An official website of the United States government
The design of completely synthetic proteins from first principles— de novo protein design—is challenging. This is because, despite recent advances in computational protein–structure prediction and design, we do not understand fully the sequence-to-structure relationships for protein folding, assembly, and stabilization. Antiparallel 4-helix bundles are amongst the most studied scaffolds for de novo protein design. We set out to re-examine this target, and to determine clear sequence-to-structure relationships, or design rules, for the structure. Our aim was to determine a common and robust sequence background for designing multiple de novo 4-helix bundles. In turn, this could be used in chemical and synthetic biology to direct protein–protein interactions and as scaffolds for functional protein design. Our approach starts by analyzing known antiparallel 4-helix coiled-coil structures to deduce design rules. In terms of the heptad repeat, abcdefg — i.e. , the sequence signature of many helical bundles—the key features that we identify are: a = Leu, d = Ile, e = Ala, g = Gln, and the use of complementary charged residues at b and c. Next, we implement these rules in the rational design of synthetic peptides to form antiparallel homo- and heterotetramers. Finally, we use the sequence of the homotetramer to derive in one step a single-chain 4-helix-bundle protein for recombinant production in E. coli . All of the assembled designs are confirmed in aqueous solution using biophysical methods, and ultimately by determining high-resolution X-ray crystal structures. Our route from peptides to proteins provides an understanding of the role of each residue in each design.
more »
« less
Rationally seeded computational protein design of ɑ-helical barrels
Abstract Computational protein design is advancing rapidly. Here we describe efficient routes starting from validated parallel and antiparallel peptide assemblies to design two families of α-helical barrel proteins with central channels that bind small molecules. Computational designs are seeded by the sequences and structures of defined de novo oligomeric barrel-forming peptides, and adjacent helices are connected by loop building. For targets with antiparallel helices, short loops are sufficient. However, targets with parallel helices require longer connectors; namely, an outer layer of helix–turn–helix–turn–helix motifs that are packed onto the barrels. Throughout these computational pipelines, residues that define open states of the barrels are maintained. This minimizes sequence sampling, accelerating the design process. For each of six targets, just two to six synthetic genes are made for expression inEscherichia coli. On average, 70% of these genes express to give soluble monomeric proteins that are fully characterized, including high-resolution structures for most targets that match the design models with high accuracy.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2019598
- PAR ID:
- 10621826
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Chemical Biology
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Nature Chemical Biology
- Volume:
- 20
- Issue:
- 8
- ISSN:
- 1552-4450
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 991 to 999
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Peptide-based helical barrels are a noteworthy building block for hierarchical assembly, with a hydrophobic cavity that can serve as a host for cargo. In this study, disulfide-stapled helical barrels were synthesized containing ligands for metal ions on the hydrophilic face of each amphiphilic peptide helix. The major product of the disulfide-stapling reaction was found to be composed of five amphiphilic peptides, thereby going from a 16-amino-acid peptide to a stapled 80-residue protein in one step. The structure of this pentamer, 5HB1, was optimized in silico, indicating a significant hydrophobic cavity of ~6 Å within a helical barrel. Metal-ion-promoted assembly of the helical barrel building blocks generated higher order assemblies with a three-dimensional (3D) matrix morphology. The matrix was decorated with hydrophobic dyes and His-tagged proteins both before and after assembly, taking advantage of the hydrophobic pocket within the helical barrels and coordination sites within the metal ion-peptide framework. As such, this peptide-based biomaterial has potential for a number of biotechnology applications, including supplying small molecule and protein growth factors during cell and tissue growth within the matrix.more » « less
-
