Abstract As the vision inA Framework for K‐12 Science Educationand the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) takes hold in schools and classrooms, there is an urgent need for teacher professional development (PD) programs that align with NGSS‐designed curriculum materials and address the unique strengths and needs of diverse student groups, including multilingual learners (MLs). The purpose of this article is to propose our conceptual framework for PD programs that aligns with current reform efforts and is grounded in the mutually supportive nature of contemporary science and language instructional shifts. Specifically, we examine our previous NGSS‐designed curriculum development project with MLs and review the literature in science education and language education with MLs. Our conceptual framework for PD programs is grounded in the perspective ofsymmetrythat teacher professional learning experiences should be symmetrical to the learning experiences we organize for students. Grounded in this perspective, our conceptual framework consists of three design principles that describe how PD programs can guide teachers to (a) develop an asset‐oriented view of MLs and instructional practices for recognizing and leveraging their assets, (b) integrate science and language in mutually supportive ways with MLs, and (c) develop more sophisticated instructional practices for integrating science and language with MLs over time. We describe contributions of our conceptual framework, which could generate a new research agenda and inform PD programs aimed at facilitating uptake of NGSS‐designed curriculum materials in linguistically diverse science classrooms.
more »
« less
Development of a questionnaire on teachers' beliefs, preparedness, and instructional practices for teaching NGSS science with multilingual learners
Abstract The limited availability of research instruments that reflect the vision of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) restricts the field's understanding of whether and how teachers are making instructional shifts called for by the standards. The need for such instruments is particularly urgent with teachers of multilingual learners (MLs), who are called on to make shifts in how they think about and enact instruction related to both science and language. The purpose of this study was to develop and gather validity evidence for a questionnaire that measures elementary teachers' beliefs, preparedness, and instructional practices for teaching NGSS science with MLs. We report on the development of the questionnaire over three phases that elicited multiple sources of validity evidence: (a) domain specification and expert review, (b) item writing and cognitive interviews, and (c) piloting and final item selection. Data included feedback from experts in science and language domains, cognitive interviews with 48 teachers, and a pilot with 310 teachers. Results indicated that the questionnaire differentiates among teachers with different levels of the underlying constructs and also that teachers' scores relate to their characteristics (e.g., familiarity with the NGSS). We highlight two implications for emerging research on NGSS‐based instrumentation: (a) the difficulty of communicating with teachers about science and language instructional shifts while teachers are still developing their understanding of such shifts and (b) the potential of emerging NGSS‐based instruments to inform professional development. We close with future directions for our research project specifically and the field of science education broadly.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2035103
- PAR ID:
- 10636440
- Publisher / Repository:
- Science Education
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Science Education
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0036-8326
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 128 to 156
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Teaching Science Literacy for MLs: Examining Shifts in Teacher Practices to Make Science Accessible.There is broad consensus among researchers and educators that locally contextualized, language-rich science and engineering-based instruction exploring scientific phenomena is essential to achieving access and rigor for all students, including multilingual learners (MLs), the fastest growing subset of the U.S. student population (NASEM, 2018; NCES, 2021). For this study, we are looking at what it means to teach language and content in an integrated manner to build science literacy in high school science classrooms that include ML students. As part of a 3-year, NSF-funded exploratory grant, this project aims to increase science literacy among MLs by implementing a model of professional learning (PL) for high school teachers in which they learn how to embed the Instructional Conversation (IC) pedagogy (Mellom, Hixon & Weber, 2019; Saunders and Goldenberg, 1999) within standards-aligned scientific and engineering practices (SEPs) (NGSS Lead States, 2013). Under this model, high school science teachers collaborate with high school ESOL teachers to co-develop and implement linguistically-sustaining instructional materials that provide MLs with intentionally scaffolded opportunities to use scientific dialogue as they collaborate to explain natural phenomena. This study examines how the PL experiences supported shifts in the teachers’ instructional practices to foster ML scientific literacy. Data includes: teacher reflection logs, teacher-generated artifacts (e.g. differentiated Task Cards, and multimodal, scaffolded lesson materials), rubric-based data (Luning & Wyatt, 2010), and field notes from classroom observations. The study uses thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) and text analysis (Kuckartz, 2019) of these data to explore how the IC pedagogical strategies promote Teachers’ skills needed to enact three instructional shifts identified by the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) as particularly relevant to science teaching with MLs: asset-based science teaching with multilingual learners (MLs); integrated content and language instruction; collaboratively engaging MLs in Science and Engineering Practices (SEPs).more » « less
