skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on June 10, 2026

Title: Integration of an Invasive Plant in Hummingbird and Flower Mite Networks Is Driven by Ecological Fitting and Generalization
ABSTRACT Most plant communities worldwide include exotic plants, which did not evolve with local organisms. The central goal of this study is to test if native organisms expanding their interactions to novel hosts are usually generalists or specialists. Here we studied new associations between hummingbirds, flower mites andMusa velutina(Musaceae), an exotic plant native to northeast India currently invading lowland forests in Costa Rica. Hummingbirds are pollinators, but flower mites feed on nectar without contributing to pollen transfer. Flower mites hitch rides on hummingbird beaks to colonize new flowers. To determine the original diet breadth of hummingbird and flower mite species, we assembled hummingbird and flower mite interactions at La Selva Biological Station. We identified four hummingbird species visitingMusa velutina. DNA barcode analyses identified only one species of flower mite colonizing flowers ofM. velutina. All new associations withM. velutinainvolved generalist hummingbird and flower mite species.Musa velutinadisplays both male and female flowers. Although flowers of both sexes were equally visited by hummingbirds, mites were 15 times more abundant in male than in female flowers. We hypothesize that this is the result of constant immigration coupled with mite population growth. Only half of the mites hitching rides on hummingbird beaks emigrate to newly opened flowers. Our results show thatM. velutinaintegration to a plant community occurs mainly by establishing interactions with generalists.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2222328 1737778
PAR ID:
10621510
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Biotropica
Volume:
57
Issue:
4
ISSN:
0006-3606
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Electric fields in terrestrial environments are used by caterpillars to detect their predators, as foraging cues by pollinators, and facilitate ballooning by spiders. This study shows that electric fields facilitate transportation and detection of hummingbirds in a guild of tropical phoretic mites. Hummingbird flower mites feed on nectar and pollen and complete their life cycle inside flowers. Mites colonize new flowers by hitching rides on hummingbird beaks. Flower mites emerge from hummingbird nostrils and disembark when the beak touches a flower. We tested whether flower mites are attracted to unmodulated electrostatic, or to modulated electric fields with amplitudes and frequencies in the range of those previously reported for hummingbirds. In a laboratory setup, mites were only attracted to modulated electric fields. In a choice experiment between positive or negative polarities, mites almost instantaneously chose positive charges, but only when the field was modulated. Mites display questing behavior, moving their front legs toward an electrostatic source. In experiments where we removed one or both front leg tarsi, we show that modulated fields are detected by sensory structures present in the front legs. We also show that flower mites use electrostatic attraction to bridge the gap to the beaks of hummingbirds, for a few milliseconds becoming one of the fastest terrestrial organisms. Our results confirm that hummingbird flower mites evolved an additional sensory modality — electroreception — to quickly detect hummingbirds and use electrostatics to facilitate transportation onto their hosts. 
    more » « less
  2. Summary Like metazoans, plants use small regulatoryRNAs (sRNAs) to direct gene expression. Several classes ofsRNAs, which are distinguished by their origin and biogenesis, exist in plants. Among them, microRNAs (miRNAs) andtrans‐acting small interferingRNAs (ta‐siRNAs) mainly inhibit gene expression at post‐transcriptional levels. In the past decades, plant miRNAs and ta‐siRNAs have been shown to be essential for numerous developmental processes, including growth and development of shoots, leaves, flowers, roots and seeds, among others. In addition, miRNAs and ta‐siRNAs are also involved in the plant responses to abiotic and biotic stresses, such as drought, temperature, salinity, nutrient deprivation, bacteria, virus and others. This review summarizes the roles of miRNAs and ta‐siRNAs in plant physiology and development. 
    more » « less
  3. ABSTRACT Microbial environmental transmission among individuals plays an important role in shaping the microbiomes of many species. Despite the importance of the microbiome for host fitness, empirical investigations on environmental transmission are scarce, particularly in systems where interactions across multiple trophic levels influence symbiotic dynamics. Here, we explore microbial transmission within insect microbiomes, focusing on solitary bees. Specifically, we investigate the environmental transmission hypothesis, which posits that solitary bees acquire and deposit their associated microbiota from and to their surroundings, especially flowers. Using experimental setups, we examine the transmission dynamics ofApilactobacillus micheneri, a fructophilic and acidophilic bacterium, between the solitary beeOsmia lignaria(Megachilidae) and the plantPhacelia tanacetifolia(Boraginaceae). Our results demonstrate that bees not only acquire bacteria from flowers but also deposit these microbes onto uninoculated flowers for other bees to acquire them, supporting a bidirectional microbial exchange. We therefore find empirical support for the environmental transmission hypothesis, and we discuss the multitrophic dependencies that facilitate microbial transmission between bees and flowers. 
    more » « less
  4. ABSTRACT The plant–mycorrhizal fungi relationship can range from mutualistic to parasitic as a function of the fungal taxa involved, plant ontogeny, as well as the availability of resources. Despite the implications this relationship may have on forest carbon cycling and storage, we know little about how mature trees may be impacted by mycorrhizae and how this impact may vary across the landscape. We collected growth data of two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF)‐associated tree species,Acer rubrumandA. saccharum, and one ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF)‐associated tree species,Quercus rubra, to assess how the mycorrhizal fungi–plant association may vary along a gradient of nitrogen (N) availability. Individual assessments of fungal taxa relative abundances showed non‐linear associations with tree growth; positive associations for the two AMF‐associated trees were mostly under low N, whereas positive to neutral associations for the EMF‐associated tree mainly took place at high N. OnlyA. rubrumexhibited greater tree growth with its tree soil‐specific mycorrhizal community when compared with predictions under a random mycorrhizal soil community. Because mycorrhizal fungi are likely to mediate how plants respond to warming, increasing levels of N deposition and of atmospheric CO2, understanding these relationships is critical to accurately forecasting tree growth. 
    more » « less
  5. Summary Abscisic acid (ABA) receptors belong to theSTARTdomain superfamily, which encompasses ligand‐binding proteins present in all kingdoms of life.STARTdomain proteins contain a central binding pocket that, depending on the protein, can couple ligand binding to catalytic, transport or signaling functions. In Arabidopsis, the best characterizedSTARTdomain proteins are the 14PYR/PYL/RCAR ABAreceptors, while the other members of the superfamily do not have assigned ligands. To address this, we used affinity purification of biotinylated proteins expressed transiently inNicotiana benthamianacoupled to untargetedLC‐MSto identify candidate binding ligands. We optimized this method usingABA–PYLinteractions and show thatABAco‐purifies with wild‐typePYL5 but not a binding site mutant. TheKdofPYL5 forABAis 1.1 μm, which suggests that the method has sufficient sensitivity for many ligand–protein interactions. Using this method, we surveyed a set of 37STARTdomain‐related proteins, which resulted in the identification of ligands that co‐purified withMLBP1 (At4G01883) orMLP165 (At1G35260). Metabolite identification and the use of authentic standards revealed thatMLBP1 binds to monolinolenin, which we confirmed using recombinantMLBP1. Monolinolenin also co‐purified withMLBP1 purified from transgenic Arabidopsis, demonstrating that the interaction occurs in a native context. Thus, deployment of this relatively simple method allowed us to define a protein–metabolite interaction and better understand protein–ligand interactions in plants. 
    more » « less