This content will become publicly available on August 18, 2026
Title: The Agony and Ecstasy of Extended Research on Computational Systems
This collaborative "essay of essays" begins with an introduction by a professor of human centered design and engineering who has been working concurrently with PhD students to study collaborative system design. We undertake widely scoped qualitative research studies, that we categorize as "extended studies," that cut across units of analysis, organizations, or time. Our research explores how people create new ways to enact systems that support the knowledge work of different stakeholders. In response to an anchor essay, the students have written reflections about the multifaceted experience of doing extended studies. Many of these studies began by focusing on a particular project to develop a particular system or information infrastructure, and associated standards. Over time the studies came to center on collaborative dynamics per se, and also how collaborative dynamics shifted the scope and functionality of products, sometimes also affecting programmatic and infrastructural level changes. more »« less
de Gooyert, V.; Goncalves, P.; Herrera, H.; Kampmann, C.; Kapmeier, F.; Kopainsky, B.; Moxnes, E.; Rooney-Varga, J.; Rouwette, E.; Struben, J.; et al
(, International System Dynamics Conference)
null
(Ed.)
With detrimental effects of climate change already here, deteriorated natural habitats, increased pollution of soils, air, and water, and appropriate action still lagging behind, work on sustainability that applies system dynamics is more urgent than ever. In July 2018, a number of researchers - mainly active in Europe - commenced an open dialogue on system dynamics and sustainability at emlyon business school in Lyon. The aim of that meeting was to assess how to increase system dynamics and sustainability research output and impact. Since then a network has emerged and, some members of the group have begun working on a number of collaborative initiatives around research, teaching, and grants. More ambitiously, discussions also have evolved around the value of more coordinated avenues for future system dynamics research. At the 2020 SD Conference in Bergen, we, the “SD&Sus Lyon Group”, would like to present some of our progress in our thinking so far. In this essay bundle, we present some of the ideas that we have developed on near future avenues for system dynamics research and applications in the domain of sustainability. The aim of this essay bundle is to initiate a dialogue about how the system dynamics community may achieve impact through coordinated accumulation of policy-relevant knowledge in the area of sustainability and to make progress on identifying those critical avenues.
Scott, Emily E.; Wenderoth, Mary Pat; Doherty, Jennifer H.
(, CBE—Life Sciences Education)
Tanner
(Ed.)
Recent calls in biology education research (BER) have recommended that researchers leverage learning theories and methodologies from other disciplines to investigate the mechanisms by which students to develop sophisticated ideas. We suggest design-based research from the learning sciences is a compelling methodology for achieving this aim. Design-based research investigates the “learning ecologies” that move student thinking toward mastery. These “learning ecologies” are grounded in theories of learning, produce measurable changes in student learning, generate design principles that guide the development of instructional tools, and are enacted using extended, iterative teaching experiments. In this essay, we introduce readers to the key elements of design-based research, using our own research into student learning in undergraduate physiology as an example of design-based research in BER. Then, we discuss how design-based research can extend work already done in BER and foster interdisciplinary collaborations among cognitive and learning scientists, biology education researchers, and instructors. We also explore some of the challenges associated with this methodological approach.
Ahmed, Ishrat; Mawasi, Areej; Wang, Shang; Wylie, Ruth; Bergner, Yoav; Whitehurst, Amanda; Walker, Erin
(, International Conference of Artificial Intelligence in Education)
A key promise of adaptive collaborative learning support is the ability to improve learning outcomes by providing individual students with the help they need to collaborate more effectively. These systems have focused on a single platform. However, recent technology-supported collaborative learning platforms allow students to collaborate in different contexts: computer-supported classroom environments, network based online learning environments, or virtual learning environments with pedagogical agents. Our goal is to better understand how students participate in collaborative behaviors across platforms, focusing on a specific type of collaboration - help-giving. We conducted a classroom study (N = 20) to understand how students engage in help-giving across two platforms: an interactive digital learning environment and an online Q&A community. The results indicate that help-giving behavior across the two platforms is mostly influenced by the context rather than by individual differences. We discuss the implications of the results and suggest design recommendations for developing an adaptive collaborative learning support system that promotes learning and transfer.
Claussen, S.; Jesiek, B. K.; Zoltowski, C. B.; Howland, S.
(, Proceedings of the 2021 American Society of Engineering Education Virtual Annual Conference)
null
(Ed.)
