<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Effect of Autoclave Cure Temperature, Pressure, and Time on the Glass Transition Temperature and the Degree of Cure of Epoxy Film Adhesive Joints</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</publisher>
				<date>10/30/2022</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10603857</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1115/IMECE2022-94434</idno>
					
					<author>Sayed A Nassar</author><author>Shraddha Jagatap</author><author>Nitesh Hirulkar</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[<title>Abstract</title> <p>This study investigates the effect of autoclave curing variables on the glass transition temperature of and the degree of cure and strength of epoxy film adhesive single lap joints (SLJs) under static tensile shear loading. Studied autoclave variables include the cure temperature, cure pressure, temperature, and pressure ramp rates on the glass transition temperature as well as the cure time duration. Test joints are made of Aluminum substrates that are autoclave-bonded using epoxy film adhesive (AF163-2k). For each variable combination of the autoclave process, the corresponding glass transition temperature of cured Epoxy film adhesive is obtained using Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA-Q800). Test data are generated for both baseline joints [uncycled] as well as for joints that have been heat-cycled in an environmental chamber after initial autoclave bonding. Results show a strong correlation between the autoclave process variable combinations and the corresponding glass transition temperature bond strength, and the failure mode of test joints.</p>]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">INTRODUCTION</head><p>Recent increase in use of adhesive joints in structural applications is mainly motivated by the increased demand for light weighting, design optimization, and energy saving, as compared to conventional joining methods that use threaded fasteners, rivets, and weldments <ref type="bibr">[1]</ref>. Recent advances in control methods and inspection have led to a significant increase the reliability and durability of adhesively bonded systems under complex service loads and severe environmental conditions including extreme temperature, water, and organic solvents <ref type="bibr">[2]</ref>.</p><p>However, moisture diffusion and humidity may still cause reversible or permanent changes to the adhesive (plasticization, swelling, hydrolysis) <ref type="bibr">[3]</ref><ref type="bibr">[4]</ref><ref type="bibr">[5]</ref>. As a result, much work has been devoted to characterizing the strength of bonded joints.</p><p>Extended exposure to moisture and humidity may also degrade the adhesion bond at the interface between the adhesive and joint substrate causing corrosion, cracking, and/or debonding, as pointed out by Bowditch et al. <ref type="bibr">[6,</ref><ref type="bibr">7]</ref>.</p><p>Moisture may be absorbed by the adhesive in two different ways; namely, as free or bound water. Free water would occupy the free spaces in the adhesive layer, which causes adhesive plasticization. Bound water would form single or multiple hydrogen bonds with the adhesive polymer chain, which causes swelling of the adhesive, plasticization, and would consequently decrease the strength and glass transition temperature Tg. Hu et al. <ref type="bibr">[8]</ref> studied different adhesives under extreme temperature environment. Their static test data showed that longer environmental exposure led to different failure modes. Da Silva et al. <ref type="bibr">[9]</ref> studied effect of diffused moisture into the adhesive layer. Their results showed deterioration in bond strength after diffusion. Boubakri et al. <ref type="bibr">[10]</ref> showed that aging temperature and water are the main reasons for adhesive degradation.</p><p>Strength of adhesively bonded structures depends on curing process parameters used during bonding. Nassar et al. <ref type="bibr">[11,</ref><ref type="bibr">12]</ref> studied effect of cure temperature T, cure pressure P, temperature ramp rate Rt, pressure ramp rate Rp, cure time t on the strength of polycarbonate joint at room temperature and after environmental loading. Their result established relation between bonding process variables and their interactions on the strength of polyurethane film adhesive. This study investigates effect of bonding process variables on the glass transition temperature Tg that impacts the lap shear strength of the epoxy film adhesive joints.</p><p>Glass transition temperature Tg is one of the most important parameters of an epoxy polymeric system. Tg determines the temperature boundary of significant changes in the enthalpic, viscoelastic, dilatometric etc. properties of all glass-forming materials. Several cure monitoring techniques like Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), rheology, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), and thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) are used to characterize the thermo-physical and mechanical properties of an epoxy during cure. DSC is primarily used to observe phase transitions including the melting point and the glass transition temperature Tg as well as heat of reaction to measure degree of cure (DOC) before or after a cure cycle has been applied <ref