<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Direct programming of human pluripotent stem cells into endothelial progenitors with SOX17 and FGF2</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>ScienceDirect</publisher>
				<date>04/01/2024</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10627779</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.stemcr.2024.02.006</idno>
					<title level='j'>Stem Cell Reports</title>
<idno>2213-6711</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">19</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">4</biblScope>					

					<author>Michael W Ream</author><author>Lauren N Randolph</author><author>Yuqian Jiang</author><author>Yun Chang</author><author>Xiaoping Bao</author><author>Xiaojun Lance Lian</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[Transcription factors (TFs) are pivotal in guiding stem cell behavior, including their maintenance and differentiation. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we investigated TFs expressed in endothelial progenitors (EPs) derived from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) and identified upregulated expression of SOXF factors SOX7, SOX17, and SOX18 in the EP population. To test whether overexpression of these factors increases differentiation efficiency, we established inducible hPSC lines for each SOXF factor and found only SOX17 overexpression robustly increased the percentage of cells expressing CD34 and vascular endothelial cadherin (VEC). Conversely, SOX17 knockdown via CRISPR-Cas13d significantly compromised EP differentiation. Intriguingly, we discovered SOX17 overexpression alone was sufficient to generate CD34 + VEC + CD31 À cells, and, when combined with FGF2 treatment, more than 90% of CD34 + VEC + CD31 + EP was produced. These cells are capable of further differentiating into endothelial cells. These findings underscore an undiscovered role of SOX17 in programming hPSCs toward an EP lineage, illuminating pivotal mechanisms in EP differentiation.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>INTRODUCTION</head><p>Generating homogeneous populations of clinically relevant cell types from human pluripotent stem cells (hPSCs) can be challenging when using growth factors and small molecules, as this approach often leads to the formation of heterogeneous cell populations <ref type="bibr">(Choi et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ditadi et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lian et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pagliuca et al., 2014)</ref>. In the past, the differentiation of hPSCs was often achieved through the formation of embryoid bodies (EBs). A study by <ref type="bibr">Levenberg et al.</ref> showed that the absence of self-renewal factors during EB formation led to spontaneous differentiation of EPs from hPSCs, albeit with very low efficiency (&lt;2%) <ref type="bibr">(Levenberg et al., 2002)</ref>. To improve the efficiency of EP differentiation from hPSCs, researchers have been exploring alternative methods. One such method involves using growth factors that enhance EP development, as well as 2D surface culturing of hPSCs without EB formation. Typically, hPSCs are first differentiated into mesodermal cells, which can then be further differentiated into EPs. In 2014, <ref type="bibr">Lian et al.</ref> showed that a GSK3b inhibitor can be used to generate mesodermal cells quickly and efficiently from hPSCs, with over 95% efficiency in just 2 days. The resulting mesodermal cells can be cultured in a basal medium with VEGF treatment for an additional 3-4 days to generate EPs, which express CD31, CD34, and vascular endothelial cadherin (VEC), with an ef-ficiency of approximately 20% <ref type="bibr">(Lian et al., 2014)</ref>. To further improve the efficiency of this process, researchers have incorporated bone morphogenetic protein 4 (BMP4) and activin A along with CHIR99021 during mesoderm differentiation <ref type="bibr">(Zhang et al., 2017)</ref>, and included an adenylyl cyclase activator during the mesoderm-to-EP differentiation stage. These modifications have increased the efficiency of EP differentiation to 61% <ref type="bibr">(Patsch et al., 2015)</ref>.</p><p>In addition to directed differentiation via small molecules and growth factors, another approach to generate desired cell types from hPSCs is forward programming. This method involves overexpression of specific transcription factors (TFs) in hPSCs to promote direct conversion into the desired cell types, bypassing relevant developmental stages. Forward programming has the potential to generate populations of desired cells with high efficiency in a shorter time frame. For example, overexpression of NFIA is sufficient to generate astrocytes from neural stem cells within 3 weeks, compared with 3-6 months required by growth factor and small molecule-based protocols <ref type="bibr">(Tchieu et al., 2019)</ref>.</p><p>To apply forward programming to derive EPs from hPSCs, it is essential to identify the TFs specifically expressed in this population. Recent advances in single-cell analysis techniques have enabled researchers to characterize differentiated cell types with unprecedented depth. Single-cell RNA</p><p>-3 0 3 6 -10 -5 0 5 UMAP 1 UMAP 2 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4 PLP1 IGFBP2 CRABP2 SOX9 CRABP1 MAFB PAX3 CDH6 FOXD3-AS1 FOXD3 ACTC1 KRT18 H4C3 PCLAF HELLS MCM3 DUT PCNA CLSPN MCM4 UBE2C KPNA2 TOP2A HMGB2 TPX2 CENPF CCNB1 DLGAP5 PTTG1 CDC20 XACT FLT1 EGFL7 GNG11 KDR RAMP2 RNASE1 CD34 PLVAP GJA4 DLK1 IGFBP3 LUM PLAT RSPO3 TNNI1 KCNQ1OT1 LINC02381 COL3A1 GATA6-AS1 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 Identity Expression Level CD34 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 4 Identity Expression Level VEC 0 1 2 3 4 Identity Expression Level 0 1 2 3 4 CD31 -3 0 3 6 -15 -10 -5 0 5 UMAP_1 UMAP_2 0 1 2 3 SOX7 -3 0 3 6 -15 -10 -5 0 5 UMAP_1 UMAP_2 0 1 2 SOX17 -3 0 3 6 -15 -10 -5 0 5 UMAP_1 UMAP_2 0 1 2 SOX18 D0 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 LaSR Basal CHIR99021 VEGF hPSCs Endothelial Progenitors VEC/SOX17/Hoechst VEC/SOX17 Control 10 6 10 4 10 2 10 0 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6 FITC APC 99.0% 0.15% 0.82% 0.031% 10 6 10 4 10 2 10 0 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6 VEC-FITC SOX17-APC 80.9% 1.18% 1.59% 16.3% 6 4 2 0 10 0 10 2 10 