<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Remote sensing of temperature‐dependent mosquito and viral traits predicts field surveillance‐based disease risk</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>Ecological Society of America</publisher>
				<date>11/01/2024</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10615382</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1002/ecy.4420</idno>
					<title level='j'>Ecology</title>
<idno>0012-9658</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">105</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">11</biblScope>					

					<author>Andrew J MacDonald</author><author>David Hyon</author><author>Samantha Sambado</author><author>Kacie Ring</author><author>Anna Boser</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[<title>Abstract</title> <p>Mosquito‐borne diseases contribute substantially to the global burden of disease, and are strongly influenced by environmental conditions. Ongoing and rapid environmental change necessitates improved understanding of the response of mosquito‐borne diseases to environmental factors like temperature, and novel approaches to mapping and monitoring risk. Recent development of trait‐based mechanistic models has improved understanding of the temperature dependence of transmission, but model predictions remain challenging to validate in the field. Using West Nile virus (WNV) as a case study, we illustrate the use of a novel remote sensing‐based approach to mapping temperature‐dependent mosquito and viral traits at high spatial resolution and across the diurnal cycle. We validate the approach using mosquito and WNV surveillance data controlling for other key factors in the ecology of WNV, finding strong agreement between temperature‐dependent traits and field‐based metrics of risk. Moreover, we find that WNV infection rate in mosquitos exhibits a unimodal relationship with temperature, peaking at ~24.6–25.2°C, in the middle of the 95% credible interval of optimal temperature for transmission of WNV predicted by trait‐based mechanistic models. This study represents one of the highest resolution validations of trait‐based model predictions, and illustrates the utility of a novel remote sensing approach to predicting mosquito‐borne disease risk.</p>]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>INTRODUCTION</head><p>Mosquito-borne diseases are some of the most persistent health challenges globally. This distinction is underpinned by their rapid response to changing environmental and sociopolitical conditions including suitable temperature <ref type="bibr">(Paz, 2015)</ref>, available breeding habitat <ref type="bibr">(Bowden et al., 2011)</ref>, political turmoil <ref type="bibr">(Kilpatrick &amp; Randolph, 2012)</ref>, and the increasing pace of introductions of vector species and pathogens to novel regions (e.g., global invasion of Aedes spp. and flaviviruses to the Americas; introduction of Anopheles stephensi to sub-Saharan Africa). These characteristics of mosquito vectors and pathogens complicate efforts to control them, despite substantial funding and public health interventions, as well as research efforts.</p><p>Mosquito-borne disease risk is further compounded by the pace of global change, leading to potentially rapid changes in environmental suitability for disease transmission <ref type="bibr">(Bowden et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kilpatrick &amp; Randolph, 2012)</ref>. Will mosquitos and the pathogens they transmit expand or shift their distributions <ref type="bibr">(Ryan et al., 2019)</ref>? Will they adapt in situ, through behavioral responses like shifting seasonality, or through evolutionary adaptation <ref type="bibr">(Couper et al., 2021)</ref>? The potential for rapid response of mosquito-borne diseases to environmental change has underscored the importance of prediction and forecasting to understand consequences for health.</p><p>One important approach to forecasting impacts of changing climate on mosquito-borne disease risk is characterizing the temperature dependence of transmission through mosquito and pathogen trait-based mechanistic models <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shocket et al., 2020)</ref>. Key mosquito and pathogen traits-from biting rates and mosquito lifespans, to transmission efficiency-are sensitive to temperature <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019)</ref>. Combining the influence of these traits on the relative R 0 of mosquito-borne diseases through mechanistic models has led to improved predictions of the optimal temperature for malaria transmission <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2013)</ref> and future forecasts of the shifting suitability for arboviruses <ref type="bibr">(Ryan et al., 2019)</ref>. However, these models rely on temperature-trait relationships measured in laboratory studies, and field-based model validation remains a challenge <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019)</ref>.