type="bibr">[13]</ref><ref type="bibr">[14]</ref><ref type="bibr">[15]</ref><ref type="bibr">[16]</ref><ref type="bibr">[17]</ref>. Another technique for material characterization is rheology which measures the viscosity, shear storage modulus, G&#8242;, which is a measure of the sample's elastic properties, and shear loss modulus, G&#8242;&#8242;, that is a measure of the sample's viscous properties <ref type="bibr">[18]</ref><ref type="bibr">[19]</ref><ref type="bibr">[20]</ref>. Like rheology, DMA determines the viscoelastic properties of a material by applying a sinusoidal stress and measuring the strain in the material. DMA investigates the longitudinal moduli, E&#8242; and E&#8242;&#8242;, and can be used to identify Tg as well as transitions associated with molecular motions <ref type="bibr">[21]</ref>. This work uses DMA for Measurements of the glass transition temperature.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">MATERIALS</head><p>The adhesives used in this work is AF 163-2K produced by 3 M Scotch-Weld. This is a film adhesive with a thermoplastic knit supporting carrier inside for bond-line thickness control. The film thickness of approximately 0.2mm in uncured state. This is a DGEBA based epoxy with an amine hardener. The reaction of Bisphenol A diglycidyl ether, DGEBA, (bisphenol A) and the amines is the typical network formation of epoxy resins, where epoxy and amine groups are linked.</p><p>TABLE 1. ADHESIVE PROPERTIES (SHEET FILM EPOXY ADHESIVE (AF163) Property Value Tensile Strength (MPa) 45 Elongation @ break (%) 500 100% Modulus (MPa) 2 Specific Gravity 1.07 Hardness (Shore A) 80 Glass Transition Temperature (&#730;C) -36 TABLE 2. SUBSTRATE MECHANICAL PROPERTIES (ALUMINUM 6061) Property Value Tensile strength (MPa) 310 Yield strength (MPa) 276 Shear strength (MPa) 207 Elastic modulus (GPa) 68.9 Poisson's ratio 0.33 Elongation (%) 12-17</p><p>Aluminum alloy, Al 6061-T6, is the used as adherend. Joint surfaces are sanded using emery paper to eliminate variation due to surface roughness. Lab grade acetone is used for the removal of foreign particles from the substrate surface and Figure <ref type="figure">1</ref> shows 3d surface roughness inspection. </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">AUTOCLAVE PROCESS VARIABLES AND TEST PROCEDURE</head><p>In this study five autoclave process variables were investigated which include, cure temperature T, cure pressure P, temperature ramp rate Rt, pressure ramp rate Rp, cure time t. Table <ref type="table">3</ref> illustrate selected two levels of five autoclave process variables. Full factorial experiment was designed to consider all 32-possible autoclave bonding process combinations with two levels of five process variables. For each autoclave bonding process combination six test coupons were bonded; each autoclave bonding process has a different combination of five autoclave process variables. MaGill Air Pressure LLC &#8482; Autoclave used for joint bonding. The autoclave is rated for a maximum pressure of 1.15 MPa and a maximum temperature of 204 &#176;C with a vacuum pump that connects. to a vacuum bag, which encloses aluminum alloy adherends and adhesive film inside the vessel during the bonding cycle.</p><p>TABLE 3. AUTOCLAVE BONDING PROCESS VARIABLE Autoclave Bonding Process Variable 2-level Autoclave Process Variables Minimum Maximum Cure Pressure [MPa] P1 = 0.345 P2 = 0.689 Cure Temperature [&#176;C] T1 = 93.33 T2 = 126.67 Temperature ramp rate[&#176;C/min] Rt1 = 1.11 Rt2 = 3.89 Pressure ramp rate [&#176;C/min] Rp1 = 0.069 Rp2 = 0.103 Cure time [minute] t1 = 40 t2 = 100</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE AND TEST SETUP</head><p>The dimensions and geometry of the specimens are shown in Fig. <ref type="figure">2</ref>, Thirty-two (32) Al/Al single lap joints (SLJ) with different combinations of five autoclave processes variables at two (2) levels tested in tensile mode for to determine static strength. Six Al/Al SLJ were autoclave bonded for each 32autoclave bonding process. From which three Al/Al SLJ were tested for baseline static strength at ambient conditions and three Al/Al SLJ were tested after cyclic heat at high relative humidity (RH) of 85%. Average test data is reported.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.1">Baseline Tests</head><p>Static tensile strength of Al-Al SLJ was evaluated using MTS 810 Material Testing System. SLJ were held inside specially designed fixture and gripped vertically on MTS system. A quasistatic axial load is applied to the coupon at a constant speed of 1.27 mm/min. Displacement and forces are recorded by MTS data acquisition system. Failure modes have been documented for all test joints.  </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.">MEASUREMENT OF GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE Tg</head><p>Dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) experiments were carried out in a TA Instruments Q800. Force and displacement calibration were done according to manufacturer recommendations. The complex Young's modulus E* of the cured AF163 epoxy film was measured using a DMA over the temperature range 20 to 170&#176;C in an air environment with sinusoidal displacement. Measurements were at a fixed frequency of 1 Hz with a temperature ramp rate of 1&#176;C/min. figure <ref type="figure">5</ref>, demonstrate of Tg analysis with DME of ID 1 process parameters. Three samples for each of 32 different autoclave cure conditions were tested. The glass transition temperature was calculated as the peak of the tangent delta signal. Sample size was 10mm in width and 20 mm in length. As shown in figure <ref type="figure">4</ref>, the fixture directly gripped the specimen approximately 5 mm from the end of the specimen length. FIGURE 5. ILLUSTRATION OF TG ANALYSIS WITH DMA 5.1 Relationship Between Glass Transition Temperature Tg and Degree Of Cure &#120630;&#120630;</p><p>The glass transition temperature Tg is one of the most important parameters of an epoxy system. Tg determines the temperature boundary of significant changes in the enthalpic, viscoelastic, dilatometric etc. The relationship between Tg and conversion degree in the curing reaction (&#120572;&#120572;) of thermosetting materials is a central concept in analysing cure phenomena. The relevance of Tg to properties of material is based on the following a) processing of a reactive material must be performed at temperatures above the value of Tg of uncured material Tg0, b) the value of Tg at full conversion of a thermoset &#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; is related to the upper temperature limit of the glass-converted material as shown in Figure <ref type="figure">6</ref>. The relationship between Tg and &#120514;&#120514; determines when vitrification occurs during cure, for which Tg equals the cure temperature Tc. At a given Tc, the reaction of a thermosetting material proceeds generally at a rate dictated by chemical kinetics if Tg is less than Tc. However, if Tg is higher than Tc, the reaction rate is controlled by diffusion. The empirical DiBenedetto equation <ref type="bibr">[14]</ref> gives relationship between Tg and a for a wide variety of thermosets,</p><p>&#120582;&#120582; =&#8710;&#119862;&#119862; &#119901;&#119901;&#8734; /&#8710;&#119862;&#119862; &#119901;&#119901;0 (Structure-dependent parameter with value between 0-1.</p><p>&#120582;&#120582; value for AF163-2K is 0.422 (from manufacture's specification). The Tg value of uncured epoxy film Tg0 = 28 [&#176;C] is obtained from tan delta curve of DMA test results. For Tg value at full conversion of an epoxy film (&#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; ) series of DMA tests are carried out over cure temperature (Tc) range from 82.22 to 148.89 [&#176;C] holding all other cure parameters constant. Highest value of Tg on the Tc vs Tg graph is considered as &#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; = 154.44 [&#176;C] as shown in Figure <ref type="figure">7</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>FIGURE 6. ISOTHERMAL TIME-TEMPERATURE-TRANSFORMATION (TTT) CURE DIAGRAM FOR AN EPOXY SYSTEM, SHOWING THREE CRITICAL VALUES OF TEMPERATURE (TG0, GELTG, AND TG&#8734;) [22] FIGURE 7. CURE TEMP TC VS GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE TG FOR AF163-2K EPOXY FILM ADHESIVE</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="6.">RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</head><p>In this section experimental results are presented and discussed. Figure <ref type="figure">10</ref> shows static strength and glass transition temperature (Tg) for all autoclave bonding process for ambient and after environmental loading. variables. The trendline of the glass transition temperature Tg follows that of the joint static strength very closely. On the one hand, the highest glass transition temperature of Tg = 306.2 &#176;C was attained by the combination of higher cure temperature T2 = 126.67 &#176;C, higher cure pressure P2 = 0.689 MPa, lower cure time t1 = 40 min, lower temperature ramp rate Rt1 = 1.11 &#176;C/min, and higher pressure ramp rate Rp2 = 0.103 MPa/min. On the other hand, the lowest glass transition temperature Tg =197.2 &#176;C corresponded to a lower cure temperature, cure time, and pressure (T1 = 93.33 &#176;C, t1 = 40 min, P1 = 0.345 MPa), and higher temperature and pressure ramp rates (Rt2 = 3.89 &#176;C/min, Rp2 = 0.103 MPa/min). The glass transition temperature of Epoxy film adhesive (AF163-2k) is significantly affected by the cure temperature level.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="6.1">Correlation Between Glass Transition Temperature and Static Strength</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>FIGURE 8. JOINT STRENGTH AND ADHESIVE GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE DATA (FOR VARIOUS AUTOCLAVE VARIABLE COMBINATIONS FOR BASELINE TEST JOINTS AND AFTER HEAT CYCLING)</head><p>Raising the cure temperature T would increase the adhesive glass transition temperature Tg until it reaches its maximum when the Epoxy adhesive (AF163-2k) is fully cured. Beyond that, continued increase of the cure temperature or cure time would cause thermal degradation of polymeric chains of the adhesive, and accordingly reduce the strength epoxy film adhesive joints.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="7.">ANOVA ANALYSIS OF GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE (Tg)</head><p>Based on ANOVA data in Table <ref type="table">4</ref>, the cure temperature (factor C), Cure time (factor E), interaction CE along with other factors and interactions found to be significant as P-value is less than 0.05 for 95% confidence. Normal plot (Fig. <ref type="figure">9</ref>) shows the significance of factors and interactions.