4 10 6 CD34-FITC SOX17-APC 82.4% 1.23% 1.69% 14.7% D5 Endothelial Progenitors mCherry VEC mCherry/VEC/Hoechst mCherry CD31 mCherry/CD31/Hoechst D5 Endothelial Progenitors -2 -1 0 1 2 A B C D E F G H I (legend on next page)</p><p>sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis has revealed heterogeneity in many differentiated populations, including endothelial cells (ECs) and pancreatic beta cells <ref type="bibr">(Paik et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Veres et al., 2019)</ref>. This approach can be used to identify critical TFs solely expressed in desired cell populations, which may be candidates for forward programming. Using scRNA-seq analysis, we identified SOXF factors <ref type="bibr">(Lefebvre et al., 2007)</ref>, SOX7, SOX17, and SOX18, as specifically expressed in our hPSC-derived EPs. We systematically studied SOX17 during hPSC differentiation to EPs and found that SOX17 overexpression enhances differentiation efficiency. Knockdown of SOX17 via CRISPR-Cas13d, however, inhibited EP differentiation. Importantly, overexpression of SOX17 alone is sufficient to program hPSCs into CD34 + VEC + CD31 &#192; cells. After screening several growth factors, we discovered that fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2) treatment enabled SOX17-programmed cells to become CD34 + VEC + CD31 + EPs.</p><p>Our findings provide new insights into endothelial development and highlight a novel role for SOX17 in deriving EPs from hPSCs. This discovery enables a unique EP programming method via overexpression of SOX17.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>RESULTS</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>scRNA-seq reveals SOXF factors expression in EPs</head><p>We developed a small molecule-based protocol <ref type="bibr">(Bao et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lian et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Randolph et al., 2019)</ref> to generate EPs from hPSCs using an initial pulse of Wnt/b-catenin signaling activation with a GSK3b inhibitor, CHIR99021 (CH). These EPs express CD34, CD31, and VEC and generate primitive vascular structures <ref type="bibr">(Galat et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lian et al., 2014)</ref>. To identify TFs specifically enriched in the EP population, we performed scRNA-seq analysis of day 5 differentiated cells (Figure <ref type="figure">1A</ref>). We sequenced 2,673 cells and after quality control filters were applied, we included 1,917 cells in our analysis (Figure <ref type="figure">S1A</ref>). Dimensional reduction and supervised clustering showed five distinct clusters of cells on day 5 of differentiation <ref type="bibr">(Figures 1B,</ref><ref type="bibr">1C,</ref><ref type="bibr">S1B,</ref><ref type="bibr">and S1D)</ref>. Clusters (0, 1, 2, 3, and 4) were composed of <ref type="bibr">609, 457, 454, 358, and 39 cells, respec-tively.</ref> Based on the top 100 differentially expressed genes, cluster-0 likely represents cardiac progenitors with upregulation of TNNI1, HAND1, and TMEM88 <ref type="bibr">(Palpant et al., 2013)</ref> (Figure <ref type="figure">1C</ref>, Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>). Cluster-3 cells show differential expression of MYL7, MYL9, and HAND1, and, therefore, may be labeled as atrial cardiac progenitors (Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>).</p><p>Cluster-4 has increased expression of SOX2 and POU5F1 and may represent residual undifferentiated hPSCs (Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>). In the UMAP projection, cluster-1 was distinctly separated from the other four clusters, and exhibited elevated levels of CD34, CDH5 (VEC), and PECAM1 (CD31), indicating its EP identity. Additionally, other genes that have been identified as critical regulators for endothelial lineage development, including ETS1, MECOM, CD93, and KDR, showed increased expression in cluster-1 as compared with all other clusters (Figure <ref type="figure">S1E</ref>).</p><p>Inspection of differentially expressed TFs uncovered high expression of all three SOXF factors (Figure <ref type="figure">1E</ref>) in the EP cell cluster (cluster-1). No other SOX factors were differentially expressed in EPs (cluster-1) (Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>). To confirm SOXF expression in our EPs, we used a SOX17-mCherry knockin reporter hPSC line <ref type="bibr">(Ng et al., 2016)</ref> and differentiated the knockin hPSCs to day 5 differentiated cells. The reporter cell line was validated by antibody staining on day 5 of differentiation (Figure <ref type="figure">S1F</ref>). In addition, mCherry expression only occurred in cells also expressing VEC and CD31 on day 5 of differentiation <ref type="bibr">(Figures 1F and 1G)</ref>. The co-expression of SOX17 with EP markers VEC and CD34 was also observed in an additional hPSC line (6-9-9 induced pluripotent stem cell [iPSC] line) by immunostaining and flow cytometry <ref type="bibr">(Figures 1H and 1I)</ref>. These data provide strong evidence that our Wnt activation protocol does result in EPs, and our scRNA-seq data revealed upregulated expression of SOXF factors in this population.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Overexpression of SOX17 but not SOX7 or SOX18 enhances EP differentiation</head><p>Upon discovering that all three SOXF factors are expressed in our EPs, we sought to understand which, if any, of these factors play a functional role in determining this cell fate. CD34 VEC CD31 0 20 40 60 80 100 Percent D5 Cells -Dox SOX7+Dox SOX17+Dox SOX18+Dox Tet-On 3G BsdR EFS P2A SOXF 5' PB 3' PB TRE3G XLone-SOXF Blasticidin EF1a hyperactive PBase H9+XLone-SOXF hyPBase XLone-SOXF hyPBase + Nucleofection H9 hPSCs + H9 XLone-SOXF Endothelial Progenitors D0 D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 LaSR basal +/-Dox VEGF CHIR99021 -Dox MERGE SOX17 VEC SOX7+Dox SOX17+Dox SOX18+Dox FSC SOX17-APC ** **** **** **** ns **** **** **** ns -Dox +Dox SOX17-APC Reference 82.6% 0.54% 10 2 10 4 10 2 10 0 10 4 10 6 10 4 10 2 10 0 10 4 10 6 10 2 ns 82.1% 1.9% 0.1% XLone-SOX17 XLone-SOX7 XLone-SOX18 A B C D E F Figure 2. SOX17 is the only SOXF member that increases EP differentiation efficiency when overexpressed (A) Schematic showing the generation of XLone-SOXF (SOX7, SOX17, or SOX18) hPSCs. