skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Building a Distributed Research Network for Undergraduate Opportunities in Molecular Biochemistry
The COVID‐19 pandemic brought to light the continued issues in access to research opportunities. Many of our undergraduate students at research‐intensive institutes lost their ability to go into labs to gain experience. However, students at most smaller colleges and universities faced these challenges to bring research opportunities to students long before the pandemic. Thus, our lower‐cost community colleges and higher education institutes with diverse students lack equity when it comes to research investments. This highlights the need for bringing research into diverse institutes using novel approaches. Over the past ten years, our team has built a strategy for integrating genomic and molecular bioinformatics tools into undergraduate opportunities. Developing bioinformatics training material, professor training opportunities, summer research opportunities, and organized large scale research projects, our team has developed a distributed research network. Our goal is to bring genomic and bioinformatic literacy to early undergraduate training to increase STEM retention while improving research equity issues. Having students work on characterizing challenging clinical variants, known as Variants of Uncertain Significance (VUS), brings novel research projects to students while filling the growing needs of clinical variant characterizations. At the core training, we focus on bringing tools to professors and instructors, lowering the initiation efforts to performing bioinformatics research. These include the optimization of protein homology modeling, molecular dynamic simulations through analysis with a few mouse clicks (or two lines of code for Linux users), 3D protein printing, deep evolutionary profiling with hundreds of species using user‐friendly tools, assessing expression from the NCBI SRA, and integrating genomic databases (GTEx, Human Protein Atlas, Geno2MP, gnomAD, Comparative Toxicogenomics Database, PharmGKB, Open Targets Genetics). Once in the hands of professors, they have implemented these tools into independent research projects for their students, coursework design such as bioinformatics classes, and research clubs. Over the past ten years, we have thus impacted hundreds of students with these tools. This can best be highlighted by the student's successes integrating the tools into publications on the NMDA receptors (PMID:34726335), CFTR database for cystic fibrosis (PMID: 32734384), NAA10 variant analysis (PMID: 33335012), multiple sclerosis genetics (PMID: 31482761), COVID‐19 immune response (PMID:34335605), the SARS‐CoV‐2 evolution/structural dynamicome (PMID: 32587094), CCR5 role in diverse phenotypes and bioethics (accepted), and SOX gene developmental biology (in review). Thus, the development of tools and strategies and the distribution of research projects can reach students and faculty at any institute, bringing equitable research opportunities to those who traditionally do not have many opportunities.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2120918
PAR ID:
10614644
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Date Published:
Journal Name:
The FASEB Journal
Volume:
36
Issue:
S1
ISSN:
0892-6638
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Comprehensive physiology)
    Genomics has grown exponentially over the last decade. Common variants are associated with physiological changes through statistical strategies such as Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and quantitative trail loci (QTL). Rare variants are associated with diseases through extensive filtering tools, including population genomics and trio-based sequencing (parents and probands). However, the genomic associations require follow-up analyses to narrow causal variants, identify genes that are influenced, and to determine the physiological changes. Large quantities of data exist that can be used to connect variants to gene changes, cell types, protein pathways, clinical phenotypes, and animal models that establish physiological genomics. This data combined with bioinformatics including evolutionary analysis, structural insights, and gene regulation can yield testable hypotheses for mechanisms of genomic variants. Molecular biology, biochemistry, cell culture, CRISPR editing, and animal models can test the hypotheses to give molecular variant mechanisms. Variant characterizations can be a significant component of educating future professionals at the undergraduate, graduate, or medical training programs through teaching the basic concepts and terminology of genetics while learning independent research hypothesis design. This article goes through the computational and experimental analysis strategies of variant characterization and provides examples of these tools applied in publications. © 2022 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12:3303-3336, 2022. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education)
