skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Mechanistic differences in eukaryotic initiation factor requirements for eIF4GI-driven cap-independent translation of structured mRNAs
Protein translation is globally downregulated under stress conditions. Many proteins that are synthesized under stress conditions use a cap-independent translation initiation pathway. A subset of cellular mRNAs that encode for these proteins contain stable secondary structures within their 5′UTR, and initiate cap-independent translation using elements called cap-independent translation enhancers or internal ribosome entry sites within their 5′UTRs. The interaction among initiation factors such as eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E), eIF4A, and eIF4GI, especially in regulating the eIF4F complex during noncanonical translation initiation of different 5′UTR mRNAs, is poorly understood. Here, equilibrium-binding assays, CD studies and in vitro translation assays were used to elucidate the recruitment of these initiation factors to the highly structured 5′UTRs of fibroblast-growth factor 9 (FGF-9) and hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha (HIF-1α) encoding mRNAs. We showed that eIF4A and eIF4E enhanced eIF4GI’s binding affinity to the uncapped 5′UTR of HIF-1α mRNA, inducing conformational changes in the protein/RNA complex. In contrast, these factors have no effect on the binding of eIF4GI to the 5′UTR of FGF-9 mRNA. Recently, Izidoro et al. reported that the interaction of 42nt unstructured RNA to human eIF4F complex is dominated by eIF4E and ATP-bound state of eIF4A. Here, we show that structured 5′UTR mRNA binding mitigates this requirement. Based on these observations, we describe two possible cap-independent translation mechanisms for FGF-9 and HIF-1α encoding mRNAs used by cells to mitigate cellular stress conditions.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2317112
PAR ID:
10587779
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Elsevier
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Volume:
300
Issue:
11
ISSN:
0021-9258
Page Range / eLocation ID:
107866
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Viral mRNAs that lack a 5′ m7GTP cap and a 3′ poly-A tail rely on structural elements in their untranslated regions (UTRs) to form unique RNA-protein complexes that regulate viral translation. Recent studies of the barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) have revealed eukaryotic initiation factor 3 (eIF3) plays a significant role in facilitating communication between its 5′ and 3′ UTRs by binding both UTRs simultaneously. This report uses in vitro translation assays, fluorescence anisotropy binding assays, and selective 2′-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) footprinting to identify secondary structures that are selectively interacting with eIF3. SHAPE data also show that eIF3 alters its interaction with BYDV structures when another factor crucial for BYDV translation, eIF4F, is introduced by the 3′ BYDV translational enhancer (BTE). The observed BTE and eIF4F-induced shift of eIF3 position on the 5’ UTR and the translational effects of altering eIF3-binding structures (SLC and SLII) support a new model for BYDV translation initiation that requires the reorientation of eIF3 on BYDV UTRs. This eIF3 function in BYDV translation initiation is both reminiscent of and distinct from eIF3–RNA interactions found in other non-canonically translating mRNAs (e.g. HCV). This characterization of a new role in translation initiation expands the known functionality of eIF3 and may be broadly applicable to other non-canonically translating mRNAs. 
    more » « less
  2. Initiation of translation for the majority of eukaryotic mRNAs is mediated by a 50 cap structure to which the eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) binds. Inhibition of the activity of eIF4E by 4EBP-1 does not prevent the translation of a number of cellular capped mRNAs, indicative of the existence of previously unexplored mechanisms for the translation of these capped mRNAs without the requirement of eIF4E. eIF4G2, also known as death-associated protein 5 (DAP5), a homolog of eIFGI that lacks the eIF4E binding domain, utilizes eIF3d (a subunit of eIF3) to promote the translation of a subset of these mRNAs. Using fluorescence anisotropy-based equilibrium binding studies, we provide the first quantitative evidence of the recruitment of eIF3d as well as eIF3d and eIFG2 complexes to a subset of human mRNAs. Our quantitative studies demonstrate the critical role a fully methylated 50 mRNA cap structure plays in the recognition and recruitment of eIF3d, as well as the eIF3d and eIFG2 complex. By using luciferase reporter-based in vitro translation assays, we further show that cap-recognition ability correlates with the efficiency of translation of these mRNAs. Essentially, by preferably utilizing eIF3d and eIFG2, specific mRNA subsets are still able to translate in a cap-dependent manner even when eIF4E is sequestered. Our findings offer new insight into the use of eIF3d and eIF4G2 as an alternative for growth and survival under conditions of cellular stress. This novel mechanism of translation may offer new targets for therapeutic regulation of mRNA translation. 