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of validating inducible SOX17 expression in XLone-SOX17 H9 cells treated with or without Dox for 24 h. (C) Schematic illustrating culture conditions for SOXF overexpression during EP differentiation.</p><p>(legend continued on next page)</p><p>To address this question, we generated cell lines with inducible overexpression of SOX7, SOX17, and SOX18 by cloning each TF into our doxycycline (Dox)-inducible, PiggyBac-based XLone construct <ref type="bibr">(Randolph et al., 2017)</ref> (Figure <ref type="figure">2A</ref>). This construct was then introduced into hPSCs, and cells successfully incorporating the construct were purified by drug selection (Figure <ref type="figure">2A</ref>). The modified cells were then referred to as XLone-SOX7, Xlone-SOX17, and XLone-SOX18 H9 cells. To confirm the intended transgene expression of the resulting cells, we treated XLone-SOX17 H9 cells with or without Dox for 24 h. This treatment resulted in a strong overexpression of SOX17 in 82.6% of cells. Importantly, we observed negligible expression in cells without Dox treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">2B</ref>). This was consistent with our previous findings for XLone and indicates the successful generation of stable transgenic XLone-SOXF cell lines.</p><p>To test whether overexpression of SOXF factors enhances Wnt activation-induced EP differentiation, we differentiated each cell line to EPs using CH and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the presence or absence of Dox and compared the expression of CD34, VEC, and CD31 (Figures <ref type="figure">2C</ref> and <ref type="figure">S2A</ref>). The expression levels of these markers in cells without Dox treatment was consistent with our earlier experiments, and the differentiation efficiency was comparable with our previous results <ref type="bibr">(Lian et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Randolph et al., 2019) (Figure 2D, 2E, and S2B)</ref>. We observed a significant increase in the SOX17 + population, up to 82%, in cells differentiated in the presence of Dox for XLone-SOX17 H9 cells, as expected. In contrast, there were few SOX17 + cells in the day 5 cells generated from either XLone-SOX7 or XLone-SOX18 H9 cells (Figures <ref type="figure">2D</ref> and <ref type="figure">2F</ref>). XLone-SOX7 H9 cells showed a significant decrease in the percentage of CD34 + cells with no change in the percentage of VEC + cells (Figures <ref type="figure">2D</ref>, <ref type="figure">2E</ref>, and S2B). XLone-SOX18 H9 cells did not exhibit any change in the CD34 + population, but showed a statistically significant increase in the VEC + population (40.27% &#177; 2.32%, p = 0.0035) (Figures <ref type="figure">2D</ref>, <ref type="figure">2E</ref>, and S2B). The day 5 cells resulting from XLone-SOX17 H9 cells showed significant increases in CD34 + (73.10% &#177; 0.94%, p = 1.15e&#192;6) and VEC + (81.40% &#177; 0.90%, p = 4.97e&#192;7) populations compared with differentiation without any transgene overexpression (Figures <ref type="figure">2D</ref>, <ref type="figure">2E</ref>, and S2B). Fluorescent microscopy revealed that the majority of SOX17 + cells were also VEC + (Figure <ref type="figure">2D</ref>). Interestingly, the overexpression of each SOXF factor resulted in a loss of CD31 expression (Figures <ref type="figure">2E</ref> and <ref type="figure">S2B</ref>). Collectively, this demonstrates that forced overexpression of SOX17, but not SOX7 or SOX18, increases Wnt activation-induced generation of CD34 + VEC + progenitors, highlighting a functional role for SOX17 in the acquisition of EC fate.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>SOX17 expression occurs prior to EP markers and Cas13d interference with SOX17 inhibits EP differentiation</head><p>To better understand the role of SOX17 during EP differentiation, we characterized SOX17 expression kinetics along hPSC differentiation to EPs. We differentiated hPSCs following the Wnt activation protocol illustrated in Figure <ref type="figure">1A</ref> and collected cells daily until day 3 and every 6 h after day 3 until day 5. Western blot analysis showed SOX17 and VEC are first detected on day 3.75 (Figures <ref type="figure">3A</ref> and <ref type="figure">3B</ref>). Immunofluorescent analysis revealed there are more cells expressing SOX17 alone on day 3.75, and this SOX17 single-positive cell number gradually decreases as cells become double-positive for SOX17 and VEC over time <ref type="bibr">(Figures 3C,</ref><ref type="bibr">3D,</ref><ref type="bibr">and S2C)</ref>. These data indicate that expression of SOX17 occurred before the appearance of VEC + cells.</p><p>To further investigate the role of SOX17 in our EP differentiation, we performed a loss-of-function analysis using a Cas13d-mediated knockdown approach. Cas13d is a member of the Cas13 family that can efficiently knockdown mRNA transcripts <ref type="bibr">(Konermann et al., 2018)</ref>. We cloned Cas13d into our XLone plasmid construct, driven by the inducible TRE3G promoter <ref type="bibr">(Randolph et al., 2017) (Figure 3E)</ref>. Additionally, we incorporated a U6 promoter expressing SOX17 crRNA into the plasmid, creating a single transposon system for Cas13d interference. We transfected this plasmid into H9 cells and used puromycin drug selection to purify the cells that integrated the XLone-Cas13d system (Figure <ref type="figure">3E</ref>). Flow cytometry analysis confirmed robust and near complete SOX17 knockdown efficiency via Cas13d during definitive endoderm differentiation with or without Dox treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">S2D</ref>). EP differentiation using this cell line with Dox treatment showed abrogation of CD31 and CD34 expression, as well as decreased VEC expression upon SOX17 knockdown (Figures <ref type="figure">3F</ref>, <ref type="figure">3G</ref>, and <ref type="figure">S2E</ref>). These results suggest that SOX17 expression is necessary for the formation of EPs from hPSCs.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>SOX17 is sufficient to program hPSCs into CD34 + VEC + cells</head><p>To determine if SOX17 overexpression can directly convert hPSCs into EPs without CH and VEGF, we  subjected XLone-SOX17 H9 cells to a basal medium (LaSR basal), with or without Dox treatment. As expected, day 5 cells cultured in the basal medium without Dox did not turn on expression of CD34, CD31, or VEC. However, when Dox treatment is applied, a population of the cells show expression of CD34 and VEC, with CD34 mRNA expression increasing as early as day 1 (Figures <ref type="figure">4A-4C</ref>).