    Many undergraduate neuroscience trainees aspire to earn a PhD. In recent years the number, demographics, and previous experiences of PhD applicants in neuroscience has changed. This has necessitated both a reconsideration of admissions processes to ensure equity for an increasingly diverse applicant pool as well as renewed efforts to expand access to the training and research experiences required for admission to graduate programs. Here, we describe both facets of graduate school admissions by demystifying the process and providing faculty with tools and resources to help undergraduate students successfully navigate it. We discuss admissions requirements and processes at two graduate institutions, highlighting holistic approaches to evaluating students, the ever-increasing research experience expectations, and the decreasing reliance on the GRE. With a particular focus on improving equity, diversity, inclusion and belonging, we discuss resources for applying to graduate school that are available for students from underrepresented populations, including summer institutes and fellowship programs and intentional relationships with minority serving institutions (MSIs) to foster bi-directional engagement between undergraduate programs at MSIs and graduate institutions. With diverse perspectives as faculty involved in undergraduate education, graduate programs, and post-baccalaureate training programs, we provide recommendations and resources for how to help all trainees — especially those from populations underrepresented in the STEM workforce — succeed in the current graduate education admissions landscape. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Scholarship and Practice of Undergraduate Research)
    The Genomics Education Partnership (GEP), a consortium of diverse colleges and universities, provides support for integrating genomics research into undergraduate curricula. To increase research opportunities for underrepresented students, GEP is expanding to more community colleges (CC). Genomics research, requiring only a computer with Internet access, may be particularly accessible for two-year institutions with limited research capacity and significant budget constraints. To understand how GEP supports student research at CCs, the authors analyzed student knowledge and self-reported outcomes. It was found that CC student gains were comparable to non-CC student gains, with improvements in attitudes toward science and thriving in science. The early findings suggest that the GEP model of centralized support with flexible implementation of a course-related undergraduate research experience benefits CC students and may help mitigate barriers to implementing research at CCs. 
    more » « less
  4. (, Genome Research)
    Over the past 20 years, the explosion of genomic data collection and the cloud computing revolution have made computational and data science research accessible to anyone with a web browser and an internet connection. However, students at institutions with limited resources have received relatively little exposure to curricula or professional development opportunities that lead to careers in genomic data science. To broaden participation in genomics research, the scientific community needs to support these programs in local education and research at underserved institutions (UIs). These include community colleges, historically Black colleges and universities, Hispanic-serving institutions, and tribal colleges and universities that support ethnically, racially, and socioeconomically underrepresented students in the United States. We have formed the Genomic Data Science Community Network to support students, faculty, and their networks to identify opportunities and broaden access to genomic data science. These opportunities include expanding access to infrastructure and data, providing UI faculty development opportunities, strengthening collaborations among faculty, recognizing UI teaching and research excellence, fostering student awareness, developing modular and open-source resources, expanding course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs), building curriculum, supporting student professional development and research, and removing financial barriers through funding programs and collaborator support. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, CBE—Life Sciences Education)
    Braun, Derek (Ed.)
    The COVID-19 pandemic shut down undergraduate research programs across the United States. A group of 23 colleges, universities, and research institutes hosted remote undergraduate research programs in the life sciences during Summer 2020. Given the unprecedented offering of remote programs, we carried out a study to describe and evaluate them. Using structured templates, we documented how programs were designed and implemented, including who participated. Through focus groups and surveys, we identified programmatic strengths and shortcomings as well as recommendations for improvements from students’ perspectives. Strengths included the quality of mentorship, opportunities for learning and professional development, and a feeling of connection with a larger community. Weaknesses included limited cohort building, challenges with insufficient structure, and issues with technology. Although all programs had one or more activities related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and justice, these topics were largely absent from student reports even though programs coincided with a peak in national consciousness about racial inequities and structural racism. Our results provide evidence for designing remote Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs) that are experienced favorably by students. Our results also indicate that remote REUs are sufficiently positive to further investigate their affordances and constraints, including the potential to scale up offerings, with minimal concern about disenfranchising students. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email