</p><p>Previous model validation efforts have relied on pairing relatively coarse weather data with either similarly coarse (e.g., county-level case reporting for West Nile virus [WNV]; <ref type="bibr">Shocket et al., 2020)</ref> or sparse (e.g., aggregation of the results of limited field studies; <ref type="bibr">Mordecai et al., 2013)</ref> transmission data. However, such scales may not represent ecologically relevant associations of temperature with metrics of disease risk, like entomological inoculation rates or human case reporting. Here, we use a novel remote sensing approach <ref type="bibr">(Boser et al., 2021)</ref> in combination with highly spatially resolved vector surveillance data to both provide novel field-based validation of trait-based mechanistic models <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shocket et al., 2020)</ref> and assess the performance of the remote sensing approach of <ref type="bibr">Boser et al. (2021)</ref> in predicting mosquito-borne disease risk. Specifically, using WNV in California's Central Valley as a case study, we quantify temperature-and temperature-dependent mosquito and viral traitsacross the diurnal cycle at high spatial resolution (70 m), and use this information to predict adult female Culex tarsalis mosquito abundance and infection with WNV.</p><p>We find key temperature-dependent traits, transmission efficiency and mosquito abundance, reliably predict metrics of WNV risk-minimum infection rate (MIR) and adult female mosquito abundance, respectively-in the field, controlling for key biotic and abiotic conditions relevant to WNV dynamics. Moreover, WNV infection rates in vector mosquitos peak almost precisely at the optimal temperature for WNV transmission predicted by <ref type="bibr">Shocket et al. (2020)</ref>. These results provide robust, high spatial resolution validation of temperature-dependent, trait-based mechanistic models, as well as validate a novel remote sensing-based approach to high spatial resolution mosquito-borne disease risk mapping and prediction <ref type="bibr">(Boser et al., 2021)</ref> that could prove valuable to vector-borne disease ecology across regions and ecological contexts.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>METHODS</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Study region</head><p>This study was conducted in the northern Central Valley of California, which encompasses the Sacramento metropolitan area, smaller cities and towns, part of the Sacramento River delta, and diverse agricultural landscapes that include rice production, row crops, and orchards. Rainy winters and crop irrigation provide breeding habitat for mosquitos, while hot, dry summers are ideal for mosquito development and population growth.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>WNV surveillance data</head><p>Mosquito and WNV surveillance is conducted throughout the year by California's mosquito and vector control districts, and includes number of mosquitos by life stage, sex, and species collected by trap type and per trap night. Mosquito pools are also screened for WNV infection, primarily during peak transmission season from late spring to early fall. All trap stations include latitude and longitude, and date of collection. Mosquito and WNV surveillance data were acquired from VectorSurv, through a CalSurv data request (#000058), for the northern Central Valley-Sacramento, Solano, Napa, Yolo, Colusa, Sutter, Placer, Yuba, Nevada, Contra Costa, San Joaquin, El Dorado, and Amador counties-from 2010 to 2020 (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>). To group nearby trap stations that were unlikely to represent independent samples based on daily dispersal distances of Culex mosquitos <ref type="bibr">(Reisen &amp; Lothrop, 1995)</ref>, trap stations were spatially aggregated using hierarchical clustering. In brief, clusters were created using a complete-linkage hierarchical clustering method with tree height cutoff of ~3000 m using the hclust function in the stats package (R Core Team, 2022), resulting in ~1500 m (1.5 km) radius buffers around trap station cluster centroids. Each cluster contains distinct trap stations, so clusters of trap stations do not contain duplicate surveillance data.</p><p>Following trap station clustering, we calculated weekly averages of (1) number of mosquitos per trap night and (2) minimum WNV infection rates (MIR) for each trap station cluster by week observation using the following equation: MIR &#188; number positive pools &#196; &#189; &#240; number specimens tested &#215; 1000&#222;. The surveillance data were then subset to the beginning of June through end of September 2018-2020, to match available imagery from the ECOSTRESS sensor (see below). This data subset was then collapsed by trap station cluster to obtain a single observation per cluster of average MIR and average number of mosquitos per trap night over the peak transmission season. Data processing was restricted to only adult Cx. tarsalis females, the primary rural WNV vector in the agriculturally dominated Central Valley.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Temperature-dependent traits</head><p>We employ a novel method developed and outlined in <ref type="bibr">Boser et al. (2021)</ref> for measuring air temperature across the diurnal cycle at high spatial resolution using remote sensing. These high spatial resolution temperature measurements (Figure <ref type="figure">1b</ref>) are then used to calculate and map temperature-dependent mosquito and viral traits <ref type="bibr">(Boser et al., 2021)</ref>. In brief, ECOSTRESS is a NASA sensor onboard the International Space Station, capable of collecting highly accurate land surface temperature (LST) at high spatial resolution (70 m). Temperature measurements occur at variable times of day due to the non-sun synchronous orbit of the sensor, with sensor revisit times averaging approximately once every two days in this region resulting in high spatial resolution temperature measurements across the diurnal cycle. From LST, we model air temperature using meteorological station temperature measurements across the Central Valley <ref type="bibr">(Boser et al., 2021)</ref>, since LST tends to be higher during the peak of the day and cooler at night than air temperature.