</p><p>We also used the XLone-ETV2 line as a positive control for hPSC programming, given that ETV2 is known to enable EP programming of hPSCs <ref type="bibr">(Wang et al., 2020)</ref>. Notably, SOX17 produces a similar percentage of CD34-expressing cells as ETV2 (Figure <ref type="figure">4A</ref>).</p><p>To confirm that SOX17-mediated forward programming was not cell line dependent, we generated and validated XLone-SOX17 cell lines using another hPSC line (H1 OCT4-GFP cells) (Figures <ref type="figure">S3A</ref> and <ref type="figure">S3B</ref>). Cells were then cultured with or without Dox treatment for 3 days in LaSR basal media (Figure <ref type="figure">S3C</ref>). We confirmed the loss of pluripotency by decrease in the GFP expression for XLone-SOX17 H1 OCT4-GFP cells from 97.1% on day 0 to 20.8% on day 5 (Figures <ref type="figure">S3D</ref> and <ref type="figure">S3F</ref>). Remarkably, in the presence of Dox, more than 85% of cells expressed VEC by day 5. In contrast, without Dox, none of the cells expressed VEC (Figures <ref type="figure">S3E</ref> and <ref type="figure">S3F</ref>). However, the percentage of CD34 + cells is less than 10% with Dox treatment, which is relatively low (Figure <ref type="figure">S3F</ref>).</p><p>To further enhance the efficiency of SOX17 forward programming, we speculated that cell density during differentiation and the duration of Dox treatment might influence efficiency. We programmed hPSCs and, on day 2, adjusted their density by passaging. We also varied the Dox treatment duration between 3 and 5 days. With the day 2 passaging, a longer Dox duration (4-5 days) significantly boosted both the CD34 + and VEC + populations compared with a 3-day treatment (Figures <ref type="figure">4D</ref> and <ref type="figure">S4A</ref>). Regarding the impact of adjusting cell density, the VEC + population increased from less than 5% (without day 2 passaging) to 44.2% &#177; 2.8% (with day 2 passaging) using 3-day Dox treatment (Figures <ref type="figure">4A-4D</ref>, <ref type="figure">S4A</ref>). A longer than 3-day duration of Dox treatment increased the efficiency to 51% &#177; 2.3% CD34 + VEC + with no significant difference between 4 or 5 days of Dox treatment (CD34 p = 0.79, VEC p = 0.23) (Figures <ref type="figure">4D</ref>, <ref type="figure">4E</ref>, and <ref type="figure">S4A</ref>). This demonstrates that extended duration of SOX17 overexpression for more than 3 days and efforts to maintain lower cell density increase the efficiency of SOX17 forward programming. We reasoned that passaging on day 2 might either select for cells undergoing forward programming or that altering cell-to-cell contact could boost differentiation. After optimizing the required duration of Dox treatment, we tested a range of concentrations to determine the optimal level of transgene activation <ref type="bibr">(Randolph et al., 2017)</ref>. We found that lower Dox concentrations (75 and 200 ng/ mL) resulted in a decreased CD34 + VEC + population and that at least 500 ng/mL Dox was required to achieve maximal efficiency (Figures <ref type="figure">4F</ref> and <ref type="figure">S4B</ref>). Based on our prior characterizations <ref type="bibr">(Randolph et al., 2017)</ref>, this indicates that maximal transgene expression is required for SOX17 forward programming. We replicated this finding with another hPSC line (6-9-9 XLone-SOX17) and obtained 57.2% &#177; 2.8% of the resulting cells expressing both CD34 and VEC (Figure <ref type="figure">S4C</ref>).</p><p>In an effort to examine the potency of SOX17 as a mediator of forward programming, we investigated whether hPSCs could be programmed through SOX17 when cultured in pluripotency maintenance media, rather than in basal media. Cells were cultured in one of two pluripotency maintenance hPSC media, LaSR or TeSR, in the presence or absence of Dox (Figures <ref type="figure">S5A</ref> and <ref type="figure">S5B</ref>). SOX17 forward programming was able to overcome pluripotency maintenance signals in hPSC media and cause cells to differentiate as evidenced by loss of pluripotent morphology (Figures <ref type="figure">S5A</ref> and <ref type="figure">S5B</ref>). Day 5 flow cytometry analysis showed the presence of CD34 + VEC + cells and CD34 &#192; VEC + cells (Figures <ref type="figure">4G</ref>, <ref type="figure">4H</ref>, S5C, and S5D). We did not observe expression of CD31 in the day 5 cells (Figures <ref type="figure">4G</ref>, <ref type="figure">4H</ref>, and <ref type="figure">S5D</ref>). Both hPSC media produced CD34 + VEC + cells and CD34 &#192; VEC + cells, albeit at different efficiencies (Figures <ref type="figure">4H</ref> and <ref type="figure">S5C</ref>). This could be due to the increased amount of bovine serum albumin in TeSR as compared with LaSR media; nevertheless, both media produced statistically significant populations of differentiated cells expressing CD34 (LaSR p = 5.75e&#192;8, TeSR p = 2.88e&#192;6, +Dox vs. &#192;Dox) and VEC (LaSR p = 6.78e&#192;9, TeSR p = 1.18e&#192;6, +Dox vs. &#192;Dox) (Figures <ref type="figure">4G</ref>, <ref type="figure">4H</ref>, and <ref type="figure">S5D</ref>). Collectively, these results demonstrated SOX17 can overcome the presence of pluripotency factors in hPSC media to efficiently produce CD34 + VEC + cells.