Abstract The impact of future Arctic sea ice loss on local climate and large-scale atmospheric circulation has been extensively studied, including through the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP). However, the influence of horizontal resolution on these responses remains largely unexplored. This study addresses this gap by conducting a set of PAMIP-type experiments in parallel using the Community Earth System Model, version 2.2 (CESM2.2), at global 110-km and Arctic-refined 14-km resolutions, with outputs regridded to a common grid to enable direct comparison. Sea ice loss is identified as the dominant driver of future Arctic precipitation increases in boreal winter. The Arctic-refined model exhibits a larger increase in precipitation over the sea ice loss region compared to the global 110-km model. This amplified response is linked to stronger updrafts and corresponding intensification of upward moisture transport. Additionally, daily precipitation variability increases in response to sea ice loss, with the change in the Arctic-refined model more than twice that in the global 110-km model, primarily connected to enhanced variability in vertical motion. Furthermore, both model resolutions capture Arctic amplification and associated dynamical responses, but the Arctic-refined model shows stronger warming and greater zonal wind deceleration over the polar cap. The thermodynamic budget analysis indicates that transient eddies associated with vertical motion are a major factor in the enhanced warming in the higher-resolution configuration. Collectively, these findings highlight the role of horizontal resolution in shaping Arctic precipitation and atmospheric circulation responses and underscore vertical motion as a key driver of this sensitivity. Significance StatementThis modeling study examines how increasing model horizontal resolution influences the atmospheric response to future Arctic sea ice loss. Using the Community Earth System Model, version 2.2 (CESM2.2), we conducted two sea ice loss experiments, one with a typical climate model resolution and one with very high resolution over the Arctic, following an experiment protocol similar to the Polar Amplification Model Intercomparison Project (PAMIP). The results show that higher resolution leads to greater increases in Arctic precipitation and its variability in response to sea ice loss. Additionally, the simulations with high resolution over the Arctic exhibit stronger lower-tropospheric temperature and circulation responses over the polar cap compared to the coarser-resolution simulations. These enhanced responses are likely linked to resolution-dependent differences in vertical motion. Our findings advance the understanding of high-resolution modeling and highlight the critical role of horizontal resolution in accurately simulating climate and climate change in the Arctic.
more »
« less
This content will become publicly available on January 1, 2027
Future extreme precipitation amplified by intensified mesoscale moisture convergence
Extreme precipitation events are driven by complex multiscale atmospheric dynamic interactions, fuelled by available moisture. They are expected to intensify with climate change, posing increasing risks to human communities and ecosystems. However, current low-resolution climate models struggle to accurately represent key extreme precipitation-generating phenomena, limiting our ability to generate robust and reliable future projections. Here we present an ensemble of climate simulations with a 10-to-25-km resolution and an improved representation of mesoscale convective systems to assess future changes in daily extreme precipitation and its drivers. Our high-resolution simulations more realistically capture the observed spatial distribution and intensity of daily extreme precipitation over the historical period than the 100-km resolution counterparts. In a future scenario with high carbon dioxide emissions, daily extreme precipitation over land could increase by about 41% by 2100, mainly as a result of increased mesoscale moisture convergence. The impact of this dynamical contribution to extreme precipitation is underestimated by a factor of three in the low-resolution model. These results highlight the crucial role of high-resolution climate modelling in constraining future extremes and informing more effective climate risk assessments and adaptation strategies.
