skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


This content will become publicly available on March 26, 2026

Title: Dynamics of Globular Proteins when Interacting with Zwitterionic Silica Nanoparticles by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spin Relaxation
The many emerging applications of nanoparticles in diverse fields in chemistry and biology require the characterization of interactions between nanoparticles and surrounding biomolecules, such as proteins. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spin relaxation of proteins, highly sensitive to interactions with nanoparticles, contains rich information about protein mobility and binding kinetics. The interactions of globular proteins with silica nanoparticles differ markedly from those with liposome nanoparticles, although both are driven by electrostatic forces. For unmodified silica nanoparticles, their interactions with an internally rigid protein like ubiquitin uniformly increases the backbone amide 15N transverse R2 relaxation for most residues. In contrast, for ubiquitin-POPG liposome interactions, their characteristic transverse R2 profiles indicate that ubiquitin undergoes diffusive rotational motions on the liposome surface. Here, we show that coating silica nanoparticles with sulfobetaine siloxane (SBS) zwitterionic molecules profoundly alters their interactions with proteins in a manner that closely resembles the interaction mode observed with liposomes. 15N-R2 relaxation reveals that ubiquitin and the Ras-binding domain (RBD) of B-Raf both exhibit axial reorientational motions about an axis perpendicular to the nanoparticle surface in the bound state, where the interactions involve the predominantly positively charged surface regions. These findings point toward a global dynamics mechanism of proteins when interacting with organic or inorganic nanoparticles with densely charged soft surfaces. This information may help tailor the coatings of nanoparticles to adopt specific modes of interaction with proteins that can be used to control their function in vivo and in vitro.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
2103637
PAR ID:
10647331
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Publisher / Repository:
American Chemical Society
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of the American Chemical Society
Volume:
147
Issue:
12
ISSN:
0002-7863
Page Range / eLocation ID:
10485 to 10492
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Protein function depends critically on intrinsic internal dynamics, which is manifested in distinct ways, such as loop motions that regulate protein recognition and catalysis. Under physiological conditions, dynamic processes occur on a wide range of time scales from subpicoseconds to seconds. Commonly used NMR spin relaxation in solution provides valuable information on very fast and slow motions but is insensitive to the intermediate nanosecond to microsecond range that exceeds the protein tumbling correlation time. Presently, very little is known about the nature and functional role of these motions. It is demonstrated here how transverse spin relaxation becomes exquisitely sensitive to these motions at atomic resolution when studying proteins in the presence of nanoparticles. Application of this novel cross-disciplinary approach reveals large-scale dynamics of loops involved in functionally critical protein-protein interactions and protein-calcium ion recognition that were previously unobservable. 
    more » « less
  2. Nanomaterials acquire a biomolecular corona upon introduction to biological media, leading to biological transformations such as changes in protein function, unmasking of epitopes, and protein fibrilization. Ex vivo studies to investigate the effect of nanoparticles on protein–protein interactions are typically performed in buffer and are rarely measured quantitatively in live cells. Here, we measure the differential effect of silica nanoparticles on protein association in vitro vs. in mammalian cells. BtubA and BtubB are a pair of bacterial tubulin proteins identified inProsthecobacterstrains that self-assemble like eukaryotic tubulin, first into dimers and then into microtubules in vitro or in vivo. Förster resonance energy transfer labeling of each of the Btub monomers with a donor (mEGFP) and acceptor (mRuby3) fluorescent protein provides a quantitative tool to measure their binding interactions in the presence of unfunctionalized silica nanoparticles in buffer and in cells using fluorescence spectroscopy and microscopy. We show that silica nanoparticles enhance BtubAB dimerization in buffer due to protein corona formation. However, these nanoparticles have little effect on bacterial tubulin self-assembly in the complex mammalian cellular environment. Thus, the effect of nanomaterials on protein–protein interactions may not be readily translated from the test tube to the cell in the absence of particle surface functionalization that can enable targeted protein–nanoparticle interactions to withstand competitive binding in the nanoparticle corona from other biomolecules. 