</p><p>FGF2 enables an emergent CD31 + CD34 + VEC + EP population in a dose-dependent manner While we successfully produced CD34 + VEC + cells using SOX17 overexpression, these cells showed minimal 3.6% 0.6% 49.5% 46.3% 1.9% 0.3% 57% 40.8% 6.19% 0.7% 37.6% 55.5% 59.1% 6.2% 21.4% 13.3% 84% 66.8% 69.7% 63% Growth Factor (ng/mL) VEGF EGF FGF2 60 20 40 0 % CD31+CD34+ 100 100 50 25 p&lt;10 TeSR or E8 LaSR basal media + Dox FGF2 or EGF or VEGF Replate Day Day -1 0 15 2 XLone-SOX17 hPSCs CD31+CD34+VEC+ EPs -7 p&lt;10 -7 p&lt;10 -7 FSC FSC 93.6% 71.9% 0.3% 6.3% 92.3% 1% 2.4% 26.3% 69.1% 2.3% (legend continued on next page) various concentrations, only FGF2 significantly boosted CD31 expression. In contrast, EGF and VEGF resulted in less than 7% of CD31 + cells (Figures <ref type="figure">5B</ref> and <ref type="figure">5C</ref>). Furthermore, FGF2 treatment positively influenced other EP markers. In the FGF2-treated group, we observed 71.7% &#177; 0.5% CD34 + and 83.8% &#177; 0.7% VEC + cells. These percentages are notably higher than those in the EGF-and VEGF-treated samples (Figures <ref type="figure">5B</ref> and <ref type="figure">5C</ref>). When we analyzed gene expression using qPCR, we discovered that FGF2 treatment led to a significant increase in the mRNA expression of CD31, CD34, and VEC (Figure <ref type="figure">S6C</ref>). To determine if FGF2's enhancement of EP programming is dose dependent, we treated cells with 0, 5, 15, 25, 50, and 100 ng/mL FGF2. Remarkably, even a dose of 5 ng/mL had a significant impact, yielding more than 40% CD31 + CD34 + cells (Figure <ref type="figure">5D</ref>). Concentrations of 25 ng/mL or more were needed to achieve more than 50% CD31 + CD34 + cells. However, increasing the FGF2 concentration beyond this point showed no further benefit (Figure <ref type="figure">5D</ref>). We wanted to see if FGF2 could also boost CD31 expression in another iPSC line and, thus, used the XLone-SOX17 6-9-9 cells. After treating these cells with FGF2 along DOXinduced differentiation, there was an increase in the percentage of CD31 + cell from 7% to 80% on day 8 (Figures <ref type="figure">S7A-S7C</ref>). This suggests that FGF2 can enhance CD31 expression across different cell lines during SOX17 forward programming.</p><p>We next investigated if hPSCs grown in albumin-free E8 media <ref type="bibr">(Chen et al., 2011)</ref> could be programmed into EPs using SOX17 and FGF2. To test this, we cultured our XLone-SOX17 H9 cells in E8 media for multiple passages and then treated them with Dox to induce SOX17 expression, along with FGF2 treatment. Impressively, we found that, when hPSCs were cultured in E8 media, a remarkable 92% of them displayed the CD31 and CD34 markers after SOX17 programming. Additionally, more than 93% of these cells showed VEC expression (Figures <ref type="figure">5E</ref> and <ref type="figure">5F</ref>). When comparing the programming efficiency of E8 cells with that of cells in TeSR media, the E8 cells showed a significantly higher efficiency (Figure <ref type="figure">5E</ref>). Furthermore, E8 media is more cost effective than TeSR. Therefore, we have decided to exclusively use E8 media for culturing hPSCs in future EP programming experiments.</p><p>Next, we examined the temporal gene expression pattern from day 0 to day 8 during the SOX17-mediated programming for hPSCs cultured in E8, comparing groups with and without FGF2 treatment using qPCR. On day 8, the FGF2-treated groups exhibited a remarkable 705-fold increase in CD31 expression, contrasting with a 40-fold increase in the untreated groups. Similarly, the FGF2-treated samples displayed significantly higher expressions of CD34 (125-fold increase) and VEC (773-fold increase) compared with 55-fold and 232-fold increases, respectively, in the untreated groups (Figure <ref type="figure">5G</ref>). Together these results demonstrate that FGF2 treatment can significantly increase SOX17-mediated EP programming of hPSCs, yielding more than 90% CD31 + CD34 + VEC + cells.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Differentiation of SOX17-programmed EPs into functional ECs</head><p>We next aimed to examine the differentiation of EPs into endothelial cells (ECs) and maintain the expansion of these ECs. Previous studies have demonstrated that the inhibition of transforming growth factor b (TGF-b) with a small molecule SB431542 supports the prolonged expansion of hPSC-derived ECs <ref type="bibr">(James et al., 2010)</ref>. As a result, we investigated the differentiation of our EPs into ECs and expanded the derived ECs using a commercial EC media (the EGM2 media), with or without the TGF-b inhibitor SB431542 (Figure <ref type="figure">6A</ref>).</p><p>When cultured in EGM2 media without SB431542, cells displayed high levels of CD31 and VEC expression by day 30 (Figures <ref type="figure">6B</ref> and <ref type="figure">6C</ref>). Concurrently, these cells lost CD34 expression, suggesting successful differentiation into ECs. However, in the absence of SB431542 treatment, these cells ceased proliferation by day 30. In contrast with the group without SB431542, cells treated with SB431542 displayed persistent proliferation beyond day 30. By day 27, these cells showed a decrease in CD34 expression, akin to the non-treated group. However, they consistently maintained high levels of CD31 and VEC expression. By day 31, 90.9% &#177; 1.56% of the cells were CD31 + and 92.8% &#177; 0.7% were VEC + , while CD34 expression had decreased to 18.1% &#177; 2.18% (Figures <ref type="figure">6D</ref> and <ref type="figure">6E</ref>).</p><p>We further assessed the functional capabilities of the ECs by measuring their uptake of Alexa Fluor 594 conjugated acetylated low-density lipoproteins (AF594 acLDL). After adding AF594 acLDL to the media and allowing (C) Quantification of the CD31 + CD34 + population for different treatment conditions (n = 3, independent experiments). (D) Flow cytometry results for the percentage of CD31 + CD34 + EPs produced by varying FGF2 concentrations, between 0 and 100 ng/mL (n = 6 for 0 and 25 ng/mL, n = 3 for 5, 15, 50, 100 ng/mL, independent experiments). (E and F) Flow cytometry data showing the percentage of CD31 + CD34 + cells obtained from the FGF2-enhanced SOX17 programming protocol, applied to hPSCs cultured in TeSR or E8 media. (n = 3, independent experiments). (G) qPCR analysis for CD31, CD34, and VEC in E8 cells subjected to SOX17-mediated programming, either with or without FGF2, from day 0 to day 8. (n = 3, technical replicates). incubation, fluorescent imaging revealed that ECs on day 30 effectively took up acLDL, indicative of their endothelial function (Figure <ref type="figure">6F</ref>). Moreover, these ECs formed vascular tubes in the Matrigel matrix when treated with exogenous VEGF (Figure <ref type="figure">6G</ref>). The endothelium reacts to inflammatory mediators, such as tumor necrosis factor a (TNF-a), by increasing the expression of adhesion molecules like intercellular cell adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1), which is associated with the capture of circulating leukocytes. In the absence of TNF-a treatment, SOX17-induced ECs exhibit low levels of ICAM-1 expression, but TNF-a treatment significantly enhances ICAM1 expression in the SOX17induced ECs (Figures <ref type="figure">6H</ref> and <ref type="figure">6I</ref>).