skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Physician Perspectives on the Potential Benefits and Risks of Applying Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatric Medicine: Qualitative Study
Title: Physician Perspectives on the Potential Benefits and Risks of Applying Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatric Medicine: Qualitative Study
BackgroundAs artificial intelligence (AI) tools are integrated more widely in psychiatric medicine, it is important to consider the impact these tools will have on clinical practice. ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterize physician perspectives on the potential impact AI tools will have in psychiatric medicine. MethodsWe interviewed 42 physicians (21 psychiatrists and 21 family medicine practitioners). These interviews used detailed clinical case scenarios involving the use of AI technologies in the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of psychiatric conditions. Interviews were transcribed and subsequently analyzed using qualitative analysis methods. ResultsPhysicians highlighted multiple potential benefits of AI tools, including potential support for optimizing pharmaceutical efficacy, reducing administrative burden, aiding shared decision-making, and increasing access to health services, and were optimistic about the long-term impact of these technologies. This optimism was tempered by concerns about potential near-term risks to both patients and themselves including misguiding clinical judgment, increasing clinical burden, introducing patient harms, and creating legal liability. ConclusionsOur results highlight the importance of considering specialist perspectives when deploying AI tools in psychiatric medicine.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2041339
PAR ID:
10634184
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Date Published:
Journal Name:
JMIR Mental Health
Volume:
12
ISSN:
2368-7959
Page Range / eLocation ID:
e64414
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; (, JMIR Formative Research)
    Abstract BackgroundWith the increasing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of daily life, there is a growing interest among designers and practitioners in incorporating AI into their fields. In health care domains like art therapy, AI is also becoming a subject of exploration. However, the use of AI in art therapy is still undergoing investigation, with its benefits and challenges being actively explored. ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the integration of AI into art therapy practices to comprehend its potential impact on therapeutic processes and outcomes. Specifically, the focus is on understanding the perspectives of art therapists regarding the use of AI-assisted tools in their practice with clients, as demonstrated through the presentation of our prototype consisting of a deck of cards with words covering various categories alongside an AI-generated image. MethodsUsing a co-design approach, 10 art therapists affiliated with the American Art Therapy Association participated in this study. They engaged in individual interviews where they discussed their professional perspectives on integrating AI into their therapeutic approaches and evaluating the prototype. Qualitative analysis was conducted to derive themes and insights from these sessions. ResultsThe study began in August 2023, with data collection involving 10 participants taking place in October 2023. Our qualitative findings provide a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of AI on facilitating therapeutic processes. The combination of a deck of cards and the use of an AI-generated tool demonstrated an enhancement in the quality and accessibility of therapy sessions. However, challenges such as credibility and privacy concerns were also identified. ConclusionsThe integration of AI into art therapy presents promising avenues for innovation and progress within the field. By gaining insights into the perspectives and experiences of art therapists, this study contributes knowledge for both practical application and further research. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; (, Health Care Management Review)
    BackgroundClinical care in modern intensive care units (ICUs) combines multidisciplinary expertise and a complex array of technologies. These technologies have clearly advanced the ability of clinicians to do more for patients, yet so much equipment also presents the possibility for cognitive overload. PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate clinicians’ experiences with and perceptions of technology in ICUs. Methodology/ApproachWe analyzed qualitative data from 30 interviews with ICU clinicians and frontline managers within four ICUs. ResultsOur interviews identified three main challenges associated with technology in the ICU: (a) too many technologies and too much data; (b) inconsistent and inaccurate technologies; and (c) not enough integration among technologies, alignment with clinical workflows, and support for clinician identities. To address these challenges, interviewees highlighted mitigation strategies to address both social and technical systems and to achieve joint optimization. ConclusionWhen new technologies are added to the ICU, they have potential both to improve and to disrupt patient care. To successfully implement technologies in the ICU, clinicians’ perspectives are crucial. Understanding clinicians’ perspectives can help limit the disruptive effects of new technologies, so clinicians can focus their time and attention on providing care to patients. Practice ImplicationsAs technology and data continue to play an increasingly important role in ICU care, everyone involved in the design, development, approval, implementation, and use of technology should work together to apply a sociotechnical systems approach to reduce possible negative effects on clinical care for critically ill patients. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, Bioengineering)
    Zaza, Gianluca; Gallo, Crescenzio (Ed.)
