<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Inducible expression of &lt;scp&gt;DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE&lt;/scp&gt; 1 enhances triacylglycerol accumulation and lipid droplet formation in vegetative tissues</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>Wiley and SEB</publisher>
				<date>03/01/2025</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10651763</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1111/tpj.70088</idno>
					<title level='j'>The Plant Journal</title>
<idno>0960-7412</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">121</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>					

					<author>Athen N Kimberlin</author><author>Sakil Mahmud</author><author>Rebekah E Holtsclaw</author><author>Alexie Walker</author><author>Kristyn Conrad</author><author>Stewart A Morley</author><author>Ruth Welti</author><author>Doug K Allen</author><author>Abraham J Koo</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[<title>SUMMARY</title> <p>Bioengineering efforts to increase oil in non‐storage vegetative tissues, which constitute the majority of plant biomass, are promising sustainable sources of renewable fuels and feedstocks. While plants typically do not accumulate significant amounts of triacylglycerol (TAG) in vegetative tissues, we report here that the expression of a plastid‐localized phospholipase A1 protein, DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE1 (DAD1), led to a substantial increase in leaf TAG in Arabidopsis. Using an inducible system to control DAD1 expression circumvented growth penalties associated with overexpressing DAD1 and resulted in a rapid burst of TAG within several hours. The increase of TAG was accompanied by the formation of oil bodies in the leaves, petioles, and stems, but not in the roots. Lipid analysis indicated that the increase in TAG was negatively correlated with plastidial galactolipid concentration. The fatty acid (FA) composition of TAG predominantly consisted of 18:3. Expression of DAD1 in the<italic>fad3fad7fad8</italic>mutant, devoid of 18:3, resulted in comparable TAG accumulation with 18:2 as the major FA constituent, reflecting the flexible<italic>in vivo</italic>substrate use of DAD1. The transient expression of either Arabidopsis DAD1 or<italic>Nicotiana benthamiana</italic>DAD1 (NbDAD1) in<italic>N. benthamiana</italic>leaves stimulated the accumulation of TAG. Similarly, transgenic soybeans expressing Arabidopsis DAD1 exhibited an accumulation of TAG in the leaves, showcasing the biotechnological potential of this technology. In summary, inducible expression of a plastidial lipase resulted in enhanced oil production in vegetative tissues, extending our understanding of lipid remodeling mediated by DAD1 and offering a valuable tool for metabolic engineering.</p>]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>INTRODUCTION</head><p>Escalating concerns about environmental sustainability and the depletion of fossil fuels have resulted in a renewed interest in vegetable oil-based alternatives to petroleum fuel <ref type="bibr">(Ortiz et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Singh et al., 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2019)</ref>. One approach is to bolster oil production in vegetative tissues of plants; however, oils are not typically found at high levels in leaves and stems <ref type="bibr">(Durrett et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Xu and Shanklin, 2016)</ref>. In addition to increasing the potential for overall higher oil production, the use of vegetative tissues to store oil can diversify the range of plant species functioning as bioenergy crops, alleviating concerns about competition for resources dedicated to food production <ref type="bibr">(Dyer et al., 2008)</ref>. The increased energy density and improved quality, including a healthier fatty acid (FA) profile, in vegetative tissues that are desirable for fodder and silage crops can directly impact both animal health and the quality of meat and dairy products <ref type="bibr">(Knothe, 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Winichayakul et al., 2013)</ref>.</p><p>To achieve this goal, plant metabolic engineering efforts have focused on manipulating genes involved in the carbon partitioning and production of lipids. Examples include manipulating single genes or combinations of multiple genes encoding transcription factors <ref type="bibr">(Baud et al., 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kim et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sanjaya et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhai et al., 2017)</ref>, enzymes that partition carbon to pyruvate for FAs <ref type="bibr">(Morley et al., 2023)</ref>, proteins catalyzing the committed steps for FA biosynthesis <ref type="bibr">(Liu et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Salie et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ye et al., 2020)</ref>, proteins involved in triacylglycerol (TAG) assembly <ref type="bibr">(Cao et al., 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fan et al., 2013b;</ref><ref type="bibr">Luo et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Singer et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2018)</ref>, packaging into lipid droplets (LDs) <ref type="bibr">(Cai et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cai et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gidda et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ischebeck et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pyc et al., 2021)</ref>, as reviewed elsewhere <ref type="bibr">(Metzger and Bornscheuer, 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ortiz et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Singh et al., 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Xu and Shanklin, 2016)</ref>. Additionally, carbon from starch was redirected to oil biosynthesis or TAG lipases or peroxisomal enzymes were targeted to block lipid turnover, to further enhance oil accumulation in vegetative tissues <ref type="bibr">(Azeez et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Aznar-Moreno et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Eastmond, 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kelly et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sanjaya et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Slocombe et al., 2009;</ref><ref type="bibr">Xu et al., 2019)</ref>.</p><p>Despite the success thus far, the capacity for much greater levels of storage oil may be possible as evidenced by changes in TAG concentration during stresses, such as elevated temperature, freezing, nitrogen deprivation, drought, exposure to ozone, wounding, or pathogen infection <ref type="bibr">(Coulon et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">El Hafid et al., 1998;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lewandowska et al., 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lippold et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Moellering et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Mueller et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Narayanan et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pant et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sakaki et al., 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">Schieferle et al., 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shimada and Hara-Nishimura, 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vu et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yang and Benning, 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2018)</ref>. Additionally, senescence can promote TAG accumulation <ref type="bibr">(Coulon et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kaup et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lu et al., 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Troncoso-Ponce et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Watanabe et al., 2013)</ref>, highlighting the plasticity of lipid production in vegetative cells.