<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Not so mush: discrete pulses of high-silica rhyolite generation in the Mineral Mountains, Utah</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher>Springer Nature</publisher>
				<date>09/01/2025</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10657319</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1007/s00410-025-02243-3</idno>
					<title level='j'>Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology</title>
<idno>0010-7999</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">180</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">9</biblScope>					

					<author>Tiffany A Rivera</author><author>Brian R Jicha</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[Crystal mush systems, often referenced in the context of large silicic magma bodies, involve the reactivation of a near- solidus crystal mush by heat input from mafic injections. This model suggests that interstitial melt is extracted from the mush, leading to the generation of high-silica rhyolites and granites. Such processes have been well-documented in various tectonic settings and contribute to both large-scale eruptions and the formation of granitic plutons. However, in the Mineral Mountains, Utah, the zircon and whole rock geochemical record indicate a different scenario. The presence of sector-zoned zircons and the absence of highly evolved central domains indicative of extraction from a mush suggest rapid magma generation from partial melting of solid granitoids rather than from a long-lived crystal mush. Fractional crystallization and equilibrium partial melting models support derivation from the granitoid bodies, rather than from a common shared parental rhyolitic magma or from coeval basalts. The proposed model, presented here, for rhyolite formation in the Mineral Mountains involves episodic injections of mafic magma into the crust, leading to localized partial melting of different granitoid lithologies. Partial melting up to 30% can produce isolated, ephemeral pools of high-silica melt, which crystallize zircons rapidly and ascend to form rhyolitic domes. This process is distinct from the long-lived crystal mush model, explains the lack of intermediate compositions, and the confinement of mafic eruptions to lower elevations. By integrating geochemical data, zircon morphology, and fractionation modeling, this study provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the magmatic processes at play in the Mineral Mountains.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Introduction</head><p>High-silica rhyolites represent a significant endmember component of continental crustal evolution, and their genesis provides insights into magmatic differentiation processes. Two processes are often cited to explain the origins of these types of magmas: fractional crystallization of a mafic or intermediate parental magma <ref type="bibr">(Bacon and Druitt 1988;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hildreth et al. 1991)</ref> or partial melting of the shallow crust Fort valley at 865 ka, then the Bailey Ridge obsidian flow in the Mineral Mountains at 851 ka, and followed by additional mafic lavas in Cove Fort valley. Eruptions continued in the Mineral Mountains with the 786 ka Wildhorse Canyon obsidian flow, and the extrusion of the "middle domes" between 766 ka and 758 ka. After a ~ 170 kyr hiatus, volcanism resumed with the eruption of the "high domes", including Little Bearskin Mountain dome (588 ka) and Bearskin Mountain dome (539 ka). Subsequent eruptions shifted to higher elevations, producing the other high domes of North Dome (520 ka), Ranch Canyon Dome (501 ka), South Twin Flat (483 ka), and North Twin Flat (undated). These eruptions were grouped into two eruptive phases of rhyolitic compositions: obsidians and "middle domes" from 850 to 750 ka, and "high domes" from 590 to 480 ka <ref type="bibr">(Rivera et al. 2024)</ref>. Mafic eruptions in Cove Fort valley continued until at least 417 ka <ref type="bibr">(Rivera et al. 2024)</ref>. Combining the geochronology with whole rock major, trace, and rare earth element geochemistry, <ref type="bibr">Rivera et al. (2024)</ref> note that compositions become increasingly evolved over time, with eruption sites migrating towards higher elevations. Previous workers suggested these trends resulted from progressive differentiation of a shared magma body, with a composition similar to that of the Bailey Ridge obsidian flow <ref type="bibr">(Evans and Nash 1978)</ref>.</p><p>This study seeks to understand the genesis and evolution of the Pleistocene high-silica rhyolites and their connection to each other, the contemporaneous basalts and andesites of Cove Fort valley, and the granitic batholith. Fractional crystallization and partial melting models of whole rock and zircon geochemical data are used to assess potential relationships, which help to elucidate the nature of the petrogenetic origins of these rhyolites. The models provide no evidence for derivation via extreme fractional crystallization of the basalts or for a long-lived crystal mush or scavenging of batholith-related crystals. Partial melting of various granitoid lithologies followed by rapid ascent to the surface may explain the petrogenesis of the Quaternary rhyolites of the Mineral Mountains (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Methods</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Sample selection</head><p>Hand samples from seven rhyolite domes were collected and processed using standard mechanical, density, and magnetic techniques to separate zircon grains from the host rock. Zircon were handpicked, mounted in epoxy, ground to expose an interior cross-section, and cathodoluminescence Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2025) 180:56</p><p>(CL) imaged at Boise State University's Isotope Geology Laboratory. CL images were used to guide the placement of laser ablation spot analyses, described below. Whole rock major, trace, and rare earth element data, along with new 40 Ar/ 39 Ar eruption ages for these samples and Cove Fort mafic lavas were published in <ref type="bibr">Rivera et al. (2024)</ref>. Here, we supplement the previously published data with zircon geochemical information from the same rhyolitic units.</p><p>Hand samples of granitoids from five different lithologies were collected and processed for major and trace element geochemistry. Based on the map units of <ref type="bibr">Kirby (2019)</ref>, these include the 26 Ma hornblende granodiorite <ref type="bibr">(Aleinikoff et al. 1987)</ref>, 18 Ma biotite hornblende granite (Coleman 1991), 18 Ma biotite-hornblende monzonite (Coleman 1991), 18 Ma biotite hornblende diorite (Coleman 1991), and 17.5 Ma biotite granite (Coleman 1991). Samples were prepared as Li-borate glasses and analyzed by wavelength dispersive x-ray fluorescence (WDXRF) using a Thermo ARL Perform'X at the Hamilton Analytical Lab following methods of <ref type="bibr">Conrey et al. (2023)</ref> and <ref type="bibr">Johnson et al. (1999)</ref>. Following, samples were analyzed by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICPMS) at Colorado School of Mines using the protocols of <ref type="bibr">Conrey et al. (2023)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Rhyolite zircon trace element analysis</head><p>Zircon trace element geochemistry for 143 spot locations was determined by LA-ICP-MS at Boise State University with a ThermoElectron X-Series II ICP-MS system and 213 nm frequency-quintupled Nd-YAG NewWave laser. Operating conditions consisted of a 5 Hz at 3.5 J/cm 2 pulsed laser and 25 &#956;m ablation spot diameter. Analytical protocols follow those of <ref type="bibr">Rivera et al. (2016)</ref> and additional details can be found in the supplementary materials. An additional 35 LA-ICPMS spot analyses were obtained at the University of Missouri Research Reactor using a Teledyne Instruments Analyte Excite HelEx 193 nm laser ablation cell coupled to a PerkinElmer SCIEX NexION 300 quadrupole ICPMS. Operating conditions consisted of a 10 Hz at 7.5 J/cm 2 pulsed laser and 35 &#956;m ablation spot diameter. Method details are available in <ref type="bibr">Greer and MacDonald (2022</ref><ref type="bibr">), MacDonald et al. (2024</ref><ref type="bibr">), and Magnavita et al. (2024)</ref>. Primary trace element standards were NIST SRM-610 and SRM-612.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Results</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Granite geochemistry</head><p>Whole rock geochemistry of four new samples were compiled with major, trace, and rare earth element data from <ref type="bibr">Coleman and Walker (1992;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fig. 2, supplementary materials)</ref>. Granitoid lithology and mineralogical descriptions follow those of <ref type="bibr">Kirby (2019)</ref>. Examples of specimens and thin sections can be found in the supplementary materials. The oldest unit, the 26 Ma hornblende granodiorite, has SiO 2 between 65 and 70 wt%, TiO 2 ~ 0.4 wt%, Rb ~ 100 ppm, and Sr ~ 600 ppm. Younger biotite granite and biotite hornblende granite have more evolved compositions with SiO 2 &gt; 70 wt%, total alkali (K 2 O + Na 2 O) &#8805; 8 wt%, TiO 2 &#8804; 0.4 wt%, and increasing Rb concentrations with decreasing Sr concentrations (Fig. <ref type="figure">2</ref>). Biotite hornblende granites can be chemically distinguished from biotite granites by their lower Rb concentrations (150-200 ppm) and greater Sr concentrations (250-350 ppm). Additionally, the biotite granites show prominent negative Eu anomalies (Fig. <ref type="figure">2</ref>), indicative of plagioclase fractionation. Other granitoid lithologies demonstrate minimal Eu anomalies. All units have a slight saddle shape for the middle REE, indicating the fractionation of hornblende and titanite (Coleman and Walker 1992).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Rhyolite zircon morphology</head><p>Zircon crystal morphology can qualitatively reflect magmatic processes <ref type="bibr">(Hanchar and Miller 1993;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zellmer 2021)</ref>. Textures and zoning patterns help identify crystals or parts of crystals as autocrystic, antecrystic, or xenocrystic, revealing complex growth histories due to magmatic thermochemical changes <ref type="bibr">(Miller et al. 2007</ref>). Here, we follow the conventions of <ref type="bibr">Miller et al. (2007)</ref> and use the term antecryst to refer to zircon that crystallized within an earlier pulse of magma that was incorporated into a later magmatic pulse. This is in contrast to a xenocryst, which refers to zircon inherited from the country rock or other magmatic pulse significantly older than the erupted magma <ref type="bibr">(Miller et al. 2007)</ref>. Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref> shows CL images of zircon crystals from the middle and high domes. Middle dome zircons are typically elongated with oscillatory zoning around a central domain, sometimes exhibiting disequilibrium textures interpreted as antecrystic or xenocrystic origins <ref type="bibr">(Miller et al. 2007)</ref>. Most have a CLbright autocrystic rim with oscillatory and sector zoning, except the 766 ka Big Cedar Cove Dome zircons, which are more irregular and lack a CL-bright rim. High dome zircons are more equant with sector zoning and smaller central domains compared to the middle domes, and they lack a CL-bright rim. Zircon images with co-located LA-ICPMS spots are provided in the supplementary materials.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Rhyolite zircon trace element geochemistry</head><p>A total of 178 laser ablation spot analyses were obtained from samples of seven rhyolite domes. Zircon trace element geochemistry is presented in Fig. <ref type="figure">4</ref>. Laser ablation spot concentrations between 2.9 and 9.8 ppm with an anomalous analysis of 27.2 ppm. (Figure <ref type="figure">4A</ref> and <ref type="figure">B</ref>). Nb contents for the high domes are generally &gt; 100 ppm, Hf contents &gt; 10,000 ppm, and Th/Y ratios &gt; 0.7 (Fig. <ref type="figure">4C</ref> and <ref type="figure">D</ref>). Zircon crystals from the oldest of the high domes, Little Bearskin Mountain (588 ka), preserve an Eu/Eu* ratio intermediate between the middle domes and high domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">4A</ref> and <ref type="figure">B</ref>). Deepening of the Eu/Eu* anomaly in zircon from the middle domes to the high domes zircons is apparent (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>), along with the enrichment in heavy REEs. Overall, the younger eruptions contain zircon that crystallized from a more fractionated magma, which is consistent with the whole-rock trace element trends <ref type="bibr">(Rivera et al. 2024)</ref>. locations on individual zircon grains and the full analytical data are available in the supplementary materials. In correlating the geochemistry to zircon morphology, there are no significant geochemical differences between interior domains and rim zircon. The 766 -758 ka middle domes have Eu/Eu* ranging from 0.05 to 0.3, U contents generally up to 1,500 ppm, and Ti contents between 3.3 and 11.9 ppm (Fig. <ref type="figure">4A</ref> and <ref type="figure">B</ref>). Additionally, the middle domes have Nb contents &lt; 100 ppm, Hf contents between 7,000 and 10,000 ppm, and Th/Y ratios between 0.1 and 1 (Fig. <ref type="figure">4C</ref> and <ref type="figure">D</ref>). Of note, the oldest of the middle domes, the 766 ka Big Cedar Cove Dome, has elevated Hf relative to the two other middle domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">4D</ref>).</p><p>Incompatible trace element concentrations and ratios for the 588 -483 ka high domes vary widely. Uranium contents range between 2,000 and 8,000 ppm, Eu/Eu* &lt; 0.1, and Ti 1 3 Fractional crystallization of a shared magma source? <ref type="bibr">Evans and Nash (1978)</ref> proposed a petrogenetic relationship between the Cove Fort valley mafic lavas and the Mineral Mountains rhyolites, which is evaluated here using the whole rock composition of the oldest and compositionally most primitive erupted basalt of the Cove Fort valley, the 865 &#177; 30 ka Black Rock tholeiitic lava <ref type="bibr">(Rivera et al. 2024)</ref>, in a Rayleigh fractional crystallization model. REE concentrations for the liquid evolution were calculated at 10%, 30%, and 50% crystallization of plagioclase and olivine in a 3:1 ratio based on modal proportions (Fig. <ref type="figure">6</ref>). Partition coefficients (Kd) for fractionating phases were obtained using the Geochemical Earth Reference Model partition coefficient database (GERM-KdD) and were selected based on the closest matching rock type. In most cases, the Kd used in the modelling is an average of Kd high and Kd low values determined from phenocryst-matrix experiments. As crystallization proceeds, the REE contents become more enriched in each subsequent liquid. The REE patterns generated from these models do not match the observed rhyolite compositions, indicating that fractional crystallization does not explain the relationship between the coeval 851 &#177; 3 ka Bailey Ridge obsidian and the 865 &#177; 30 ka Black Rock lava flow. Additionally, fractional crystallization of any Cove Fort lava cannot produce the compositions of the middle or high domes. Basaltic andesites and trachyandesites (~ 750 ka) were excluded from modeling due to their more evolved compositions, and the ~ 300 ka andesite (Johnsen et al. 2010) indicates it was not a precursor to any of the Mineral Mountains rhyolites.