skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: A characterization of Colorado Front Range and Denver Basin Aquifer System wateer stable isotope signatures
The Denver Basin Aquifer System (DBAS) is an important groundwater resource for Front Range communities and is currently experiencing increasing demand as populations grow and surface water supplies remain limited. It is necessary to better constrain aquifer recharge mechanisms to enable sustainable use of this resource. In other sedimentary basin aquifer systems, mountain front recharge has been shown to be a significant contributor to local basin groundwater recharge. In the DBAS, inputs from the mountain block are poorly understood, and previous numerical models have treated large segments of the mountain-front boundary as impermeable. However, there exist potential connections between the mountain block and the DBAS, either by direct contact of permeable units, which would facilitate underflow recharge into the basin, or by surface water infiltration to the aquifer units where they outcrop near the mountain front. To observe spatial and temporal relationships between mountain block water and DBAS water, we use water stable isotopes and characterize the d2H and d18O of monthly precipitation, seasonal surface waters, and groundwaters in and around the Front Range and Denver Basin. The goal of this study is to determine if differences in the isotopic composition of waters across the Front Range permit the use of d18O and d2H as tracers of water flow between Front Range streams and groundwater and the DBAS. We analyzed the unique signature of mountain-block water to compare with DBAS water stable isotope data collected from Castle Rock Water municipal wells. Stable isotope ratios varied spatially and temporally, with the greatest temporal variance observed in precipitation. Streams showed great spatial variance, and less significant seasonal variance between the three seasonal sampling events conducted. Groundwaters showed very little temporal variance but had great spatial variance both between the aquifer units of the DBAS and between different locations within the mountain block crystalline aquifer. The lowest d2H and d18O ratios were measured in winter precipitation, winter streams, and groundwater samples collected from the high-elevation Front Range. Samples of DBAS groundwaters with the lowest d2H and d18O ratios indicate potential hydrogeologic connection to the mountain block. Interpreted mixing lines on a d-excess versus d18O plot support the potential DBAS-mountain block connection. The deepest aquifer units of the DBAS (Arapahoe and Laramie-Fox Hills) show the least relationship with meteoric or surface waters on both a d2H and d18O plot and the d-excess versus d18O plot and have higher d18O values than would be predicted based on their previously measured recharge ages and paleoclimate data from the region. Characterizing the spatial and temporal variations in water stable isotope signatures of the Front Range and DBAS region enhances understanding of the region’s hydrology and hydrogeology. Additionally, these results help to better inform models of aquifer recharge and promote sustainable use of the DBAS resource.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2333172
PAR ID:
10589176
Author(s) / Creator(s):
Publisher / Repository:
ProQuest
Date Published:
Format(s):
Medium: X
Institution:
Colorado State University
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Water Resources Research)
    Abstract Mountain System Recharge processes are significant natural recharge pathways in many arid and semi‐arid mountainous regions. However, Mountain System Recharge processes are often poorly understood and characterized in hydrologic models. Mountains are the primary water supply source to valley aquifers via lateral groundwater flow from the mountain block (Mountain Block Recharge) and focused recharge from mountain streams contributing to focused Mountain Front Recharge at the piedmont zone. Here, we present a multi‐tool isogeochemical approach to characterize mountain flow paths and Mountain System Recharge in the northern Tulare Basin, California. We used groundwater chemistry data to delineate hydrochemical facies and explain the chemical evolution of groundwater from the Sierra Nevada to the Central Valley aquifer. Stable isotopes and radiogenic groundwater tracers validated Mountain System Recharge processes by differentiating focused from diffuse recharge, and estimating apparent groundwater age, respectively. Novel application of End‐Member Mixing Analysis using conservative chemical components revealed three Mountain System Recharge end‐members: (a) evaporated Ca‐HCO3water type associated with focused Mountain Front Recharge, (b) non‐evaporated Ca‐HCO3and Na‐HCO3water types with short residence times associated with shallow Mountain Block Recharge, and (c) Na‐HCO3groundwater type with long residence time associated with deep Mountain Block Recharge. We quantified the contribution of each Mountain System Recharge process to the valley aquifer by calculating mixing ratios. Our results show that deep Mountain Block Recharge is a significant recharge component, representing 31%–53% of the valley groundwater. Greater hydraulic connectivity between the Sierra Nevada and Central Valley has significant implications for parameterizing groundwater flow models. Our framework is useful for understanding Mountain System Recharge processes in other snow‐dominated mountain watersheds. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, Water Resources Research)
    Abstract Mountain‐front recharge (MFR), or all inflow to a basin‐fill aquifer with its source in the mountain block, is an important component of recharge to basin‐fill aquifer systems. Distinguishing and quantifying the surface from subsurface components of MFR is necessary for water resource planning and management, particularly as climate change may impact these components in distinct ways. This study tests the hypothesis that MFR components can be distinguished in long‐screened, basin‐fill production wells by (1) groundwater age and (2) the median elevation of recharge. We developed an MFR characterization approach by combining age distributions in six wells using tritium, krypton‐85, argon‐39, and radiocarbon, and median recharge elevations from noble gas thermometry combined with numerical experiments to determine recharge temperature lapse rates using flow and energy transport modeling. We found that groundwater age distributions provided valuable information for characterizing the dominant flow system behavior captured by the basin‐fill production wells. Tracers indicated the presence of old (i.e., no detectable tritium) water in a well completed in weathered bedrock located close to the mountain front. Two production wells exhibited age distributions of binary mixing between modern and a small fraction of old water, whereas the remaining wells captured predominantly modern flow paths. Noble gas thermometry provided important complementary information to the age distributions; however, assuming constant recharge temperature lapse rates produced improbable recharge elevations. Numerical experiments suggest that surface MFR, if derived from snowmelt, can locally suppress water table temperatures in the basin‐fill aquifer, with implications for recharge elevations estimated from noble gas thermometry. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; (, Hydrological Processes)