    (1) Background: With technological advancements, the integration of wireless sensing and artificial intelligence (AI) has significant potential for real-time monitoring and intervention. Wireless sensing devices have been applied to various medical areas for early diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment response. This review focuses on the latest advancements in wireless, AI-incorporated methods applied to clinical medicine. (2) Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, IEEEXplore, Embase, and Scopus for articles that describe AI-incorporated wireless sensing devices for clinical applications. We analyzed the strengths and limitations within their respective medical domains, highlighting the value of wireless sensing in precision medicine, and synthesized the literature to provide areas for future work. (3) Results: We identified 10,691 articles and selected 34 that met our inclusion criteria, focusing on real-world validation of wireless sensing. The findings indicate that these technologies demonstrate significant potential in improving diagnosis, treatment monitoring, and disease prevention. Notably, the use of acoustic signals, channel state information, and radar emerged as leading techniques, showing promising results in detecting physiological changes without invasive procedures. (4) Conclusions: This review highlights the role of wireless sensing in clinical care and suggests a growing trend towards integrating these technologies into routine healthcare, particularly patient monitoring and diagnostic support. 
    more » « less
  4. ; (, Current Landscape Ecology Reports)
    Abstract Purpose of ReviewArtificial intelligence (AI) is disrupting science and discovery across disciplines, offering new modes of inquiry that are changing how questions are asked and answered and upsetting established norms. In this paper, we review the state of the art of AI in landscape ecology and offer six areas of opportunity for landscape ecologists to capitalize on AI tools moving forward. These areas include geospatial AI (GeoAI), geometric AI, Explainable AI (xAI), generative AI (GenAI), Natural Language Processing (NLP), and robotics. Recent FindingsLandscape ecology has a long history of using AI, notably machine learning methods for image classification tasks, agent-based modeling, and species distribution modeling but also knowledge representation and automated reasoning for landscape generation and spatial planning. Methods have become more diverse and complex in recent years, with a new generation of AI-based tools rapidly emerging. These new tools have potential to improve how landscape ecologists map, measure, and model landscape patterns and processes as well as improve the explainability of model outputs. SummaryThere are many untapped opportunities for landscape ecologists to leverage emerging AI-based tools in research and practice including generating virtual landscapes for simulating processes such as wildfires and leveraging natural language processing to generate new insights from text data. Regardless of the application, researchers using AI tools must also consider the ethical implications of data and algorithmic biases and critically assess how these methods can be used responsibly. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al (, medRxiv)
    Abstract BackgroundDiagnostic pathology depends on complex, structured reasoning to interpret clinical, histologic, and molecular data. Replicating this cognitive process algorithmically remains a significant challenge. As large language models (LLMs) gain traction in medicine, it is critical to determine whether they have clinical utility by providing reasoning in highly specialized domains such as pathology. MethodsWe evaluated the performance of four reasoning LLMs (OpenAI o1, OpenAI o3-mini, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking Experimental, and DeepSeek-R1 671B) on 15 board-style open-ended pathology questions. Responses were independently reviewed by 11 pathologists using a structured framework that assessed language quality (accuracy, relevance, coherence, depth, and conciseness) and seven diagnostic reasoning strategies. Scores were normalized and aggregated for analysis. We also evaluated inter-observer agreement to assess scoring consistency. Model comparisons were conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s Honestly Significant Difference (HSD) test. ResultsGemini and DeepSeek significantly outperformed OpenAI o1 and OpenAI o3-mini in overall reasoning quality (p < 0.05), particularly in analytical depth and coherence. While all models achieved comparable accuracy, only Gemini and DeepSeek consistently applied expert-like reasoning strategies, including algorithmic, inductive, and Bayesian approaches. Performance varied by reasoning type: models performed best in algorithmic and deductive reasoning and poorest in heuristic and pattern recognition. Inter-observer agreement was highest for Gemini (p < 0.05), indicating greater consistency and interpretability. Models with more in-depth reasoning (Gemini and DeepSeek) were generally less concise. ConclusionAdvanced LLMs such as Gemini and DeepSeek can approximate aspects of expert-level diagnostic reasoning in pathology, particularly in algorithmic and structured approaches. However, limitations persist in contextual reasoning, heuristic decision-making, and consistency across questions. Addressing these gaps, along with trade-offs between depth and conciseness, will be essential for the safe and effective integration of AI tools into clinical pathology workflows. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email