</p><p>Evans and <ref type="bibr">Nash (1978)</ref> proposed that the younger domes were derivatives of the older obsidian flows. To test this, a Rayleigh fractionation model was applied to the obsidian flows in an attempt to reproduce the observed compositions of the middle and high domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">7A</ref>). The model removes a eutectic composition of 30% quartz, 35% potassium feldspar, and 35% plagioclase from the nearly aphyric (&lt; 0.5% phenocrysts; Nash 1976) 851 &#177; 3 ka Bailey Ridge obsidian. While the calculated liquids for 10%, 30%, and 50% crystallization begin to reproduce the negative Eu anomalies of the middle and high domes, they became enriched in other REE, whereas observed concentrations were depleted with respect to the parental magma. In a bivariate plot of La/Sm versus Sm (Fig. <ref type="figure">7B</ref>), modeled liquids clearly diverge from observed middle and high dome concentrations. Removal of accessory titanite, allanite, or zircon in addition to the eutectic phases from a magma with the composition of the obsidian could not produce residual liquids with compositions similar to those observed in the middle or high domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">7B</ref>). Thus, fractional crystallization models</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Discussion</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Petrogenetic models for rhyolite production in the Mineral Mountains</head><p>Earlier researchers in the Mineral Mountains identified chemical differences between the middle and high domes and suggested they shared a common source, proposing that later domes were fractionates of magmas with compositions similar to those of the earlier erupted obsidian flows <ref type="bibr">(Evans and Nash 1978)</ref>. The high domes contain a few percent (&lt; 5%) of phenocrysts, largely quartz, two-feldspars, and minor biotite; the middle domes have the greatest percent of phenocrysts ranging from 5 to 8% <ref type="bibr">(Nash 1976</ref>). Petrography and electron microprobe analyses of feldspar phenocrysts (supplementary material) do not suggest significant antecrystic or xenocrystic inheritance. Given the low phenocryst abundance coupled with lack of significant inheritance, we assume that the bulk rock compositions determined by Rivera at al. ( <ref type="formula">2024</ref>) are representative of melt compositions and thus use whole rock compositions in the following petrogenetic models.</p><p>High-silica rhyolitic melts can be produced through fractional crystallization of a basaltic melt <ref type="bibr">(Geist et al. 1995)</ref> or anatectic melting of crustal material from basaltic underplating <ref type="bibr">(Huppert and Sparks 1988;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hildreth et al. 2023</ref>). This study tests models of fractional crystallization versus partial melting to address the following questions: (1) Are the oldest Cove Fort valley mafic lavas parental to the Mineral Mountains obsidian flows or rhyolite domes? (2) Are the oldest obsidian flows parental to the younger middle and high domes, or do the middle and high domes share a common magma source? (3) Does partial melting of granitic country rock produce any of the Mineral Mountains rhyolites? Coupled assimilation and fractional crystallization (AFC) was considered but excluded because the mixing of fractionating basaltic compositions with potential assimilants (granitoids, Precambrian metamorphic rocks, or Paleozoic sedimentary rocks) would not generate the SiO 2 concentrations &gt; 75 wt% observed in the Mineral Mountain rhyolites.</p><p>Following earlier workers, <ref type="bibr">Rivera et al. (2024)</ref> noted that less evolved felsic Mineral Mountain magmas erupted first near the valley floor, with progressively more differentiated lavas erupting at higher elevations over time. Zircon compositional trends mirror whole rock geochemistry trends, with the middle domes showing higher Eu/Eu* values (less evolved magma) compared to lower Eu/Eu* values in the high domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">4A</ref> and <ref type="figure">B</ref>). This trend of decreasing Eu/ Eu* with increasing U and other incompatible elements in zircon may suggest progressive differentiation of a shared magma body, which we test through petrogenetic modeling.</p><p>1. The Quaternary rhyolites of the Mineral Mountains were not derived from extreme fractional crystallization of the coeval basalts in the adjacent Cove Fort valley (Fig. <ref type="figure">6</ref>). 2. The 850 -785 ka obsidian flows do not represent parental magmas for either the middle or high domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">7A</ref> and <ref type="figure">B</ref>). 3. The 766 -758 ka middle domes do not represent parental magmas for the high domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">8A</ref>). 4. The 588 -483 ka high domes may share a common parental magma, similar in composition to the 588 ka Little Bearskin Mountain, although not all observed zircon trace element compositions can be reproduced through fractional crystallization modeling (Figs. 7C and D and 8B, C and D). 5. At least four distinct magma bodies were involved over a period of ~ 400 ka: at least one for the basalts, one for the obsidian flows, one for the middle domes, and one for the high domes.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Partial melting of the Mineral Mountains batholith?