An official website of the United States government
There is an increasing demand for developing new metrics that can effectively measure the physical demand experienced by users in augmented reality (AR) environments. In this study, we evaluated one of the recent metrics, called “slouching score,” in an AR-based biomechanics lecture. This study aims to uncover the correlation between the AR interaction and the physical demand of users in a different setup compared to the earlier study. The slouching score, which evaluates posture changes that may indicate fatigue during AR interactions, is measured using Xsens motion capture equipment. These calculated scores are compared with responses to physical demand assessments surveyed using NASA-TLX questionnaires. One of the key differences between the current study and earlier ones is that participants had to physically move to access the next AR module in earlier studies. In contrast, this time, participants simply needed to click a virtual arrow button to view the next AR modules, eliminating the need for physical movement. Our preliminary findings show correlations between the slouching score from some modules and the NASA-TLX physical demand ratings.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on December 30, 2025
Measuring physical demand in Augmented Reality learning environments
Augmented Reality revolutionises education by enhancing learning with interactive, immersive experiences. However, the impact of long-term AR use, particularly in terms of physical demand, within educational environments remains poorly understood. This study investigates the relationship between AR engagement and physical demand, utilising motion capture technology, NASA Task Load Index, and HoloLens eye-tracking to quantify user posture, engagement, and perceived workload. We hypothesise that prolonged AR interaction results in a change in slouching scores, indicating increased fatigue. The results show a strong correlation between the slouching score and the NASA-TLX physical demand score. Our study lays the groundwork for incorporating predictive modelling to develop proactive physical demand measures.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 2202108
- PAR ID:
- 10643919
- Publisher / Repository:
- Taylor & Francis
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Ergonomics
- ISSN:
- 0014-0139
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1 to 13
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This study examines the ergonomic impact of augmented reality (AR) technologies in educational contexts, with a focus on understanding how prolonged AR engagement affects postural dynamics and physical demands on users. By analyzing slouching scores alongside NASA Task Load Index (TLX) Physical Demand (PD) values, we assess the physical strain experienced by participants during the initial modules of an AR-based lecture series. Our findings demonstrate a notable decline in slouching scores as participants progress through the lecture modules, indicating increased postural deviations. To quantify these effects, we developed a regression model that effectively predicts the physical demands imposed by various AR modules, based on the observed slouching scores.more » « less
-
This study investigates the method for measuring cognitive workload in augmented reality-based biomechanics lectures by analyzing pupil dilation. Using Dikablis Glasses 3 and Microsoft HoloLens, we recorded physiological and subjective data across learning and problem-solving phases. Pupil dilation was normalized and segmented, enabling a comparison of cognitive demands between phases. The results indicated significant correlations between pupil dilation and NASA TLX cognitive demand, particularly in lectures that primarily involved procedural knowledge. These findings suggest that instructional design and content complexity have a significant impact on cognitive load, providing valuable insights for optimizing AR-based learning environments to support cognitive efficiency and student engagement.more » « less
-
In this digital learning era, Augmented Reality (AR) has become a significant driver of innovative user experience. However, the ergonomic implications of AR, particularly regarding the postural fatigue dynamics, have not been comprehensively addressed. This study investigates the correlation between prolonged AR engagement and the onset of postural fatigue, characterized by a backward shift in the center of mass (COM). Employing motion capture technology alongside cognitive load assessment tools such as the NASA Task Load Index and HoloLens eye-tracking, we seek to quantify the relationship between user posture, engagement duration, and perceived workload. We hypothesize that an observable rearward displacement of COM signifies escalating fatigue levels. The methodology integrates ergonomic analysis, biomechanics, and predictive modeling. Preliminary findings indicate a decline in postural stability with increased AR exposure, reinforcing the need for ergonomics interventions. This study underscores the necessity of ergonomic consideration in the design and use of AR systems to safeguard user well-being in educational settings.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Although driving is a complex and multitask activity, it is not unusual for drivers to engage simultaneously in other non-driving related tasks using secondary in-vehicle displays (IVIS). The use of IVIS and its potential negative safety consequences has been investigated over the years. However with the advent and advance of in-vehicle technologies such as augmented-reality head-up displays (AR HUDs), there are increasing opportunities for improving secondary task engagement and decreasing negative safety consequences. In this study, we aim to understand the effects of AR HUD low cognitive load tasks on driving performance during monotonous driving. Adapting NHTSA’s driver distraction guidelines, we conducted a user-study with twenty-four gender-balanced participants that performed secondary AR HUD tasks of different durations while driving in a monotonous environment using a medium-fidelity driving simulator. We performed a mixed-methods analysis to evaluate driver’s perceived workload (NASA-TLX), lateral, and longitudinal driving performance. Although we found that drivers subjectively perceive AR HUD tasks to have a higher cognitive demand; AR tasks resulted in improved driving performance. Conversely, the duration of the secondary tasks had no measurable impacts on performance which suggests that the amount of time spent on tasks has no negative or positive implications on driving performance. We provide evidence that there are potential benefits of secondary AR task engagement; in fact, there are situations in which AR HUDs can improve driver’s alertness and vigilance.more » « less