    more » « less
  3. The ubiquitin ligase CHIP catalyzes covalent attachment of ubiquitin to unfolded proteins chaperoned by the heat shock proteins Hsp70/Hsc70 and Hsp90. CHIP interacts with Hsp70/Hsc70 and Hsp90 by binding of a C-terminal IEEVD motif found in Hsp70/Hsc70 and Hsp90 to the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain of CHIP. Although recruitment of heat shock proteins to CHIP via interaction with the CHIP-TPR domain is well established, alterations in structure and dynamics of CHIP upon binding are not well understood. In particular, the absence of a structure for CHIP-TPR in the free form presents a significant limitation upon studies seeking to rationally design inhibitors that may disrupt interactions between CHIP and heat shock proteins. Here we report the 1H, 13C, and 15N backbone and side chain chemical shift assignments for CHIP-TPR in the free form, and backbone chemical shift assignments for CHIP-TPR in the IEEVD-bound form. The NMR resonance assignments will enable further studies examining the roles of dynamics and structure in regulating interactions between CHIP and the heat shock proteins Hsp70/Hsc70 and Hsp90. 
    more » « less
  4. When nanoparticles and nanoplastics enter biological fluids, their surfaces are rapidly coated with proteins, forming a corona that governs biological responses. However, understanding protein- surface interaction energetics remains a significant challenge. Here, we examine how protein charge distribution affects adsorption to polystyrene nanoparticles (PSNPs) by generating a series of lysine-to-alanine variants of the GB3 protein. Using isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we found that the K19A variant binds most strongly to both non-functionalized and carboxylate- functionalized PSNPs. ITC thermograms indicate that K19A forms a stable monolayer, while other variants exhibit multilayer adsorption. We hypothesize that removing lysine at position 19 creates a flatter, more neutral interaction surface that promotes efficient initial binding. Fluorescence denaturation experiments show that PSNPs destabilize GB3 protein variants, and binding correlates strongly with protein unfolding (r = 0.82, p < 0.01 for COOH-PSNPs and r = 0.76, p < 0.03 for non-functionalized PSNPs). These results reveal how protein stability and charge distribution shape adsorption thermodynamics, offering a framework for predicting protein-surface interactions. 
    more » « less
  5. Intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) are important components of protein functionality, with their charge distribution serving as a key factor in determining their roles. Notably, many proteins possess IDRs that are highly negatively charged, characterized by sequences rich in aspartate (D) or glutamate (E) residues. Bioinformatic analyses indicate that negatively charged low-complexity IDRs are significantly more common than their positively charged counterparts rich in arginine (R) or lysine (K). For instance, sequences of 10 or more consecutive negatively charged residues (D or E) are present in 268 human proteins. In contrast, corresponding sequences of 10 or more consecutive positively charged residues (K or R) are present in only 12 human proteins. Interestingly, about 50% of proteins containing D/E tracts function as DNA-binding or RNA-binding proteins. Negatively charged IDRs can electrostatically mimic nucleic acids and dynamically compete with them for the DNA-binding domains (DBDs) or RNA-binding domains (RBDs) that are positively charged. This leads to a phenomenon known as autoinhibition, in which the negatively charged IDRs inhibit binding to nucleic acids by occupying the binding interfaces within the proteins through intramolecular interactions. Rather than merely reducing binding activity, negatively charged IDRs offer significant advantages for the functions of DNA/RNA-binding proteins. The dynamic competition between negatively charged IDRs and nucleic acids can accelerate the target search processes for these proteins. When a protein encounters DNA or RNA, the electrostatic repulsion force between the nucleic acids and the negatively charged IDRs can trigger conformational changes that allow the nucleic acids to access DBDs or RBDs. Additionally, when proteins are trapped at high-affinity non-target sites on DNA or RNA ("decoys"), the electrostatic repulsion from the negatively charged IDRs can rescue the proteins from these traps. Negatively charged IDRs act as gatekeepers, rejecting nonspecific ligands while allowing the target to access the molecular interfaces of DBDs or RBDs, which increases binding specificity. These IDRs can also promote proper protein folding, facilitate chromatin remodeling by displacing other proteins bound to DNA, and influence phase separation, affecting local pH. The functions of negatively charged IDRs can be regulated through protein-protein interactions, post-translational modifications, and proteolytic processing. These characteristics can be harnessed as tools for protein engineering. Some frame-shift mutations that convert negatively charged IDRs into positively charged ones are linked to human diseases. Therefore, it is crucial to understand the physicochemical properties and functional roles of negatively charged IDRs that compete with nucleic acids. 
    more » « less