</p><p>To further evaluate the functional characteristics of SOX17-induced ECs, we introduced two control groups into our study: ECs differentiated from hPSCs through CHIR99021 treatment (referred to as CH-induced ECs) <ref type="bibr">(Lian et al., 2014)</ref> and human umbilical vein ECs (HUVECs). Employing three distinct functional assaystube formation on Matrigel, acLDL uptake, and responsiveness to the inflammatory factor TNF-a-we assessed the performance of these control cell types. Our data reveal that both control cell types are capable of tube formation, acLDL uptake, and exhibit upregulation of ICAM1 in response to TNF-a treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">7</ref>). The data collectively demonstrate that SOX17-induced ECs exhibit comparable functional properties to both CH-induced ECs and HUVECs.</p><p>In summary, our findings suggest that cells programmed with SOX17 and FGF2 can differentiate and proliferate in EC media when using a TGF-b inhibitor. These derived ECs not only exhibit acLDL uptake and upregulation of ICAM1 expression upon TNF-a treatment, but also have the ability to form vascular tubes on the Matrigel matrix.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>DISCUSSION</head><p>Forward programming has proven to be an effective strategy for the generation of various somatic cell types <ref type="bibr">(Sugimura et al., 2017)</ref>. SOX17 plays a pivotal role in governing the specification of the endothelial lineage and endothelial regeneration <ref type="bibr">(Goveia et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Liu et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Trinh et al., 2023)</ref>. Furthermore, SOX17 expression has been observed in many other cells, such as definitive endoderm cells <ref type="bibr">(Jiang et al., 2021)</ref> and primordial germ cells <ref type="bibr">(Irie et al., 2015)</ref>. In this study, we provide the first evidence demonstrating that overexpressing SOX17 in hPSCs cultured in LaSR basal medium <ref type="bibr">(Lian et al., 2014)</ref> is sufficient to produce CD34 + VEC + cells, eliminating the need of other small molecules and growth factors. Furthermore, when FGF2 is introduced during the SOX17-mediated programming, it results in the generation of more than 90% CD34 + VEC + CD31 + EPs. These progenitors can then further differentiate into functional ECs under the right conditions.</p><p>Our scRNA-seq data, derived from EPs generated using our small molecule Wnt activation EP protocol, underscored the differential expression of SOXF factors. However, only SOX17 enhanced the differentiation efficiency when overexpressed during the EP differentiation. Despite belonging to the same SOXF sub-family, SOX7, SOX17, and SOX18 exhibit distinct interactions with various partner proteins, leading to the induction of unique gene expression patterns. For example, Sox7 demonstrates the capability to induce the expression of Fgf3 <ref type="bibr">(Murakami et al., 2004)</ref> and VEC <ref type="bibr">(Costa et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Doyle et al., 2019)</ref>. Conversely, SOX18 exhibits the ability to induce the expression of MAP4K4 <ref type="bibr">(Moustaqil et al., 2018)</ref>, CLDN5 <ref type="bibr">(Fontijn et al., 2008)</ref>, and Prox1 <ref type="bibr">(Klaus et al., 2016)</ref>, while SOX17 elicits the expression of CSNK1A1 <ref type="bibr">(Kuo et al., 2014)</ref>, MBP <ref type="bibr">(Sohn et al., 2006)</ref>, and Hnf1B <ref type="bibr">(Hudson et al., 1997)</ref>. Interestingly, all three SOXF factors enhanced VEC expression, aligning with studies revealing SOX17 and SOX7's ability to activate VEC expression <ref type="bibr">(Costa et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Nakajima-Takagi et al., 2013)</ref>. Given the SOXF subgroup's conserved nature and analogous binding sites, it is plausible that all three exert a similar influence on VEC transcription in humans. Notably, the expression of CD31 in the context of SOX17 forward programming only became apparent after the introduction of FGF2 from day 2 onward.</p><p>To further investigate SOX17's role, we employed Cas13d in loss-of-function studies. Results indicated that SOX17 knockdown significantly restricts hPSCs differentiation into EPs, mirroring previous studies <ref type="bibr">(Clarke et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Jung et al., 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kim et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Nakajima-Takagi et al., 2013)</ref>. Having confirmed the functional importance of SOX17 by loss of function, we went on to show that forward programming by SOX17 overexpression is sufficient to obtain CD34 + VEC + cells from multiple hPSC lines in a variety of different culture media, including hPSC media. We optimized forward programming conditions to find the ideal temporal window and level for transgene expression. After evaluating growth factors to enhance CD31 expression, we found that, by combining FGF2 treatment with SOX17 forward programming, we can consistently achieve a high purity of CD31 + CD34 + VEC + EPs, with yields exceeding 90%. These EPs can further differentiate into functional ECs that uptake acLDL and form vascular tubes in the Matrigel matrix.</p><p>In summary, this is the first documented instance of using SOX17 for hPSC forward programming into EPs. It also uniquely showcases a single TF facilitating endothelial commitment without relying on typical mesodermal induction or standard growth factors like activin A, BMP4, Wnt ligands or VEGF. These insights elevate SOX17's significance in human endothelial development and warrant further exploration. Although extensive research has explored endothelial fate and development, the genetic intricacies of human endothelial development remain elusive. We anticipate that our current and forthcoming discoveries will enrich our comprehension of human endothelial development and pave the way for improved manufacturing of therapeutically relevant cells.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Resource availability</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Lead contact</head><p>Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the corresponding author Dr. Xiaojun Lance Lian (Lian@psu.edu).