An official website of the United States government
Abstract Let$$\mathrm {R}$$be a real closed field. Given a closed and bounded semialgebraic set$$A \subset \mathrm {R}^n$$and semialgebraic continuous functions$$f,g:A \rightarrow \mathrm {R}$$such that$$f^{-1}(0) \subset g^{-1}(0)$$, there exist an integer$$N> 0$$and$$c \in \mathrm {R}$$such that the inequality (Łojasiewicz inequality)$$|g(x)|^N \le c \cdot |f(x)|$$holds for all$$x \in A$$. In this paper, we consider the case whenAis defined by a quantifier-free formula with atoms of the form$$P = 0, P>0, P \in \mathcal {P}$$for some finite subset of polynomials$$\mathcal {P} \subset \mathrm {R}[X_1,\ldots ,X_n]_{\leq d}$$, and the graphs of$$f,g$$are also defined by quantifier-free formulas with atoms of the form$$Q = 0, Q>0, Q \in \mathcal {Q}$$, for some finite set$$\mathcal {Q} \subset \mathrm {R}[X_1,\ldots ,X_n,Y]_{\leq d}$$. We prove that the Łojasiewicz exponent in this case is bounded by$$(8 d)^{2(n+7)}$$. Our bound depends ondandnbut is independent of the combinatorial parameters, namely the cardinalities of$$\mathcal {P}$$and$$\mathcal {Q}$$. The previous best-known upper bound in this generality appeared inP. Solernó, Effective Łojasiewicz Inequalities in Semi-Algebraic Geometry, Applicable Algebra in Engineering, Communication and Computing (1991)and depended on the sum of degrees of the polynomials defining$$A,f,g$$and thus implicitly on the cardinalities of$$\mathcal {P}$$and$$\mathcal {Q}$$. As a consequence, we improve the current best error bounds for polynomial systems under some conditions. Finally, we prove a version of Łojasiewicz inequality in polynomially bounded o-minimal structures. We prove the existence of a common upper bound on the Łojasiewicz exponent for certain combinatorially defined infinite (but not necessarily definable) families of pairs of functions. This improves a prior result of Chris Miller (C. Miller, Expansions of the real field with power functions, Ann. Pure Appl. Logic (1994)).
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on January 27, 2026
SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS FOR LOCAL TABULARITY OF A POLYMODAL LOGIC
Abstract On relational structures and on polymodal logics, we describe operations which preserve local tabularity. This provides new sufficient semantic and axiomatic conditions for local tabularity of a modal logic. The main results are the following. We show that local tabularity does not depend on reflexivity. Namely, given a class$$\mathcal {F}$$of frames, consider the class$$\mathcal {F}^{\mathrm {r}}$$of frames, where the reflexive closure operation was applied to each relation in every frame in$$\mathcal {F}$$. We show that if the logic of$$\mathcal {F}^{\mathrm {r}}$$is locally tabular, then the logic of$$\mathcal {F}$$is locally tabular as well. Then we consider the operation of sum on Kripke frames, where a family of frames-summands is indexed by elements of another frame. We show that if both the logic of indices and the logic of summands are locally tabular, then the logic of corresponding sums is also locally tabular. Finally, using the previous theorem, we describe an operation on logics that preserves local tabularity: we provide a set of formulas such that the extension of the fusion of two canonical locally tabular logics with these formulas is locally tabular.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2231414
- PAR ID:
- 10593160
- Publisher / Repository:
- Cambridge University Press
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Journal of Symbolic Logic
- ISSN:
- 0022-4812
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 26