</p><p>However, these effects are transient, as TAG molecules can be quickly removed by &#946;-oxidation or converted into other metabolites <ref type="bibr">(James et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Theodoulou and Eastmond, 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tjellstrom et al., 2015)</ref>. Further, vegetative tissues with significant storage oil accumulation can exhibit reduced plant growth <ref type="bibr">(Kelly et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kim et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sanjaya et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Xu et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhai et al., 2021)</ref>, suggesting the oil production may be a costly process. In some instances, particularly in tobacco, the plants are comparable or only slightly smaller in size <ref type="bibr">(Chu et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhou et al., 2020)</ref>; thus, the underlying physiology that results in altered plant size when lipid levels increase remains enigmatic. Perhaps there is selection pressure against storing high-energy nutrients in vegetative tissues, considering the heightened vulnerability to insect pests in plants with elevated oil content <ref type="bibr">(Sanjaya et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2018)</ref>. Alternatively, the costs associated with intensive lipid production compared to other forms of biomass may be significant enough to hinder plant growth.</p><p>The fatty acyl building blocks used for TAG assembly in non-storage organs during stress responses are likely derived from membrane lipids hydrolyzed by lipases <ref type="bibr">(Higashi et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lippold et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pant et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sakaki et al., 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shimada and Hara-Nishimura, 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Troncoso-Ponce et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vu et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yu et al., 2021)</ref> or through reverse reactions of acyltransferases <ref type="bibr">(Tjellstrom et al., 2015)</ref>. Phospholipases, a major class of lipid hydrolases, can cleave fatty acyl groups from various glycerol lipid substrates that constitute most cell membranes. Several class A phospholipases (PLAs) have been implicated in membrane remodeling under various stress conditions (reviewed in <ref type="bibr">(Ali et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chen et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kelly and Feussner, 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Laxalt and Munnik, 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yu et al., 2021)</ref>, and some have been shown to be involved in TAG accumulation <ref type="bibr">(Wang et al., 2017)</ref>. PLASTID LIPASE1 (PLIP1) in Arabidopsis hydrolyzes fatty acyl group from phosphatidylglycerol (PG) from chloroplast thylakoids and contributes to oil accumulation during seed development <ref type="bibr">(Aulakh and Durrett, 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2017)</ref> and galactolipases (e.g., PGD1) can release fatty acyl groups from monogalactosyldiacylglycerol (MGDG) for TAG synthesis as noted for nitrogen starved green algae <ref type="bibr">(Li et al., 2012)</ref>. A portion of FAs hydrolyzed from membrane lipids is converted to oxylipins including jasmonates <ref type="bibr">(Kallenbach et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>, which are an important class of phytohormones that protect plants against diverse abiotic and biotic stresses <ref type="bibr">(Howe et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo, 2018)</ref>. In Arabidopsis, seven PLA1s with predicted plastid transit peptides have been identified: DEFECTIVE IN ANTHER DEHISCENCE1 (AtDAD1; At2g44810), DONGLE (DGL; At1g05800), PLA1-I&#945;2 (At2g31690), PLA1-I&#946;2 (At4g16820), PLA1-I&#947;1 (At1g06800), PLA1-I&#947;2 (At2g30550), and PLA1-I&#947;3 (At1g51440) <ref type="bibr">(Rudus et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ryu, 2004)</ref>. Several of these plastidial PLA1s including AtDAD1, contribute redundantly to oxylipin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis <ref type="bibr">(Ellinger et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hyun et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ishiguro et al., 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Morin et al., 2023)</ref>. Additionally, two abscisic acid (ABA)-responsive paralogs of the above-mentioned PLIP1 have been reported to contribute to oxylipin biosynthesis <ref type="bibr">(Wang et al., 2018)</ref>. The HEAT INDUCIBLE LIPASE1 when knocked out reduced heat-induced TAG accumulation in Arabidopsis leaves at the expense of MGDG <ref type="bibr">(Higashi et al., 2018)</ref>. Both PLIP1 and HIL1 are distinct from the seven DAD1-like plastidial PLA1s. While involvement of lipid hydrolysis in TAG biosynthesis in leaves is evident, there have been no concerted efforts to alter leaf oil by manipulating plastidial PLA1s.</p><p>In this study, we report oil accumulation in vegetative tissues by expression of a plastidial PLA1 (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>). A chemical-inducible expression system was employed to overcome the growth inhibitory complications associated with constitutively expressing PLA1s <ref type="bibr">(Ishiguro et al., 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kimberlin et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2017)</ref>. The resulting plants exhibited conditional accumulation of a substantial amount of TAG in the vegetative tissues in response to the exogenous application of a chemical inducer. The TAG predominantly consisted of 18:3, accompanied by a concomitant decrease in MGDG and digalactosyldiacylglycerol (DGDG).</p><p>Heterologous expression in Nicotiana benthamiana and Glycine max resulted in similar increases in leaf TAGs. We discuss how this unique approach can be leveraged and integrated with existing strategies to advance efforts in developing biofuel crops.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>RESULTS</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Transient expression of AtDAD1 under an inducible promoter leads to TAG accumulation in leaves</head><p>We previously reported on the generation of transgenic lines (Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc) carrying a dexamethasone (dex)-inducible construct expressing AtDAD1-Myc and characterization of jasmonic acid (JA) metabolism <ref type="bibr">(Holtsclaw et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. Based on those studies, we hypothesized that the ectopic expression of AtDAD1 would hydrolyze membrane glycerolipids within plastids, liberating free fatty acids (FAs) like &#945;-LA, which would then be metabolized via pathways beyond the JA biosynthetic route to produce TAG (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>).</p><p>Consistent with previous findings, AtDAD1-Myc did not express in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants in the absence of exogenously applied dex, a compound not biosynthesized in planta. This was confirmed through mRNA transcript analysis and protein immunoblot using commercial Myc antibodies to detect recombinant AtDAD1-Myc (Figure <ref type="figure">S1a</ref> and <ref type="figure">b</ref>). Upon an application of dex, there was distinct induction of both AtDAD1-Myc transcripts and proteins within 12 h (Figure <ref type="figure">S1a</ref> and <ref type="figure">b</ref>). Earlier induction of both transcripts and proteins was reported within 4 h <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. Lipid analysis was conducted on leaf samples collected from Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants at 0, 4, 8 and 12 h after dex treatment, and those were compared with lipids extracted from control WT plants similarly treated with dex for 12 h. TLC plate separation of the total lipid extract, utilizing a hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid (80/20/1, v/v/v) solvent system, revealed time-dependent appearance of TAG bands in the dex-treated Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc samples (Figure <ref type="figure">S1c</ref>). No clear TAG band could be detected from the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc samples prior to the dex treatment (0 h) similar to the WT control.