An official website of the United States government
Hydrology and chemistry data for a spatially distributed synoptic and discharge campaign in the Augusta Creek Catchment (located in southwestern Michigan). The spatially distributed chemistry data was collected every 2-3 weeks from October 2021 to June 2024, and includes dissolved organic carbon (DOC), nitrate, sulfate, and chloride. Within 24 hours of collection samples were filtered through 0.45µm cellulose acetate membrane filters. We measured DOC (as non-purgeable organic carbon - NPOC), using two total organic carbon analyzers with total nitrogen units (Shimadzu TOC-V CPH with a TNM-1 and autosampler ASI-V before March 9 2023 and Shimadzu TOC-L CPH/CPN with a TNM-L ROHS and autosampler ASI-L after March 9 2023). For our analysis, we only include DOC/NPOC data after March 9 2023, due to discrepancies between the two instruments used. We measured anions (Cl-, NO3-, SO42-) using an ion chromatography system (Thermo Fisher Dionex, ICS1100 and ICS1000 and AS-DV autosampler). Our method detection limits were: 0.02 mg L-1 for anions and 0.43 mg L-1 for NPOC. Values that are "BDL" were below instrument detection limit. For values below method or instrument detection limit, we assigned concentrations of half the limit of quantification for the purpose of calculations and analyses. If this data is used in the future, values below the method detection limit will need to be filtered appropriately. Values that are NA were not analyzed. We collected discharge data during a period of baseflow from August 13-14, 2024 using two Sontek Flowtracker2 Acoustic Doppler Velocimeters. Discharge values were calculated using the Flowtracker’s mid-section method, measuring depth and velocity at ~20 stations across the stream width. Uncertainty in discharge (%) was also calculated by the Flowtracker instrument. To calculate specific discharge , we normalized our measured discharge by contributing area for each flow location. This data supports the paper: Weidner, C. R., Zarnetske, J. P., Kendall, A. D., Martin, S. L., Nesheim, S., & Shogren, A. J. (2025). Wetlands, groundwater and seasonality influence the spatial distribution of stream chemistry in a low‐relief catchment. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 130, e2025JG008989. https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JG008989 Abstract: Evaluating stream water chemistry patterns provides insight into catchment ecosystem and hydrologic processes. Spatially distributed patterns and controls of stream solutes are well‐established for high‐relief catchments where solute flow paths align with surface topography. However, the controls on solute patterns are poorly constrained for low‐relief catchments where hydrogeologic heterogeneities and river corridor features, like wetlands, may influence water and solute transport. Here, we provide a data set of solute patterns from 58 synoptic surveys across 28 sites and over 32 months in a low‐relief wetland‐rich catchment to determine the major surface and subsurface controls along with wetland influence across the catchment. In this low‐relief catchment, the expected wetland storage, processing, and transport of solutes is only apparent in solute patterns of the smallest subcatchments. Meanwhile, downstream seasonal and wetland influence on observed chemistry can be masked by large groundwater contributions to the main stream channel. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating variable groundwater contributions into catchment‐scale studies for low‐relief catchments, and that understanding the overall influence of wetlands on stream chemistry requires sampling across various spatial and temporal scales. Therefore, in low‐relief wetland‐rich catchments, given the mosaic of above and below ground controls on stream solutes, modeling efforts may need to include both surface and subsurface hydrological data and processes.