</head><p>If the rhyolites are not related to the basalts, nor each other, could they be derived from partial melting of the granitoids through which they erupted? <ref type="bibr">Nash (1976)</ref> proposed that the rhyolites were a "classic example" of crustal melts resulting from basaltic magma injection in an extensional tectonic regime, with no evidence of a long-lived shallow magma body <ref type="bibr">(Nash 1986</ref>). The model involves crustal thinning induced by extension leading to asthenospheric upwelling, generating basaltic magmas in the upper mantle. These magmas ascend into the lower crust, inducing partial melting of the country rock and undergo subsequent fractional crystallization prior to eruption. Additionally, Evans and <ref type="bibr">Nash (1978)</ref> proposed a petrogenetic relationship between the Cove Fort valley mafic lavas and the Mineral Mountains rhyolites, which was attributed to the high regional heat flow <ref type="bibr">(Sass et al. 1976;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chapman et al., 1978)</ref> and periodic injection of mafic magmas. Coleman (1992) also suggested periodic partial melting due to extension for the generation of the granitic batholith. The oldest cooling ages (18 -16 Ma) are from the structurally highest parts of the batholith on the eastern and northern margins where it intrudes Paleozoic wall rocks, while the youngest ages (11 -9 Ma) are from the structurally deepest parts on the west-central margin where it intrudes Precambrian basement rocks (Coleman 2009).</p><p>Alternatively, Evans and <ref type="bibr">Nash (1978)</ref> proposed that the chemically distinct rhyolites could be distinct melt pockets produced by repeated basalt injections into the crust that independently fractionated. This would reflect the chemical variability of the source rock rather than differentiation processes. Partial melting of mafic material to produce felsic using the oldest tholeiitic lava or high-silica rhyolite could not produce the observed compositions of the middle or high domes. Similarly, using a middle dome as the parental magma and the same fractionating phases yielded liquid compositions diverging from the high domes. Zircon geochemistry further indicates no genetic relationship between the middle and high domes, as the Eu anomalies of middle dome zircon remained unchanged with Nb content, indicating no significant fractional crystallization (Fig. <ref type="figure">8A</ref>).</p><p>With fractional crystallization of basaltic and earlier erupted rhyolite compositions both ruled out as representing parental magmas, Rayleigh fractional crystallization modeling was conducted to determine if the 588 to 483 ka high domes, the youngest group of Mineral Mountains rhyolites, could be derived from a shared magma source (Fig. <ref type="figure">7C</ref> and D; supplementary materials). Using Little Bearskin Mountain as the parental magma, which is the oldest of the high domes and located nearest to the valley floor, crystallization and subsequent removal of 0.05% allanite, along with eutectic proportions of quartz, potassium feldspar, and plagioclase can produce residual liquids approximating the compositions of the other high domes at 40-60% crystallinity (Fig. <ref type="figure">7D</ref>). This suggests that the high domes could share a common source distinct from the magma bodies of the older middle domes and obsidian flows.</p><p>The same fractional crystallization model was applied to the zircon geochemistry, again using Little Bearskin Mountain as the parental magma (crystal proportions: 30% quartz, 35% plagioclase, 35% alkali feldspar, 0.01 to 0.05% allanite; Fig. <ref type="figure">8</ref>). The model reproduced some, but not all, observed trace element patterns. It generally reproduced the trend of Eu/Eu* compositions and most Hf compositions (excluding Ranch Canyon Dome) but struggled with U and Y compositions. The poor reproducibility of observed zircon compositions using a fractional crystallization model that generates observed whole rock compositions indicates that fractional crystallization alone is unlikely to account for the compositional variability observed in the high domes.</p><p>Although magma recharge and mixing may account for the compositional variations within a magma batch, the morphology of the high domes zircon crystal do not show disequilibrium textures that could be attributed to mixing processes (Supplementary Materials).</p><p>In summary, the fractional crystallization models yield the following conclusions: 1 3 Page 7 of 17 56 Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology (2025) 180:56 identical to the obsidians. Similarly, melting up to 30% of a biotite-hornblende granite collected near the southwestern edge of the range yields liquids resembling the compositions of the middle domes. The zircon and whole rock geochemical similarities among the three middle domes suggest they may be different pulses of a larger single magma body, though elevated Hf in Big Cedar Cove Dome zircon relative to Wildhorse Domes North and South indicates minor differentiation differences or compositional variations in the partially melted crust. High dome compositions can be melts has been suggested at ocean island volcanoes (e.g., Bohrson and Reid 1997; Sverrisdottir 2007; Carley et al. 2011) and may be responsible for creating bimodal basaltrhyolite volcanic fields (e.g., Charlier et al. 2013; Meade et al. 2014).