More Like this

1. Comparing and combining analysis-based and learning-based regression test selection

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3524481.3527230  

   Zhang, Jiyang; Liu, Yu; Gligoric, Milos; Legunsen, Owolabi; Shi, August (May 2022, IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automation of Software Test)

   Regression testing---rerunning tests on each code version to detect newly-broken functionality---is important and widely practiced. But, regression testing is costly due to the large number of tests and the high frequency of code changes. Regression test selection (RTS) optimizes regression testing by only rerunning a subset of tests that can be affected by changes. Researchers showed that RTS based on program analysis can save substantial testing time for (medium-sized) open-source projects. Practitioners also showed that RTS based on machine learning (ML) works well on very large code repositories, e.g., in Facebook's monorepository. We combine analysis-based RTS and ML-based RTS by using the latter to choose a subset of tests selected by the former. We first train several novel ML models to learn the impact of code changes on test outcomes using a training dataset that we obtain via mutation analysis. Then, we evaluate the benefits of combining ML models with analysis-based RTS on 10 projects, compared with using each technique alone. Combining ML-based RTS with two analysis-based RTS techniques-Ekstazi and STARTS-selects 25.34% and 21.44% fewer tests, respectively. 

   more » « less
2. Comparing and Combining Analysis-Based and Learning-Based Regression Test Selection

   Jiyang Zhang; Yu Liu; Milos Gligoric; Owolabi Legunsen; August Shi (April 2022, ICSE Workshop on Automation of Software Test)

   Regression testing - rerunning tests at each code version to detect newly-broken functionality - is important and widely practiced. But regression testing is costly due to the large number of tests and high frequency of code changes. Regression test selection (RTS) optimizes regression testing by rerunning only a subset of tests that can be affected by code changes. Researchers showed that RTS based on dynamic and static program analysis can save substantial testing time for (medium-sized) open-source projects. Simultaneously, practitioners showed that RTS based on machine learning (ML) is lightweight and works well on very large software repositories, e.g., in Facebook’s monorepository. We combine analysis-based RTS and ML-based RTS by using ML-based RTS to choose a subset of tests selected by analysis-based RTS. To do so, we first design several novel ML-based RTS techniques that leverage mutation analysis to obtain a training set for learning the impact of code changes on test outcomes. Then, we empirically evaluate, using 10 projects, the benefits of combining various ML models with analysis-based RTS. We also compare combining the techniques with using each technique individually. Combining ML-based RTS with two analysis-based RTS techniques - Ekstazi and STARTS - selects 25.34% and 21.44% fewer tests. 

   more » « less
3. Model-Based Non-Invasive Hemorrhage Detection: Observer-Based and Parameter Estimation-Based Approaches

   Yekanth Ram Chalumuri, Xin Jin (June 2022, American Control Conference)
4. Distance-based and RKHS-based dependence metrics in high dimension

   https://doi.org/10.1214/19-AOS1934  

   Zhu, Changbo; Zhang, Xianyang; Yao, Shun; Shao, Xiaofeng (December 2020, The Annals of Statistics)

   null (Ed.)
5. Synergetic effects of solute and strain in biocompatible Zn-based and Mg-based alloys

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2019.09.059  

   Guo, Y.Q.; Zhang, S.H.; Beyerlein, I.J.; Legut, D.; Shang, S.L.; Liu, Z.K.; Zhang, R.F. (December 2019, Acta Materialia)