More Like this

1. Benchmark coupled-cluster lattice energy of crystalline benzene and assessment of multi-level approximations in the many-body expansion

   https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0159410  

   Borca, Carlos H.; Glick, Zachary L.; Metcalf, Derek P.; Burns, Lori A.; Sherrill, C. David (June 2023, The Journal of Chemical Physics)

   The many-body expansion (MBE) is promising for the efficient, parallel computation of lattice energies in organic crystals. Very high accuracy should be achievable by employing coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples at the complete basis set limit [CCSD(T)/CBS] for the dimers, trimers, and potentially tetramers resulting from the MBE, but such a brute-force approach seems impractical for crystals of all but the smallest molecules. Here, we investigate hybrid or multi-level approaches that employ CCSD(T)/CBS only for the closest dimers and trimers and utilize much faster methods like Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) for more distant dimers and trimers. For trimers, MP2 is supplemented with the Axilrod–Teller–Muto (ATM) model of three-body dispersion. MP2(+ATM) is shown to be a very effective replacement for CCSD(T)/CBS for all but the closest dimers and trimers. A limited investigation of tetramers using CCSD(T)/CBS suggests that the four-body contribution is entirely negligible. The large set of CCSD(T)/CBS dimer and trimer data should be valuable in benchmarking approximate methods for molecular crystals and allows us to see that a literature estimate of the core-valence contribution of the closest dimers to the lattice energy using just MP2 was overbinding by 0.5 kJ mol−1, and an estimate of the three-body contribution from the closest trimers using the T0 approximation in local CCSD(T) was underbinding by 0.7 kJ mol−1. Our CCSD(T)/CBS best estimate of the 0 K lattice energy is −54.01 kJ mol−1, compared to an estimated experimental value of −55.3 ± 2.2 kJ mol−1. 

   more » « less
2. The Electronic Structure of Zirconium and Hafnium Monochalcogenides

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5c05402  

   F_Romeu, João G; Joyner, Nickolas A; Kaye, Elliot; Peterson, Kirk A; Kawagoe, Thomas T; Stinson, Samantha L; Morse, Michael D; Dixon, David A (October 2025, The Journal of Physical Chemistry A)

   High-level ab initio CCSD(T) and spin-orbit icMRCI+Q calculations were used to predict potential energy curves (PECs) for the lowest-lying states of ZrO, ZrS, HfO, and HfS. The prediction of the ground state is basis set dependent at the icMRCI+Q level for ZrO and ZrS due to the small singlet-triplet splitting between the lowest 1Σ+ and 3Δ states. CCSD(T) with a spin orbit correction predicted the 1Σ+ ground state in agreement with experiment. New all-electron basis sets were developed for Hf to improve the results over those predicted by use of effective core potentials (ECPs) that subsume the 4f electrons into the definition of the core. The use of the new DK-4f basis sets rather than ECPs became more important for HfO and HfS where there is a lack of a good core-valence separation. icMRCI+Q, CCSD(T), and DFT calculations for the spectroscopic parameters of ZrO, ZrS, HfO, and HfS were benchmarked with available experimental data. Bond dissociation energies (BDEs) of these four systems were calculated at the Feller-Peterson-Dixon (FPD) level to be 762.1 (ZrO), 543.5 (ZrS), 803.8 (HfO), and 575.1 kJ/mol (HfS), in excellent agreement with experiment. The HfS BDE was remeasured using the R3PI method, providing an updated experimental measurement of D0(HfS) = 5.978 ± 0.002 eV = 576.8 ± 0.2 kJ/mol. This experimental value, combined with experimental measurements of the ionization energies of Hf and HfS, gives the cationic BDE of D0(Hf+-S) = 5.124 ± 0.002 eV = 494.4 ± 0.2 kJ/mol. 

   more » « less
3. A comparison between hydrogen and halogen bonding: the hypohalous acid–water dimers, HOX⋯H ₂ O (X = F, Cl, Br)

   https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP00422J  

   Wolf, Mark E.; Zhang, Boyi; Turney, Justin M.; Schaefer, Henry F. (March 2019, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics)