Amidst growing concerns about a lack of attention to ethics in engineering education and professional practice, a variety of formal course-based interventions and informal or extracurricular programs have been created to improve the social and ethical commitments of engineering graduates. To supplement the formal and informal ethics education received as undergraduate students, engineering professionals often also participate in workplace training and professional development activities on ethics, compliance, and related topics. Despite this preparation, there is growing evidence to suggest that technical professionals are often challenged to navigate ethical situations and dilemmas. Some prior research has focused on assessing the impacts of a variety of learning experiences on students’ understandings of ethics and social responsibility, including the PIs’ prior NSF-funded CCE STEM study which followed engineering students through the four years of their undergraduate studies using both quantitative and qualitative research methods. This prior project explored how the students’ views on these topics changed across demographic groups, over time, between institutions, and due to specific interventions. Yet, there has been little longitudinal research on how these views and perceptions change (or do not change) among engineers during the school-to-work transition. Furthermore, there has been little exploration of how these views are influenced by the professional contexts in which these engineers work, including cultures and norms prevalent in different technical fields, organizations, and industry sectors. This NSF-supported Ethical and Responsible Research (ER2) study responds to these gaps in the literature by asking: RQ1) How do perceptions of ethics and social responsibility change in the transition from undergraduate engineering degree programs to the workplace (or graduate studies), and how are these perceptions shaped or influenced?, and RQ2) How do perceptions of ethics and social responsibility vary depending on a given individual’s engineering discipline/background and current professional setting? This paper gives an overview of the research project, describing in particular the longitudinal, mixed-methods study design which will involve collecting and analyzing data from a large sample of early career engineers. More specifically, we will present the proposed study contexts, timeline, target subject populations, and procedures for quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis. We will also describe how this study leverages our prior project, thereby allowing unique longitudinal comparisons that span participants’ years as an engineering undergraduate student to their time as an early-career professional. Through this project, we aim to better understand how early career engineers’ perceptions of social and ethical responsibility are shaped by their prior experiences and current professional contexts. This paper will likely be of particular interest to scholars who teach or research engineering ethics, social responsibility, and professional practice.
Zhou, Yiqiu
(, 2023 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition)
With the increasing adoption of collaborative learning approaches, instructors must understand students’ problem-solving approaches during collaborative activities to better design their class. Among the multiple ways to reveal collaborative problem-solving processes, temporal submission patterns is one that is more scalable and generalizable in Computer Science education. In this paper, we provide a temporal analysis of a large dataset of students’ submissions to collaborative learning assignments in an upper-level database course offered at a large public university. The log data was collected from an online assessment and learning system, containing the timestamps of each student’s submissions to a problem on the collaborative assignment. Each submission was labeled as quick (Q), medium (M), or slow (S) based on its duration and whether it was shorter or longer than the 25th and 75th percentile. Sequential compacting and mining techniques were employed to identify pairs of transitions highly associated with one another. This preliminary research sheds light on the recurring submission patterns derived from the amount of time spent on each problem, warranting further examination on these patterns to unpack collaborative problem-solving behaviors. Our study demonstrates the potential of temporal analysis to identify meaningful problem-solving patterns based on log traces, which may help flag key moments and alert instructors to provide in-time scaffolding when students work on group assignments.
Lee, Charlotte P, Sutherland, Will, Alimohammadi, Negin, LeDoux, Ridley Jones, and Neang, Andrew B. The Agony and Ecstasy of Extended Research on Computational Systems. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10603987.
Lee, Charlotte P, Sutherland, Will, Alimohammadi, Negin, LeDoux, Ridley Jones, & Neang, Andrew B. The Agony and Ecstasy of Extended Research on Computational Systems. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10603987.
Lee, Charlotte P, Sutherland, Will, Alimohammadi, Negin, LeDoux, Ridley Jones, and Neang, Andrew B.
"The Agony and Ecstasy of Extended Research on Computational Systems". Country unknown/Code not available: ACM Digital Library. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10603987.
@article{osti_10603987,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
title = {The Agony and Ecstasy of Extended Research on Computational Systems},
url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10603987},
abstractNote = {This collaborative "essay of essays" begins with an introduction by a professor of human centered design and engineering who has been working concurrently with PhD students to study collaborative system design. We undertake widely scoped qualitative research studies, that we categorize as "extended studies," that cut across units of analysis, organizations, or time. Our research explores how people create new ways to enact systems that support the knowledge work of different stakeholders. In response to an anchor essay, the students have written reflections about the multifaceted experience of doing extended studies. Many of these studies began by focusing on a particular project to develop a particular system or information infrastructure, and associated standards. Over time the studies came to center on collaborative dynamics per se, and also how collaborative dynamics shifted the scope and functionality of products, sometimes also affecting programmatic and infrastructural level changes.},
journal = {},
publisher = {ACM Digital Library},
author = {Lee, Charlotte P and Sutherland, Will and Alimohammadi, Negin and LeDoux, Ridley Jones and Neang, Andrew B},
}
Warning: Leaving National Science Foundation Website
You are now leaving the National Science Foundation website to go to a non-government website.
Website:
NSF takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the views expressed or the accuracy of
the information contained on this site. Also be aware that NSF's privacy policy does not apply to this site.