more »
« less
Wetlands, Groundwater and Seasonality Influence the Spatial Distribution of Stream Chemistry in a Low‐Relief Catchment
Abstract Evaluating stream water chemistry patterns provides insight into catchment ecosystem and hydrologic processes. Spatially distributed patterns and controls of stream solutes are well‐established for high‐relief catchments where solute flow paths align with surface topography. However, the controls on solute patterns are poorly constrained for low‐relief catchments where hydrogeologic heterogeneities and river corridor features, like wetlands, may influence water and solute transport. Here, we provide a data set of solute patterns from 58 synoptic surveys across 28 sites and over 32 months in a low‐relief wetland‐rich catchment to determine the major surface and subsurface controls along with wetland influence across the catchment. In this low‐relief catchment, the expected wetland storage, processing, and transport of solutes is only apparent in solute patterns of the smallest subcatchments. Meanwhile, downstream seasonal and wetland influence on observed chemistry can be masked by large groundwater contributions to the main stream channel. These findings highlight the importance of incorporating variable groundwater contributions into catchment‐scale studies for low‐relief catchments, and that understanding the overall influence of wetlands on stream chemistry requires sampling across various spatial and temporal scales. Therefore, in low‐relief wetland‐rich catchments, given the mosaic of above and below ground controls on stream solutes, modeling efforts may need to include both surface and subsurface hydrological data and processes.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10630932
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences
- Volume:
- 130
- Issue:
- 8
- ISSN:
- 2169-8953
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Solute concentrations in stream water vary with discharge in patterns that record complex feedbacks between hydrologic and biogeochemical processes. In a comparison of headwater catchments underlain by shale in Pennsylvania, USA (Shale Hills) and Wales, UK (Plynlimon), dissimilar concentration-discharge behaviors are best explained by contrasting landscape distributions of soil solution chemistry – especially dissolved organic carbon (DOC) – that have been established by patterns of vegetation. Specifically, elements that are concentrated in organic-rich soils due to biotic cycling (Mn, Ca, K) or that form strong complexes with DOC (Fe, Al) are spatially heterogeneous in pore waters because organic matter is heterogeneously distributed across the catchments. These solutes exhibit non-chemostatic "bioactive" behavior in the streams, and solute concentrations either decrease (Shale Hills) or increase (Plynlimon) with increasing discharge. In contrast, solutes that are concentrated in soil minerals and form only weak complexes with DOC (Na, Mg, Si) are spatially homogeneous in pore waters across each catchment. These solutes are chemostatic in that their stream concentrations vary little with stream discharge, likely because these solutes are released quickly from exchange sites in the soils during rainfall events. Differences in the hydrologic connectivity of organic-rich soils to the stream drive differences in concentration behavior between catchments. As such, in catchments where soil organic matter (SOM) is dominantly in lowlands (e.g., Shale Hills), bioactive elements are released to the stream early during rainfall events, whereas in catchments where SOM is dominantly in uplands (e.g., Plynlimon), bioactive elements are released later during rainfall events. The distribution of vegetation and SOM across the landscape is thus a key component for predictive models of solute transport in headwater catchments.more » « less
-
Understanding how subsurface water storage—created and structured by the geology and geomorphology of the critical zone—governs hydrologic connectivity between landscapes and streams is essential for explaining spatial and temporal variation in stream water chemistry. Most headwater studies have focused on high‐resolution stream water chemistry at the catchment outlet, rarely examining the spatial variability among tributaries and the main channel, or how these patterns relate to the underlying geology and geomorphology. Linking upstream spatial and temporal variability with chemical dynamics at the outlet over time is even less common. We conducted weekly synoptic sampling along Lookout Creek, located within the HJ Andrews Experimental Forest Long Term Ecological Research programme. Lookout Creek is in the volcanic terrain of the western Cascades, Oregon. The catchment spans multiple geologic units (e.g., lava flows) and geomorphic features (e.g., earthflows). We measured stream chemistry along the main stem and five tributaries to assess how varying degrees of hydrologic connectivity influence solute concentrations and transport across this geologic and geomorphologic template. To identify the timing and magnitude of hydrologic connectivity between tributaries, the main stem, and the