</p><p>Modal equilibrium partial melting models were generated for each group of rhyolites (Fig. <ref type="figure">9</ref>; supplementary materials). Melting up to 30% of the hornblende granodiorite sample collected near the 786 ka Wildhorse Canyon sample site produces liquids with REE compositions nearly versus Eu/Eu*. C. Nb (ppm) versus Th/Y. D. Hf (ppm) versus Th/Y. E. Eu/Eu* versus 40Ar/39Ar eruption age (Rivera et al. 2024). Sample abbreviations are the same as in Fig. 1 1 3 </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Discrete melt generation and segregation in the Mineral Mountains</head><p>Melt segregation from a pluton-scale crystal mush is often referenced as the process to extract liquids from parental rocks to generate high-silica rhyolites and granites (e.g., modeled by melting up to 30% of a biotite granite sampled in the western valley. However, some high dome compositions (RCD and ST) are predicted between 50 and 63% melting of the biotite granite (Fig. <ref type="figure">9F</ref>). This seems unlikely in the upper crust and, as such, may instead represent a mixture of partial melting and fractional crystallization processes that were not modeled here or, alternatively, smaller degrees of partial melting of a slightly different or mixed granitoid lithologies. The latter is favored given that the vents for RCD and ST are within the biotite-hornblende granite near the contact with the biotite granite <ref type="bibr">(Kirby 2019)</ref>. In all scenarios, middle to heavy REE (Gd, Tb, Ho, Er) depletion in the modeled liquid suggests retention in the restite, likely due to the presence of titanite in the source granite. Thus, melting the dominant granitoid lithology exposed nearest the rhyolite lavas could produce the observed compositions, indicating that partial melting of different granitoids is likely responsible for the compositional variability in the rhyolites.</p><p>In summary, we propose the following scenario for the generation of the Mineral Mountains rhyolites (Fig. <ref type="figure">10</ref>).</p><p>1. 865 ka: Injection of mafic material causes the eruption of the Black Rock tholeiitic lava. The associated heat partially melts the hornblende granodiorite, resulting Major phenocryst phases and accessory minerals record thermal, geochemical, and geochronologic evidence of extraction from a mush <ref type="bibr">(Ellis et al. 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Stelten et al. 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rivera et al. 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Allan et al. 2017)</ref>. For instance, in the 1.3 Ma Mesa Falls Tuff (Yellowstone volcanic field), zircon with "dark cores" were modeled to represent &gt; 90% crystallinity of the host magma based on colder crystallization temperatures, higher incompatible trace element concentrations (e.g., &gt;20,000 ppm U), and U/Pb crystallization ages up to 50 kyr prior to eruption <ref type="bibr">(Rivera et al. 2016)</ref>. The authors interpreted the anetcrystic zircon as minor pulses of pre-eruptive magmatism, providing the heat needed to sustain a long-lived crystal mush with interstitial melt. The absence of highly differentiated cores in zircon from the Mineral Mountains' middle and high domes (Fig. <ref type="figure">3</ref>) suggest that they were not extracted from a long-lived mush.</p><p>In contrast, zircon morphology, geochemistry, thermometry, and geochronology of the Alder Creek Rhyolite (ACR), Geysers Geothermal-Clear Lake Volcanic Field, California, record two unrelated zircon populations <ref type="bibr">(Rivera et al. 2013)</ref>. The first was related to the nascent ACR magma; however, the second population was morphologically and <ref type="bibr">Hildreth 1981</ref><ref type="bibr">Hildreth , 2021;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hildreth and Wilson 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cashman et al. 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Schaen et al. 2017</ref><ref type="bibr">Schaen et al. , 2021;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Andersen et al. 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lu et al. 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pamuk&#231;u et al. 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Boulanger and France 2023)</ref>. This model involves the thermal reactivation of a crystal mush from rheological lock up, followed by the extraction of interstitial liquids, which rise and accumulate into larger magma bodies that either erupt as high-silica rhyolites or crystallize as pods of evolved granite in the subsurface <ref type="bibr">(Bachmann and Bergantz 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Huber et al. 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Escribano et al. 2022)</ref>. Eruptable liquids extracted from the mush may occur as crystal-poor rhyolites, leaving behind a cumulate crystal pile <ref type="bibr">(Bachmann and Bergantz 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wolff and Ramos 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ellis et al. 2023</ref>). The mush model has been used to explain various eruptions across tectonic settings <ref type="bibr">(Bachmann and Bergantz 2008)</ref>, including voluminous high-silica rhyolites (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Wolff and Ramos 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wotzlaw et al. 2014</ref><ref type="bibr">Wotzlaw et al. , 2015;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Shamloo and Till 2019;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wilson et al. 2021;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pamuk&#231;u et al. 2022)</ref>, small volume rhyolites <ref type="bibr">(Hildreth et al. 2014</ref><ref type="bibr">(Hildreth et al. , 2023;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Stelten et al. 