</p><p>Quantitative analysis by GC-FID of leaf TAGs ranged from 300 &#181;g/gFW at 4 h to 400-500 &#181;g/gFW at 8 h and 12 h post dex treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">1b</ref>). No statistically significant changes were observed in total leaf lipid contents (converted to FA methyl ester (FAME)) of dex-induced Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc compared to WT over time (Figure <ref type="figure">1c</ref>), indicating no net gain or loss in overall acyl lipid quantity. In order to verify that the TAG increase in the leaves of Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc was dependent on the activity of AtDAD1, a transgenic line expressing a mutated variant of AtDAD1 was examined (Pdex:AtDAD1 mut -Myc) (Figure <ref type="figure">1d</ref> and <ref type="figure">e</ref>). The mutant construct housed in this line had the AtDAD1 with highly conserved GXSXG motif that included catalytic Ser 295 residue replaced with five alanine residues controlled by the same dexinducible expression system <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. Lipid analysis of Pdex:AtDAD1 mut -Myc exhibited no noticeable increase in TAG following dex treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">1d</ref> and <ref type="figure">e</ref>). This indicated that the rise of TAG within the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc lines is contingent upon the catalytic activity of the functional AtDAD1 enzyme.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Lipid droplets form in the leaves and stems of dex-induced Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc</head><p>Where does the accumulated TAGs localize within the cellular context? Previous studies have shown the leaf tissue's potential to amass lipid droplets (LD) <ref type="bibr">(Bouchnak et al., 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pyc et al., 2017a)</ref>, typically found in oil-rich tissues such as seeds. When stained with BODIPY and examined using a laser scanning confocal microscope, punctate structures that are typical for LDs (green in the image), much smaller than chloroplasts (red), emerged in dex-treated (8 h) Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">2a</ref>). A secondary oil staining approach with Nile Red further confirmed the oil-filled nature of these organelles (Figure <ref type="figure">2a</ref>). Notably, LDs were absent in mock-treated (0.01% Triton X-100 in water) Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc lines or dex-treated WT leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">2a</ref>). As time progressed (12 h post dex treatment) the presence of LDs intensified in the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc lines (Figure <ref type="figure">2a</ref>). To investigate LD formation in tissues other than leaves, lipid staining was carried out in petiole, stem, and root tissues. Similar to the leaf tissue, LDs formed in dex-treated (12 h) petiole and stem tissues of Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc, in contrast to WT, which did not display any perceivable LD stain (Figure <ref type="figure">2b</ref>). Interestingly, LDs failed to form in the roots (Figure <ref type="figure">2b</ref>), even though the control root tissues that had been fed with exogenous &#945;-LA, displayed lipid stains (Figure <ref type="figure">2b</ref>), consistent with the root's capacity to accumulate LDs <ref type="bibr">(Kelly et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pyc et al., 2017a;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pyc et al., 2017b)</ref>. These findings align with previously reported transgenic lines with increased oil content showing LD formation in vegetative tissues <ref type="bibr">(Cai et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chu et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gidda et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Winichayakul et al., 2013)</ref>. The reasons for the limited accumulation of TAG in the roots of Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc are unclear, but it could likely be due to the lack of extensive internal membrane system (thylakoids) in root plastids <ref type="bibr">(Xue et al., 1997)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants can be induced to accumulate leaf TAGs at various developmental stages</head><p>Undesirable agronomic traits like stunted growth, diminished yield, or heightened insect herbivory <ref type="bibr">(Sanjaya et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhai et al., 2021)</ref>, may be avoided if oil accumulation can be transiently induced at specific, desired times. The dex-inducible system is under tight regulation, resulting in minimal, if any, leakage of transgene expression (Figure <ref type="figure">S1</ref>) <ref type="bibr">(Koo et al., 2009)</ref>. Consequently, Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants prior to dex induction exhibited normal growth, similar to WT plants (Figure <ref type="figure">3a</ref> and <ref type="figure">b</ref>). Meanwhile, both AtDAD1-Myc transcripts and proteins were induced to comparable levels by dex at various developmental stages (Figure <ref type="figure">3c</ref> and <ref type="figure">d</ref>). These observations underscore the effective functionality of the inducible vector system across most developmental stages of rosette leaves. Qualitative assessment of oil accumulation in these samples revealed that, except for 8-d-old plants, TAG was detectable at similar levels in samples from the five remaining developmental stages (11-26 d) (Figure <ref type="figure">3e</ref>). Although the sample from 8-d-old plant in the TLC image (Figure <ref type="figure">3e</ref>) appears to be slightly underloaded, the absence of the TAG band was evident. Given that this sample exhibited equivalent levels of AtDAD1-Myc transcripts and proteins as other plant age samples (Figures <ref type="figure">3c</ref> and <ref type="figure">d</ref>), the lack of TAG was surprising. However, this observation aligns with a previous report where the induced AtDAD1 proteins were also unable to trigger JA accumulation early in development (&lt; 10-d-old) <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Leaf TAG formation primarily occurs at the expense of MGDG and DGDG</head><p>Although classified as a phospholipase, some PLA1s exhibit additional substrate specificity for galactolipids <ref type="bibr">(Hyun et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ishiguro et al., 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kallenbach et al., 2010)</ref>. Considering AtDAD1's localization in the plastids <ref type="bibr">(Ishiguro et al., 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Padham et al., 2007)</ref> and the prevalence of MGDG and DGDG (constituting &gt; 60% of leaf lipids and &gt; 75% of plastid lipids) <ref type="bibr">(Browse and Somerville, 1994;</ref><ref type="bibr">Welti et al., 2002)</ref>, these galactolipids are expected to be the primary substrates for AtDAD1. In line with this prediction, a noticeable reduction in MGDG and DGDG levels was observed upon dex treatment in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">4a</ref>).</p><p>The decline in MGDG was particularly pronounced 12 h post dex-induction, as indicated by GC analysis (Figure <ref type="figure">4b</ref>). However, the reduction in individual MGDG lipid species was more evident even at earlier time points (4 h and 8 h), in a separate set of samples analyzed by lipidomics (Figure <ref type="figure">4d</ref>). Statistically significant decreases (P &lt; 0.05) in DGDG were also observed at 4 and 8 h post dex treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">4e</ref>). The combined levels of MGDG and DGDG were reduced by 200-250 &#181;g/gFW compared to either WT or untreated Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants.</p><p>Among the MGDG species, three major variants-MGDG (34:6), MGDG (36:6), and MGDG (34:5)-exhibited substantial decreases in their levels over time following dex treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">4d</ref>) (Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>). These lipid species all contained 18:3 FA (although MGDG (34:5) likely contained some 18:2-16:3)). Similarly, levels of all major species of DGDG lipids-DGDG (36:6), DGDG (34:3), and DGDG (34:6)-with 18:3 fatty acyl groups were reduced following dex treatment. In contrast, changes in phospholipids such as PC, PG, PE, PS, PI, and PA were more subtle, with no overt shifts detected in overall levels (Figure <ref type="figure">S2</ref>). Nonetheless, individual PC species exhibited more complex patterns: some species (PC (36:6), PC (34:3), PC (34:4)) increased, while others (PC (36:4), PC (36:3), PC (36:2), PC (34:2), PC (34:1)) decreased, and certain species remained unchanged (PC (36:5)) (Figure <ref type="figure">S3a</ref>). Additionally, there was an increase in LysoPC containing 18:3 and 18:2 FAs (Figure <ref type="figure">S3b</ref>). The fluctuations in PC could reflect the transition of FAs that have been released from the plastid through PC intermediates as part of the PC-acyl editing cycle <ref type="bibr">(Allen, 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bates, 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tjellstr&#246;m et al., 2012)</ref> on their paths to being incorporated into TAG (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>). Notably, a reduction in one PG species (34:4) was also observed (Figure <ref type="figure">S3c</ref>). The change in PG suggests that the action of AtDAD1 may not be solely limited to MGDG and DGDG.