intersection of research data and observations of practice. During the poster session at ASEE 2019, we will share the three REDPAR Tipsheets that have been produced thus far: Creating Strategic Partnerships, Communicating Change, and Shared Vision. We will also work with attendees to demonstrate how the tipsheet content is adaptable to the attendees’ specific academic context. Our goal for the poster session is to provide attendees with tipsheet resources that are useful to their specific change project. 

   more » « less
4. Ruminations on the NSF Broader Impacts Criterion: A Dialogue with Academic Researchers and Broader Impacts Professionals

   https://doi.org/10.54656/jces.v17i2.616  

   Telliel, Yunus Doğan; Chen, Katherine C (November 2024, Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship)

   The National Science Foundation, a United States federal agency supporting STEM research, puts special emphasis on research impacts in society, and requires each funded research project to have “broader impacts” outside of conventional academic scholarship. As “broader impacts” have become an important part of the STEM research landscape in the U.S., most academic researchers need guidance and support in their broader impact plans. Focusing on a mid-size STEM-focused university, our research identified three major areas that matter to academic researchers: (1) autonomy of the researcher and non-prescriptive nature of broader impacts, (2) impact identity and personal connection to broader impacts, and (3) a critical engagement with diversity and inclusion in research and education. Combining these findings with a broader impacts professional’s reflections, we examine the ways in which broader impacts resources such as the ARIS Toolkit can assist academic researchers. We argue that by constructing dialogues between faculty researchers and broader impacts professionals, the research culture in the U.S. can turn into an ecosystem that supports meaningful, inclusive, and transformative STEM practices. 

   more » « less
5. Data for "Breaking the Paywall: The role of Open Journal System as key Open Science infrastructure"

   https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14020182  

   Milia, Matías Federico; R_Murillo, Luis Felipe (January 2024, Zenodo)

   Context This research was conducted within the NSF-SEEKCommons Project, a research initiative dedicated to supporting Open Science and Open Access in disciplinary research. The project has a special interest in understanding the role that critical infrastructure has in supporting open initiatives. The Open Journal System (OJS) serves as a long-standing fundamental piece for Open Access throughout the globe. Hence, it provides valuable information about experiences developing, deploying, and maintaining open technologies.  Methods We used mixed methods for our research, triangulating repository data, installation data, interviews, and documentary analysis. We collected repository data using a report generator (Kopp [2018] 2024) that uses repository metadata to present general statistics about a Git project. The resulting information was manually curated, disambiguated, and annotated to have a homogeneous set of developers with information about their institutional affiliation and country.    Names are normalized based on the information in qualitative interviews and by browsing the full-extent commits in the GitHub repository. Other sources for this were the institutional materials (available in current and archived versions of the PKP website), meeting minutes, the user forum, and further project documentation available online. GitHub handles are homologated to their most comprehensive version. For institutional and country affiliation, we resorted to GitHub profiles, PKP documentation and forums, institutional domains available in emails, and researchers' ORCID IDs.  Available files Information about the codebase (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp) organized by month, quarter, and semester. See file: OJS_GitStats_04-24.csv Information about the historical evolution of the codebase (number of files, lines of code, and timestamp), including a description of the top committers for each month. Commiters are described by including their institutional affiliation and country of origin. See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_1.tsv Information about the historical evolution of the codebase focusing on top committers, along with their institution and country. This file is formatted to map the co-occurrence of developers and attributes by month between 2004-2024.See file: OJS_DevStats_Institution-Country_2.tsv Selected fields to describe working and regularly maintained plugins for OJS as of October 2024. Includes name of the plugin, homepage, description, maintainer, and institutional affiliation. See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Processed.tsv Details of the aggregated information included in Table 5 of the article.See file: OJS_Plugins_2024_Table5.tsv Snapshot to XML information of the plugin gallery of OJS (October 21) retrieved from PKP website (Smecher 2024)See file: OJS_Plugins_2024.csv Funding The SEEKCommons Project is funded by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF), grant #2226425 

   more » « less