skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Increasing Student Success: A Faculty Cohort Mentoring Story
Mentoring has been used in higher education to support faculty growth and targeting the mentoring relationship to changes in classroom practice can help to inspire transformational growth in an institution. Further, pairing mentors and mentees in professional development focusing on constructing practices to support diverse learners builds reciprocal mentoring relationships in line with relevant literature. Such a reciprocal mentoring program was developed for mathematics faculty at a two-year Hispanic serving institution. Valencia College in Orlando, Florida, serves around 75,000 students annually with approximately 235 mathematics faculty. Faculty across the seven main campuses were given the opportunity to participate in the mentoring program and professional development designed to foster inclusive classroom practices and active learning. Cohorts underwent professional development in the summer and engaged in mentoring in the Fall semester. Two cohorts have participated in the faculty mentoring program (n=26, 25). Over 200 classroom lessons centered on inclusive active learning were developed and implemented from the pairings, indicating a substantial change in instructional delivery. Qualitative feedback from mentors indicated appreciation of the reciprocal nature of the mentoring relationship. In qualitative and quantitative preliminary results, mentees describe engaging in more student outreach and reported an increase in knowledge of inclusive active learning techniques and their importance.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2111262
PAR ID:
10636132
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Corporate Creator(s):
Editor(s):
Trube, M; Martinez, W; Dominguez, N
Publisher / Repository:
The UNM Mentoring Institute
Date Published:
Edition / Version:
1
Volume:
8
Issue:
3
ISSN:
2372-9848
Page Range / eLocation ID:
452-457
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
mentorship program higher education active learning
Format(s):
Medium: X Size: 94kb Other: pdf
Size(s):
94kb
Location:
doi.org/10.62935/4p5cxu
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Eddy, Pamela (Ed.)
    Faculty development (FD) plays a pivotal role in supporting instructors’ classroom practice and can be instrumental in driving transformational change across an institution. The present case‐study describes how FD supports the transformation of a mathematics department to promote inclusive active learning (IAL) classrooms at a community college, which has been designated as a Hispanic Serving Institution (HSI). Using a tiered cohort mentoring model, instructors worked together to learn the theory and techniques of IAL, redesigning their classrooms to be a space that creates the right conditions for all learners. Instructors were trained on analyzing disaggregated student outcome data and encouraged to explore student performance within their own courses. The FD team supported the design of a structured mentor training program for faculty, a curriculum designed to promote cohort learning, and supplementary instruction in effective mentoring practices and IAL, to equip mentors to guide their mentees. Qualitative data indicated both mentors and mentees felt strongly supported and empowered to make dynamic classroom changes that support learning for all students. Instructors reported being more open to trying new techniques in the classroom following the professional development experience. 
    more » « less
  2. Karunakaran, S. S.; Higgins, A. (Ed.)
    Peer mentoring programs are one approach to improving the pedagogical development of mathematical sciences graduate students. This paper describes the peer mentoring experiences at three institutions that have implemented a multi-faceted GTA professional development program. Data was collected from surveys and focus groups conducted with graduate teaching assistants at each institution regarding mentees’ ratings of their mentors, mentors’ ratings of their impact on mentees, mentors’ impressions of the benefits and challenges of peer mentoring, and mentees and mentors’ ratings of program components related to support from mentors, their TA coach, program staff, and other graduate students. Most GTAs found value in participating in the peer mentoring program. While the mentees found their mentors to be significant to their own success and effectiveness, the mentors did not rate themselves as high as the mentees rated them with respect to their own significance in impacting the effectiveness of their mentee. 
