An official website of the United States government
In computer-supported collaborative learning environments, analyzing student dialogue is essential for understanding collaborative problem-solving behaviors and supporting effective learning. Prior work often treats all dialogue interactions uniformly, failing to capture how specific dialogue interaction differentially impact learning experiences and outcomes. To address this limitation, we introduce a dialogue-based learning analytics framework that integrates weighted temporal clustering of dialogue with large language model-based interpretation. Our framework identifies student interaction patterns most predictive of group learning gains and uses these insights to enable early prediction of learning outcomes and generate pedagogically meaningful interpretations. We evaluate our framework on collaborative dialogue from middle school students engaged in a collaborative game-based learning environment. Our results show that our framework achieves 83.1% accuracy in learning outcome prediction. In addition, expert evaluations and case studies demonstrate that the identified weighted dialogue patterns reflect key collaborative problem-solving behaviors recognized as important in collaborative learning. By surfacing high-impact interaction patterns and enabling prioritized interpretation generation, our framework provides a promising approach for accurately analyzing students’ collaborative dialogue.
more »
« less
Predicting and Analyzing Students’ Higher-Order Questions in Collaborative Problem-Solving
Question-asking is a crucial learning and teaching approach. It reveals different levels of students' understanding, application, and potential misconceptions. Previous studies have categorized question types into higher and lower orders, finding positive and significant associations between higher-order questions and students' critical thinking ability and their learning outcomes in different learning contexts. However, the diversity of higher-order questions, especially in collaborative learning environments. has left open the question of how they may be different from other types of dialogue that emerge from students' conversations, To address these questions, our study utilized natural language processing techniques to build a model and investigate the characteristics of students' higher-order questions. We interpreted these questions using Bloom's taxonomy, and our results reveal three types of higher-order questions during collaborative problem-solving. Students often use Why, How and What If' questions to I) understand the reason and thought process behind their partners' actions: 2) explore and analyze the project by pinpointing the problem: and 3) propose and evaluate ideas or alternative solutions. In addition. we found dialogue labeled 'Social'. 'Question - other', 'Directed at Agent', and 'Confusion/Help Seeking' shows similar underlying patterns to higher-order questions, Our findings provide insight into the different scenarios driving students' higher-order questions and inform the design of adaptive systems to deliver personalized feedback based on students' questions.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10591787
- Publisher / Repository:
- APSCE
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- International Conference on Computers in Education
- ISSN:
- 3078-4360
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)In successful collaborative paradigms such as pair programming, students engage in productive dialogue and work to resolve con- flicts as they arise. However, little is known about how elementary students engage in collaborative dialogue for computer science learning. Early findings indicate that these younger students may struggle to manage conflicts that arise during pair programming. To investigate collaborative dialogue that elementary learners use and the conflicts that they encounter, we analyzed videos of twelve pairs of fifth grade students completing pair programming activities. We developed a novel annotation scheme with a focus on collab- orative dialogue and conflicts. We found that student pairs used best-practice dialogue moves such as self-explanation, question generation, uptake, and praise in less than 23% of their dialogue. High-conflict pairs antagonized their partner, whereas this behav- ior was not observed with low-conflict pairs. We also observed more praise (e.g., “We did it!”) and uptake (e.g., “Yeah and. . . ”) in low-conflict pairs than high-conflict pairs. All pairs exhibited some conflicts about the task, but high-conflict pairs also engaged in conflicts about control of the computer and their partner’s con- tributions. The results presented here provide insights into the collaborative process of young learners in CS problem solving, and also hold implications for educators as we move toward building learning environments that support students in this context.more » « less
-
Recently, there has been a surge in developing curricula and tools that integrate computing (C) into Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) programs. These environments foster authentic problem-solving while facilitating students’ concurrent learning of STEM+C content. In our study, we analyzed students’ behaviors as they worked in pairs to create computational kinematics models of object motion. We derived a domain-specific metric from students’ collaborative dialogue that measured how they integrated science and computing concepts into their problem-solving tasks. Additionally, we computed social metrics such as equity and turn-taking based on the students’ dialogue. We identified and characterized students’ planning, enacting, monitoring, and reflecting behaviors as they worked together on their model construction tasks. This study in-vestigates the impact of students’ collaborative behaviors on their performance in STEM+C computational modeling tasks. By analyzing the relationships between group synergy, turn-taking, and equity measures with task performance, we provide insights into how these collaborative behaviors influence students’ ability to construct accurate models. Our findings underscore the importance of synergistic discourse for overall task success, particularly during the enactment, monitoring, and reflection phases. Conversely, variations in equity and turn-taking have a minimal impact on segment-level task performance.more » « less
-
Question-asking in collaborative dialogue has long been established as key to knowledge construction, both in internal and collaborative problem solving. In this work, we examine probing questions in collaborative dialogues: questions that explicitly elicit responses from the speaker`s interlocutors. Specifically, we focus on modeling the causal relations that lead directly from utterances earlier in the dialogue to the emergence of the probing question. We model these relations using a novel graph-based framework of *deliberation chains*, and realize the problem of constructing such chains as a coreference-style clustering problem. Our framework jointly models probing and causal utterances and the links between them, and we evaluate on two challenging collaborative task datasets: the Weights Task and DeliData. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of our theoretically-grounded approach compared to both baselines and stronger coreference approaches, and establish a standard of performance in this novel task.more » « less
-
Collaboration plays an essential role in computer science. While there is growing recognition that learners of all ages can benefit from collaborative learning, little is known about how elementary age children engage in collaborative problem solving in computer science. This paper reports on the analysis of a dataset of elementary students collaborating on a programming project. We found that children tend to make several different types of suggestions. In turn, their partners address those suggestions in different ways such as by implementing them directly in code or by replying through dialogue. We observe that students regularly accept or reject suggestions without explanation or explicit acknowledgement and that it is often unclear whether they understand the substance of the suggestion. These behaviors may inhibit the development of a shared understanding between the partners and limit the value of the collaborative process. These results can inform instructional practice and the development of new adaptive tools that facilitate productive collaborative problem solving in computer science.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.58459/icce.2024.4807