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Burgess et al. 2021)</ref>, and plutonic systems <ref type="bibr">(Schaen et al. 2018;</ref><ref type="bibr">Tavazzani et al. 2020;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lu et al. 2021)</ref>. olivine in a ratio of 3:1 to produce liquids at F = 0.9, F = 0.7, and F = 0.5 (i.e., 10%, 30%, and 50% liquids, respectively). Chondrite normalization values are from <ref type="bibr">Sun and McDonough (1989)</ref> 1 3 56 pyramidal sectors (enriched in REE, Hf, Y, and U), and CLbright prismatic sectors. The combined morphology and lack of Miocene-aged central domains suggest rapid magma extraction without scavenging pre-existing zircon from the cooled pluton. On the contrary, it is possible that the melts hosted pluton-extracted zircon that were dissolved as the melts sat above the zircon saturation temperature. The dissolution of zircon is significantly influenced by temperature, degree of Zr undersaturation, size of the zircon, and volume of the melt cell surrounding the zircon <ref type="bibr">(Bindeman and Melnik 2016)</ref>. Larger bodies (&gt; 200 m) can completely dissolve zircons, while smaller ones result in partial dissolution and rim overgrowth <ref type="bibr">(Bindeman and Melnik 2016)</ref>. Thermal erosion of zircon begins at temperatures typical of crustal melting (~ 750&#730;C to 900 &#176;C), and complete dissolution of a xenocryst could occur on timescales of 10 2 to 10 4 years <ref type="bibr">(Bindeman and Melnik 2016)</ref>. However, zircon dissolution is often incomplete, leading to resorbed, embayed, or antecrystic cores in newly grown zircon overgrowths. geochemically distinct, and produced consistently older U-Pb dates. These zircon were attributed to the liberation and extraction of xenolithic zircon from partially melting earlier cooled intrusive granitoids, rather than forming within a long-lived crystal mush <ref type="bibr">(Rivera et al. 2013)</ref>. The Mineral Mountains zircon crystal cargo preserves a third process by which to generate zircon crystals within highsilica rhyolites. Here, the exposed granitic batholith is a cooled body rather than a near-solidus mush. Zircon U-Pb dates suggest batholith emplacement at 18 Ma, initial exhumation at 11 Ma, and final cooling at 8 Ma <ref type="bibr">(Coleman et al. 2009)</ref>. Mafic injections beneath the batholith likely caused partial melting of solidified granite with various lithologies, rather than reheating of a mush, generating ephemeral pools of magma in which new zircon crystallized. Zircon textures such as sector zoning may form as a result of rapid crystal growth, in which incompatible elements are pushed to the edges or corners of the crystal face (e.g., Chamberlain 2019; <ref type="bibr">Watson and Liang 1995;</ref><ref type="bibr">Watson 1996)</ref>. Sector zoning is present in all high domes investigated here, with CL-dark Fig. <ref type="figure">7</ref> Fractional crystallization models remove eutectic proportions of 30% quartz, 35% plagioclase, and 35% alkali feldspar. Liquid compositions are shown for F = 0.9, F = 0.7, and F = 0.5 (i.e., 10%, 30%, and 50% liquids, respectively). A and B Bailey Ridge obsidian as parental melt. Chondrite values from <ref type="bibr">Sun and McDonough (1989)</ref>. to occur along the periphery of the system, where magmas exist as individual pods prior to amalgamating into larger magma chambers <ref type="bibr">(Bacon et al. 1980;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hildreth 1981</ref>). In the western United States, samples younger than 1 Ma are primarily found in areas experiencing localized thinning Coeval basalt-rhyolite eruptions in other Quaternary North American volcanic fields include the Yellowstone Volcanic Field (Wyoming), Long Valley caldera system and Coso Volcanic Field (California), and the San Francisco peaks (Arizona). In these settings, eruptions are more likely of Kirby 2019). In panels A, C, E, the mode of the source rock in the model is provided, and this mode is used in the models presented in panels B, D, F, respectively. D = partition coefficient; F = percent of melt Fig. 8 Zircon trace element fractional crystallization models of the middle and high domes. A Model of a middle dome parental composition to produce high dome compositions. B-D Model using the 588 ka Little Bearskin Mountain high dome as the parental magma to relate to other high dome compositions. Poor reproducibility of zircon compositions suggests fractional crystallization is not likely the process generating chemical heterogeneity. Percentages reflect amount of fractional crystallization 1 3 </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Conclusions</head><p>In the Mineral Mountains, the rhyolites do not originate from extreme fractional crystallization of coeval basalts from the neighboring Cove Fort valley. Fractional crystallization models indicate that neither the older obsidian