skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on June 9, 2026

Title: Mapping the Completeness and Positional Accuracy of OpenStreetMap Road Data at the County Level in the Contiguous United States
ABSTRACT The OpenStreetMap (OSM) project allows volunteers in the community to contribute and manage spatial data collaboratively and provides free spatial data with global coverage to the public. OSM data have been widely used in many applications. However, the quality of OSM data can be inconsistent due to the crowdsourcing nature of the OSM project. This study compares the OSM road data with the national road data from the U.S. Census Topologically Integrated Geographic Encoding and Referencing system (TIGER) project in the contiguous United States. Specifically, we used three indicators to examine the completeness and positional accuracy of the OSM road data at the county level. Then we performed spatial analysis to study the patterns of the discrepancies. Our results show that OSM road data are inconsistent in completeness and positional accuracy across different counties. Finally, we compared the three indicators among metropolitan, nonmetropolitan, and rural counties with Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Boxplot. The results show that the OSM road data in metropolitan counties have better completeness and positional accuracy than those in nonmetropolitan and rural counties. This study can improve our understanding of the quality of OSM road data in the United States, which in turn can help the OSM community improve the quality of road data and allow data users to better use OSM road data in different applications.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2400661
PAR ID:
10599552
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Transactions in GIS
Volume:
29
Issue:
4
ISSN:
1361-1682
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Borders, Tyrone (Ed.)
    Purpose This study creates a COVID-19 susceptibility scale at the county level, describes its components, and then assesses the health and socioeconomic resiliency of susceptible places across the rural-urban continuum. Methods Factor analysis grouped 11 indicators into 7 distinct susceptibility factors for 3,079 counties in the conterminous United States. Unconditional mean differences are assessed using a multivariate general linear model. Data from 2018 are primarily taken from the US Census Bureau and CDC. Results About 33% of rural counties are highly susceptible to COVID-19, driven by older and health-compromised populations, and care facilities for the elderly. Major vulnerabilities in rural counties include fewer physicians, lack of mental health services, higher disability, and more uninsured. Poor Internet access limits telemedicine. Lack of social capital and social services may hinder local pandemic recovery. Meat processing facilities drive risk in micropolitan counties. Although metropolitan counties are less susceptible due to healthier and younger populations, about 6% are at risk due to community spread from dense populations. Metropolitan vulnerabilities include minorities at higher health and diabetes risk, language barriers, being a transportation hub that helps spread infection, and acute housing distress. Conclusions There is an immediate need to know specific types of susceptibilities and vulnerabilities ahead of time to allow local and state health officials to plan and allocate resources accordingly. In rural areas it is essential to shelter-in-place vulnerable populations, whereas in large metropolitan areas general closure orders are needed to stop community spread. Pandemic response plans should address vulnerabilities. 
    more » « less
  2. This CSV file contains geometric and topological road network statistics for the majority of counties in the conterminous U.S. The underlying road network data is the USGS-NTD v2019. These road network data from 2019 were clipped to historical settlement extents obtained from the HISDAC-US dataset  Road network statistics are multi-temporal, calculated in time slices for the years: 1810-1900, 1880-1920, 1900-1940, 1920-1960, 1940-1980, 1960-2000, 1980-2015 The historical built-up areas used to model the historical road networks are derived from historical settlement layers from the  Historical settlement data compilation for the U.S. (HISDAC-US, Leyk & Uhl 2018). See Burghardt et al. (2022) for details on the modelling strategy. Spatial coverage: all U.S. counties that are covered by the HISDAC-US historical settlement layers. This datasets includes around 2,700 U.S. counties. In the remaining counties, construction year coverage in the underlying ZTRAX data (Zillow Transaction and Assessment Dataset) is low. See Uhl et al. (2021) for details. All data created by Johannes H. Uhl, University of Colorado Boulder, USA. Code available at https://github.com/johannesuhl/USRoadNetworkEvolution. References: Burghardt, K., Uhl, J., Lerman, K.,  & Leyk, S. (2022). Road  Network Evolution in the Urban and Rural  United States Since 1900.  Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. Leyk, S., & Uhl, J. H. (2018). HISDAC-US, historical settlement  data  compilation for the conterminous United States over 200 years. Scientific data, 5(1), 1-14. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.175  Uhl, J. H., Leyk, S., McShane, C. M., Braswell, A. E., Connor, D.  S.,  & Balk, D. (2021). Fine-grained, spatiotemporal datasets  measuring  200 years of land development in the United States. Earth system science data, 13(1), 119-153. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-119-2021  
