skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Training LLMs to Recognize Hedges in Dialogues about Roadrunner Cartoons
Hedges allow speakers to mark utterances as provisional, whether to signal non-prototypicality or “fuzziness”, to indicate a lack of commitment to an utterance, to attribute responsibility for a statement to someone else, to invite input from a partner, or to soften critical feedback in the service of face management needs. Here we focus on hedges in an experimentally parameterized corpus of 63 Roadrunner cartoon narratives spontaneously produced from memory by 21 speakers for co-present addressees, transcribed to text (Galati and Brennan, 2010). We created a gold standard of hedges annotated by human coders (the Roadrunner-Hedge corpus) and compared three LLM-based approaches for hedge detection: fine-tuning BERT, and zero and few-shot prompting with GPT-4o and LLaMA-3. The best-performing approach was a fine-tuned BERT model, followed by few-shot GPT-4o. After an error analysis on the top performing approaches, we used an LLM-in-the-Loop approach to improve the gold standard coding, as well as to highlight cases in which hedges are ambiguous in linguistically interesting ways that will guide future research. This is the first step in our research program to train LLMs to interpret and generate collateral signals appropriately and meaningfully in conversation.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2125295
PAR ID:
10615162
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Association for Computational Linguistics
Date Published:
Page Range / eLocation ID:
204 to 215
Format(s):
Medium: X
Location:
Kyoto, Japan
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, Education Sciences)
    Few studies have compared Large Language Models (LLMs) to traditional Machine Learning (ML)-based automated scoring methods in terms of accuracy, ethics, and economics. Using a corpus of 1000 expert-scored and interview-validated scientific explanations derived from the ACORNS instrument, this study employed three LLMs and the ML-based scoring engine, EvoGrader. We measured scoring reliability (percentage agreement, kappa, precision, recall, F1), processing time, and explored contextual factors like ethics and cost. Results showed that with very basic prompt engineering, ChatGPT-4o achieved the highest performance across LLMs. Proprietary LLMs outperformed open-weight LLMs for most concepts. GPT-4o achieved robust but less accurate scoring than EvoGrader (~500 additional scoring errors). Ethical concerns over data ownership, reliability, and replicability over time were LLM limitations. EvoGrader offered superior accuracy, reliability, and replicability, but required, in its development a large, high-quality, human-scored corpus, domain expertise, and restricted assessment items. These findings highlight the diversity of considerations that should be used when considering LLM and ML scoring in science education. Despite impressive LLM advances, ML approaches may remain valuable in some contexts, particularly those prioritizing precision, reliability, replicability, privacy, and controlled implementation. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; (, IEEE Access)
    The burgeoning sophistication of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has catalyzed the rapid proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) within software development. These models are increasingly employed to automate the generation of functionally correct code, address complex computational problems, and facilitate the debugging of existing software systems. However, LLM-generated code often faces challenges due to inherent inefficiencies, including redundant logical structures, factually inconsistent content (hallucinations), and programming errors. To address this issue, our research rigorously evaluated the computational efficiency of Python code generated by three prominent LLMs: GPT-4o-Mini, GPT-3.5-Turbo, and GPT-4-Turbo. The evaluation metrics encompass execution time, memory utilization, and peak memory consumption, while maintaining the functional correctness of the generated code. Leveraging the EffiBench benchmark datasets within the Google Vertex AI Workbench environment, across a spectrum of machine configurations, the study implemented a consistent seed parameter to ensure experimental reproducibility. Furthermore, we investigated the impact of two distinct optimization strategies: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and model fine-tuning. Our findings reveal a significant enhancement in efficiency metrics for GPT-4o-Mini and GPT-3.5-Turbo when employing CoT prompting; however, this trend was not observed for GPT-4-Turbo. Based on its promising performance with CoT prompting, we selected the GPT-4o-Mini model for subsequent fine-tuning, aiming to further enhance both its computational efficiency and accuracy. However, contrary to our expectations, fine-tuning the GPT-4o-Mini model led to a discernible degradation in both its accuracy and computational efficiency. In conclusion, this study provides empirical evidence suggesting that the deployment of high-CPU machine configurations, in synergy with the utilization of the GPT-4o-Mini model and CoT prompting techniques, yields demonstrably more efficient and accurate LLM-generated Python code, particularly within computationally intensive application scenarios. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association)
