An official website of the United States government
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most prevalent musculoskeletal disorder and a leading cause of disability globally. Although many efforts have been made to treat this condition, current tissue engineering (TE) and regenerative medicine strategies fail to address the inflammatory tissue environment that leads to the rapid progression of the disease and prevents cartilage tissue formation. First, this review addresses in detail the current antiinflammatory therapies for OA with a special emphasis on pharmacological approaches, gene therapy, and mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) intra-articular administration, and discusses the reasons behind the limited clinical success of these approaches at enabling cartilage regeneration. Then, we analyze the state-of-the-art TE strategies and how they can be improved by incorporating immunomodulatory capabilities such as the optimization of biomaterial composition, porosity and geometry, and the loading of anti-inflammatory molecules within an engineered structure. Finally, the review discusses the future directions for the new generation of TE strategies for OA treatment, specifically focusing on the spatiotemporal modulation of anti-inflammatory agent presentation to allow for tailored patient-specific therapies.
more »
« less
Advancements in Cartilage Tissue Engineering: A Focused Review
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent joint disorder that is characterized by the degeneration of articular cartilage in synovial joints. Most of the current treatment options for this disorder tend to focus on symptom management rather than addressing the underlying progression of the disease. Cartilage tissue engineering has emerged as a promising approach to address the limitations of current OA treatments, aiming to regenerate cartilage and restore the natural function of affected joints. Like any other tissue engineering field, cartilage tissue engineering uses different fabrication techniques and biomaterials to develop the constructs. Numerous studies over the last few years have demonstrated the preclinical efficacy of tissue‐engineered constructs in promoting cartilage regeneration and highlight the potential of tissue‐engineered constructs as a viable therapeutic approach for OA. This paper aims to provide a focused review of advancements in tissue‐engineered constructs over the past decade. Specifically, we highlight the constructs based on natural, synthetic, and composite biomaterials and the varying conventional and advanced fabrication techniques. We also highlight the challenges instate‐of‐the‐artcartilage tissue engineering that must be overcome in the upcoming years to fully replicate the complex anatomy of the native cartilage. We believe that continued collaborative research efforts among researchers from various facets of engineering and clinicians are required to advance the field of cartilage tissue engineering and become a viable OA therapy.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2152135
- PAR ID:
- 10609711
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials
- Volume:
- 113
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1552-4973
- Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
- articular cartilage biomaterials cartilage tissue engineering osteoarthritis
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Articular cartilage is the avascular and aneural tissue which is the primary connective tissue covering the surface of articulat- ing bone. Traumatic damage or degenerative diseases can cause articular cartilage injuries that are common in the population. As a result, the demand for new therapeutic options is continually increasing for older people and traumatic young patients. Many attempts have been made to address these clinical needs to treat articular cartilage injuries, including osteoarthritis (OA); however, regenerating highly qualified cartilage tissue remains a significant obstacle. 3D bioprinting technology combined with tissue engineering principles has been developed to create biological tissue constructs that recapitulate the anatomical, structural, and functional properties of native tissues. In addition, this cutting-edge technology can precisely place multiple cell types in a 3D tissue architecture. Thus, 3D bioprinting has rapidly become the most innovative tool for manufacturing clinically applicable bioengineered tissue constructs. This has led to increased interest in 3D bioprinting in articular cartilage tissue engineering applications. Here, we tissue engineering.