</p><p>We then apply the mechanistic relationships for key mosquito and viral traits for Cx. tarsalis and WNV across the diurnal temperature cycle produced from ECOSTRESS, following <ref type="bibr">Boser et al. (2021)</ref>. Specifically, we focus on: </p><p>We focus on transmission efficiency, b T &#240; &#222;, as a modeled proxy for WNV MIRs, and mosquito abundance, M T &#240; &#222;, as a modeled proxy for mosquitos per trap night from WNV surveillance (Appendix S1: Figures <ref type="figure">S1</ref> and <ref type="figure">S2</ref>). Finally, we summarize temperature-dependent traits within ~1500 m radius buffers, to approximate average weekly Culex mosquito dispersal distances reported in the literature <ref type="bibr">(Reisen &amp; Lothrop, 1995)</ref>, centered on each trap station cluster to assess the relationship between modeled traits and field surveillance.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Abiotic and biotic controls</head><p>Many other factors may influence WNV risk, including humidity <ref type="bibr">(Paz, 2015)</ref>, standing water for breeding <ref type="bibr">(Kovach &amp; Kilpatrick, 2018)</ref>, land cover <ref type="bibr">(Bowden et al., 2011)</ref> and host abundance, including reservoir bird hosts <ref type="bibr">(Kilpatrick et al., 2007)</ref>. To capture these factors in our analysis, we include additional key biotic and abiotic characteristics, summarized by trap station cluster across the summer months of 2018-2020 (Appendix S1: Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>). We include abundance of key passerine bird hosts-house sparrows, house finches, western scrub jays, American robins, and American crows-both individually and summed to quantify overall "competent" bird abundance, as well as overall bird diversity using modeled bird abundance data from the Cornell Lab of Ornithology, ebird Status and Trends <ref type="bibr">(Fink et al., 2020)</ref>. We also include human and livestock (cattle and chickens) density as a measure of overall blood meal host availability from WorldPop (<ref type="url">www.worldpop.org</ref>) and the UN FAO, respectively <ref type="bibr">(Gilbert et al., 2018)</ref>. We also include cumulative precipitation (mm) and average vapor pressure deficit (in kilopascal) from gridMET <ref type="bibr">(Abatzoglou, 2013)</ref>, enhanced vegetation index (EVI) from MODIS, drought severity (Palmer Drought Severity Index) from gridMET <ref type="bibr">(Abatzoglou, 2013)</ref>, standing water from the European Commission's Joint Research Centre Global Surface Water database <ref type="bibr">(Pekel et al., 2016)</ref>, area of irrigated agriculture from irrMapper <ref type="bibr">(Ketchum et al., 2020)</ref>, and a categorical variable for the dominant land cover type from the 2019 National Land Cover Dataset-agriculture (reference category in models), developed, natural and wetland <ref type="bibr">(Dewitz &amp; USGS, 2021)</ref>. Finally, we include other temperature-dependent mosquito traits (i.e., biting rate, a T &#240; &#222;, and abundance, M T &#240; &#222;, in the WNV MIR models) that might influence the relationship between the focal trait and vector surveillance <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019)</ref>. Data availability is described in Appendix S1: Table <ref type="table">S1</ref> (MacDonald, 2024).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Statistical analysis</head><p>All analyses were conducted in R version 4.2.2 (R Core Team, 2022). To remove the effects of spatial autocorrelation, we spatially thinned the trap station clusters so that the distance between trap station cluster centroids was at least 3 km, resulting in a random subset of trap station clusters that maximizes the number of retained data points, and that avoids overlap of the 1500-m-radius buffers around each trap station cluster centroid (Appendix S1: Figure <ref type="figure">S3</ref>). Spatial thinning was achieved using the ensemble.spatialThin function in the BiodiversityR package <ref type="bibr">(Kindt &amp; Coe, 2005)</ref>. If residual spatial autocorrelation was still present in full or best fit models (see below), according to Moran's I tests on model residuals, the x and y coordinates of trap station clusters were added as additional controls in the final models.</p><p>To model the relationship between temperaturedependent traits, derived from ECOSTRESS, and field-based WNV surveillance, we use generalized linear models (GLMs) with a Tweedie response distribution and log link function using the package glmmTMB <ref type="bibr">(Brooks et al., 2017)</ref>. The Tweedie distribution is in the exponential family and is useful for modeling outcome data that have a point mass at zero and a skewed positive distribution when greater than zero <ref type="bibr">(Gilchrist &amp; Drinkwater, 2000)</ref>, as is the case for MIR and mosquitos per trap night in our surveillance dataset. We standardized (z-score transformed) all variables, with the exception of categorical land cover, to allow for interpretation of relative effect sizes.