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Materials availability</head><p>All plasmids generated from this paper will be available at <ref type="url">www.  addgene.org/Xiaojun_Lian/</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>CH-Induced ECs HUVECs</head><p>Tube Formation Assay</p><p>Brightfield AF594 acLDL No acLDL (Control) With acLDL Brightfield AF594 acLDL No acLDL (Control) With acLDL CH-Induced ECs HUVECs CH-Induced ECs HUVECs FSC FSC ICAM1-APC ICAM1-APC 2.14% 97.5% 9.51% 91.9% No TNF&#945; With TNF&#945; No TNF&#945; With TNF&#945; </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Data and code availability</head><p>d High-throughput sequencing data obtained in this study have been submitted to GEO and are available under the accession number GEO: GSE161408.</p><p>d This paper does not report original code.</p><p>d Any additional information required to re-analyze the data reported in this paper is available from the corresponding author (Lian@psu.edu) upon request.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Maintenance of hPSCs</head><p>Human embryonic stem cells (H9, H9 SOX17-mCherry, and H1 OCT4-GFP) and iPSCs (6-9-9) were maintained on either Matrigel (Corning) or iMatrix-511 silk (Iwai North America) coated plates in TeSR (Stemcell Technologies), LaSR, or E8 media according to previously published methods <ref type="bibr">(Bao et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lian et al., 2013)</ref>. All the transgenic XLone hPSCs were maintained with 10 mg/mL blasticidin (Sigma) to prevent construct silencing. All drugs were removed upon initiating differentiation or forward programming. Cells were routinely tested to ensure mycoplasma free culture conditions using an established PCR-based detection method. Cell line details are included in Table <ref type="table">S2</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>EP differentiation of hPSCs via CH and VEGF</head><p>EP differentiation of hPSCs was initiated when hPSCs seeded on Matrigel or iMatrix-511 silk coated plates reached 60% confluence. Differentiation was performed according to our previously published methods <ref type="bibr">(Bao et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lian et al., 2014)</ref>. Briefly, at day 0, cells were treated with 6 mM CHIR99021 (Cayman Chemical) for 48 h in LaSR Basal media, which consists of Advanced DMEM/F12, 2.5 mM GlutaMAX and 60 mg/mL ascorbic acid, with media refreshed after 24 h. From day 2 to day 5, cells were maintained in LaSR basal medium with 50 ng/mL VEGF. Analysis was performed on day 5.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>SOX17-mediated endothelial programming of hPSCs</head><p>For forward programming experiments, XLone-SOX17 hPSCs were cultured on Matrigel or iMatrix-511 coated plates. When cells reached 10% confluence, Dox was added from day 0 to 3 at 1 mg/mL and from day 3 to 5 at 5 mg/mL. Cells were re-plated on iMatrix-511 coated plates on day 2 by dissociation with Accutase (Innovative Cell Technologies) for 5 min at 37 C, pelleting, and resuspension in the day 2 media with 5 mM Y27632. The seeding density on day 2 should be 18,000 cells/cm 2 . From day 2, 25 ng/mL FGF2 should be added into the media to enhance EP programming. Media should be changed every day, and the cells grew without further passaging after day 2 until harvesting for analysis.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Differentiation of EPs into ECs</head><p>Day 15 EPs were seeded onto Matrigel coated plates at a seeding density of 5,000/cm 2 . EGM2 media (Lonza) supplemented with 10 mM SB413542 (Cayman Chemicals) were used to culture the cells. A ROCK inhibitor GSK269962A (Selleck Chemicals) was used for the first 24 h following passaging. When cell culture reach more than 90% confluency, cells will be passaged via Accutase and replated at the same cell density in EGM2, supplemented with SB431542 and GSK269962A.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>scRNA-seq</head><p>H9 cells were differentiated using Wnt activation EP differentiation protocol. On day 5 of differentiation, cells were treated with Accutase for 10 min. Single cells were counted and resuspended in PBS with 0.04% BSA. A cell strainer was used to get rid of debris and clumps of cells. The single cell library was constructed using the Chromium Next GEM Single Cell 3 0 protocol. Then the library was sequenced on a NextSeq 550 equipment with the High Output 150 cycle kit. scRNA-seq data were processed through the 103 Genomics Cell Ranger pipeline to generate count matrices. These count matrices were then analyzed using Seurat version 3.2.1 <ref type="bibr">(Butler et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Stuart et al., 2019)</ref>. Briefly, quality control filters were applied to sort out dying or dead cells and multiplets. The gene expression for each cell was then normalized by the total expression, scaled, and log transformed. A linear transform was then applied to the data prior to dimensional reduction via principal-component analysis. Statistical (JackStraw) and heuristic (elbow plot) strategies were used to determine the number of principle components to include.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Immunostaining</head><p>Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (Sigma) for 15 min at room temperature. Then, cells were washed three times with DPBS and then blocked for 1 h at room temperature with DPBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 and 5% non-fat dry milk (BioRad). Cells were then stained with primary antibodies (Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>) in DPBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 and 5% non-fat dry milk for 2 h. Then cells were washed with DPBS three times and incubated with secondary antibodies (Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>) for 1 h. Cells were washed three times with DPBS. Nuclei were stained with Hoechst 33342 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). A Nikon Ti Eclipse epifluorescence microscope was used for image capture and analysis. Fiji and MATLAB were used for further analyses and quantification.