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Given a family$$\mathcal{F}$$of bipartite graphs, theZarankiewicz number$$z(m,n,\mathcal{F})$$is the maximum number of edges in an$$m$$by$$n$$bipartite graph$$G$$that does not contain any member of$$\mathcal{F}$$as a subgraph (such$$G$$is called$$\mathcal{F}$$-free). For$$1\leq \beta \lt \alpha \lt 2$$, a family$$\mathcal{F}$$of bipartite graphs is$$(\alpha,\beta )$$-smoothif for some$$\rho \gt 0$$and every$$m\leq n$$,$$z(m,n,\mathcal{F})=\rho m n^{\alpha -1}+O(n^\beta )$$. Motivated by their work on a conjecture of Erdős and Simonovits on compactness and a classic result of Andrásfai, Erdős and Sós, Allen, Keevash, Sudakov and Verstraëte proved that for any$$(\alpha,\beta )$$-smooth family$$\mathcal{F}$$, there exists$$k_0$$such that for all odd$$k\geq k_0$$and sufficiently large$$n$$, any$$n$$-vertex$$\mathcal{F}\cup \{C_k\}$$-free graph with minimum degree at least$$\rho (\frac{2n}{5}+o(n))^{\alpha -1}$$is bipartite. In this paper, we strengthen their result by showing that for every real$$\delta \gt 0$$, there exists$$k_0$$such that for all odd$$k\geq k_0$$and sufficiently large$$n$$, any$$n$$-vertex$$\mathcal{F}\cup \{C_k\}$$-free graph with minimum degree at least$$\delta n^{\alpha -1}$$is bipartite. Furthermore, our result holds under a more relaxed notion of smoothness, which include the families$$\mathcal{F}$$consisting of the single graph$$K_{s,t}$$when$$t\gg s$$. We also prove an analogous result for$$C_{2\ell }$$-free graphs for every$$\ell \geq 2$$, which complements a result of Keevash, Sudakov and Verstraëte.more » « less
-
Abstract For a connected reductive groupGover a nonarchimedean local fieldFof positive characteristic, Genestier-Lafforgue and Fargues-Scholze have attached a semisimple parameter$${\mathcal {L}}^{ss}(\pi )$$to each irreducible representation$$\pi $$. Our first result shows that the Genestier-Lafforgue parameter of a tempered$$\pi $$can be uniquely refined to a tempered L-parameter$${\mathcal {L}}(\pi )$$, thus giving the unique local Langlands correspondence which is compatible with the Genestier-Lafforgue construction. Our second result establishes ramification properties of$${\mathcal {L}}^{ss}(\pi )$$for unramifiedGand supercuspidal$$\pi $$constructed by induction from an open compact (modulo center) subgroup. If$${\mathcal {L}}^{ss}(\pi )$$is pure in an appropriate sense, we show that$${\mathcal {L}}^{ss}(\pi )$$is ramified (unlessGis a torus). If the inducing subgroup is sufficiently small in a precise sense, we show$$\mathcal {L}^{ss}(\pi )$$is wildly ramified. The proofs are via global arguments, involving the construction of Poincaré series with strict control on ramification when the base curve is$${\mathbb {P}}^1$$and a simple application of Deligne’s Weil II.more » « less
-
Let$$G$$be a split semisimple group over a global function field$$K$$. Given a cuspidal automorphic representation$$\Pi$$of$$G$$satisfying a technical hypothesis, we prove that for almost all primes$$\ell$$, there is a cyclic base change lifting of$$\Pi$$along any$$\mathbb {Z}/\ell \mathbb {Z}$$-extension of$$K$$. Our proof does not rely on any trace formulas; instead it is based on using modularity lifting theorems, together with a Smith theory argument, to obtain base change for residual representations. As an application, we also prove that for any split semisimple group$$G$$over a local function field$$F$$, and almost all primes$$\ell$$, any irreducible admissible representation of$$G(F)$$admits a base change along any$$\mathbb {Z}/\ell \mathbb {Z}$$-extension of$$F$$. Finally, we characterize local base change more explicitly for a class of toral representations considered in work of Chan and Oi.more » « less