</p><p>We first specified models with just the focal trait (i.e., MIR as a function of modeled transmission efficiency and mosquitos per trap night as a function of modeled mosquito abundance). We then specified full models with all relevant control variables, and used backward stepwise variable selection by Akaike information criterion (AIC) using the stepAIC function in the MASS package <ref type="bibr">(Venables &amp; Ripley, 2002)</ref> to select the best fit models, ensuring limited collinearity in the final set of predictors using the performance package <ref type="bibr">(L&#252;decke et al., 2021)</ref>. To ensure that model results were robust to model selection approach, we undertook an all possible model comparison with model selection by AIC c using the dredge function in the MuMIn package <ref type="bibr">(Barton, 2023)</ref>. Finally, we specified full and best fit models, as above, using a quadratic function of air temperature in place of the temperature-dependent traits. We do so to assess the shape of the relationship between temperature alone, derived from ECOSTRESS, and field surveillance-based estimates of WNV risk (i.e., MIR). The full suite of model results and diagnostics is presented in Appendix S1: Figures <ref type="figure">S4-S6</ref>, Tables <ref type="table">S2-S9</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>RESULTS</head><p>The best-fit models predicting adult female Cx. tarsalis per trap night included temperature-dependent mosquito abundance modeled from ECOSTRESS (M T &#240; &#222;), competent bird abundance, bird diversity (Shannon index), precipitation, area of irrigated agriculture, EVI, vapor pressure deficit, area of standing water, cattle density, dominant land cover, and x and y coordinates of trap station clusters. The model estimates a strong positive association between temperature-dependent mosquito abundance and mosquitos per trap night from field-based surveillance ( exp&#240; b &#946;&#222; &#188; 1:42 [1.02-1.97], Figure <ref type="figure">2a</ref>; Appendix S1: Figure <ref type="figure">S4</ref>, Tables <ref type="table">S2-S4</ref>). Specifically, for a one SD increase in temperaturedependent mosquito abundance, the model predicts a 42% increase in the number of mosquitos per trap night. In addition, mosquitos per trap night were positively associated with competent bird host abundance, precipitation, area of irrigated agriculture and wetland land cover, and negatively associated with overall bird diversity, EVI, vapor pressure deficit, area of standing water, and developed land cover (Figure <ref type="figure">2a</ref>; Appendix S1: Figure <ref type="figure">S4</ref>, Tables <ref type="table">S2-S4</ref>).</p><p>Best fit models predicting WNV MIRs in adult female Cx. tarsalis included temperature-dependent transmission efficiency modeled from ECOSTRESS (b T &#240; &#222;), bird diversity, EVI, vapor pressure deficit, mosquito biting rate, area of standing water, human population and chicken density, dominant land cover, and x and y coordinates of trap station clusters. The model estimates a strong positive association between temperature-dependent transmission efficiency and MIR (exp&#240; b &#946;&#222; &#188; 1:84 [1.14-2.95], Figure <ref type="figure">2b</ref>; Appendix S1: Figure <ref type="figure">S5</ref>, Tables <ref type="table">S5-S7</ref>). Specifically, for a one SD increase in temperature-dependent transmission efficiency, the model predicts an 84% increase in MIR. In addition, MIR was positively associated with bird diversity and EVI, and negatively associated with mosquito biting rates (a T &#240; &#222;) and human population density (Figure <ref type="figure">2b</ref>; Appendix S1: Figure <ref type="figure">S5</ref>, Tables <ref type="table">S5-S7</ref>).</p><p>In models predicting MIRs from field surveillance with ECOSTRESS-based air temperature in place of  <ref type="table">S9</ref>).</p><p>temperature-dependent traits (Figure <ref type="figure">2c</ref>; Appendix S1: Figure <ref type="figure">S6</ref>, Tables <ref type="table">S8</ref> and <ref type="table">S9</ref>), we identify a clear unimodal relationship between temperature and MIR that peaks at ~24.6-25.2 C (Figure <ref type="figure">2d</ref>), almost precisely in the center of the range of predicted optimal temperature for transmission of WNV by Cx. tarsalis (22.9-25.9 C) <ref type="bibr">(Shocket et al., 2020)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>DISCUSSION</head><p>Mosquito-borne diseases threaten human health globally and remain a significant public health challenge due to the sensitivity of mosquito vectors and pathogen transmission to rapidly changing environmental conditions <ref type="bibr">(Bowden et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kilpatrick &amp; Randolph, 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Paz, 2015)</ref>. There has therefore been significant interest in modeling the response of mosquito-borne diseases to key environmental parameters like temperature <ref type="bibr">(Hartley et al., 2012)</ref>, as well as in mapping transmission risk to better understand current and future threats to human health <ref type="bibr">(Ryan et al., 2019)</ref>. Recent advances in trait-based mechanistic modeling of the temperature dependence of pathogen transmission <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019)</ref> have improved understanding of the potential responses of mosquito-borne diseases to changing climate. However, field-based validation of model predictions has been a significant challenge, due in part to a dearth of high spatial resolution temperature estimates that can be combined with similarly high resolution surveillance data <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019)</ref>.