flows nor the middle domes served as parental magmas for the younger high domes. The rhyolites appear to be products of partial melting of granitoid lithologies. Melting up to 30% of local granitoid samples can produce liquids that match the REE compositions of the obsidians, middle domes, and high domes. This suggests that the compositional variability observed in the rhyolites is due to partial melting of different granitoids. The preserved zircon record indicates rapid magma generation and differentiation (10 3 -10 4 years), with the presence of sector zoning and the lack of highly differentiated cores, supporting the absence of a highly differentiated mush. The proposed model can be summarized as:</p><p>1. Injection of mafic material leads to eruption of mafic lavas in the Cove Fort valley. Associated heat causes partial melting of granitoids, producing isolated, ephemeral pools of high-silica rhyolite melt. 2. Newly formed high-silica melts seed and crystallize zircon, with minimal scavenging of batholith-related zircon. New zircon form rapidly as evidenced by sector zoning and minimal within-grain compositional heterogeneity. These melts prohibit basalt eruptions within the range, confining those eruptions to the low-elevation valley. 3. Crystal-poor high-silica liquids ascend through the batholith to erupt on the surface as a series of domes.</p><p>This model aligns with observations from other Quaternary volcanic fields, where rapid magma generation and eruption are common. The isolated, ephemeral melt pockets formed by partial melting of granitoids due to mafic injections result in compositional diversity among the rhyolites. The absence of a long-lived crystal mush and the presence of rapid zircon crystallization suggest a dynamic magmatic system with transient magma bodies. Consequently, the Mineral Mountains' volcanic activity can be explained by a series of mafic injections causing localized partial melting and rapid ascent of high-silica melts, rather than by prolonged fractional crystallization or extraction from a crystal mush.</p><p>and are seldom observed in regions where the lithosphereasthenosphere boundary is deeper than 90 km (Golos and Fischer 2022).</p><p>During periods of high magmatic flux, batches of mafic melt are emplaced in the root zone below the Mineral Mountains, which triggers a partial melting event of the granitoid. The partial melts are thus ephemeral, isolated pockets of melt, which act as a barrier against further ascent of the basalt <ref type="bibr">(Hildreth 1981;</ref><ref type="bibr">Huppert and Sparks 1988;</ref><ref type="bibr">Escribano et al. 2022;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ellis et al. 2023)</ref>. The basalts are then confined to the valley, whereas the felsic magmas may continue to rise through the crust via a system of dikes, producing a cluster of domes at the surface <ref type="bibr">(Hildreth 1981;</ref><ref type="bibr">Petford et al. 1993)</ref>. This interpretation coincides with the discrete, isolated eruptions that occurred in the latest period of volcanism, which span ~ 10 km across the ridgeline (Fig. <ref type="figure">1B</ref>). Our model removes the need for a shallow, long-lived (&gt; 10 5 ) crystal mush <ref type="bibr">(Costa 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Schoene et al. 2012)</ref>. The paucity of intermediate compositions can also be explained by this model; mafic magmas ascend rapidly to the surface in the valley, with minimal interaction with the crust. Naturally, melting of high-silica granites will only yield highsilica melts.</p><p>Duration of magmatic activity suggests that heat must have been supplied to the magma body fairly continuously in order to prevent solidification. <ref type="bibr">Nash (1986)</ref> notes that there is "ample evidence of supply" in the neighboring Cove Fort valley; Nash (1986) also notes observed quenched basalt xenoliths within the rhyolites, suggesting that mafic magmas were injected directly into felsic magmas. High heat flow has been recorded regionally <ref type="bibr">(Sass et al. 1976;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chapman et al., 1978)</ref> and seismic velocities suggest the presence of melt below the lithosphere-asthenosphere boundary near the Mineral Mountains <ref type="bibr">(Byrnes et al. 2023)</ref>. Further, a 270 km 2 dilute mantle He anomaly was identified in the cold groundwater and geothermal waters of the nearby Roosevelt Hot Springs <ref type="bibr">(Simmons and Kirby 2024)</ref>. Interpretation of magnetotelluric data <ref type="bibr">(Wannamaker and Maris 2024)</ref> indicates the presence of a strong lower crustal conductor in the 15-35 km depth range <ref type="bibr">(Simmons and Kirby 2024)</ref>. The combination of He isotopic analysis with the geophysical data led <ref type="bibr">Simmons and Kirby (2024)</ref> to suggest that the predominant source of mantle-derived helium in the Milford Valley, the western basin adjacent to the Mineral Mountains, is linked to the underplating and intrusion of mafic magma. The presence of a thick and impermeable crystalline granitic basement rock at mid-crustal levels is noted as a barrier that influences the ascent of mantle He, creating separate flow paths for helium and heat <ref type="bibr">(Simmons and Kirby 2024)</ref>.</p></div></body>
		</text>
</TEI>