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)The tissue engineering approach for repairing osteochondral (OC) defects involves the fabrication of a biological tissue scaffold that mimics the physiological properties of natural OC tissue ( e.g. , the gradient transition between the cartilage surface and the subchondral bone). The OC tissue scaffolds described in many research studies exhibit a discrete gradient ( e.g. , a biphasic or tri/multiphasic structure) or a continuous gradient to mimic OC tissue attributes such as biochemical composition, structure, and mechanical properties. One advantage of a continuous gradient scaffold over biphasic or tri/multiphasic tissue scaffolds is that it more closely mimics natural OC tissue since there is no distinct interface between each layer. Although research studies to this point have yielded good results related to OC regeneration with tissue scaffolds, differences between engineered scaffolds and natural OC tissue remain; due to these differences, current clinical therapies to repair OC defects with engineered scaffolds have not been successful. This paper provides an overview of both discrete and continuous gradient OC tissue scaffolds in terms of cell type, scaffold material, microscale structure, mechanical properties, fabrication methods, and scaffold stimuli. Fabrication of gradient scaffolds with three-dimensional (3D) printing is given special emphasis due to its ability to accurately control scaffold pore geometry. Moreover, the application of computational modeling in OC tissue engineering is considered; for example, efforts to optimize the scaffold structure, mechanical properties, and physical stimuli generated within the scaffold–bioreactor system to predict tissue regeneration are considered. Finally, challenges associated with the repair of OC defects and recommendations for future directions in OC tissue regeneration are proposed.more » « less
-
Abstract Bioprinting is an additive manufacturing technique that combines living cells, biomaterials, and biological molecules to develop biologically functional constructs. Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting is commonly used as anin vitromodeling system and is a more accurate representation ofin vivoconditions in comparison to two-dimensional cell culture. Although 3D bioprinting has been utilized in various tissue engineering and clinical applications, it only takes into consideration the initial state of the printed scaffold or object. Four-dimensional (4D) bioprinting has emerged in recent years to incorporate the additional dimension of time within the printed 3D scaffolds. During the 4D bioprinting process, an external stimulus is exposed to the printed construct, which ultimately changes its shape or functionality. By studying how the structures and the embedded cells respond to various stimuli, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of the functionality of native tissues. This review paper will focus on the biomaterial breakthroughs in the newly advancing field of 4D bioprinting and their applications in tissue engineering and regeneration. In addition, the use of smart biomaterials and 4D printing mechanisms for tissue engineering applications is discussed to demonstrate potential insights for novel 4D bioprinting applications. To address the current challenges with this technology, we will conclude with future perspectives involving the incorporation of biological scaffolds and self-assembling nanomaterials in bioprinted tissue constructs.more » « less
-
Abstract Articular cartilage (AC) is a load-bearing tissue that covers long bones in synovial joints. The biphasic/poroelastic mechanical properties of AC help it to protect joints by distributing loads, absorbing impact forces, and reducing friction. Unfortunately, alterations in these mechanical properties adversely impact cartilage function and precede joint degeneration in the form of osteoarthritis (OA). Thus, understanding what factors regulate the poroelastic mechanical properties of cartilage is of great scientific and clinical interest. Transgenic mouse models provide a valuable platform to delineate how specific genes contribute to cartilage mechanical properties. However, the poroelastic mechanical properties of murine articular cartilage are challenging to measure due to its small size (thickness ∼ 50 microns). In the current study, our objective was to test whether the poroelastic mechanical properties of murine articular cartilage can be determined based solely on time-dependent cell death measurements under constant loading conditions. We hypothesized that in murine articular cartilage subjected to constant, sub-impact loading from an incongruent surface, cell death area and tissue strain are closely correlated. We further hypothesized that the relationship between cell death area and tissue strain can be used—in combination with inverse finite element modeling—to compute poroelastic mechanical properties. To test these hypotheses, murine cartilage-on-bone explants from different anatomical locations were subjected to constant loading conditions by an incongruent surface in a custom device. Cell death area increased over time and scaled linearly with strain, which rose in magnitude over time due to poroelastic creep. Thus, we were able to infer tissue strain from cell death area measurements. Moreover, using tissue strain values inferred from cell death area measurements, we applied an inverse finite element modeling procedure to compute poroelastic material properties and acquired data consistent with previous studies. Collectively, our findings demonstrate in the key role poroelastic creep plays in mediating cell survival in mechanically loaded cartilage and verify that cell death area can be used as a surrogate measure of tissue strain that enables determination of murine cartilage mechanical properties.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.35520