-
Abstract This paper will study almost everywhere behaviors of functions on partition spaces of cardinals possessing suitable partition properties. Almost everywhere continuity and monotonicity properties for functions on partition spaces will be established. These results will be applied to distinguish the cardinality of certain subsets of the power set of partition cardinals. The following summarizes the main results proved under suitable partition hypotheses.•If$$\kappa $$is a cardinal,$$\epsilon < \kappa $$,$${\mathrm {cof}}(\epsilon ) = \omega $$,$$\kappa \rightarrow _* (\kappa )^{\epsilon \cdot \epsilon }_2$$and$$\Phi : [\kappa ]^\epsilon _* \rightarrow \mathrm {ON}$$, then$$\Phi $$satisfies the almost everywhere short length continuity property: There is a club$$C \subseteq \kappa $$and a$$\delta < \epsilon $$so that for all$$f,g \in [C]^\epsilon _*$$, if$$f \upharpoonright \delta = g \upharpoonright \delta $$and$$\sup (f) = \sup (g)$$, then$$\Phi (f) = \Phi (g)$$.•If$$\kappa $$is a cardinal,$$\epsilon $$is countable,$$\kappa \rightarrow _* (\kappa )^{\epsilon \cdot \epsilon }_2$$holds and$$\Phi : [\kappa ]^\epsilon _* \rightarrow \mathrm {ON}$$, then$$\Phi $$satisfies the strong almost everywhere short length continuity property: There is a club$$C \subseteq \kappa $$and finitely many ordinals$$\delta _0, ..., \delta _k \leq \epsilon $$so that for all$$f,g \in [C]^\epsilon _*$$, if for all$$0 \leq i \leq k$$,$$\sup (f \upharpoonright \delta _i) = \sup (g \upharpoonright \delta _i)$$, then$$\Phi (f) = \Phi (g)$$.•If$$\kappa $$satisfies$$\kappa \rightarrow _* (\kappa )^\kappa _2$$,$$\epsilon \leq \kappa $$and$$\Phi : [\kappa ]^\epsilon _* \rightarrow \mathrm {ON}$$, then$$\Phi $$satisfies the almost everywhere monotonicity property: There is a club$$C \subseteq \kappa $$so that for all$$f,g \in [C]^\epsilon _*$$, if for all$$\alpha < \epsilon $$,$$f(\alpha ) \leq g(\alpha )$$, then$$\Phi (f) \leq \Phi (g)$$.•Suppose dependent choice ($$\mathsf {DC}$$),$${\omega _1} \rightarrow _* ({\omega _1})^{\omega _1}_2$$and the almost everywhere short length club uniformization principle for$${\omega _1}$$hold. Then every function$$\Phi : [{\omega _1}]^{\omega _1}_* \rightarrow {\omega _1}$$satisfies a finite continuity property with respect to closure points: Let$$\mathfrak {C}_f$$be the club of$$\alpha < {\omega _1}$$so that$$\sup (f \upharpoonright \alpha ) = \alpha $$. There is a club$$C \subseteq {\omega _1}$$and finitely many functions$$\Upsilon _0, ..., \Upsilon _{n - 1} : [C]^{\omega _1}_* \rightarrow {\omega _1}$$so that for all$$f \in [C]^{\omega _1}_*$$, for all$$g \in [C]^{\omega _1}_*$$, if$$\mathfrak {C}_g = \mathfrak {C}_f$$and for all$$i < n$$,$$\sup (g \upharpoonright \Upsilon _i(f)) = \sup (f \upharpoonright \Upsilon _i(f))$$, then$$\Phi (g) = \Phi (f)$$.•Suppose$$\kappa $$satisfies$$\kappa \rightarrow _* (\kappa )^\epsilon _2$$for all$$\epsilon < \kappa $$. For all$$\chi < \kappa $$,$$[\kappa ]^{<\kappa }$$does not inject into$${}^\chi \mathrm {ON}$$, the class of$$\chi $$-length sequences of ordinals, and therefore,$$|[\kappa ]^\chi | < |[\kappa ]^{<\kappa }|$$. As a consequence, under the axiom of determinacy$$(\mathsf {AD})$$, these two cardinality results hold when$$\kappa $$is one of the following weak or strong partition cardinals of determinacy:$${\omega _1}$$,$$\omega _2$$,$$\boldsymbol {\delta }_n^1$$(for all$$1 \leq n < \omega $$) and$$\boldsymbol {\delta }^2_1$$(assuming in addition$$\mathsf {DC}_{\mathbb {R}}$$).more » « less