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10662763
- Publisher / Repository:
- Nature Geosciences
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Nature Geoscience
- Volume:
- 19
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1752-0894
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 33 to 41
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract High-frequency precipitation variance is calculated in 12 different free-running (non-data-assimilative) coupled high resolution atmosphere–ocean model simulations, an assimilative coupled atmosphere–ocean weather forecast model, and an assimilative reanalysis. The results are compared with results from satellite estimates of precipitation and rain gauge observations. An analysis of irregular sub-daily fluctuations, which was applied by Covey et al. (Geophys Res Lett 45:12514–12522, 2018. 10.1029/2018GL078926 ) to satellite products and low-resolution climate models, is applied here to rain gauges and higher-resolution models. In contrast to lower-resolution climate simulations, which Covey et al. (2018) found to be lacking with respect to variance in irregular sub-daily fluctuations, the highest-resolution simulations examined here display an irregular sub-daily fluctuation variance that lies closer to that found in satellite products. Most of the simulations used here cannot be analyzed via the Covey et al. (2018) technique, because they do not output precipitation at sub-daily intervals. Thus the remainder of the paper focuses on frequency power spectral density of precipitation and on cumulative distribution functions over time scales (2–100 days) that are still relatively “high-frequency” in the context of climate modeling. Refined atmospheric or oceanic model grid spacing is generally found to increase high-frequency precipitation variance in simulations, approaching the values derived from observations. Mesoscale-eddy-rich ocean simulations significantly increase precipitation variance only when the atmosphere grid spacing is sufficiently fine (< 0.5°). Despite the improvements noted above, all of the simulations examined here suffer from the “drizzle effect”, in which precipitation is not temporally intermittent to the extent found in observations.more » « less
-
Abstract This study presents a novel, high-resolution, dynamically downscaled dataset that will help inform regional and local stakeholders regarding potential impacts of climate change at the scales necessary to examine extreme mesoscale conditions. WRF-ARW version 4.1.2 was used in a convection-permitting configuration (horizontal grid spacing of 3.75 km; 51 vertical levels; data output interval of 15-min) as a regional climate model for a domain covering the contiguous US Initial and lateral boundary forcing for the regional climate model originates from a global climate model simulation by NCAR (Community Earth System Model) that participated in phase 5 of the Coupled Model Inter comparison Project. Herein, we use a version of these data that are regridded and bias corrected. Two 15-year downscaled simulation epochs were examined comprising of historical (HIST; 1990–2005) and potential future (FUTR; 2085–2100) climate using Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5. HIST verification against independent observational data revealed that annual/seasonal/monthly temperature and precipitation (and their extremes) are replicated admirably in the downscaled HIST epoch, with the largest biases in temperature noted with daily maximum temperatures (too cold) and the largest biases in precipitation (too dry) across the southeast US during the boreal warm season. The simulations herein are improved compared to previous work, which is significant considering the differences in previous modeling approaches. Future projections of temperature under the RCP 8.5 scenario are consistent with previous works using various methods. Future precipitation projections suggest statistically significant decreases of precipitation across large segments of the southern Great Plains and Intermountain West, whereas significant increases were noted in the Tennessee/Ohio Valleys and across portions of the Pacific Northwest. Overall, these simulations serve as an additional datapoint/method to detect potential future changes in extreme meso-γ weather phenomena.more » « less
-
This study employs a pseudo–global warming approach to investigate precipitation changes from a mesoscale convective system (MCS) on 14 May 2018 over the eastern United States. An Appalachian-Mountain-crossing MCS is simulated for historical, mid-twenty-first century (2045–54), and late-twenty-first century (2090–99) climate scenarios. For experiments using ensemble-mean perturbations in atmospheric, soil, and oceanic variables derived from 34 general circulation models, MCS precipitation diminishes by 25%in the midcentury and 65%in the late century. Experiments testing the sensitivity to these variables separately reveal that atmospheric variables primarily drive precipitation changes. Additional sensitivity experiments quantify MCS responses to temperature, moisture, and wind perturbations separately, with the magnitude of perturbations stratified as low, moderate, or high. Experiments highlight the dominant though contrasting roles of the thermodynamic variables. In midcentury, temperature increases lead to reductions in rainfall rates by up to 74.3%, while increased moisture raises rainfall rates by 75.1%. In the late century, the MCS fails to initiate for temperature perturbations of all magnitudes. Rainfall rate and precipitation area substantially increase with larger moisture perturbations, while the frequency of heavy (95th percentile) and extreme (99th percentile) precipitation increases more than 100%, with minimal changes in precipitation rate. Finally, ensemble-mean perturbations are added to all variables, except for temperature or moisture, to which either a low or high perturbation is added. MCSs are robust when low-temperature or high-moisture perturbations are included, though they fail to initiate for low-moisture and high-temperature perturbations, highlighting the challenges in projecting future MCS behavior.more » « less
-
Abstract Although the intensity of extreme precipitation is predicted to increase with climate warming, at the weather scale precipitation extremes over most of the globe decrease when temperature exceeds a certain threshold, and the spatial extent of this negative scaling is projected to increase as the climate warms. The nature and cause of the negative scaling at high temperature and its implications remain poorly understood. Based on sub-daily data from observations, reanalysis data, and output from a coarse-resolution (∼200 km) global model and a fine-resolution (4 km) convection-permitting regional model, we show that the negative scaling is primarily a reflection of high temperature suppressing precipitation over land and storm-induced temperature variation over the ocean. We further identify the high temperature-induced increase of saturation deficit as a critical condition for the negative scaling of extreme precipitation over land. Large saturation deficit reduces precipitation intensity by slowing down the convective updraft condensation rate and accelerating condensate evaporation. The heat-induced suppression of precipitation, both for its mean and extremes, provides one mechanism for the co-occurrence of drought and heatwaves. As the saturation deficit over land is expected to increase in a warmer climate, our results imply a growing prevalence of negative scaling, potentially increasing the frequency of compound drought and heat events. Understanding the physical mechanisms underlying the negative scaling of precipitation at high temperature is, therefore, essential for assessing future risks of extreme events, including not only flood due to extreme precipitation but also drought and heatwaves.more » « less
An official website of the United States government
