More Like this

1. Integrating Cyber Physical System Security Concepts in Computer System Security Curriculum

   https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEC57711.2023.10402293  

   Rathore, Heena (March 2023, IEEE)
2. Considering obsolescence in system design

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.05.085  

   Brock, Joshua M.; Payne, Elizabeth R.; Collopy, Paul D.; Brown, Owen C. (January 2019, Procedia Computer Science)
3. Irrigation in the Earth system

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-023-00438-5  

   McDermid, Sonali; Nocco, Mallika; Lawston-Parker, Patricia; Keune, Jessica; Pokhrel, Yadu; Jain, Meha; Jägermeyr, Jonas; Brocca, Luca; Massari, Christian; Jones, Andrew D.; et al (January 2023, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment)
4. Plastics in the Earth system

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb0354  

   Stubbins, Aron; Law, Kara Lavender; Muñoz, Samuel E.; Bianchi, Thomas S.; Zhu, Lixin (July 2021, Science)

   null (Ed.)

   Plastic contamination of the environment is a global problem whose magnitude justifies the consideration of plastics as emergent geomaterials with chemistries not previously seen in Earth’s history. At the elemental level, plastics are predominantly carbon. The comparison of plastic stocks and fluxes to those of carbon reveals that the quantities of plastics present in some ecosystems rival the quantity of natural organic carbon and suggests that geochemists should now consider plastics in their analyses. Acknowledging plastics as geomaterials and adopting geochemical insights and methods can expedite our understanding of plastics in the Earth system. Plastics also can be used as global-scale tracers to advance Earth system science. 

   more » « less
5. Empirical Evidence for Kahneman's System 1 and System 2 Thinking in Design

   Kannengiesser, U; Gero, John S (April 2019, Human Behavior in Design)

   This paper analyses design protocols of professional engineers and engineering students using the FBS schema, testing two hypotheses related to the use of system 1 and system 2 thinking. These two modes of thinking are characterised as: one that is fast and intuitive (system 1), and one that is slow and tedious (system 2). Their relevance for design thinking has already been shown conceptually. This paper provides empirical support for the existence of system 1 design thinking and system 2 design thinking. 

   more » « less