    Abstract ObjectiveExtracting social determinants of health (SDoHs) from medical notes depends heavily on labor-intensive annotations, which are typically task-specific, hampering reusability and limiting sharing. Here, we introduce SDoH-GPT, a novel framework leveraging few-shot learning large language models (LLMs) to automate the extraction of SDoH from unstructured text, aiming to improve both efficiency and generalizability. Materials and MethodsSDoH-GPT is a framework including the few-shot learning LLM methods to extract the SDoH from medical notes and the XGBoost classifiers which continue to classify SDoH using the annotations generated by the few-shot learning LLM methods as training datasets. The unique combination of the few-shot learning LLM methods with XGBoost utilizes the strength of LLMs as great few shot learners and the efficiency of XGBoost when the training dataset is sufficient. Therefore, SDoH-GPT can extract SDoH without relying on extensive medical annotations or costly human intervention. ResultsOur approach achieved tenfold and twentyfold reductions in time and cost, respectively, and superior consistency with human annotators measured by Cohen's kappa of up to 0.92. The innovative combination of LLM and XGBoost can ensure high accuracy and computational efficiency while consistently maintaining 0.90+ AUROC scores. DiscussionThis study has verified SDoH-GPT on three datasets and highlights the potential of leveraging LLM and XGBoost to revolutionize medical note classification, demonstrating its capability to achieve highly accurate classifications with significantly reduced time and cost. ConclusionThe key contribution of this study is the integration of LLM with XGBoost, which enables cost-effective and high quality annotations of SDoH. This research sets the stage for SDoH can be more accessible, scalable, and impactful in driving future healthcare solutions. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, ACM)
    As large language models (LLMs) show great promise in generating a wide spectrum of educational materials, robust yet cost-effective assessment of the quality and effectiveness of such materials becomes an important challenge. Traditional approaches, including expert-based quality assessment and student-centered evaluation, are resource-consuming, and do not scale efficiently. In this work, we explored the use of pre-existing student learning data as a promising approach to evaluate LLM-generated learning materials. Specifically, we used a dataset where students were completing the program construction challenges by picking the correct answers among human-authored distractors to evaluate the quality of LLM-generated distractors for the same challenges. The dataset included responses from 1,071 students across 22 classes taught from Fall 2017 to Spring 2023. We evaluated five prominent LLMs (OpenAI-o1, GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, and Llama-3.1-8b) across three different prompts to see which combinations result in more effective distractors, i.e., those that are plausible (often picked by students), and potentially based on common misconceptions. Our results suggest that GPT-4o was the most effective model, matching close to 50% of the functional distractors originally authored by humans. At the same time, all of the evaluated LLMs generated many novel distractors, i.e., those that did not match the pre-existing human-authored ones. Our preliminary analysis shows that those appear to be promising. Establishing their effectiveness in real-world classroom settings is left for future work. 
    more » « less
  5. ; (, Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence)
    Learning outcomes are clear and concise statements that describe what students should be able to do or know at the end of a particular course. These statements are crucial in instructional planning, curriculum development, and assessment of student progress and learning. Although there is no universal guidance on how to develop learning outcomes, Bloom’s taxonomy is one widely used framework that helps instructors develop outcomes that reflect different levels of thinking, from basic remembering to creative problem-solving. This study investigates the potential of generative AI, specifically GPT-4, in classifying course learning outcomes according to their respective cognitive levels within the revised Bloom’s taxonomy. To assess the effectiveness of GenAI, we conducted a comparative study using a dataset of 1000 annotated learning outcomes. We tested multiple prompt engineering strategies, including zero-shot, few-shot, chain-of-thought, rhetorical situation, and multiple binary questions, leveraging GPT-4. Classification performance was evaluated using accuracy, Cohen’s κ, and F1-score. The results indicate that the prompt incorporating rhetorical context and domain-specific knowledge achieved the highest classification performance, while the multiple binary question approach underperformed even compared to the zero-shot method. Furthermore, we compared the best-performing prompting strategy with a state-of-the-art classification model, BERT. Although the fine-tuned BERT model showed superior performance, prompt-based classification exhibited moderate to substantial agreement with expert annotations. Overall, this article demonstrates the potential of leveraging large language models to advance both theoretical understanding and practical application within the field of education and natural language processing. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email