    more » « less
  3. Structures in the 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs) of mRNAs can physically modulate translation efficiency by impeding the scanning ribosome or by sequestering the translational start site. We assessed the impact of stable protein binding in 5′- and 3′-UTRs on translation efficiency by targeting the MS2 coat protein to a reporter RNA via its hairpin recognition site. Translation was assessed from the reporter RNA when coexpressed with MS2 coat proteins of varying affinities for the RNA, and at different expression levels. Binding of high-affinity proteins in the 5′-UTR hindered translation, whereas no effect was observed when the coat protein was targeted to the 3′-UTR. Inhibition of translation increased with coat protein concentration and affinity, reaching a maximum of 50%–70%. MS2 proteins engineered to bind two reporter mRNA sites had a stronger effect than those binding a single site. Our findings demonstrate that protein binding in an mRNA 5′-UTR physically impedes translation, with the effect governed by affinity, concentration, and sterics. 
    more » « less
  4. The 3′ untranslated regions (3′ UTRs) of mRNAs serve as hubs for post-transcriptional control as the targets of microRNAs (miRNAs) and RNA-binding proteins (RBPs). Sequences in 3′ UTRs confer alterations in mRNA stability, direct mRNA localization to subcellular regions, and impart translational control. Thousands of mRNAs are localized to subcellular compartments in neurons—including axons, dendrites, and synapses—where they are thought to undergo local translation. Despite an established role for 3′ UTR sequences in imparting mRNA localization in neurons, the specific RNA sequences and structural features at play remain poorly understood. The nervous system selectively expresses longer 3′ UTR isoforms via alternative polyadenylation (APA). The regulation of APA in neurons and the neuronal functions of longer 3′ UTR mRNA isoforms are starting to be uncovered. Surprising roles for 3′ UTRs are emerging beyond the regulation of protein synthesis and include roles as RBP delivery scaffolds and regulators of alternative splicing. Evidence is also emerging that 3′ UTRs can be cleaved, leading to stable, isolated 3′ UTR fragments which are of unknown function. Mutations in 3′ UTRs are implicated in several neurological disorders—more studies are needed to uncover how these mutations impact gene regulation and what is their relationship to disease severity. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract The D1 subunit of photosystem II is subject to photooxidative damage. Photodamaged D1 must be replaced with nascent D1 to maintain photosynthesis. In plant chloroplasts, D1 photodamage regulates D1 synthesis by modulating translation initiation on psbA mRNA encoding D1, but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Analyses of reporter constructs in transplastomic tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) showed that the psbA translational regulator HCF173 activates via a cis-element in the psbA 5′-UTR. However, the psbA UTRs are not sufficient to program light-regulated translation. Instead, the psbA open reading frame represses translation initiation in cis, and D1 photodamage relieves this repression. HCF173 remains bound to the psbA 5′-UTR in the dark and truncation of HCF173 prevents repression in the dark, implicating HCF173 as a mediator of repression. We propose a model that accounts for these and prior observations, which is informed by structures of the Complex I assembly factor CIA30/NDUFAF1. We posit that D1 photodamage relieves a repressive cotranslational interaction between nascent D1 and HCF173's CIA30 domain, that the photosystem II assembly factor HCF136 promotes this repressive interaction, and that these events toggle HCF173 between activating and repressive conformations on psbA mRNA. These findings elucidate a translational rheostat that optimizes photosynthesis in response to shifting light conditions. 
    more » « less