</p><p>The R-Squared shows accuracy of the model in predicting the response values or the measurement of the amount of variation around the mean; R-Squared value closer to 1.0 is desirable. In this analysis, the value is equal to 0.9995, which is good. Additionally, the difference between Predicted R&#178; of 0.9988and Adjusted R&#178; of 0.9992is less than 0.0004 which is favourable. In addition, Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) with value of 1 indicates an ideal correlation between the regression coefficients or how much the variance around the estimated coefficient is inflated by the lack of orthogonality, in which all the model terms are orthogonal to all other factors in this study. VIFs values more than 10 would raise alarm that present coefficients are poorly estimated because of multi-co-linearity.  Equation ( <ref type="formula">2</ref>) gives the statistical prediction of the Tg (&#176;C) of AF163-2k epoxy film adhesive that have not been heat cycled.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>FIGURE 9. NORMAL PLOT FOR GLASS TRANSITION TEMPERATURE TG [&#176;F]</head><p>From Fig. <ref type="figure">10 (A</ref>) can be observed that residuals follow a normal distribution, as a line is fitted through the normal plot of residuals. Fig. <ref type="figure">10 (B</ref>) is a plot of the residuals versus the experimental run order, checks lurking variables that may have influenced the response during the analysis. Random scatter must be obvious; blocking and randomization of testing would minimize the probability of trends that may invalidate the analysis.</p><p>(A) (B)</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>FIGURE 10. TG [&#176;C] FOR AF163-2K EPOXY FILM ADHESIVE (A) NORMAL PLOT OF RESIDUALS (B) RESIDUAL VS. RUN</head><p>Fig. <ref type="figure">11</ref> shows single-variable effect on glass transition temperature Tg [&#176;C]. Lines with positive slopes indicates that increasing that factor would increase joint static strength; the opposite is true as well. The value of the slope is a measure of how significant the factor is <ref type="bibr">[21]</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>FIGURE 11. SINGLE VARIABLE EFFECT ON GLASS</head><p>TRANSITION TEMPERATURE (Tg)</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="8.">CONCLUSIONS</head><p>The effect of cure process variables on Static performance and glass transition temperature of autoclave cured epoxy film adhesive is investigated. The experimental study offers the following observations and conclusions.</p><p>High cure temperature (T2 =126.67 &#176;C) have positive effect on static strength and Tg as compared low cure temperature (T1= 93.33 &#176;C) when combined with cure time (t1). But opposite effect was observed for higher cure time (t2) process combined with high cure temperature. It's because with increase in cure temperature Tg continue to rise to almost linearly to reach vitrification.</p><p>It shows lower temperature ramp rate (Rt1) have positive effect on the static strength as compared with high cure temperature (Rt). Rt1 ensures longer cure process and more mobility of monomers to increase cross linking and degree of cure (&#8733;).</p><p>High cure pressure (P1) results into higher static strength, Tg when compared to low cure pressure (P2). High cure pressure results in formation of intermolecular hydrogen bonding between hydroxy groups and carbonyl groups also increased the interaction of the polymer chains which improve the crosslinking densities and the mechanical properties of the cured adhesive.</p><p>Longer cure time (t2 = 100 min) combined with lower cure temperature (T1= 93.33 &#176;C) increased the static strength of test joints. The static strength was lower for the cure variable combination of t2, T2, Rt1 (longer cure time, higher cure temperature, and lower temperature ramp rate, respectively). The thermal degradation or oxidative crosslinking (above the &#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; of the adhesive) is responsible for the decrease of strength with increasing curing time.</p><p>When below the Tcure at which the &#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; is achieved, the static strength and degree of cure (&#8733;) of the adhesive increases as the cure temperature increases. When above the Tcure at which the &#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; is achieved, there is an opposite behavior, i.e., both the strength and stiffness decrease as the cure temperature increases.</p><p>Tg and the mechanical properties have a similar behaviour. It was found that the Tg, static strength, and degree of cure (&#8733;) vary as a function of the cure temperature of the epoxy adhesive. When cured below the Tcure at which the &#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; is achieved, the Tg, static strength, and degree of cure (&#8733;) increase as the cure temperature increases. When cured above Tcure (at which &#119879;&#119879; &#119892;&#119892;&#8734; is achieved), both the Tg, static strength, as well as the degree of cure &#8733; are decreased by increasing the cure temperature Tcure.</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>Copyright &#169; 2022 by ASME</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