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Leaf TAG in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc mainly consists of unsaturated 18-carbon FAs</head><p>Next, we analyzed the FA composition of leaf TAG in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc. WT and uninduced Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants accumulated less than 10 &#181;g/gFW TAG (Figure <ref type="figure">5a</ref>), and the small amount they did accumulate primarily consisted of saturated 16 and 18-carbon FAs. However, 50-60% of TAGs from dex-induced Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc consisted of 18:3 (Figure <ref type="figure">5a</ref> and <ref type="figure">b</ref>). The remaining 50% contained 18:2, 16:0, 18:0, 16:3, and 18:1 in decreasing order of relative abundance. This FA profile remained consistent over time, except for 16:3 and 18:1, which showed opposite trends of decreasing and increasing, with their relative abundance ultimately reversing by 12 h post-dex treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">5a</ref>). These FA profiles stand in stark contrast to Arabidopsis seed oil, which mainly consists of 18:2 (30%), followed by 20:1 and 18:3, each accounting for about 20% <ref type="bibr">(Browse and Somerville, 1994;</ref><ref type="bibr">Li et al., 2006)</ref>. The predominance of 18:3 in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc TAG reflects that in MGDG and DGDG (Figure <ref type="figure">5b</ref>). The main difference between TAG and galactolipid FA profile lies in the relatively high 18:2 content (20-25%) in TAG, compared to larger 16:3 content (25-30%) in MGDG (Figure <ref type="figure">5b</ref>). The exclusion of 16:3 in leaf TAG is likely due to the predominant occurrence of 16:3 in the sn-2 position of MGDG <ref type="bibr">(Miquel and Browse, 1992)</ref> and AtDAD1 being a PLA1 enzyme.</p><p>Lipidomic analysis of Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaf tissues revealed acyl species in TAG (Figure <ref type="figure">5c</ref>) (Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>). Consistent with prior results, very little TAG was present in WT or uninduced (0 h) Pdex:AtDAD-Myc plants; however, leaf samples collected after 4 h and 8 h of dex treatment contained several TAG species (Figure <ref type="figure">5c</ref>). The two most abundant species were TAG (54:8) and TAG (54:9), consisting of TAG (18:2_18:3_18:3) and TAG (18:3_18:3_18:3), respectively.</p><p>The next four most abundant TAG species all contained 18:3. The unsaturation index also increased in TAG and the extraplastidial phospholipids PC and PI (and PA), while it decreased in the plastidial glycerolipids MGDG, DGDG and PG (Figure <ref type="figure">S4</ref>). These FA profiles in TAGs and double bond contents in lipids reflect the expected outcomes of plastidial PLA1 hydrolyzing glycerolipids, particularly, MGDG and DGDG, releasing unsaturated 18-carbon FAs, ultimately culminating in highly unsaturated TAG molecules within the leaves.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc can promote TAG accumulation in fad3fad7fad8 mutant</head><p>The sterility phenotype of dad1 mutant plants, attributed to the absence of the plant hormone JA, is caused by the defect in the release of 18:3, serving as the precursor for JA biosynthesis <ref type="bibr">(Ishiguro et al., 2001)</ref>. This coupled with the FA composition analysis results, showing the predominance of 18:3 in the leaf TAG of Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc (Figure <ref type="figure">5</ref>), suggest that the main substrate of AtDAD1 enzyme is 18:3-containing galactolipids. To further probe the in vivo specificity of the AtDAD1 enzyme for 18:3-containing lipids, we introduced Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc into the FA desaturase triple mutant, fad3fad7fad8, which lacks 18:3 (McConn and <ref type="bibr">Browse, 1996)</ref>. Similar to the results observed in the WT background, dex-treated Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc in fad3fad7fad8 background exhibited TAG accumulation in leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">S5</ref>). Notably, there was no significant difference in the total leaf TAG levels between these two genetic backgrounds (Figure <ref type="figure">S5a</ref>). However, lipidomic analysis revealed a major shift in acyl compositions within TAGs. TAGs containing 18:3 were almost completely absent, while TAGs containing 18:2, such as TAG (18:2_18:2_18:2) and TAG (18:2_18:2_18:1), accumulated in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc / fad3fad7fad8 (Figure <ref type="figure">S5b</ref>). Additionally, there was a higher abundance of TAGs containing 18:1 and 18:0 in the fad3fad7fad8 background compared to the WT background (Figure <ref type="figure">S5b</ref>). These findings indicate that even in the absence of 18:3, the AtDAD1 enzyme retains an ability to hydrolyze 18 carbon FA with varying levels of saturation from glycerolipids in leaves.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Wounding enhances TAG accumulation in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc</head><p>Our previous research on the role of AtDAD1 in JA biosynthesis revealed that co-treatment with wounding and dex significantly enhances JA production in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants compared to either of the single treatments. The evidence suggests the activation of AtDAD1 activity through a post-transcriptional mechanism triggered by wounding, resulting in increased JA production <ref type="bibr">(Holtsclaw et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. Given that AtDAD1 generates precursors for both JA and TAG, we hypothesized that wounding might also enhance TAG accumulation in dex-induced Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants.</p><p>Leaves that had been pretreated with dex for 8 h were subsequently wounded for 8 h.</p><p>Wounding alone did not cause a significant increase in TAG compared to the no-wounding control (Figure <ref type="figure">S6</ref>) under our condition, somewhat different from earlier reports that found increases <ref type="bibr">(Lewandowska et al., 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vu et al., 2014)</ref>. Treatments with dex increased TAG to about 500 &#181;g/gFW (Figure <ref type="figure">S6</ref>) in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc as observed earlier (Figure <ref type="figure">1</ref>). However, co-treatment with both dex and wounding increased TAG levels to a higher level (750 &#181;g/gFW). This is consistent with observations made for JA biosynthesis <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>, although the magnitude of TAG increase by the 'dex+wound' co-treatment was smaller than that was observed for JA.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Transient expression of AtDAD1 and NbDAD1 promoted TAG accumulation in N. benthamiana leaves</head><p>With the long-term goal of developing crops with high biomass oil content, we conducted experiments to assess whether Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc can induce TAG accumulation in other plant species. We selected N. benthamiana as a suitable laboratory system for quick testing and evaluation of the effects of transient gene expression. Previous successes in producing oil in tobacco leaves have been reported <ref type="bibr">(Cai et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chu et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gidda et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhou et al., 2020)</ref>. In addition to the AtDAD1 gene from Arabidopsis, we also tested a homolog to AtDAD1 found in N. benthamiana. A BLAST query of Sol Genomics Network (genome release, v1.0.1) using the full-length Arabidopsis AtDAD1 amino acid sequence identified four sequences with sequence identities above 60% (Niben101Scf04104g03001.1, Niben101Scf05795g00005.1, Niben101Scf02400g02012.1, Niben101Scf02386g01005.1) <ref type="bibr">(Holtsclaw et al., 2024)</ref>. From these, Niben101Scf02386g01005.1 was selected, which was predicted to be localized in the plastids by TargetP2.0 <ref type="bibr">(Almagro Armenteros et al., 2019)</ref>, and designated it as NbDAD1.