skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Interactions Between [PdX 4 ] 2− (X=Cl, Br) Dianions in Presence of Counterions
Abstract The interaction between two square palladium (II) dianions PdX42−(X=Cl, Br) is evaluated by crystal study and analyzed by quantum chemical means. The arrangement within the crystal between each pair of PdX42−neighbors is suggestive of a Pd⋅⋅⋅X noncovalent bond, which is verified by a battery of computational protocols. While the potential between these two bare dianions is computed to be highly repulsive, the introduction of even just two counterions makes this interaction attractive, as does the presence of a constellation of point charges. It is concluded that there is indeed a stabilizing Pd⋅⋅⋅X bond, but it is incapable of overcoming the strong coulombic repulsive force between two dianions. While the QTAIM, NBO, and NCI tools can indicate the presence of a noncovalent bond, they are unable to distinguish an attractive from a repulsive interaction.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1954310
PAR ID:
10624155
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
ce
Date Published:
Journal Name:
ChemPhysChem
Volume:
26
Issue:
5
ISSN:
1439-4235
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Inspection of the arrangement of tetrachloridopalladate( ii ) centers in a crystalline solid places the Cl of one [PdCl 4 ] 2− directly above the Pd center of its neighbor. A survey of the CSD provides 22 more examples of such MX 4 2− ⋯MX 4 2− complexes, with M being a Group 10 metal and X = Cl, Br, or I. Quantum calculations attribute this arrangement to a π-hole bond wherein Cl lone pairs of one unit transfer charge to vacant orbitals above the Pd center of its neighbor. The stabilizing effect of this bond must overcome the strong Coulombic repulsion between the two dianions, which is facilitated by a polarizable environment as would be present in a crystal, but much more so when the effects of the neighboring counterions are factored in. These conclusions are extended to other [MX 4 ] 2− homodimers, where M represents other members of Group 10, namely Ni and Pt. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Careful analysis of the crystals formed in the reduction of AriPr8AlI2(AriPr8=C6H‐2,6‐(C6H2‐2,4,6‐iPr3)2‐3,5‐iPr2) with sodium on sodium chloride showed them to contain the long sought‐after dialuminene AriPr8AlAlAriPr8(1) that forms alongside the previously characterized alanediyl :AlAriPr8. The single crystal X‐ray structure of1revealed a nearly planar,trans‐bent C(ipso)AlAlC(ipso) core with an Al−Al distance of 2.648(2) Å. The molecular and electronic structure of1are consistent with an Al−Al double dative interaction augmented with diradical character and stabilized by dispersion interactions. Density functional theory calculations showed that the reactivity of :AlAriPr8with dihydrogen involves1, not :AlAriPr8, as the reactive species. In contrast, the reaction of :AlAriPr8with ethylene gave two products, the 1,4‐dialuminacyclohexane AriPr8Al(C2H4)2AlAriPr8(2) and the aluminacyclopentane AriPr8Al(C4H8) (3), that can both form from the aluminacyclopropane intermediate AriPr8Al(C2H4). Although the [2+2+2] cycloaddition of1with two equivalents of ethylene was also calculated to be exergonic, it is likely to be kinetically blocked by the numerous isopropyl substituents surrounding the Al−Al bond. Attempts to fine‐tune the steric bulk of the terphenyl ligand to allow stronger Al−Al bonding were unsuccessful, leading to the isolation of the sodium salt of a cyclotrialuminene, Na2[AlAriPr6]3(4), instead of AriPr6AlAlAriPr6
    more » « less
  3. Abstract The ability of an anion to serve as electron‐accepting Lewis acid in a noncovalent bond is assessed via DFT calculations. NH3is taken as the common base, and is paired with a host of AClnanions, with central atom A=Ca, Sr, Mg, Te, Sb, Hg, Zn, Ag, Ga, Ti, Sn, I, and B. Each anion reacts through its σ or π‐hole although the electrostatic potential of this hole is quite negative in most cases. Despite the contact between this negative hole and the negative region of the approaching nucleophile, the electrostatic component of the interaction energy of each bond is highly favorable, and accounts for more than half of the total attractive energy. The double negative charge of dianions precludes a stable complex with NH3
    more » « less
  4. Abstract Adducts between OsO4and Lewis bases exert a role in important oxidation processes such as epoxidation and dihydroxylation. It has been shown that the attractive interaction driving the formation of these adducts is a σ‐hole bond involving the metal as the electrophilic species; the term Osme Bond (OmB) was proposed for designating it. Here some new adducts between OsO4and various bases have been characterized through single crystal x‐ray diffraction (XRD) and computational studies (density functional theory, DFT), confirming the existence of a robust correlation between σ‐hole interaction energy and deformation of the tetrahedral geometry of OsO4. Also, some adducts formed by RuO4with nucleophiles were investigated computationally. 
    more » « less
  5. The possibility that MX 3 − anions can interact with one another is assessed via ab initio calculations in gas phase as well as in aqueous and ethanol solution. A pair of such anions can engage in two different dimer types. In the bridged configuration, two X atoms engage with two M atoms in a rhomboid structure with four equal M–X bond lengths. The two monomers retain their identity in the stacked geometry which contains a pair of noncovalent M⋯X interactions. The relative stabilities of these two structures depend on the nature of the central M atom, the halogen substituent, and the presence of solvent. The interaction and binding energies are fairly small, generally no more than 10 kcal mol −1 . The large electrostatic repulsion is balanced by a strong attractive polarization energy. 
    more » « less