skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Symbiotic nitrogen fixation reduces belowground biomass carbon costs of nitrogen acquisition under low, but not high, nitrogen availability
Title: Symbiotic nitrogen fixation reduces belowground biomass carbon costs of nitrogen acquisition under low, but not high, nitrogen availability
Abstract Many plant species form symbiotic associations with nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Through this symbiosis, plants allocate photosynthate belowground to the bacteria in exchange for nitrogen fixed from the atmosphere. This symbiosis forms an important link between carbon and nitrogen cycles in many ecosystems. However, the economics of this relationship under soil nitrogen availability gradients is not well understood, as plant investment toward symbiotic nitrogen fixation tends to decrease with increasing soil nitrogen availability. Here, we used a manipulation experiment to examine how costs of nitrogen acquisition vary under a factorial combination of soil nitrogen availability and inoculation with Bradyrhizobium japonicum in Glycine max L. (Merr.). We found that inoculation decreased belowground biomass carbon costs to acquire nitrogen and increased total leaf area and total biomass, but these patterns were only observed under low fertilization and were the result of increased plant nitrogen uptake and no change in belowground carbon allocation. These results suggest that symbioses with nitrogen-fixing bacteria reduce carbon costs of nitrogen acquisition by increasing plant nitrogen uptake, but only when soil nitrogen is low, allowing individuals to increase nitrogen allocation to structures that support aboveground growth. This pattern may help explain the prevalence of plants capable of forming these associations in less fertile soils and provides useful insight into understanding the role of nutrient acquisition strategy on plant nitrogen uptake across nitrogen availability gradients.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2045968
PAR ID:
10614003
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Editor(s):
Kalcsits, Lee
Publisher / Repository:
Oxford University Press
Date Published:
Journal Name:
AoB PLANTS
Volume:
16
Issue:
5
ISSN:
2041-2851
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; (, Ecology and Evolution)
    Abstract Plants adjust their allocation to different organs based on nutrient supply. In some plant species, symbioses with nitrogen‐fixing bacteria that live in root nodules provide an alternate pathway for nitrogen acquisition. Does access to nitrogen‐fixing bacteria modify plants' biomass allocation? We hypothesized that access to nitrogen‐fixing bacteria would have the same effect on allocation to aboveground versus belowground tissues as access to plentiful soil nitrogen. To test this hypothesis and related hypotheses about allocation to stems versus leaves and roots versus nodules, we conducted experiments with 15 species of nitrogen‐fixing plants in two separate greenhouses. In each, we grew seedlings with and without access to symbiotic bacteria across a wide gradient of soil nitrogen supply. As is common, uninoculated plants allocated relatively less biomass belowground when they had more soil nitrogen. As we hypothesized, nitrogen fixation had a similar effect as the highest level of fertilization on allocation aboveground versus belowground. Both nitrogen fixation and high fertilization led to ~10% less biomass allocated belowground (~10% more aboveground) than the uninoculated, lowest fertilization treatment. Fertilization reduced allocation to nodules relative to roots. The responses for allocation of aboveground tissues to leaves versus stems were not as consistent across greenhouses or species as the other allocation trends, though more nitrogen fixation consistently led to relatively more allocation to leaves when soil nitrogen supply was low. Synthesis: Our results suggest that symbiotic nitrogen fixation causes seedlings to allocate relatively less biomass belowground, with potential implications for competition and carbon storage in early forest development. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Journal of Experimental Botany)
    Abstract Plants respond to increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations by reducing leaf nitrogen content and photosynthetic capacity—patterns that correspond with increased net photosynthesis and growth. Despite the longstanding notion that nitrogen availability regulates these responses, eco-evolutionary optimality theory posits that leaf-level responses to elevated CO2 are driven by leaf nitrogen demand for building and maintaining photosynthetic enzymes and are independent of nitrogen availability. In this study, we examined leaf and whole-plant responses of Glycine max L. (Merr) subjected to full-factorial combinations of two CO2, two inoculation, and nine nitrogen fertilization treatments. Nitrogen fertilization and inoculation did not alter leaf photosynthetic responses to elevated CO2. Instead, elevated CO2 decreased the maximum rate of ribulose-1,5-bisophosphate oxygenase/carboxylase (Rubisco) carboxylation more strongly than it decreased the maximum rate of electron transport for ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration, increasing net photosynthesis by allowing rate-limiting steps to approach optimal coordination. Increasing fertilization enhanced positive whole-plant responses to elevated CO2 due to increased below-ground carbon allocation and nitrogen uptake. Inoculation with nitrogen-fixing bacteria did not influence plant responses to elevated CO2. These results reconcile the role of nitrogen availability in plant responses to elevated CO2, showing that leaf photosynthetic responses are regulated by leaf nitrogen demand while whole-plant responses are constrained by nitrogen availability. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Plant and Soil)