</p><p>The full-length NbDAD1 gene was cloned into the dex-inducible vector system (Pdex:NbDAD1), and Agrobacteria carrying Pdex:NbDAD1 were syringe-infiltrated into 4week-old N. benthamiana leaves. Agrobacteria carrying an empty vector or the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc construct were also infiltrated. After 2 days, the infiltrated leaves were sprayed with a 30 &#181;M dex solution and incubated for another 6 h before collecting tissue samples for RNA and oil analyses. The reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis showed clear induction of NbDAD1 and AtDAD1 transcripts in leaves infiltrated with either constructs, compared to EV infiltrated leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">6a</ref>). AtDAD1 primers cross-reacted with NbDAD1 in Pdex:NbDAD1 infiltrated samples. This is presumably due to the high expression level of NbDAD1 in those samples because the non-specific amplification was not observed in the EV control (Figure <ref type="figure">6a</ref>).</p><p>The TLC stain of the oil samples revealed a clear induction of TAG bands in leaves infiltrated with either Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc or Pdex:NbDAD1, compared to EV control (Figure <ref type="figure">6b</ref>). These results were reproducible in four biological repetitions of each construct. The leaf TAG amounts of 200-450 &#181;g/gFW (Figure <ref type="figure">6c</ref>) in the leaves expressing either constructs were comparable to those observed in Arabidopsis Pdex:DAD1-Myc leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">1b</ref>). Similar to Arabidopsis (Figure <ref type="figure">4</ref>), a visible reduction of galactolipids (especially DGDG) was observed in N. benthamiana leaves expressing Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc compared with EV-infiltrated leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">S7</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Development of transgenic soybeans with increased biomass oil</head><p>After obtaining positive results supporting the potential to use inducible PLA1s for engineering biomass oil lines in Arabidopsis and N. benthamiana, we transformed soybean (Glycine max).</p><p>Fourteen independent transgenic events introducing the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc construct were identified, showing both basta resistance and PCR-amplification of the transgene (Figure <ref type="figure">S8a</ref>). In the absence of exogenous dex treatment, the oil extracts from leaves of all fourteen lines contained low background level of TAG similar to that in WT (Figure <ref type="figure">S8b</ref> upper panel); however, upon dex treatment (12 h), several lines exhibited notable TAG accumulation (Figure <ref type="figure">S8b</ref> lower panel). Among the eight lines (indicated by arrows in the figure) that displayed visibly increased TAG compared to WT controls, one line (L7) was selected for quantitative analyses in the subsequent T2 generation. RT-qPCR showed 30-fold increase of AtDAD1-Myc transcript in dex-induced 3-wk-old L7 leaves compared to WT (Figure <ref type="figure">7a</ref>). Increases in the transcript expression correlated with increased leaf TAG (~500 &#181;g/gFW, equivalent to ~4 mg/g dry weight or 0.4% of leaf dry weight) (Figure <ref type="figure">7b</ref>). The induction of TAG was also observable in older plants (6-wk-old) (Figure <ref type="figure">S9a</ref>) at the expense of galactolipids (Figure <ref type="figure">S9b</ref>), similar to Arabidopsis (Figures <ref type="figure">3</ref> and <ref type="figure">4</ref>). Collectively, these results provide proof-of-concept for the biotechnological potential of using DAD1 and DAD1-like genes to engineer crops to produce oil in leaves.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>DISCUSSION</head><p>Conditional activation of plastid-localized DAD1 resulted in accumulation of TAG in leaves.</p><p>Unlike seed TAG, the leaf TAG in the dex-induced Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaves featured a FA profile resembling that of leaf membrane lipids (Figure <ref type="figure">5</ref>). A pathway model was drawn based on our observations and currently known metabolic pathways for TAG biosynthesis (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>).</p><p>Galactolipids, especially the MGDG, are expected to be the major source providing FA building blocks for TAG assembly in the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaves. This is because although AtDAD1 is classified as a phospholipase, galactolipids such as MGDG are likely its main substrate. This is conclusion is based on the predominance of galactolipids in the chloroplasts where AtDAD1 is localized, as well as reported substrate preferences for AtDAD1 <ref type="bibr">(Ishiguro et al., 2001)</ref> and other plastidial PLA1s <ref type="bibr">(Hyun et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kallenbach et al., 2010)</ref>. Supporting this prediction, the increase in TAG was accompanied by concomitant decreases in MGDG and DGDG (Figure <ref type="figure">4</ref>) while displaying no clear changes to most of phospholipid levels (Figure <ref type="figure">S2</ref>). A similar preference for MGDG was reported for an ABA-responsive plastidial lipase PLIP2 and a heatinducible lipase <ref type="bibr">(Higashi et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2018)</ref>. In addition, MGDG is also the most abundant reservoir for 18:3 FAs which were found to be the most abundant FA component comprising the TAGs in the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaves (Figure <ref type="figure">5</ref>). However, with reference to the substrate preferences among different saturation levels of 18-carbon FAs, the results from Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc / fad3fad7fad8 plants (Figure <ref type="figure">S5b</ref>) <ref type="bibr">(McConn and Browse, 1996;</ref><ref type="bibr">Miquel and Browse, 1992)</ref> suggested that AtDAD1 can accept 18-carbon FA in the sn1 position other than 18:3. Lack of 18:3 in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc / fad3fad7fad8 did not reduce overall TAG levels but instead caused compensatory increases of TAG species with 18:2, 18:0 and 18:1 (Figure <ref type="figure">S5</ref>), indicating that changes in saturation levels did not decrease AtDAD1 activity for lipid substrates containing these FAs. AtDAD1's broad substrate specificity for lipid substrates with varying saturation levels could be beneficial in engineering efforts aimed at tailoring FA composition for different functionalities.</p><p>Upon hydrolysis from MGDG, 18:3 is expected to be exported from the chloroplast likely through a similar mechanism as the FAs synthesized de novo involving FATTY ACID EXPORT (FAX) proteins (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>) <ref type="bibr">(Koo et al., 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Li et al., 2015)</ref>. Subsequently, upon activation by acyl activation enzymes <ref type="bibr">(Koo et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhao et al., 2019)</ref>, the 18:3 will be added to the acyl-CoA pool. These acyl-CoAs can then enter the TAG assembly pipeline either via the Kennedy Pathway, where they sequentially combine with glycerol-3-phosphate molecules, or through the Lands Cycle, where acyl-CoAs are joined to PC before incorporation into TAG <ref type="bibr">(Bates et al., 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Haslam et al., 2016)</ref>. Nascent 18:1 leaving the plastid is first channeled into PC by the lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) acyltransferase (LPCAT) enzymes for acyl editing <ref type="bibr">(Bates et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Karki et al., 2019)</ref>. The 18:2 and 18 :3-CoA produced through acyl editing are then utilized for glycerolipid assembly including PC which ultimately provides the DAG backbone for TAG. Although there were no net changes in the overall PC levels (Figure <ref type="figure">S2</ref>), fluctuations in several PC species with different acyl compositions have been observed in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc, indicative of an active acyl editing through PC (Figure <ref type="figure">S3</ref>). Next, two key enzymes, DIACYLGLYCEROL ACYLTRANSFERASE1 (DGAT1) and PHOSPHOLIPID:DIACYLGLYCEROL ACYLTRANSFERASE1 (PDAT1), were shown to play major roles in the final steps of TAG assembly in leaves <ref type="bibr">(Fan et al., 2013a;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tjellstrom et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2017)</ref>. The relative contribution of the two pathways in incorporating the AtDAD1-derived 18:3-CoA from plastid for TAG synthesis in the leaves of Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc is unknown; however, there is some evidence supporting concerted action of another plastidial lipase, PLIP1 and PDAT1 in Arabidopsis seeds <ref type="bibr">(Aulakh and Durrett, 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2017)</ref>.