An official website of the United States government
Communities are considering local food production in response to the pressing need to reduce food system greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, local food systems can vary considerably in design and operation, including controlled environment agriculture (CEA), which refers to agricultural production that takes place within an enclosed space where environmental conditions, such as temperature, humidity, and light, are precisely controlled. Such systems require a considerable amount of energy and thus emissions; therefore, this study seeks to quantify these environmental impacts to determine how local CEA systems compare to alternative systems. For this study’s methods, we apply life cycle assessment methodology to quantify the cradle-to-storeshelf GHG emissions and water consumption of four lettuce production systems: local indoor plant factory, local greenhouse, local seasonal soil, and conventional centralized production in California with transportation. Using geographically specific inputs, the study estimates the environmental impact of the different production systems including geospatially resolved growth modeling, emissions intensity, and transportation distances. The results include the major finding that baseline CEA systems always have higher GHG emissions (2.6–7.7 kg CO2e kg−1) than centralized production (0.3–1.0 kg CO2e kg−1), though water consumption is significantly less owing to hydroponic efficiency. In contrast, local seasonal soil production generally has a lower GHG impact than centralized production, though water consumption varies by crop yield and local precipitation during growing seasons. Scenario analyses indicate CEA facilities would need to electrify all systems and utilize low-carbon electricity sources to have equivalent or lower GHG impacts than California centralized production plus transportation. We conclude that these results can inform consumers and policy makers that local seasonal production and conventional supply chains are more sustainable than local CEA production in near-term food-energy-water sustainability nexus decision making.
more »
« less
Carbon Footprint Assessment on the Viability of Utilizing Brewer’s Spent Grain to Produce Biochar
The waste generated by the brewing industry, particularly brewer’s spent grain (BSG) and wastewater, presents challenges for sustainable management practices. While BSG is traditionally utilized as cattle feed, this option is not universally accessible. This study considered the environmental impact of a novel, laboratory-based process for converting BSG into biochar that also utilizes brewing wastewater, as compared to disposing of BSG and cleaning chemical wastewater. The study employed a carbon footprint assessment approach to quantify the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with each disposal method, using one unprocessed kg of BSG as the functional unit. The results indicated that landfilling BSG generated approximately 3 kg CO2 equivalent (CO2e) per kg of unprocessed BSG, whereas biochar production reduced emissions to 1.18 kg CO2e per kg of BSG. The study concluded that diverting BSG from landfills to biochar production presents a viable strategy for minimizing environmental impacts associated with BSG disposal. However, several factors must be considered in the development of a biochar production facility, including biochar transportation. These elements may contribute more GHG emissions than landfilling if not properly designed.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2115405
- PAR ID:
- 10637695
- Publisher / Repository:
- Applied Sciences
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Applied Sciences
- Volume:
- 15
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 2076-3417
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 5525
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
The nitrogen cycle needed for scaled agriculture relies on energy- and carbon-intensive processes and generates nitrate-containing wastewater. Here we focus on an alternative approach—the electrified co-electrolysis of nitrate and CO2 to synthesize urea. When this is applied to industrial wastewater or agricultural runoff, the approach has the potential to enable low-carbon-intensity urea production while simultaneously providing wastewater denitrification. We report a strategy that increases selectivity to urea using a hybrid catalyst: two classes of site independently stabilize the key intermediates needed in urea formation, *CO2NO2 and *COOHNH2, via a relay catalysis mechanism. A Faradaic efficiency of 75% at wastewater-level nitrate concentrations (1,000 ppm NO3− [N]) is achieved on Zn/Cu catalysts. The resultant catalysts show a urea production rate of 16 µmol h−1 cm−2. Life-cycle assessment indicates greenhouse gas emissions of 0.28 kg CO2e per kg urea for the electrochemical route, compared to 1.8 kg CO2e kg−1 for the present-day route.more » « less
-