   Hypohalous acids (HOX) are a class of molecules that play a key role in the atmospheric seasonal depletion of ozone and have the ability to form both hydrogen and halogen bonds. The interactions between the HOX monomers (X = F, Cl, Br) and water have been studied at the CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pVTZ level of theory with the spin free X2C-1e method to account for scalar relativistic effects. Focal point analysis was used to determine CCSDT(Q)/CBS dissociation energies. The anti hydrogen bonded dimers were found with interaction energies of −5.62 kcal mol −1 , −5.56 kcal mol −1 , and −4.97 kcal mol −1 for X = F, Cl, and Br, respectively. The weaker halogen bonded dimers were found to have interaction energies of −1.71 kcal mol −1 and −3.03 kcal mol −1 for X = Cl and Br, respectively. Natural bond orbital analysis and symmetry adapted perturbation theory were used to discern the nature of the halogen and hydrogen bonds and trends due to halogen substitution. The halogen bonds were determined to be weaker than the analogous hydrogen bonds in all cases but close enough in energy to be relevant, significantly more so with increasing halogen size. 

   more » « less
4. A quantitative assessment of deformation energy in intermolecular interactions: How important is it?

   https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0155895  

   Sargent, Caroline T.; Kasera, Raina; Glick, Zachary L.; Sherrill, C. David; Cheney, Daniel L. (June 2023, The Journal of Chemical Physics)

   Dimer interaction energies have been well studied in computational chemistry, but they can offer an incomplete understanding of molecular binding depending on the system. In the current study, we present a dataset of focal-point coupled-cluster interaction and deformation energies (summing to binding energies, De) of 28 organic molecular dimers. We use these highly accurate energies to evaluate ten density functional approximations for their accuracy. The best performing method (with a double-ζ basis set), B97M-D3BJ, is then used to calculate the binding energies of 104 organic dimers, and we analyze the influence of the nature and strength of interaction on deformation energies. Deformation energies can be as large as 50% of the dimer interaction energy, especially when hydrogen bonding is present. In most cases, two or more hydrogen bonds present in a dimer correspond to an interaction energy of −10 to −25 kcal mol−1, allowing a deformation energy above 1 kcal mol−1 (and up to 9.5 kcal mol−1). A lack of hydrogen bonding usually restricts the deformation energy to below 1 kcal mol−1 due to the weaker interaction energy. 

   more » « less
5. Approximating large-basis coupled-cluster theory vibrational frequencies using focal-point approximations

   https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0168608  

   Nelson, Philip M; Glick, Zachary L; Sherrill, C David (September 2023, The Journal of Chemical Physics)

   The focal-point approximation can be used to estimate a high-accuracy, slow quantum chemistry computation by combining several lower-accuracy, faster computations. We examine the performance of focal-point methods by combining second-order Møller–Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) with coupled-cluster singles, doubles, and perturbative triples [CCSD(T)] for the calculation of harmonic frequencies and that of fundamental frequencies using second-order vibrational perturbation theory (VPT2). In contrast to standard CCSD(T), the focal-point CCSD(T) method approaches the complete basis set (CBS) limit with only triple-ζ basis sets for the coupled-cluster portion of the computation. The predicted harmonic and fundamental frequencies were compared with the experimental values for a set of 20 molecules containing up to six atoms. The focal-point method combining CCSD(T)/aug-cc-pV(T + d)Z with CBS-extrapolated MP2 has mean absolute errors vs experiment of only 7.3 cm−1 for the fundamental frequencies, which are essentially the same as the mean absolute error for CCSD(T) extrapolated to the CBS limit using the aug-cc-pV(Q + d)Z and aug-cc-pV(5 + d)Z basis sets. However, for H2O, the focal-point procedure requires only 3% of the computation time as the extrapolated CCSD(T) result, and the cost savings will grow for larger molecules. 

   more » « less