    Purpose Legumes form root nodules to gain fixed nitrogen from rhizobia and can also access nitrogen in soil. Data suggest that plants might discriminate among these sources to optimize growth, but recogni- tion of symbiotically fixed nitrogen and its regulation remain poorly understood. Methods A greenhouse inoculation study manipu- lated the molecular form and concentration of nitro- gen available using two Lotus japonicus genotypes and the nitrogen-fixing symbiont, Mesorhizobium loti. Plants were supplied with sole organic and inorganic nitrogen sources to simulate forms that plants might receive from symbiotic nitrogen fixation or from the soil. Host benefit from and regulation of symbiosis was investigated by quantifying symbiotic trait varia- tion and isotopic analysis of nitrogen fixation. Results Host growth varied in response to fertili- zation with alanine, aspartic acid, ammonium, and nitrate, suggesting differences in catabolism effi- ciency. Net benefits of nodulation were reduced or eliminated under all forms of extrinsic fertilization. However, even when symbiosis imposed significant costs, hosts did not reduce investment into nodulation or nitrogen fixation when exposed to aspartic acid, unlike with other nitrogen sources. Conclusions L. japonicus can adaptively down- regulate investment into symbiosis in the presence of some but not all nitrogen sources. Failure to down- regulate any aspect of symbiosis in the presence of aspartic acid suggests that it might be jamming the main signal used by L. japonicus to detect nitrogen fixation. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; (, New Phytologist)
    Summary Natural selection favors growth by selecting a combination of plant traits that maximize photosynthetic CO2assimilation at the lowest combined carbon costs of resource acquisition and use. We quantified how soil nutrient availability, plant nutrient acquisition strategies, and aridity modulate the variability in plant costs of nutrient acquisition relative to water acquisition (β).We used an eco‐evolutionary optimality framework and a global carbon isotope dataset to quantify β.Under low soil nitrogen‐to‐carbon (N : C) ratios, a mining strategy (symbioses with ectomycorrhizal and ericoid mycorrhizal fungi) reduced β by mining organic nitrogen, compared with a scavenging strategy (symbioses with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi). Conversely, under high N : C ratios, scavenging strategies reduced β by effectively scavenging soluble nitrogen, compared with mining strategies. N2‐fixing plants did not exhibit reduced β under low N : C ratios compared with non‐N2‐fixing plants. Moisture increased β only in plants using a scavenging strategy, reflecting direct impacts of aridity on the carbon costs of maintaining transpiration in these plants. Nitrogen and phosphorus colimitation further modulated β.Our findings provide a framework for simulating the variability of plant economics due to plant nutrient acquisition strategies in earth system models. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; (, Biotropica)
    Harrison, Rhett (Ed.)
    ABSTRACT Belowground resources are key determinants of seedling growth and survival in tropical forests. Nutrients and light may limit plant growth the most in tropical wet forests, whereas water may limit plant growth more in tropical dry forests. Nitrogen (N)‐fixing species play an important role in the nitrogen and carbon cycles across tropical dry forests. However, studies investigating the joint effects of water and nutrients on the physiology and performance of N‐fixing species are scarce. We implemented a full factorial shade house experiment that manipulated water and nutrients (NPK 20:20:20 and complete micronutrients) using eight tree species representing N‐fixing and non‐fixing tree species in the tropical dry forest of Costa Rica to determine: (1) How plant responses to water and nutrient availability vary between N‐fixing and non‐fixing tree species?; and (2) How nutrient and/or water availability influences seedling water‐ and nutrient‐use traits? We found that growth and physiological responses to water and nutrient addition depended directly on the capacity of species to fix atmospheric N2. N‐fixing species responded more strongly to nutrient addition, accumulating 67% more total biomass on average (approximately double that of non‐fixing taxa) and increasing average height growth rate by 41%. N‐fixing species accumulated more biomass without compromising water‐use efficiency, taking full advantage of the increased nutrient availability. Interestingly, results from our experiment show that increased water availability rarely influenced tropical dry forest seedling performance, whereas nutrient availability had a strong effect on biomass and growth. Overall, our results highlight the ability of N‐fixing seedlings to take advantage of local soil resource heterogeneity, which may help to explain the dominance of N‐fixing trees in tropical dry forests. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email