    more » « less
  3. Despite interest and potential in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics), neurodivergent (ND) individuals face underrepresentation and marginalization. These individuals experience low rates of degree completion and even higher dropout rates from STEM programs. In the workplace, elevated levels of unemployment among individuals with disabilities underscore the need to address obstacles to persistence in STEM programs and pathways to the workforce. The AIE-STEMPLOS (Access to Innovative Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics-Providing Learning Opportunities and Scholarship) program at Landmark College, launched in 2021, aims to empower ND STEM scholars by leveraging effective mentoring strategies to support degree completion and career development in STEM fields. Supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) through scholarship funding (S-STEM), the program's primary goals are to support domestic low-income, academically talented ND scholars in Computer Science and Life Science, create a robust culture of mentorship within the STEM department, and strengthen scholarly professional development. We generally refer to students as scholars in this program as that is the language preferred by the NSF. The mentoring component is designed to enhance psychosocial and professional development through faculty, group, and peer mentoring. Employing tools like the Birkman Method, mentor maps and Individual Development Plans (IDP), the program fosters self-understanding and community among scholars. Evaluation methods include qualitative and quantitative assessments, with data showing high satisfaction with mentor-mentee relationships, robust engagement in professional development activities, and significant improvements in scholars' professional outlook and STEM identity. This comprehensive approach integrates faculty mentors, career counselors, and weekly cohort meetings for mentoring and professional development activities. This paper will highlight the faculty and group/ peer mentoring components of the program, demonstrating how inclusive educational strategies can promote diversity within STEM fields. 
    more » « less
  4. This full research paper explores the role of faculty mentors in supporting student mentees. Faculty mentors of undergraduate students have the ability to make an academic, professional, and/or personal impact on their students. For example, mentors may provide assistance with course planning, share career goal feedback, offer life advice, etc. The benefits of these relationships may prove to be especially valuable in competitive fields such as engineering. While students stand to gain much in mentor/mentee relationships, these interactions can be mutually beneficial, producing positive effects for mentors. Despite the importance of faculty mentoring undergraduate students, there is a gap in understanding what enables faculty mentors to feel effective in their roles. The majority of studies focus on student-related outcomes and do not delve into the mentors’ side of the relationship. Addressing this gap can serve to enhance the quality of student education by providing insight into mentoring relationships. This paper will utilize Zachary’s model for effective mentoring to understand the foundation of effective mentoring. This model provides a framework for understanding mentor-mentee interactions by describing the seven elements of an effective relationship: reciprocity, learning, relationship, partnership, collaboration, mutually defined goals, and development. Mentors in academia are put in the position to orchestrate student growth through these areas by lending their guidance and expertise. In order to better understand the faculty mentor experience within one-on-one and small-group faculty-to-student mentoring relationships in the undergraduate setting, this qualitative project will study a cohort of engineering faculty mentors of undergraduate engineering students at a mid-sized research university in the Midwest. Two research questions will be examined: a. What are the factors that enable faculty mentors of undergraduate engineering students to feel effective in their role? b. How can engineering faculty be supported to enhance their mentoring interactions? The primary focus of this study will be to fill a critical gap in the understanding of faculty mentoring of undergraduate students by investigating the factors that enable faculty mentors to feel effective and proposing strategies for their support. 
    more » « less
  5. Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the mentoring program of the Minority Scholars from Under-Represented Groups in Engineering and the Social Sciences (SURGE) Capacity in Disasters initiative, a pilot program that aimed to address the challenges that graduate students of color face in academic programs. SURGE promotes mentoring and professional development through its mentoring program for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) students. Methods: Data collection involved distributing online surveys designed in Qualtrics to mentors and mentees five months after the SURGE program’s initiation. Separate surveys were created for student mentees and faculty mentors in order to collect feedback about the mentoring program. Mentees and mentors were also asked to rate their satisfaction with the specific individuals in their mentoring network so that the evaluation team could identify issues that arose across participants. Results: We found that students had several motivations for and expectations from SURGE. A majority of the students found the SURGE mentoring program to have been at least somewhat valuable in helping them achieve these expectations. Nonetheless, students did identify a few challenges, namely lack of swift responsiveness from some mentors, not enough guidance on navigating the mentor-mentee relationship, and little to no in-person interaction. While half of the students mentioned that some individuals within their mentoring team were hard to reach, a majority remained satisfied with the overall responsiveness of their mentors. This suggests that the many-to-many mentoring model helped to ensure none were entirely dissatisfied on this measure. Conclusions: These findings support previous research and show promise for mentoring as an effective intervention to the challenges that underrepresented students face in their academic programs and for their retention and representation, particularly in hazards and disaster-related fields. 
    more » « less