Abstract Structures at serine‐proline sites in proteins were analyzed using a combination of peptide synthesis with structural methods and bioinformatics analysis of the PDB. Dipeptides were synthesized with the proline derivative (2S,4S)‐(4‐iodophenyl)hydroxyproline [hyp(4‐I‐Ph)]. The crystal structure of Boc‐Ser‐hyp(4‐I‐Ph)‐OMe had two molecules in the unit cell. One molecule exhibitedcis‐proline and a type VIa2 β‐turn (BcisD). Thecis‐proline conformation was stabilized by a C–H/O interaction between Pro C–Hαand the Ser side‐chain oxygen. NMR data were consistent with stabilization ofcis‐proline by a C–H/O interaction in solution. The other crystallographically observed molecule hadtrans‐Pro and both residues in the PPII conformation. Two conformations were observed in the crystal structure of Ac‐Ser‐hyp(4‐I‐Ph)‐OMe, with Ser adopting PPII in one and the β conformation in the other, each with Pro in the δ conformation andtrans‐Pro. Structures at Ser‐Pro sequences were further examined via bioinformatics analysis of the PDB and via DFT calculations. Ser‐Pro versus Ala–Pro sequences were compared to identify bases for Ser stabilization of local structures. C–H/O interactions between the Ser side‐chain Oγand Pro C–Hαwere observed in 45% of structures with Ser‐cis‐Pro in the PDB, with nearly all Ser‐cis‐Pro structures adopting a type VI β‐turn. 53% of Ser‐trans‐Pro sequences exhibited main‐chain COi•••HNi+3or COi•••HNi+4hydrogen bonds, with Ser as theiresidue and Pro as thei + 1 residue. These structures were overwhelmingly either type I β‐turns or N‐terminal capping motifs on α‐helices or 310‐helices. These results indicate that Ser‐Pro sequences are particularly potent in favoring these structures. In each, Ser is in either the PPII or β conformation, with the Ser Oγcapable of engaging in a hydrogen bond with the amide N–H of thei + 2 (type I β‐turn or 310‐helix; Serχ1t) ori + 3 (α‐helix; Serχ1g+) residue. Non‐prolinecisamide bonds can also be stabilized by C–H/O interactions.more » « less
-
The extreme 5′-end of the enterovirus RNA genome contains a conserved cloverleaf-like domain that recruits 3CD and PCBP proteins required for initiating genome replication. Here, we report the crystal structure at 1.9 Å resolution of this domain from the CVB3 genome in complex with an antibody chaperone. The RNA folds into an antiparallel H-type four-way junction comprising four subdomains with co-axially stacked sA-sD and sB-sC helices. Long-range interactions between a conserved A40 in the sC-loop and Py-Py helix within the sD subdomain organize near-parallel orientations of the sA-sB and sC-sD helices. Our NMR studies confirm that these long-range interactions occur in solution and without the chaperone. The phylogenetic analyses indicate that our crystal structure represents a conserved architecture of enteroviral cloverleaf-like domains, including the A40 and Py-Py interactions. The protein binding studies further suggest that the H-shape architecture provides a ready-made platform to recruit 3CD and PCBP2 for viral replication.more » « less
-
Tailed bacteriophages use a DNA-packaging motor to encapsulate their genome during viral particle assembly. The small terminase (TerS) component of this DNA-packaging machinery acts as a molecular matchmaker that recognizes both the viral genome and the main motor component, the large terminase (TerL). However, how TerS binds DNA and the TerL protein remains unclear. Here we identified gp83 of the thermophilic bacteriophage P74-26 as the TerS protein. We found that TerS P76-26 oligomerizes into a nonamer that binds DNA, stimulates TerL ATPase activity, and inhibits TerL nuclease activity. A cryo-EM structure of TerS P76-26 revealed that it forms a ring with a wide central pore and radially arrayed helix–turn–helix domains. The structure further showed that these helix–turn–helix domains, which are thought to bind DNA by wrapping the double helix around the ring, are rigidly held in an orientation distinct from that seen in other TerS proteins. This rigid arrangement of the putative DNA-binding domain imposed strong constraints on how TerS P76-26 can bind DNA. Finally, the TerS P76-26 structure lacked the conserved C-terminal β-barrel domain used by other TerS proteins for binding TerL. This suggests that a well-ordered C-terminal β-barrel domain is not required for TerS P76-26 to carry out its matchmaking function. Our work highlights a thermophilic system for studying the role of small terminase proteins in viral maturation and presents the structure of TerS P76-26 , revealing key differences between this thermophilic phage and its mesophilic counterparts.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41589-024-01642-0
