skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on October 1, 2026

Title: An Introduction to Network Analysis in Plant Biology
ABSTRACT This beginner's guide is intended for plant biologists new to network analysis. Here, we introduce key concepts and resources for researchers interested in incorporating network analysis into research, either as a stand‐alone component for generating hypotheses or as a framework for examining and visualizing experimental results. Network analysis provides a powerful tool to predict gene functions. Advances in and reduced costs for systems biology techniques, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, have generated abundant omics data for plants; however, the functional annotation of plant genes lags. Therefore, predictions from network analysis can be a starting point to annotate genes and ultimately elucidate genotype–phenotype relationships. In this paper, we introduce networks and compare network‐building resources available for plant biologists, including databases and software for network analysis. We then compare four databases available for plant biologists in more detail: AraNet, GeneMANIA, ATTED‐II, and STRING. AraNet and GeneMANIA are functional association networks, ATTED‐II is a gene coexpression database, and STRING is a protein–protein interaction database. AraNet and ATTED‐II are plant‐specific databases that can analyze multiple plant species, whereas GeneMANIA builds networks forArabidopsis thalianaand nonplant species and STRING for multiple species. Finally, we compare the performance of the four databases in predicting known and probable gene functions of theA. thalianaNuclear Factor‐Y (NF‐Y) genes. We conclude that plant biologists have an invaluable resource in these databases and discuss how users can decide which type of database to use depending on their research question.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2048410
PAR ID:
10645718
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Plant Direct
Volume:
9
Issue:
10
ISSN:
2475-4455
Subject(s) / Keyword(s):
Biological graph AraNet ATTED-II GeneMANIA network analysis Nuclear Factor-Y STRING
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. This beginner’s guide is intended for plant biologists new to network analysis. Here, we introduce key concepts and resources for researchers interested in incorporating network analysis into research, either as a stand-alone component for generating hypotheses or as a framework for examining and visualizing experimental results. Network analysis provides a powerful tool to predict gene functions. Advances in and reduced costs for systems biology techniques, such as genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, have generated abundant -omics data for plants; however, the functional annotation of plant genes lags. Therefore, predictions from network analysis can be a starting point to annotate genes and ultimately elucidate genotype-phenotype relationships. In this paper, we introduce networks and compare network-building resources available for plant biologists, including databases and software for network analysis. We then compare four databases available for plant biologists in more detail: AraNet, GeneMANIA, ATTED-II, and STRING. AraNet, and GeneMANIA are functional association networks, ATTED-II is a gene coexpression database, and STRING is a protein-protein interaction database. AraNet, and ATTED-II are plant-specific databases that can analyze multiple plant species, whereas GeneMANIA builds networks for Arabidopsis thaliana and non-plant species, and STRING for multiple species. Finally, we compare the performance of the four databases in predicting known and probable gene functions of the A. thaliana Nuclear Factor-Y (NF-Y) genes. We conclude that plant biologists have an invaluable resource in these databases and discuss how users can decide which type of database to use depending on their research question. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract Identifying genes that interact to confer a biological function to an organism is one of the main goals of functional genomics. High‐throughput technologies for assessment and quantification of genome‐wide gene expression patterns have enabled systems‐level analyses to infer pathways or networks of genes involved in different functions under many different conditions. Here, we leveraged the publicly available, information‐rich RNA‐Seq datasets of the model plantArabidopsis thalianato construct a gene co‐expression network, which was partitioned into clusters or modules that harbor genes correlated by expression. Gene ontology and pathway enrichment analyses were performed to assess functional terms and pathways that were enriched within the different gene modules. By interrogating the co‐expression network for genes in different modules that associate with a gene of interest, diverse functional roles of the gene can be deciphered. By mapping genes differentially expressing under a certain condition inArabidopsisonto the co‐expression network, we demonstrate the ability of the network to uncover novel genes that are likely transcriptionally active but prone to be missed by standard statistical approaches due to their falling outside of the confidence zone of detection. To our knowledge, this is the firstA. thalianaco‐expression network constructed using the entire mRNA‐Seq datasets (>20,000) available at the NCBI SRA database. The developed network can serve as a useful resource for theArabidopsisresearch community to interrogate specific genes of interest within the network, retrieve the respective interactomes, decipher gene modules that are transcriptionally altered under certain condition or stage, and gain understanding of gene functions. 