catchment outlet, we analysed spatiotemporal patterns in stream chemistry using concentration‐discharge relationships, principal component analysis, and a metric of subcatchment synchrony. We found that in previously glaciated catchments with active earthflows, solute concentrations and base‐cation‐to‐silica ratios were higher, and more solutes had a chemostatic or mobilising behaviour, indicating high subsurface storage. This variability in subsurface storage, and its influence on hydrologic connectivity, ultimately determined the degree of chemical synchrony with the catchment outlet. Our findings suggest that, under future climate scenarios with shifts in precipitation phase and timing, headwater systems with substantial subsurface storage are likely to be more chemically resilient.more » « less
-
Abstract. Solute concentrations in stream water vary with discharge in patterns that record complex feedbacks between hydrologic and biogeochemical processes. In a comparison of three shale-underlain headwater catchments located in Pennsylvania, USA (the forested Shale Hills Critical Zone Observatory), and Wales, UK (the peatland-dominated Upper Hafren and forest-dominated Upper Hore catchments in the Plynlimon forest), dissimilar concentration–discharge (C–Q) behaviors are best explained by contrasting landscape distributions of soil solution chemistry – especially dissolved organic carbon (DOC) – that have been established by patterns of vegetation and soil organic matter (SOM). Specifically, elements that are concentrated in organic-rich soils due to biotic cycling (Mn, Ca, K) or that form strong complexes with DOC (Fe, Al) are spatially heterogeneous in pore waters because organic matter is heterogeneously distributed across the catchments. These solutes exhibit non-chemostatic behavior in the streams, and solute concentrations either decrease (Shale Hills) or increase (Plynlimon) with increasing discharge. In contrast, solutes that are concentrated in soil minerals and form only weak complexes with DOC (Na, Mg, Si) are spatially homogeneous in pore waters across each catchment. These solutes are chemostatic in that their stream concentrations vary little with stream discharge, likely because these solutes are released quickly from exchange sites in the soils during rainfall events. Furthermore, concentration–discharge relationships of non-chemostatic solutes changed following tree harvest in the Upper Hore catchment in Plynlimon, while no changes were observed for chemostatic solutes, underscoring the role of vegetation in regulating the concentrations of certain elements in the stream. These results indicate that differences in the hydrologic connectivity of organic-rich soils to the stream drive differences in concentration behavior between catchments. As such, in catchments where SOM is dominantly in lowlands (e.g., Shale Hills), we infer that non-chemostatic elements associated with organic matter are released to the stream early during rainfall events, whereas in catchments where SOM is dominantly in uplands (e.g., Plynlimon), these non-chemostatic elements are released later during rainfall events. The distribution of SOM across the landscape is thus a key component for predictive models of solute transport in headwater catchments.more » « less
-
Temporal patterns in stream chemistry provide integrated signals describing the hydrological and ecological state of whole catchments. However, stream chemistry integrates multi-scale signals of processes occurring in both the catchment and stream. Deconvoluting these signals could identify mechanisms of solute transport and transformation and provide a basis for monitoring ecosystem change. We applied trend analysis, wavelet decomposition, multivariate autoregressive state-space modeling, and analysis of concentration–discharge relationships to assess temporal patterns in high-frequency (15 min) stream chemistry from permafrost-influenced boreal catchments in Interior Alaska at diel, storm, and seasonal time scales. We compared catchments that varied in spatial extent of permafrost to identify characteristic biogeochemical signals. Catchments with higher spatial extents of permafrost were characterized by increasing nitrate concentration through the thaw season, an abrupt increase in nitrate and fluorescent dissolved organic matter (fDOM) and declining conductivity in late summer, and flushing of nitrate and fDOM during summer rainstorms. In contrast, these patterns were absent, of lower magnitude, or reversed in catchments with lower permafrost extent. Solute dynamics revealed a positive influence of permafrost on fDOM export and the role of shallow, seasonally dynamic flowpaths in delivering solutes from high-permafrost catchments to streams. Lower spatial extent of permafrost resulted in static delivery of nitrate and limited transport of fDOM to streams. Shifts in concentration–discharge relationships and seasonal trends in stream chemistry toward less temporally dynamic patterns might therefore indicate reorganized catchment hydrology and biogeochemistry due to permafrost thaw.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1029/2025JG008989