</p><p>Here, we overcome these challenges using a novel remote sensing approach to estimating air temperature at high spatial resolution, and across the diurnal cycle <ref type="bibr">(Boser et al., 2021)</ref>. We find good agreement between temperature-dependent mosquito and viral traits, and entomological metrics of risk from high resolution field surveillance data, as well as validate predictions of optimal temperature for transmission of WNV by Cx. tarsalis from trait-based mechanistic models <ref type="bibr">(Shocket et al., 2020)</ref>.</p><p>Importantly, these temperature-dependent traits are significant predictors of entomological metrics of WNV risk from field-based surveillance even in models controlling for other biotic and abiotic factors relevant to mosquito biology and WNV ecological dynamics <ref type="bibr">(Bowden et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kilpatrick et al., 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Reisen &amp; Lothrop, 1995)</ref>. Bird host abundance and land cover characteristics relevant to mosquito breeding are also important predictors of the field-based metrics of WNV risk. For example, area of irrigated agriculture and wetland land cover are positively associated with mosquito abundance. Interestingly, area of standing water is negatively associated with mosquito abundance, which may be a function of the region of interest; large areas of standing water in this part of the Central Valley are primarily associated with the brackish Sacramento and San Joaquin Delta, which may be less ideal for Cx. tarsalis breeding than other water sources like irrigation ditches, storm drains, and seasonal wetlands <ref type="bibr">(Reisen &amp; Lothrop, 1995)</ref>. EVI, a metric of vegetation greenness, is positively associated with WNV MIR, as is overall bird diversity, which may be the case if overall abundance of highly competent hosts is elevated in high diversity bird communities.</p><p>While our novel remote sensing-based approach to risk mapping of WNV yields good agreement between temperature-dependent traits and field-based WNV surveillance, validating mechanistic model predictions, the approach does have some limitations. First, the mechanistic models from which our temperature-dependent traits are derived are necessarily simplified representations of the mosquito development and viral transmission processes <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019)</ref>. For example, the egg-to-adult development rate (MDR), encompasses multiple developmental stages and processes from timing of eggs to hatch, to development from larvae to pupae and adults. Each of these stages may respond differently to temperature, as will timing from adult emergence to female maturity and oviposition. This simplification is often necessary to make mechanistic models more interpretable and to simplify their parameterization while still capturing relevant dynamics. However, simplification may also lead, in our context, to disconnects between trait-based predictions and observed abundance or infection rates in the field, if for example some process is not accurately captured that has an outsized impact on the system. Another important limitation is that the revisit time of the ECOSTRESS sensor limits our temperature estimates to a single high spatial resolution diurnal temperature profile during the peak summer season. This may be more useful in regions with relatively consistent temperatures during distinct transmission seasons, like the Central Valley, but perhaps less so where conditions are more variable and transmission occurs variably year-round. Thus, the results we present from our study region may not be generalizable to these different ecological contexts. Cloud cover is also an issue for many applications of remote sensing, so this approach may be more challenging to implement in regions with significant cloud cover, particularly in tropical regions where vector surveillance may be limited, and remote sensing approaches potentially more valuable. Finally, the approach relies on meteorological station data to model air temperature from LST, so regions with sparse meteorological stations may also present a challenge.</p><p>High spatial and temporal resolution, globally consistent satellite imagery is increasingly available, and presents novel opportunities for mosquito-borne disease ecology, risk mapping, and future forecasting. Here we assess the performance of a novel remote sensing approach to temperature-dependent risk mapping <ref type="bibr">(Boser et al., 2021)</ref> in predicting entomological metrics of WNV risk in the Central Valley of California, and present one of the highest resolution validations of temperature-dependent mechanistic model predictions <ref type="bibr">(Mordecai et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shocket et al., 2020)</ref> of mosquito-borne disease transmission to date. We show that our approach, integrating across the diurnal temperature cycle, is well suited to capturing the nonlinearity of temperature-trait relationships, and to predicting mosquito-borne disease risk in the field.</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>19399170, 2024, 11, Downloaded from https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecy.4420, Wiley Online Library on [15/07/2025]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
