skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


  • NSF Public Access
  • Search Results
  • Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis
Title: Dialect and Mathematics Performance in African American Children Who Use AAE: Insights from Explanatory IRT and Error Analysis
Little is known about mismatches between the language of mathematics testing instruments and the rich linguistic repertoires that African American children develop at home and in the community. The current study aims to provide a proof of concept and novel explanatory item response design that uses error analysis to investigate the relationship between AAE child language and chil- dren’s mathematics assessment outcomes. Here, we illustrate 2nd and 3rd grade children’s qualitative patterns of performance on arithmetic tasks in relation to their AAE dialect use and elaborate a unified framework for examining child and item level linguistic characteristics. Results suggest that children draw upon their emerging (bi)dialectal repertoire with arithmetic problems when selecting appropriate problem-solving strategies on language-formatted problems. The mismatch of assessment language formatting with children’s repertoires may disadvantage AAE speakers’ strategy selections and result in a language-based performance disadvantage unrelated to mathematical ability.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2204272
PAR ID:
10644290
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Routledge
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Educational Assessment
Volume:
29
Issue:
3
ISSN:
1062-7197
Page Range / eLocation ID:
147 to 162
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; (, Language speech hearing services in schools)
    Storkel, Holly L; Mills, Monique M (Ed.)
    Purpose: The purpose of this assessment-focused clinical focus article is to increase familiarity with African American English (AAE)–speaking children’s pattern of language use in third- person singular contexts and to discuss implications for speech- language assessments of developing AAE-speaking children. Method: The clinical focus draws on descriptive case study data from four typically developing child speakers of AAE who are between the ages of 3 and 5 years. The children’s data from three different sources—sentence imitation, story retell, and play-based language samples—were subjected to linguistic analyses. Results: The three sources of linguistic data offered different insights into the children’s production of –s and other linguistic patterns in third-person singular contexts. Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of exploring developing child AAE from a descriptive approach to reveal different types of information about patterns of morphological marking in different linguistic contexts, which is crucial in assessing developing AAE. Implications for language assessment are discussed. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ; (, Psychological Science)
    null (Ed.)
    Early linguistic input is a powerful predictor of children’s language outcomes. We investigated two novel questions about this relationship: Does the impact of language input vary over time, and does the impact of time-varying language input on child outcomes differ for vocabulary and for syntax? Using methods from epidemiology to account for baseline and time-varying confounding, we predicted 64 children’s outcomes on standardized tests of vocabulary and syntax in kindergarten from their parents’ vocabulary and syntax input when the children were 14 and 30 months old. For vocabulary, children whose parents provided diverse input earlier as well as later in development were predicted to have the highest outcomes. For syntax, children whose parents’ input substantially increased in syntactic complexity over time were predicted to have the highest outcomes. The optimal sequence of parents’ linguistic input for supporting children’s language acquisition thus varies for vocabulary and for syntax. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; (, Language development research)
    We compared everyday language input to young congenitally-blind children with no addi- tional disabilities (N=15, 6–30 mo., M:16 mo.) and demographically-matched sighted peers (N=15, 6–31 mo., M:16 mo.). By studying whether the language input of blind children differs from their sighted peers, we aimed to determine whether, in principle, the language acquisition patterns observed in blind and sighted children could be explained by aspects of the speech they hear. Children wore LENA recorders to capture the auditory language environment in their homes. Speech in these recordings was then analyzed with a mix of automated and manually-transcribed measures across various subsets and dimensions of language input. These included measures of quantity (adult words), interaction (conversational turns and child-directed speech), linguistic properties (lexical diversity and mean length of utterance), and conceptual features (talk centered around the here-and-now; talk focused on visual referents that would be inaccessible to the blind but not sighted children). Overall, we found broad similarity across groups in speech quantitative, interactive, and linguistic properties. The only exception was that blind children’s language environments contained slightly but significantly more talk about past/future/hypothetical events than sighted children’s input; both groups received equiva- lent quantities of “visual” speech input. The findings challenge the notion that blind children’s lan- guage input diverges substantially from sighted children’s; while the input is highly variable across children, it is not systematically so across groups, across nearly all measures. The findings suggest instead that blind children and sighted children alike receive input that readily supports their language development, with open questions remaining regarding how this input may be differentially leveraged by language learners in early childhood. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; (, Cognitive development)
    null (Ed.)
    Understanding division is critical for later mathematical achievement. Yet division concepts are difficult to grasp and are often not explicitly taught until middle childhood. Given the structural similarity between sharing and division, we investigated whether contextualizing division problems as sharing scenarios improved preschool-aged children’s abilities to solve them, as compared with other arithmetic problems which do not share structural similarities with sharing. Preschoolers (N = 113) completed an addition, subtraction, and division problem in either a sharing context that presented arithmetic via contextualized sharing scenarios, or a comparable, linguistically-matched non-social context (randomly assigned). Children were assessed on their formal, verbal responses and their informal, non-verbal, action-based responses (abilities to solve the problems using manipulatives) to these arithmetic problems. Most critically, context predicted children’s performance on the division, but not the addition or subtraction trial, supporting a structural link between sharing and division. Results also revealed that children’s action-based responses to the arithmetic problems were much more accurate than their verbal ones. Results are discussed in terms of the conceptual link between division and sharing. 
    more » « less
  5. (, International journal of speech technology)
    Understanding and assessing child verbal communication patterns is critical in facilitating effective language development. Typically speaker diarization is performed to explore children’s verbal engagement. Understanding which activity areas stimulate verbal communication can help promote more efficient language development. In this study, we present a two stage children vocal engagement prediction system that consists of (1) a near to real-time, noise robust system that measures the duration of child-to-adult and child-to-child conversations, and tracks the number of conversational turn-takings, (2) a novel child location tracking strategy, that determines in which activity areas a child spends most/least of their time. A proposed child–adult turn-taking solution relies exclusively on vocal cues observed during the interaction between a child and other children, and/or classroom teachers. By employing a threshold optimized speech activity detection using a linear combination of voicing measures, it is possible to achieve effective speech/non-speech segment detection prior to conversion assessment. This TO-COMBO-SAD reduces classification error rates for adult-child audio by 21.34% and 27.3% compared to a baseline i-Vector and standard Bayesian Information Criterion diarization systems, respectively. In addition, this study presents a unique location tracking system adult-child that helps determine the quantity of child–adult communication in specific activity areas, and which activities stimulate voice communication engagement in a child–adult education space. We observe that our proposed location tracking solution offers unique opportunities to assess speech and language interaction for children, and quantify the location context which would contribute to improve verbal communication. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email