    more » « less
  3. Societal Impact StatementGroundcherry (Physalis grisea) is a plant species grown for its flavorful fruit. The fruit drops from the plant, hence the common name groundcherry. This makes harvest cumbersome and puts the fruit at risk for carrying soil‐borne pathogens, therefore making them unsellable. Furthermore, insects often damage the plants, reducing yield. Advances in gene editing offer promise for addressing these issues and aiding home gardeners and farmers. Improvement will expand access to this nutritious fruit, rich in potassium, vitamin C, and antioxidants. Additionally, studies of its biology could serve as a model for improving other fruiting plants, particularly underutilized species. SummaryP. griseais an underutilized, semidomesticated fruit crop with rising agronomic value. Several resources have been developed for its use in fundamental biological research, including a plant transformation system and a high‐quality reference genome. Already,P. griseahas been used as a model to investigate biological phenomena including inflated calyx syndrome and gene compensation.P. griseahas also been used to demonstrate the potential of fast‐tracking domestication trait improvement through approaches such as CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. This work has led to thePhysalisImprovement Project, which relies on reverse genetics to understand the mechanisms that underlie fruit abscission and plant–herbivore interactions to guide approaches for improvement of undesirable characteristics. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing has been used to targetP. griseagenes that are suspected to act in fruit abscission, particularly orthologs of those that are reported in tomato abscission zone development. A similar approach is being taken to targetP. griseagenes involved in the withanolide biosynthetic pathway to determine the impact of withanolides on plant–herbivore interactions. Results from these research projects will lead to a greater understanding of important biological processes and will also generate knowledge needed to develop cultivars with reduced fruit drop and increased resistance to insect herbivory. 
    more » « less
  4. Summary In flowering plants, cell–cell communication plays a key role in reproductive success, as both pollination and fertilization require pathways that regulate interactions between many different cell types. Some of the most critical of these interactions are those between the pollen tube (PT) and the embryo sac, which ensure the delivery of sperm cells required for double fertilization. Synergid cells function to attract thePTthrough secretion of small peptides and inPTreception via membrane‐bound proteins associated with the endomembrane system and the cell surface. While many synergid‐expressed components regulatingPTattraction and reception have been identified, few tools exist to study the localization of membrane‐bound proteins and the components of the endomembrane system in this cell type. In this study, we describe the localization and distribution of seven fluorescent markers that labelled components of the secretory pathway in synergid cells ofArabidopsis thaliana. These markers were used in co‐localization experiments to investigate the subcellular distribution of the twoPTreception componentsLORELEI, aGPI‐anchored surface protein, andNORTIA, aMILDEW RESISTANCE LOCUSO protein, both found within the endomembrane system of the synergid cell. These secretory markers are useful tools for both reproductive and cell biologists, enabling the analysis of membrane‐associated trafficking within a haploid cell actively involved in polar transport. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract ARGONAUTES are the central effector proteins ofRNAsilencing which bind target transcripts in a smallRNA‐guided manner.Arabidopsis thalianahas 10ARGONAUTE(AGO) genes, with specialized roles inRNA‐directedDNAmethylation, post‐transcriptional gene silencing, and antiviral defense. To better understand specialization amongAGOgenes at the level of transcriptional regulation we tested a library of 1497 transcription factors for binding to the promoters ofAGO1,AGO10, andAGO7using yeast 1‐hybrid assays. A ranked list of candidateDNA‐bindingTFs revealed binding of theAGO7promoter by a number of proteins in two families: the miR156‐regulatedSPLfamily and the miR319‐regulatedTCPfamily, both of which have roles in developmental timing and leaf morphology. Possible functions forSPLandTCPbinding are unclear: we showed that these binding sites are not required for the polar expression pattern ofAGO7, nor for the function ofAGO7in leaf shape. NormalAGO7transcription levels and function appear to depend instead on an adjacent 124‐bp region. Progress in understanding the structure of this promoter may aid efforts to understand how the conservedAGO7‐triggeredTAS3pathway functions in timing and polarity. 
    more » « less