An official website of the United States government
ABSTRACT Tiger moth species vary greatly in the number of clicks they produce and the resultant duty cycle. Signals with higher duty cycles are expected to more effectively interfere with bat sonar. However, little is known about the minimum duty cycle of tiger moth signals for sonar jamming. Is there a threshold that allows us to classify moths as acoustically aposematic versus sonar jammers based on their duty cycles? We performed playback experiments with three wild-caught adult male bats, Eptesicus fuscus. Bat attacks on tethered moths were challenged using acoustic signals of Bertholdia trigona with modified duty cycles ranging from 0 to 46%. We did not find evidence for a duty cycle threshold; rather, the ability to jam the bat's sonar was a continuous function of duty cycle consistent with a steady increase in the number of clicks arriving during a critical signal processing time window just prior to the arrival of an echo. The proportion of successful captures significantly decreased as the moth duty cycle increased. Our findings suggest that moths cannot be unambiguously classified as acoustically aposematic or sonar jammers based solely on duty cycle. Bats appear to compensate for sonar jamming by lengthening the duration of their terminal buzz and they are more successful in capturing moths when they do so. In contrast to previous findings for bats performing difficult spatial tasks, the number of sonar sound groups decreased in response to high duty cycles and did not affect capture success.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on May 15, 2026
How swarming bats can use the collective soundscape for obstacle avoidance
Some echolocating bats, such asTadarida brasiliensis, fly in groups when emerging from or entering caves. In large, dense swarms, distinguishing self-generated echoes from the multitude of calls and echoes produced by others presents a significant challenge – akin to a cocktail party nightmare. While spectral jamming responses have been proposed as a solution, this mechanism is unlikely to be effective in such conditions. Here, we propose an alternative hypothesis: rather than isolating their own echoes, bats might navigate by relying on the local amplitude gradient of the collective soundscape. To test this, we developed an agent-based simulation of bats flying through corridors, demonstrating that they can avoid obstacles, including other bats and corridor walls, without distinguishing individual echoes. Our findings suggest that in dense swarms, bats can exploit the emergent acoustic environment to maintain safe distances. The current paper also suggests shifting the perspective on jamming itself. Rather than framing overlapping signals solely as a source of interference, our findings highlight that these signals can also carry useful information, reframing the problem from conflict to cooperative signal processing.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2034885
- PAR ID:
- 10632391
- Editor(s):
- Marshall, James AR
- Publisher / Repository:
- PLoS
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- PLOS Computational Biology
- Volume:
- 21
- Issue:
- 5
- ISSN:
- 1553-7358
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- e1013013
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Social animals exhibit collective behavior whereby they negotiate to reach an agreement, such as the coordination of group motion. Bats are unique among most social animals, since they use active sensory echolocation by emitting ultrasonic waves and sensing echoes to navigate. Bats’ use of active sensing may result in acoustic interference from peers, driving different behavior when they fly together rather than alone. The present study explores quantitative methods that can be used to understand whether bats flying in pairs move independently of each other or interact. The study used field data from bats in flight and is based on the assumption that interactions between two bats are evidenced in their flight patterns. To quantify pairwise interaction, we defined the strength of coupling using model-free methods from dynamical systems and information theory. We used a control condition to eliminate similarities in flight path due to environmental geometry. Our research question is whether these data-driven methods identify directed coupling between bats from their flight paths and, if so, whether the results are consistent between methods. Results demonstrate evidence of information exchange between flying bat pairs, and, in particular, we find significant evidence of rear-to-front coupling in bats’ turning behavior when they fly in the absence of obstacles.more » « less
-
Migratory locusts (Locusta migratoria) emit two key odorants during aggregation: 4-vinylanisole (4VA), which serves as an aggregation pheromone attracting conspecifics to form swarms, and phenylacetonitrile (PAN), which acts as an aposematic signal and a precursor of a defense toxin, deterring conspecifics from cannibalism and protecting against predators. However, how locusts reconcile these two conflicting olfactory signals while aggregating is not yet understood. Our study addresses this by examining the release dynamics of the two signals, their behavioral effects, and the neural mechanisms underlying their perception. 4VA is released earlier and at lower locust densities than PAN, with PAN’s release increasing as aggregation progresses. Although PAN’s emission levels eventually exceed those of 4VA, locusts consistently exhibit a preference for the emitted blend, regardless of variations in proportions and concentrations. Notably, increasing amounts of 4VA added to PAN can counteract PAN’s repellent effects, but this is not the case when PAN is added to 4VA. Mechanistically, we found that antennal neurons responsive to 4VA suppress the activity of neurons responsive to PAN. In the antennal lobe, it is the conduction velocities of projection neurons, rather than other neural properties, that are responsible for the observed behavioral pattern, leading to an overall attractive response. Collectively, our findings imply that insects are capable of harmonizing the effects of two distinct pheromones to optimize both social cohesion and chemical defense.more » « less
-
Hearing mediates many behaviours critical for survival in echolocating bats, including foraging and navigation. Although most mammals are susceptible to progressive age-related hearing loss, the evolution of biosonar, which requires the ability to hear low-intensity echoes from outgoing sonar signals, may have selected against the development of hearing deficits in bats. Many echolocating bats exhibit exceptional longevity and rely on acoustic behaviours for survival to old age; however, relatively little is known about the ageing bat auditory system. In this study, we used DNA methylation to estimate the ages of wild-caught big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) and measured hearing sensitivity in young and ageing bats using auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). We found no evidence for hearing deficits in bats up to 12.5 years of age, demonstrated by comparable thresholds and similar ABR and DPOAE amplitudes across age groups. We additionally found no significant histological evidence for cochlear ageing, with similar hair cell counts, afferent and efferent innervation patterns in young and ageing bats. Here, we demonstrate that big brown bats show minimal evidence for age-related hearing loss and therefore represent informative models for investigating mechanisms that may preserve hearing function over a long lifetime.more » « less
-
Animals that rely on electrolocation and echolocation for navigation and prey detection benefit from sensory systems that operate in the dark, exploiting a sensory niche with few competitors. Active sensing can be described as a highly specialized form of communication, with the self as both sender and receiver of sensory information. However, the overlapping functions of active sensing as communication with the self and active sensing as communication with others creates challenges for signal privacy and fidelity by leaving active sensing animals vulnerable to eavesdropping, jamming, and noise. Here we present an overview of active sensing systems used by weakly electric fish, bats and odontocetes and consider their susceptibility to heterospecific and conspecific jamming signals and eavesdropping. Susceptibility to jamming signals by both conspecifics and prey animals reduces the efficacy of electrolocation and echolocation for prey capture and foraging. Likewise, active sensing signals may be eavesdropped, opening risk of predation or competition at productive foraging sites. The evolutionary success of these animals suggests that they effectively counter the costs of active sensing through rich and diverse adaptive behaviors that allow them to mitigate the effects of competition for signal space and the exploitation of their signals for social communication.more » « less