High energy density lithium-O2 batteries have potential to increase electric vehicle driving range, but commercialization is prevented by technical challenges. Researchers have proposed electrolytes, catalysts, and binders to improve the battery capacity and reduce capacity fade. Novel battery design, however, is not always consistent with reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Optimizing battery design using solely electrochemical metrics ignores variations in the environmental impacts of different materials. The lack of uniform reporting practices further complicates such efforts. This paper presents commonly used lithium-O2 battery materials along with their GHG emissions. We use LCA methodology to estimate GHG emissions for five proposed lithium-O2 battery designs: (i) without catalyst, (ii) with catalyst, (iii) carbon-less and binder-less, (iv) anode protection, and (v) carbon-less, binder-less with gold catalyst. This work highlights knowledge gaps in lithium-O2 battery LCA, provides a benchmark to quantify battery composition impacts, and demonstrates the GHG emissions associated with certain materials and designs for laboratory-scale batteries. Predicted GHG emissions range from 10–70 kg of CO2 equivalent (kg CO2𝑒) kg−1 of battery, 60–1200 kg CO2𝑒 kWh−1, and 0.15–21 kg CO2𝑒 per km of vehicle travel, if battery replacement is considered.more » « less
-
The rise in human population and the advent of biological wastewater treatment has led to increased biosolid production, which requires sustainable solutions to mitigate potential negative impacts associated with the disposal of biosolids. Biosolid land application has the potential to decrease reliance on synthetic fertilizers and improve soil fertility; however, the microbial activity and associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions need to be evaluated to ensure there are no negative externalities of this approach. To address these issues, this study aimed to (i) assess the potential of a biosolid-amended soil system to emit nitrous oxide (N2O), (ii) quantify actual field GHG emissions from biosolid-amended soils, and (iii) evaluate a process-based model to predict these soil GHG emissions. This study performed a comprehensive analysis, including laboratory (potential assays and gene abundances), field (static chamber GHG measurements), and modeling (process-based) approaches, to understand the effect of biosolids on soil GHG emissions. We found that biosolid application increased soil nitrate and organic matter, and decreased soil pH in the short-term. Together, the changes in soil conditions promoted more denitrification, which became more complete with laboratory potential dinitrogen higher than nitrous oxide as the end-product over time. In the field, GHG emissions were generally higher in biosolid-amended soils, particularly just after biosolid application. While the predictive model was able to simulate general trends for field GHG emissions, it often underpredicted the magnitude of these emissions. Overall, despite initial increases in GHG, biosolids have the potential as a sustainable amendment to improve soil health and mitigate GHG emissions in agricultural practices over the long term. This research contributes to understanding biosolid use in promoting environmental sustainability and offers insights for future agricultural management strategies.more » « less
-
Abstract Biochar is a promising climate-smart agriculture (CSA) solution to sustainably support food security while mitigating the adverse impacts of climate change on agroecosystems. Yet, its effectiveness across diverse environments is not well quantified. We developed a process-based biochar model and used it to evaluate biochar’s impacts on agroecosystem production and the dynamics of soil biogeochemical cycles (e.g., key CSA indicators such as crop yield, soil organic carbon (SOC), and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions) across 48 globally distributed field experiment sites. The biochar model was calibrated and evaluated in maize, wheat, and soybean cropping systems, with an average root mean square error of 1878.9 kg ha−1(R2 = 0.78) for crop yield, 4129.3 kg C ha−1(R2 = 0.72) for SOC, and 1995.7 kg CO2 ha−1(R2 = 0.91) for GHG emissions. The model accuracy varied across environments, with yield predictions performing better in tropical (R2 = 0.90) and temperate (R2 = 0.81) zones and on medium-textured soils (R2 = 0.87), but declining in arid regions (R2 = 0.55) and on coarse soils (R2 = 0.65). Simulation accuracy of SOC and CO2was higher in maize than in soybean systems. Biochar application rates also influenced model performance, with medium rates best for crop yield and high rates optimal for SOC and CO2 emissions. These results highlight the need for robust modeling tools to optimize biochar application across diverse soil and climate conditions. These tools can be important for stakeholders, from farmers to policymakers, and can help refine biochar management strategies and advance global goals of sustainable intensification and net-zero agricultural systems. HighlightsA process-based biochar model was developed and calibrated using observational data from 48 global field studies.Model’s performance was evaluated across a range of climate conditions, soil types, cropping systems, and biochar application rates.The model serves as a robust tool for optimizing site-specific biochar application and advancing climate-smart agriculture. Graphical Abstractmore » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105525