</p><p>Additionally, the FA profile of leaf TAGs in PDAT1-overexpressing plants exhibited some resemblance to that of Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc, with 18:3, 18:2, and 16:0 being the three dominant FAs, supportive of the contribution through PDAT1 <ref type="bibr">(Fan et al., 2013a)</ref>. In contrast, DGAT1overexpression resulted in an increase in 18:1 and a reduction in 18:3 in TAG <ref type="bibr">(Andrianov et al., 2010)</ref>. Interestingly, transcripts of both DGAT1 and PDAT1 increased in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaves 12 h after dex treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">S10</ref>). This upregulation may reflect positive feedback regulation of these genes at the transcript level rather than serving as a prerequisite for TAG synthesis, as TAG accumulation begins earlier at 4 h and 8 h post dex treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">1b</ref>, Figure <ref type="figure">S1c</ref>). Meanwhile, this may suggest that the DGAT1 and/or PDAT1 activity might be limiting and that their co-expression with AtDAD1 in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc could further enhance TAG accumulation. Ultimately, radiolabel pulse-chasing experiments <ref type="bibr">(Johnson et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">Parchuri et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhou et al., 2020)</ref> could provide detailed insights into the metabolic route of fatty acids from the chloroplast membrane to TAG in the cytosol.</p><p>A second metabolic fate of the 18:3 released by AtDAD1 in the plastid is octadecanoid pathway to synthesize oxylipins (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>) <ref type="bibr">(Farmer and Ryan, 1992;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo, 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wasternack and Hause, 2013)</ref>. This pathway has been shown to be primarily regulated at the level of substrate availability, namely by the provision of 18:3 <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo and Howe, 2009;</ref><ref type="bibr">Miersch and Wasternack, 2000;</ref><ref type="bibr">Scholz et al., 2015)</ref>. Consistently, the induction of AtDAD1 in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc by dex treatment led to accumulation of JA, its intermediary precursor 12oxophytodienoic acid, and its downstream metabolites <ref type="bibr">(Holtsclaw et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. JA derivatives, particularly, its amino acid conjugate, jasmonoyl-isoleucine, serves as a hormonal signal for many stress responses and normal plant developmental processes such as fertility, making its synthesis essential for plant survival <ref type="bibr">(Howe et al., 2018)</ref>. However, the production of JA can also lead to plant growth inhibition <ref type="bibr">(Poudel et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Staswick et al., 1992;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhang and Turner, 2008)</ref>. AtDAD1 expressed under a JA-responsive promoter resulted in severe growth retardation <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. Similar growth inhibitory effects were observed by the constitutive expression of AtDAD1 or PLIP2, another plastid-localized lipase involved in abscisic acid-induced JA biosynthesis <ref type="bibr">(Ishiguro et al., 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang et al., 2018)</ref>.</p><p>Apart from the growth retardation through JA signaling, constitutive accumulation of leaf TAG could itself cause negative effects on growth <ref type="bibr">(Fan et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2019)</ref>. In addition, plants with higher leaf TAG content were found to support greater insect growth <ref type="bibr">(Sanjaya et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2018)</ref>, potentially posing problems for the mass cultivation of high biomass oil lines in the field. However, these problems could possibly be mitigated by the inducible expression of AtDAD1, as Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc plants can be grown normally (Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref>) until a desirable age when TAG accumulation can be induced. The production of lipid-derived defense signals such as JA by DAD1 may also enhance plant resistance against insects <ref type="bibr">(Howe et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo, 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo and Howe, 2009)</ref>, although this remains to be tested. Induction of AtDAD1 led to largely equivalent TAG accumulation at various developmental stages except for the very young seedling (&lt; 10-d-old) stage (Figure <ref type="figure">3e</ref>).</p><p>The time of AtDAD1 induction can be determined based on various considerations, including desirable biomass and flowering time. Harvesting the AtDAD1-induced leaves at the height of TAG accumulation can further reduce TAG loss through the turnover pathway involving TAG lipase and peroxisomal &#946;-oxidation <ref type="bibr">(Eastmond, 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fan et al., 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zolman et al., 2001)</ref>. In addition, inducing DAD1 in senescent leaves <ref type="bibr">(Kaup et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tjellstrom et al., 2015)</ref> or at specific time of the day <ref type="bibr">(Gidda et al., 2016)</ref> may further promote TAG accumulation.</p><p>Oil accumulation was enhanced by mechanically wounding the Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc tissues that had been pretreated with dex (Figure <ref type="figure">S6</ref>). Wounding has been reported to induce TAG accumulation in leaves <ref type="bibr">(Lewandowska et al., 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vu et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vu et al., 2014)</ref>, although this was not clearly observable under our current experimental conditions. However, cotreatment with dex and wounding in Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc leaves resulted in a greater increase in TAG levels than either treatment alone. A similar synergistic increase was observed for an 18:3derived hormone, JA, following the same treatments (i.e., dex+wounding) <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. However, JA increase was substantially more dramatic than TAG, with JA-levels increasing by 6-fold compared to either treatment alone. A post-transcriptional mode of regulations for the lipases (i.e, AtDAD1 or NbGLA1) by wounding has been postulated <ref type="bibr">(Holtsclaw et al., 2024;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. Why the same treatment does not result in as high TAG accumulation as JA is unclear, but the disparity might be, in part, due to the differences in their relative abundances-JA content in leaves is several orders of magnitude lower than that of lipids. It could also reflect a more streamlined conversion of 18:3 to JA by JAmetabolic enzymes than their assembly into TAGs, where there may be greater competition for 18:3 substrates by multiple enzymes, including those that incorporate FAs into membrane lipids.</p><p>Regardless, from a biotechnological point of view, tissue damage that inevitably happens during crop harvest is expected to contribute positively to increasing leaf TAG yield.