    Abstract Despite its location in the rain shadow of the southern Sierra Nevada, the Panamint Range hosts a complex mountain groundwater system supporting numerous springs which have cultural, historical, and ecological importance. The sources of recharge that support these quintessential desert springs remain poorly quantified since very little hydrogeological research has been completed in the Panamint Range. Here we address the following questions: (i) what is the primary source of recharge that supports springs in the Panamint Range (snowmelt or rainfall), (ii) where is the recharge occurring (mountain‐block, mountain‐front, or mountain‐system) and (iii) how much recharge occurs in the Panamint Range? We answer questions (i) and (ii) using stable isotopes measured in spring waters and precipitation, and question (iii) using a chloride mass‐balance approach which is compared to a derivation of the Maxey–Eakin equation. Our dataset of the stable isotopic composition (δ18O andδ2H) of precipitation is short (1.5 years), but analyses on spring water samples indicate that high‐elevation snowmelt is the dominant source of recharge for these springs, accounting for 57 (±9) to 79 (±12) percent of recharge. Recharge from rainfall is small but not insignificant. Mountain‐block recharge is the dominant recharge mechanism. However, two basin springs emerging along the western mountain‐front of the Panamint Range in Panamint Valley appear to be supported by mountain‐front and mountain‐system recharge, while Tule Spring (a basin spring emerging at the terminus of the bajada on the eastern side of the Panamint Range) appears to be supported by mountain‐front recharge. Calculated recharge rates range from 19 mm year−1(elevations < 1000 mrsl) to 388 mm year−1(elevations > 1000 mrsl). The average annual recharge is approximately 91 mm year−1(equivalent to 19.4 percent of total annual precipitation). We infer that the springs in the Panamint Range (and their associated ecosystems) are extremely vulnerable to changes in snow cover associated with climate change. They are heavily dependent on snowmelt recharge from a relatively thin annual snowpack. These findings have important implications for the vulnerability of desert springs worldwide. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences)
    Abstract. Mountainous regions act as the water towers of the worldby producing streamflow and groundwater recharge, a function that isparticularly important in semiarid regions. Quantifying rates of mountainsystem recharge is difficult, and hydrologic models offer a method toestimate recharge over large scales. These recharge estimates are prone touncertainty from various sources including model structure and parameters.The quality of meteorological forcing datasets, particularly in mountainousregions, is a large source of uncertainty that is often neglected ingroundwater investigations. In this contribution, we quantify the impact ofuncertainty in both precipitation and air temperature forcing datasets onthe simulated groundwater recharge in the mountainous watershed of theKaweah River in California, USA. We make use of the integrated surface water–groundwater model, ParFlow.CLM, and several gridded datasets commonly usedin hydrologic studies, downscaled NLDAS-2, PRISM, Daymet, Gridmet, andTopoWx. Simulations indicate that, across all forcing datasets, mountain front recharge is an important component of the water budget in themountainous watershed, accounting for 9 %–72 % of the annual precipitation and ∼90 % of the total mountain system recharge to theadjacent Central Valley aquifer. The uncertainty in gridded air temperatureor precipitation datasets, when assessed individually, results in similarranges of uncertainty in the simulated water budget. Variations in simulatedrecharge to changes in precipitation (elasticities) and air temperature(sensitivities) are larger than 1 % change in recharge per 1 % change inprecipitation or 1 ∘C change in temperature. The total volume ofsnowmelt is the primary factor creating the high water budget sensitivity, and snowmelt volume is influenced by both precipitation and air temperatureforcings. The combined effect of uncertainty in air temperature andprecipitation on recharge is additive and results in uncertainty levels roughly equal to the sum of the individual uncertainties depending on thehydroclimatic condition of the watershed. Mountain system recharge pathwaysincluding mountain block recharge, mountain aquifer recharge, and mountainfront recharge are less sensitive to changes in air temperature than changesin precipitation. Mountain front and mountain block recharge are moresensitive to changes in precipitation than other recharge pathways. Themagnitude of uncertainty in the simulated water budget reflects theimportance of developing high-quality meteorological forcing datasets in mountainous regions. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Environmental System Science Data Infrastructure for a Virtual Ecosystem; Watershed Function SFA)
    The radon isotope and stable water isotope data for Coal Creek Watershed, Colorado, consists of d2H, d18O, and 222Rn values from samples collected at 8 stream location along Coal Creek, samples from 7 groundwater springs within the watershed, and precipitation isotope samples collected by Next Generation Water Observing System (NGWOS) from a collector within the watershed. All stream and spring samples were collected between June and October, 2021, and precipitation isotope samples were collected between November 2020 and September 2021. These data were collected to evaluate how groundwater contributions to Coal Creek originating from a fractured hillslope and alluvial fan respond to summer monsoon rains and seasonal drying. Understanding of groundwater-surface water interactions in montane systems in critical for the future of water availability in the Western US as groundwater contributions are expected to become more important for sustaining summer stream flows. This data package contains: (1) a csv of all radon samples; (2) a csv of all stream and spring isotope samples; (3) a csv of precipitation isotope samples; and (4) a csv of locations for each sampling site. The dataset additionally includes a file-level metadata (flmd.csv) file that lists each file contained in the dataset with associated metadata; and a data dictionary (dd.csv) file that contains column/row headers used throughout the files along with a definition, units, and data type. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email