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Flow cytometry analysis</head><p>For staining and analysis of fixed cells, after dissociation with TrypLE Express (differentiated cells) or Accutase (hPSCs), cells were pelleted and resuspended in DPBS with 1% formaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were pelleted and washed three times with DPBS. Cells were stained with primary antibodies in DPBS with 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.5% BSA for 2 h at room temperature. Then cells were stained with secondary antibodies for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Then cells were pelleted and washed three times with DPBS with 0.5% BSA before analysis.</p><p>For staining and analysis of live cells, cells were dissociated with TrypLE Express (differentiated cells) or Accutase (hPSCs) and pelleted. Cells were then resuspended in DPBS with 0.5% BSA and the appropriate amount of conjugated primary antibodies. Then cells were incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. Cells were pelleted and washed with DPBS with 0.5% BSA. Data were collected on a BD Accuri C6 Plus flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo. Gating was based on the corresponding untreated or secondary antibody-stained cell control.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Western blotting</head><p>Cells were washed with DPBS and lysed with Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with 13 Halt's Protease and Phosphatase (Thermo Fisher Scientific) by incubation for 3 min. Cell lysate was collected and stored at &#192;80 C until used. Samples were mixed with Laemmli sample buffer (BioRad) at a working concentration of 13 and incubated at 97 C for 5 min. Samples were loaded into a pre-cast MP TGX stain-free gel (BioRad) and run at 200 V for 30 min in 13 Tris/Glycine/SDS buffer (BioRad). Protein was transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane using a Trans-blot Turbo Transfer System (BioRad). The membrane was blocked for 30 min at room temperature in 13 TBST with 5% dry milk. The membrane was incubated overnight at 4C with primary antibodies, followed by 1 h at room temperature with secondary antibodies in 13 TBST with 5% dry milk.</p><p>The membrane was washed between each antibody exposure with 13 TBST. Chemiluminescence was activated using Clarity Western ECL Substrate (BioRad) and the blot was imaged using a ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System and Image Lab software (BioRad). Blots were analyzed using Fiji software.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>qPCR</head><p>RNA was extracted from cells using a Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Plus Kit (Zymo Research). A Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to generate cDNA. A BioRad CFX Connect system was used for performing qPCR with the PowerSYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and primers (Table <ref type="table">S4</ref>). Data were analyzed by the DD cycle threshold (DDC t ) method, where target C t values were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) C t values and fold changes in target gene expression were determined by comparing with day 0 samples. Each sample was run in triplicate.</p><p>In the event that no measurable expression was detected, the relative expression to GAPDH was set to zero.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Generation of XLone-SOXF hPSC lines</head><p>The open reading frame for human SOX17 was PCR amplified using GoTaq Master Mix (Promega) from the PB-TRE3G-SOX17 plasmid. The amplicon was gel purified and ligated into XLone, which was linearized using restriction enzymes KpnI and SpeI (New England Biolabs), using In-Fusion ligase (TaKaRa Bio).</p><p>XLone-SOX7 and XLone-SOX18 were cloned into XLone by Genewiz. To generate transgenic cell lines, hPSCs were dissociated with Accutase for 10 min at 37 C and pelleted. The cell pellet was resuspended in 100 mL PBS with 8 mg plasmid DNA, including 3 mg EF1a-hyPBase and 5 mg XLone-SOX17 (Table <ref type="table">S5</ref>). The mixture was transferred to a cuvette and nucleofected using the CB150 program on the Lonza 4D Nucleofector. All plasmid DNA used was prepared using an Invitrogen PureLink HiPure Plasmid Filter Midiprep Kit.</p><p>Cells were plated at a high density with 5 mM Y27632. Successfully modified cells were purified using media supplemented with 30 mg/mL blasticidin. Upon achieving a relatively pure population, cells were maintained in media containing 10 mg/mL blasticidin. All plasmids generated have been submitted to Addgene.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>acLDL uptake assay</head><p>After a minimum of two passages in the EC media, cells underwent an additional passage into EGM2 supplemented with SB431542. Subsequently, the media was replaced with fresh EGM2 containing 5 mg/mL AF594-labeled acLDL (Invitrogen) and the plate was incubated at 37 C in the dark for 2 h. After incubation, the wells were washed three times with PBS and replenished with fresh EGM2. Cells were then allowed to recover at 37 C for 5 min before imaging with fluorescence microscopy.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Vascular tube formation assay</head><p>To evaluate capillary structure formation, 1 3 10 5 ECs in 0.4 mL EGM2 medium supplemented with 50 ng/mL VEGF were plated into one well of a 24-well tissue culture plate precoated with 250 mL Matrigel. After 24 h of incubation, tube formation was inspected using light microscopy.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Statistics</head><p>Experiments were performed in triplicate. Data obtained from multiple experiments or replicates are shown as the mean &#177; SEM.</p><p>Where appropriate, one or two tailed Student's t test or ANOVA was utilized (alpha = 0.05) with a Bonferroni or Tukey's post hoc test where appropriate. Data were considered significant when p &lt; 0.05. Statistical tests were performed using MATLAB or GraphPad Prism.</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>Stem Cell Reports j Vol. 19 j 579-595 j April 9, 2024 581</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" n="584" xml:id="foot_1"><p>Stem Cell Reports j Vol. 19 j 579-595 j April 9, 2024</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" n="588" xml:id="foot_2"><p>Stem Cell Reports j Vol. 19 j 579-595 j April 9, 2024</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_3"><p>Stem Cell Reports j Vol. 19 j 579-595 j April 9, 2024 589</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_4"><p>Stem Cell Reports j Vol. 19 j 579-595 j April 9, 2024 591</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