</p><p>Heterologous expression of AtDAD1 in N. benthamiana and soybean both resulted in similar increases in leaf TAGs, roughly estimated to be about 0.4% of dry leaf mass. The findings demonstrate the translational potential of this technology to crop plants. While 0.4% is modest compared to some of the highest achieving lines, such as transgenic Nicotiana tabacum lines that accumulated TAG up to 30% of dried leaf weight <ref type="bibr">(Vanhercke et al., 2017)</ref>, similar modest increases have been reported in several engineering efforts <ref type="bibr">(Cai et al., 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sanjaya et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yang et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yurchenko et al., 2017)</ref>. ThePLA1-based approach presented is likely compatible with and expected to become more effective when combined with existing lines developed to enhance vegetative oil content. Although PLA genes have diverged into a large number in higher plants <ref type="bibr">(Ali et al., 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kelly and Feussner, 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ryu, 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wang, 2001)</ref>, the well-conserved nature of lipase domains and the broad substrate specificities make it likely that the ectopic expression of homologous genes will result in similar effects as AtDAD1. Supporting this concept, transient expression of NbDAD1 in N. benthamiana leaves caused largely equivalent increases of leaf TAG as AtDAD1 (Figures <ref type="figure">6</ref> and <ref type="figure">S7</ref>); however, characterization is needed to determine whether this process follows similar metabolic pathways of converting FAs originated from the plastidial galactolipids to the TAGs in the cytosol as with AtDAD1 in Arabidopsis. In addition, further investigation is required to determine whether the presented increase in leaf TAG by PLAs is limited to PLAs localized in plastids or can be extended to extra-plastidial PLAs. Given the general observation of TAG accumulation in leaves by diverse stress conditions that are likely to be attributed to induction of diverse PLAs suggests the latter possibility, i.e., contribution by extra-plastidial PLAs to stress-induced TAG accumulation <ref type="bibr">(Higashi et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kelly and Feussner, 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lewandowska et al., 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rajashekar et al., 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tan et al., 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vanhercke et al., 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Welti et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Yang et al., 2011)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>MATERIALS AND METHODS</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Plant materials and chemicals</head><p>Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) was cultivated under long-day conditions (16 h light) with a light intensity of 100-120 &#181;E m -2 s -1 in growth chambers maintained at 22 &#176;C. Columbia-0 (Col-0) was used as the wild-type (WT). Arabidopsis seeds were either directly sown in soil or initially grown on solid Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) media (Caisson Laboratories, UT, USA) (0.7% w/v Phytoblend agar, 0.7% w/v sucrose) with or without antibiotics before being transferred to soil. Nicotiana benthamiana was grown in a chamber kept at 22&#176;C with a 16-hlight photoperiod with a light intensity of 130-150 &#956;E m -2 s -1 . Soybean (Glycine max) cultivar 'Maverick' was grown in an environmental chamber set at day/night cycle of 25 &#176;C/22 &#176;C with a 16 h-light photoperiod with 120-150 &#956;E m -2 s -1 intensity light.</p><p>Mechanical wounding of Arabidopsis leaves was performed on 3-week-old plants as previously described <ref type="bibr">(Herde et al., 2013)</ref>. All tissue samples were flash frozen in liquid nitrogen upon harvest and stored at -80 &#176;C until use. For oil, protein, and nucleic acid analyses, the frozen tissues were pulverized to a fine powder in 2 mL screw-capped microcentrifuge tubes containing metal beads using a tissue homogenizer (TissueLyser II, Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) immediately before extractions. Dexamethasone (dex), &#945;-linolenic acid ((9Z,12Z,15Z)-octadeca-9,12,15-trienoic acid) (&#945;-LA), pentadecanoic acid, heptadecanoic acid, tripentadecanoin, triheptadecanoin, ammonium glufosinate, Nile Red, and primulin were purchased from MilliporeSigma (Burlington, MA, USA). BODIPY (493/503) was from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, MI, USA).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Transgenic lines and transient expression</head><p>The cloning of dex-inducible vector constructs Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc and its active site-mutated variant Pdex:AtDAD1 mut -Myc, along with the generation of their respective Arabidopsis transgenic lines, has been described previously <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. The Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc gene construct was also introduced into the fad3fad7fad8 triple mutant background <ref type="bibr">(McConn and Browse, 1996)</ref> using the Agrobacterium-mediated floral dip method <ref type="bibr">(Clough and Bent, 1998)</ref>.</p><p>Sterile flowers of JA-deficient fad3fad7fad8 plants were thoroughly sprayed with a solution containing 100 &#181;M methyl-JA (MilliporeSigma) to induce fertility once every day from 3 d before floral dipping, continuing for another 5 d.</p><p>The Pdex:NbDAD1 construct was generated by PCR-amplifying NbDAD1 (Niben101Scf02386g01005.1) from cDNA prepared from N. benthanmiana leaf tissues using Phusion High-Fidelity Polymerase (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA) and primers described in Table <ref type="table">S2</ref>. The resulting PCR fragment was initially cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector system (Promega, Madison, WI). Upon sequence verification, the NbDAD1 insert was subcloned into the glucocorticoid-inducible vector system (Pdex) <ref type="bibr">(Aoyama and Chua, 1997;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo et al., 2009)</ref>, utilizing XhoI as the restriction enzyme site. Transient expression in N. benthamiana leaves was conducted using C58C1 strain of Agrobacterium tumefaciens carrying Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc, Pdex:NbDAD1, or empty vector constructs according to previous described protocol <ref type="bibr">(Holtsclaw et al., 2024)</ref>. To induce gene expression, an induction solution containing dex (30 &#181;M in 0.01% Triton X-100 in water) was sprayed to saturation on the adaxial side of the leaf.</p><p>For N. benthamiana, 11-mm diameter leaf discs were punched from the surrounding regions of the syringe-infiltration site after the dex spraying.</p><p>Transgenic soybean lines expressing Pdex:AtDAD1-Myc were generated at the Transformation Core Facility, University of Missouri. Fourteen transgenic events (designated as L1-L14) were obtained as described in the Results (Figure <ref type="figure">S8</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>RNA analysis</head><p>Total RNA was extracted from samples containing 50-100 mg of pulverized frozen tissue powders using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher, MA, USA) and the Direct-zol RNA MiniPrep Plus Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. cDNA was reverse transcribed from 1 &#181;g of total RNA using the iScript Reverse Transcription Supermix (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) and oligo (dT)20 primers. The resulting cDNA served as a template for either semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-qPCR) with the iTaq SYBR Green Supermix (BioRad) in a CFX96 Touch real-time PCR detection system (BioRad), or regular reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) using Bioline BioMix Red (Meridian Bioscience, London, UK). ACT8 (At1g49240), NbEF1&#945; (Niben101Scf08653g00001.1) <ref type="bibr">(Kallenbach et al., 2010)</ref>, and GmACT2 (GenBank: AW350943) (M. <ref type="bibr">Libault, 2008)</ref> were used as the internal reference genes for Arabidopsis, N. benthamiana, and G. max, respectively, using primers listed in Table <ref type="table">S2</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Protein extraction and Western blot analysis</head><p>Proteins were extracted from around 100 mg of ground frozen tissues according to a previously described procedure <ref type="bibr">(Kimberlin et al., 2022)</ref>. An aliquot of the total protein extract was used to determine protein concentration using the Bradford Assay (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).