    more » « less
  3. Quirindongo, Rico; Theodore, Georgeen (Ed.)
    Most small and rural communities in the United States are shrinking. This population loss is often accompanied by economic and social upheaval—job losses, out migration of young people, school closures, reductions in local services, and deteriorating physical infrastructure. Because design firms cluster in metropolitan areas and most rural commissions are for private clients, architects are largely absent from these places. The AIA Framework for Design Excellence calls for the professional community to enable more sustainable, resilient, and inclusive environments, yet rural places pose a challenge because they remain a strikingly underserved market for architectural services. How can this vision for Design Excellence extend its reach into places where new construction is rare, and architects are not present to learn from and develop relationships with potential clients?This paper presents an overview of an interdisciplinary research project at Iowa State University funded by a $1.5 million grant from the National Science Foundation. The research begins with this question: why do people in some rural towns perceive their quality of life to be increasing even when the population continues to shrink? Using twenty years of survey data about quality of life, the team identified small rural communities in Iowa where the typical association of population loss with community decline did not appear to hold true. Through interviews, site visits, spatial analysis, and data analysis using machine learning and other methods, the team is working to better understand what influences people’s perceptions of quality of life. Understanding more about these unexpectedly resilient communities requires conversations and building trust in places where few outsiders ever visit. Examples of projects in towns working with the research team include adaptive reuse of closed schools and other abandoned properties; improved recreational spaces and parks; and repurposing underused commercial properties. 
    more » « less
  4. An ESRI Shapfile containing spatially generalized built-up areas for each decade from 1900 to 2010, and for 2015, for each core-based statistical area (CBSA, i.e., metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area) in the conterminous United States. These areas are derived from historical settlement layers from the Historical settlement data compilation for the U.S. (HISDAC-US, Leyk & Uhl 2018). See Burghardt et al. (2022) for details on the data processing. Additionally, there is a CSV file (HISDAC-US_patch_statistics.csv) containing the counts of built-up property records (BUPR), and -locations (BUPL), as well as total building indoor area (BUI) and built-up area (BUA) per CBSA, year, and patch, extraced from the HISDAC-US data (Uhl & Leyk 2018, Uhl et al. 2021). This CSV can be joined to the shapefile (column uid2) by concatenating the columns msaid_year_Id. Spatial coverage: all CBSAs that are covered by the HISDAC-US historical settlement layers. This dataset includes around 2,700 U.S. counties. In the remaining counties, construction year coverage in the underlying ZTRAX data (Zillow Transaction and Assessment Dataset) is low. See Uhl et al. (2021) for details. All data created by Johannes H. Uhl, University of Colorado Boulder, USA. Code available at https://github.com/johannesuhl/USRoadNetworkEvolution. References: Burghardt, K., Uhl, J., Lerman, K.,  & Leyk, S. (2022). Road Network Evolution in the Urban and Rural  United States Since 1900. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems. Leyk, S., & Uhl, J. H. (2018). HISDAC-US, historical settlement data  compilation for the conterminous United States over 200 years. Scientific data, 5(1), 1-14. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.175  Uhl, J. H., Leyk, S., McShane, C. M., Braswell, A. E., Connor, D. S.,  & Balk, D. (2021). Fine-grained, spatiotemporal datasets measuring  200 years of land development in the United States. Earth system science data, 13(1), 119-153. DOI:  https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-119-2021  
    more » « less
  5. Abstract This analysis quantifies the network dynamics, geographic concentration, and disparities in perishable food supply networks for temperature-controlled food shipments in the United States. The United States forms the core of global food systems and produces more high-quality data for network analysis than most other countries. We use the 2017 US Census Commodity Flow Survey and other publicly available data to derive empirical results from the Food Flow Model for perishable meats and perishable prepared foods. We identify the top ten counties for perishable food distribution and find that the Los Angeles and Chicago regions support the greatest volumes of perishable food movements. States that largely exist outside national perishable food networks are Arizona, Michigan, Montana, North Dakota, Texas, and West Virginia. Our analysis of US data highlights the importance of certain counties, states, and regions in perishable food networks and suggests areas where interventions could improve systems’ functions by increasing access to markets for farmers and access to food for underserved communities, especially those in rural regions. 
    more » « less