-
There is broad consensus among researchers and educators that locally-contextualized, language-rich, science-based instruction is essential to achieving access and rigor for all students, including multilingual learners (MLs), the fastest growing subset of the US student population (NASEM, 2018; NCES, 2021). Among the instructional shifts envisioned in the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS, NGSS Lead States, 2013), three pose particularly acute and ongoing challenges to science teaching with MLs: 1) developing asset-oriented perspectives and instructional practices (Lee, 2020; Lyon et al., 2018); 2) integrating science and language instruction in mutually supportive ways (Lee et al., 2019; Buxton & Lee, 2023), and; 3) collaboratively engaging all students, including MLs, in science and engineering practices (SEPs) (NASEM, 2018; Grapin, 2019). As these shifts involve knowledge, beliefs, and practices largely absent from traditional science classrooms and teacher preparation curricula, teachers require innovative pedagogical support and professional learning (PL) opportunities to achieve them (NASEM, 2016; NRC, 2015). Crucially, such innovations necessitate greater collaboration between the science and ML education communities (Lee et al., 2019; Marshall, et al., 2021). As part of a 3-year, NSF-funded grant, this project aims to increase collaboration among high school science content and ESOL teachers by implementing a model of professional learning (PL) in which they learn how to embed the Instructional Conversation (IC) pedagogy (Mellom, Hixon & Weber, 2019; Saunders and Goldenberg, 1999) within standards-aligned scientific and engineering practices (SEPs) (NGSS Lead States, 2013). This study examines how participating teachers discuss content and language and collaborate across disciplinary divides to plan and implement linguistically-sustaining lessons in science classrooms. Data include: teacher reflection logs, transcripts of recorded face-to-face PL sessions, and transcripts of focus groups. The study uses thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke, 2006) to explore the supports teachers need to facilitate effective multidisciplinary collaboration for NGSS-aligned science teaching with MLs.more » « less
-
Teachers must know how to use language to support students in knowledge generation environments that align to the Next Generation Science Standards. To measure this knowledge, this study refines a survey on teachers’ knowledge of language as an epistemic tool. Rasch modelling was used to examine 15 items’ fit statistics and the functioning of a previously-designed questionnaire’s response categories. Cronbach’s alpha reliability was also examined. Additionally, interviews were used to investigate teachers’ interpretations of each item to identify ambiguous items. The results indicated that three ambiguous items were deleted based on qualitative data and three more items were deleted because of negative correlation and mismatched fit statistics. Finally, we present a revised language questionnaire with nine items and acceptable correlation and good fit statistics, with utility for science education researchers and teacher educators. This research contributes a revised questionnaire to measure teachers’ knowledge of language that could inform professional development efforts. This research also describes instrument refinement processes that could be applied elsewhere.more » « less
-
Abstract Despite the importance of developing elementary science teachers' content knowledge for teaching (CKT), there are limited assessments that have been designed to measure the full breadth of their CKT at scale. Our overall research project addressed this gap by developing an online assessment to measure elementary preservice teachers' CKT about matter and its interactions. This study, which was part of our larger project, reports on findings from one component of the item development process examining the construct validity of 118 different CKT about matter assessment items. In this study, 86 elementary teachers participated in cognitive interviews to examine: (a) the knowledge and reasoning they used when responding to these CKT about matter assessment items and (b) the nature of the content challenges and the content teaching challenges they encountered. Findings showed that over 80% of participant interview responses indicated that the CKT about matter items functioned as hypothesized, providing evidence to support future use of these items on a large‐scale assessment and in studies of science teachers' CKT. When responding to the items, participants showed evidence of four main challenges with the science content: (a) using scientific concepts to reason about science tasks, (b) using adequate evidence to reason about science phenomenon, (c) drawing upon examples of scientific phenomena, and (d) drawing upon science vocabulary. Findings also showed that participants experienced challenges regarding the following content teaching aspects when responding to these items: (a) connecting to key scientific concepts involved in the work of teaching science, (b) attending to instructional goal(s), and (c) recognizing features of grade‐level appropriateness. Implications for using CKT items as part of large‐scale science assessment systems and identifying areas to target in elementary science teachers' CKT development are addressed.more » « less
An official website of the United States government