</p><p>Twenty &#181;g of total protein was separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel. Before loading, samples were mixed with sample buffer (6 M urea in 2&#215;Laemmli buffer) and incubated at 37 &#176;C for 30 min. For Western blot analysis, proteins in SDS-PAGE gels were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes and probed with polyclonal antibodies against Myc (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) at a 1:3000 dilution, followed by incubation with a secondary antibody (anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP), MilliporeSigma) at a 1:15,000 dilution. The HRP signal was detected by X-ray film exposure in the presence of a chemiluminescent substrate (SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Lipid extractions, thin layer chromatography, and derivatization</head><p>Lipid extraction for thin-layer and gas chromatographic analysis followed a previously described method <ref type="bibr">(Hara and Radin, 1978)</ref> with minor modifications <ref type="bibr">(Koo et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koo et al., 2004)</ref>. Tissue samples for oil analyses were taken from leaves of 24-d-old Arabidopsis, 3-or 6-wk-old soybean, and 4-wk-old N. benthamiana plants, as described in each figure legends.</p><p>Approximately 200 mg of frozen tissue, ground to a fine power, was immediately placed in 4 mL of pre-warmed (90 &#176;C) isopropanol containing internal standards (15:0 FA, 17:0 FA, tripentadecanoin or triheptadecanoin) with 100 &#181;g of butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and incubated for 15 min at 90 &#176;C. The cooled sample was mixed with hexane (6 mL) and 15% aqueous sodium sulfate (5 mL). The upper phase was collected and combined with subsequent extractions using 1.5 mL of hexane followed by another 4 mL of isopropanol/hexane (v/v = 2/7).</p><p>The pooled extracts were dried down under streams of nitrogen gas and resuspended in 0.2-1 mL of hexane (for neutral lipid analysis) or acetone (for total lipid analysis).</p><p>For neutral lipid separations, lipid extracts were loaded onto thin layer chromatography (TLC) Silica Gel 60 plates (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA) and developed using hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid (v/v/v = 80/20/1) as the mobile phase. For polar lipid separation, TLC Silica Gel 60 plates were submerged in 0.15 M ammonium sulfate solution and allowed to dry completely. The dried plates were activated by baking in 120 &#176;C oven for 2 h immediately prior to use. A solvent mixture consisting of acetone/toluene/water (v/v/v = 91/30/7.5) was used as the mobile phase for polar lipid separation. Lipids on TLC plates were visualized by either briefly placing in a sealed tank containing iodine crystals or spraying with 50% sulfuric acid followed by charring at 120 &#176;C for 15 min. The TLC plates with lipids for subsequent recovery and GC analysis was stained with primulin (0.05% in acetone/water (v/v = 8/2)) <ref type="bibr">(White et al., 1998)</ref>.</p><p>For GC analysis, TLC bands containing lipids were scraped from the plate and extracted by multiple iterations of sonication (15 min) with hexane and chloroform for TAG and a mixture of chloroform/methanol/water (v/v/v = 5/5/1) for galactolipids and phospholipids. Resulting lipid extracts were dried down under stream of nitrogen gas and resuspended in 100 &#181;L toluene.</p><p>Derivatization to FAMEs was carried out by incubating at 90 &#176;C for 45 min in 1 mL of methanolic boron trifluoride solution (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). After samples were cooled, 1 mL of water was added, and FAMEs were extracted three times with 3 mL hexane and concentrated.</p><p>For lipidomics analysis, lipids were extracted by placing whole leaf tissues (200-300 mg) into 4 mL of hot isopropanol (75 &#176;C) containing 0.01% BHT and incubating for 15 min. To cooled samples, 12 mL of chloroform/methanol/water (v/v/v = 30/41.5/3.5) was added and shaken at 100 rpm for 24 h. Lipid extracts were dried down under nitrogen gas and resuspended in 1 mL chloroform. Tissue materials were recovered, dried, and weighed.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Lipid analysis by GC-FID and ESI-LC-MS/MS</head><p>Transmethylated lipids resulting in FAMEs were analyzed using a Focus GC gas chromatograph flame ionization detector (GC-FID, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) with an installed DB-23 capillary column (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) and XCalibur control software as previously described <ref type="bibr">(Morley et al., 2023;</ref><ref type="bibr">Koley et al., 2022)</ref>. Briefly, conditions for the GC-FID were as follows; sampling volume (&#181;L): 2, split mode flow (mL/min): 20, inlet temperature: 250 &#176;C, FID temperature: 250 &#176;C, carrier gas constant flow (mL/min): 2. Gradient conditions during a sample injection included an initial temperature: 170 &#176;C held for 1 min, temperature gradient (&#176;C/min): 10, final temperature: 250 &#176;C held for 2 min. Integration of GC-FID peaks was performed using XCalibur software. FAMEs with chain lengths of 15:0, 16:0, 17:0, 18:0, 18:1, 18:2, 18:3, 20:0, 20:1, 20:2, and 22:1, were detected with 15:0 or 17:0 serving as an internal standard for quantitation. Peak detection was performed using the Genesis algorithm, using the nearest assigned retention time for each FAME and a signal/noise ratio greater than 3. Retention times were previously established through analysis of standards. Integration of detected peaks used 1 smoothing point and a signal/noise threshold of 0.5. The integration of all peaks was inspected and peaks that were small or with poor quality peak shape were manually integrated as necessary.</p><p>Electrospray tandem triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (ESI-MS/MS) analyses were performed by direct infusion into an Applied Biosystems 4000 QTrap (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) with an electrospray ionization source, and lipid mass spectral parameters are indicated in Table <ref type="table">S3</ref>. Polar lipid analysis was similar to that described <ref type="bibr">(Xiao et al., 2010)</ref> in their supplemental data. After calculation of polar lipid values in relation to the internal standards, phospholipid values were corrected using response factors calculated for the employed internal standards vs the SPLASH Lipidomix (product 330707, Avanti Polar Lipids, Alabaster, AL, USA), and galactolipids were corrected using response factors determined by comparing data from gas chromatographic analysis of FAMEs from MGDG and DGDG with data on intact lipids analyzed by direct infusion lipidomics as done in this work. TAG analysis was performed as previously described <ref type="bibr">(Li et al., 2014)</ref>. However, no response factors were employed, and data are presented in signal units, in which a unit of 1 is equal to the signal of 1 nmol of internal standard.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Histochemical staining of lipid droplets and confocal microscopy</head><p>Lipid droplets (LDs) were stained with BODIPY493/503 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) or Nile Red (MilliporeSigma, Burlington, MA, USA). Tissues samples of 16-d-old leaves and roots or 6-wk-old plants were incubated in 50 mM PIPES (pH 7.0) containing 0.004 mg/mL BODIPY or 6.5 mg/mL Nile Red for 5-30 min before washing with 50 mM PIPES (pH 7.0). As a control, tissues samples were pre-incubated in a 100 &#181;M &#945;-LA solution for 1 h prior to lipid staining.</p><p>Images were acquired using a Leica TCP SP8 STED confocal microscope featuring a Leica 633 Plan Apochromat oil-immersion objective (40&#215;) or a dry objective (10&#215;), and the Leica Application Suite X (LAS X) package. BODIPY, Nile Red and chlorophyll autofluorescence were activated using a 488-nm laser with an adjusted pinhole set to 3. Emission fluorescence signals were gathered within the ranges of 501-506 nm for BODIPY, 528-650 nm for Nile Red, and 680-750 nm for chlorophyll.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>ACCESSION NUMBERS Accession numbers</head><p>Accession numbers for genes appearing in this paper are as follows from Arabidopsis.org, National Center for Biotechnology Information library, and Sol Genomics Network (genome release, v1.0.1). DAD1 (At2g44810, AEC10469.1); DGAT1 (At2g19450); PDAT1 (At5g13640), NbDAD1 (Niben101Scf02386g01005.1); ACT8 (At1g49240); NbEF1&#945; (Niben101Scf08653g00001.1); GmACT2 (GenBank: AW350943). protein loading. (e) Sulfuric acid charred TLC plate showing relative TAG production throughout the indicated development time course.    Three-week-old leaves were sprayed with mock (0.01% Triton X-100 in water) or dex (30 &#181;M, 0.01% Triton X-100) for 12 h. GmACT2 was used as a reference (a) and TAG quantification was by GC-FID (b). Bar graphs represent mean &#177; SD of three biological replicates, with letters above the bars denoting statistical significance (pairwise t-tests, P &lt; 0.05)</p><note type="other">FIGURE LEGENDS</note></div></body>
		</text>
</TEI>
